Arizona
Right to Life says AZ Supreme Court should block abortion rights initiative from the ballot
An anti-abortion group is hoping the Arizona Supreme Court will step in and block voters in November from deciding whether to amend the state constitution to include a right to abortion.
Arizona Right to Life failed to convince a trial court judge that the campaign for the Arizona Abortion Access Act misled voters who signed their petition to make it on the ballot. After their lawsuit was dismissed on Aug. 6, the group immediately appealed the decision to the high court, asking the justices to overturn the trial judge’s decision and block the measure from being put to voters.
In both the initial lawsuit and the appeal, attorneys for Arizona Right to Life claim that the 200-word summary shown to Arizonans who signed petition sheets to help the act qualify for the ballot was so unlawfully misleading that it puts all of the signatures into question.
The Arizona Secretary of State’s Office confirmed Monday that the Abortion Access Act had collected enough voter signatures to make it on the ballot. The campaign behind the act, Arizona for Abortion Access, gathered a total of more than 820,000 signatures, and approximately 578,000 were confirmed to be valid, significantly more than the nearly 384,000 it needed to qualify.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
If voters favor the Abortion Access Act, it would guarantee a woman’s right to an abortion up to the point of fetal viability, around 24 weeks of pregnancy. Exceptions to that limit would be allowed if a health care provider determined it was necessary to preserve a patient’s life, physical or mental health.
Jennifer Wright, an attorney for Arizona Right to Life, wrote in the appeal that the summary shown to those who signed the petition was misleading because it contained the phrase “health care provider” while the full text of the act refers to the “treating health care provider” when describing who has the authority to determine that an abortion is necessary beyond fetal viability.
Wright is a former assistant Arizona attorney general who is representing Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Kari Lake in a defamation suit filed against her by Republican Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer. She also recently began representing Lake in her suit to overturn the results of the 2022 gubernatorial race that she lost to Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs.
Attorneys for the anti-abortion organization claimed that omitting the word “treating” in the summary misled those who signed the Abortion Access petition into thinking that someone other than an abortion provider would decide whether an abortion past the point of fetal viability was warranted. But trial court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian disagreed.
“Reasonable people understand that medical diagnoses and treatment plans are typically determined by the medical provider who is actively treating a patient whose health is at issue,” Julian wrote. “For pregnant patients, this could include the patient’s primary care, obstetrical, or other medical providers, including one who provides abortions.”
Wright went on to argue that the exception for the mental or physical health of the mother would essentially give a green flag to any abortion, up until birth — an inflammatory and inaccurate claim frequently advanced by abortion foes.
Wright argued that the summary should include a description of how the Abortion Access Act would impact existing abortion legislation, but Julian disagreed on that point, as well.
“Concern about the impact this initiative may have on existing abortion regulations is not a ground to compel the initiative’s removal from the ballot. ‘The proper place to argue about the potential impact of an initiative is in the political arena, in speeches, newspaper articles, advertisements and other forums,’” Julian wrote, referencing previous rulings.
At present, Arizona is under a 15-week gestational ban that will likely be nullified if the act is passed.
The proposed constitutional amendment also includes a provision stating that “no law, regulation, policy or practice shall be enacted or enforced” that restricts, denies or interferes with the right to receive an abortion either before or after fetal viability.
Arizona Right to Life claims that this provision, which says that any restrictions put on the procedure should “not infringe on that person’s autonomous decision-making,” essentially bans all regulations on the procedure, including that it be performed by a licensed medical professional.
“For example, if a woman wants an unlicensed abortion provider to perform an abortion, even someone without medical training, her desire for autonomous decision-making would appear to trump any state interest,” Wright wrote.
The group also alleged that it would allow abortions to be performed for egregious reasons.
“At a minimum, this means the State can do nothing to stop the abortion, even if it is being done for the worst eugenic or racist reasons, is being done in a horrific manner that is particularly painful to the prenatal human or is being done at any time up to birth,” Wright wrote.
Arizona Right to Life was one of several organizations behind the “Decline to Sign” campaign that unsuccessfully sought to persuade voters not to support the Abortion Access Act’s effort to qualify for the November election.
Dawn Penich, a spokeswoman for the abortion rights initiative’s campaign, told the Arizona Mirror that no one was available Tuesday to comment on the appeal to the Supreme Court.
But Penich previously criticized Arizona Right to Life for continuing to pursue arguments already rejected by the trial court.
“This appeal shows yet again that they are willing to do and say anything — no matter how desperate or dishonest — to deprive Arizonans of their right to direct democracy,” she said in an emailed statement after the anti-abortion group said it would appeal the trial court ruling. “We’re hopeful the Arizona Supreme Court will grant us a fair and unbiased review and allow Arizona voters to have their say at the ballot box. Arizona for Abortion Access remains committed to giving Arizona voters the chance to restore and protect our right to access abortion free from government overreach, once and for all.”
Arizona Supreme Court Justice Bill Montgomery, who once accused Planned Parenthood of committing genocide, said he wouldn’t recuse himself from a previous case to decide whether “unborn human being” could be used to describe the abortion rights initiative in an election information pamphlet sent to every voter in the state.
Arizona for Abortion Access has argued that, because of his opposition to Planned Parenthood and history of using anti-abortion language, he cannot be impartial in rulings regarding the abortion rights measure.
Montgomery adamantly disagreed, saying that his strong feelings regarding abortion don’t make him biased.
Arizona
Which US states are most and least diverse? Here’s where Arizona ranks
Arizona appeared as one of the 10 states with major diversity in the United States in a September report by the financial company WalletHub where they ranked all states from most to least diverse.
“The American narrative is a story of diversity,” said WalletHub in its report. And what is the clearest proof of this narrative? A record of data that doesn’t lie.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, from 2010 to 2020, the diversity index increased from 54.9% to 61.1%. But the growth doesn’t end there, as it is projected that by 2045 there will no longer be a single ethnic majority in the country. However, diversity varies from state to state and can be defined as something that goes beyond race, gender, or ethnicity.
“Race and gender are probably the first things that come to mind when people think about diversity, but there’s plenty more that makes this nation diverse,” said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo. “The most diverse states have above-average variety when it comes to people’s ages, birthplaces, languages, jobs, family structures and more.”
To conduct their study, WalletHub compared the 50 states of the country across six key dimensions: socio-economic diversity, cultural diversity, economic diversity, household diversity, religious diversity, and political diversity.
Do you know how diverse the state you live in is? Take a look at the results of WalletHub’s report.
10 most diverse states in the United States
The 10 most diverse states in the country, according to WalletHub are:
- California
- Texas
- New Mexico
- Florida
- Nevada
- New York
- New Jersey
- Hawaii
- Maryland
- Arizona
10 least diverse states in the United States
The 10 least diverse states in the country, according to WalletHub are:
50. West Virginia
49. Maine
48. New Hampshire
47. Vermont
46. Montana
45. Kentucky
44. Wyoming
43. Iowa
42. Utah
41. North Dakota
40. Wisconsin
How did they determine the most and least diverse states in the United States?
To determine the most and least diverse states in the country, WalletHub compared all 50 states across six key dimensions: socio-economic diversity, cultural diversity, economic diversity, household diversity, religious diversity, and political diversity.
These dimensions were evaluated using 14 relevant metrics on a 100-point scale (100 being the highest score). Then, a weighted average of all metrics was calculated to determine each state’s overall score, which was used to rank the states from most to least diverse.
The metrics analyzed included:
Socio-economic diversity
- Household-income diversity
- Educational-attainment diversity
Cultural diversity
- Racial and ethnic diversity
- Linguistic diversity
- Birthplace diversity
Economic diversity
- Industry diversity
- Occupational diversity
- Worker-class diversity
Household diversity
- Marital-status diversity
- Generational diversity
- Household-type diversity
- Household-size diversity
Religious diversity
- Evangelical Protestant, Mainline Protestant, Black Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, other or unaffiliated
Political diversity
- Conservative, moderate, liberal, unclaimed
What were Arizona’s results?
Arizona occupied the 10th overall place in the list. In addition, other of its metrics and their respective placements were:
- Eighth in income diversity
- 19th in educational-attainment diversity
- 11th in Racial and Ethnic Diversity
- Ninth in linguistic diversity
- Third in birthplace diversity
- Ninth in industry diversity
- 30th in worker-class diversity
- 17th in marital-status diversity
- Sixth in generational diversity
- 10th in household-type diversity
- 10th in household-size diversity
Reach out to La Voz reporter Paula Soria via email: psoriaaguilar@gannett.com.
Arizona
Arizona women’s basketball pulls away late to defeat Chicago State
The University of Arizona women’s basketball team (8-2) defeated Chicago State University (1-10) 89-70 on Monday, Dec. 15 in McKale Center. This marks the Wildcats’ second consecutive victory after snapping a brief losing streak last week.
Graduate guard Mickayla Perdue delivered a remarkable performance for the Wildcats, scoring a career-high 34-points. Her shooting ability was on full display as she converted four 3-pointers from well beyond the arc. Perdue’s long-range accuracy not only increased Arizona’s scoring output but also created opportunities for aggressive drives to the basket. Her assertiveness resulted in frequent trips to the free throw line, where she shot 10-of-12 from the charity stripe.
Redshirt junior combo guard Tanyuel Welch complemented Perdue’s efforts with an efficient double-double. Welch contributed 18 points and recorded 10 rebounds, showcasing her versatility on both ends of the floor. She was highly effective, shooting 70% from the field, which played a key role in helping the Wildcats maintain momentum and dictate the pace of the game.
For the Cougars, sophomore guard Aiyanna Culver emerged as the offensive leader, finishing with a team-high 23 points. Culver demonstrated her shooting range by going 5- for-10 from 3-point territory, providing a consistent scoring threat and keeping Chicago State competitive throughout the contest.
The Wildcats entered the game aiming to control the tempo and establish dominance from the outset. They capitalized on Chicago State turnovers to build a quick 7-0 lead. However, Arizona struggled with ball control in the second quarter, committing several turnovers that allowed Chicago State to close the gap.
Later in the first half, graduate guard Noelani Cornfield made a significant impact with multiple key steals, finishing the game with five takeaways alongside frequent trips to the free throw line. Her efforts helped Arizona maintain momentum and secure a 45-33 lead heading into halftime.
Chicago State came out of halftime with a surge of energy, led by Culver’s three triples in the quarter. The Cougars had multiple offensive rebounds which led to extended possessions and second chance points which helped keep the lead within reach.
The Wildcats went through a scoring drought during the first three minutes of the fourth quarter, which allowed the Cougars to reduce the deficit to just 2-points, their shortest gap since the opening tip.
Arizona responded by ramping up the tempo and embarked on a decisive 26-9 scoring run, highlighted by 13 points from Perdue in the final period. During this stretch, Chicago State struggled taking care of the basketball, committing nine turnovers in the fourth quarter and totaling 30 for the game.
Despite making several mistakes throughout the game, the Wildcats demonstrated tremendous resilience. Each time adversity struck, Arizona responded with tenacious defense and huge scoring runs. These efforts were largely fueled by the leadership and experience of their veteran players, who set the tone for the team.
Looking ahead
Arizona head coach Becky Burke will look for her team to clean up the turnovers as Arizona prepares for its final non-conference matchup against Bellarmine University. The game is scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 18 in McKale Center and will be streamed live on ESPN+.
Follow the Daily Wildcat on Instagram and Twitter/X
Arizona
AP men’s basketball Top 25: Arizona remains No. 1, Nebraska earns highest ranking since 1991
Arizona maintained its position as the No. 1 team in the Associated Press men’s basketball Top 25 on Monday, earning 42 of 61 first-place votes after a week that included a 96-75 win over No. 16 Alabama.
The Wildcats (9-0), one of seven undefeated teams remaining in Division I, already own five wins over high-major opponents.
There was little movement in the top 10 after a week with few upsets. Michigan (10-0), Duke (10-0), Iowa State (11-0) and UConn (10-1) remained Nos. 2-5, respectively. The only team to move up in the top 10 was No. 7 Gonzaga (10-1), which swapped places with No. 8 Houston (10-1) after adding another top-tier win over UCLA on Saturday.
The greater movement occurred between Nos. 10-25.
Nebraska (11-0) was the biggest riser, jumping eight spots to No. 15 after Saturday’s 83-80, buzzer-beating win over No. 18 Illinois. The Huskers, the lone power-conference team to never win an NCAA Tournament game, achieved their highest ranking since 1990-91, when they finished the season No. 11.
Illinois (8-3) and No. 23 Florida (6-4) were the biggest fallers, dropping five spots apiece.
Georgia (9-1) was the lone newcomer to the poll at No. 25, while UCLA (7-3) dropped out.
Here’s the full poll, along with my ballot:
|
Rank
|
Team
|
Record
|
Prev
|
CJ’s vote
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
9-0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
10-0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
10-0 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
4 |
11-0 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
5 |
10-1 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
6 |
10-1 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
7 |
10-1 |
8 |
7 |
|
|
8 |
10-1 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
9 |
9-1 |
9 |
9 |
|
|
10 |
9-1 |
10 |
8 |
|
|
11 |
9-1 |
11 |
11 |
|
|
12 |
9-1 |
14 |
15 |
|
|
13 |
10-0 |
15 |
12 |
|
|
14 |
8-2 |
17 |
14 |
|
|
15 |
11-0 |
23 |
13 |
|
|
16 |
7-3 |
12 |
17 |
|
|
17 |
8-3 |
19 |
16 |
|
|
18 |
8-3 |
13 |
18 |
|
|
19 |
7-3 |
16 |
21 |
|
|
20 |
7-3 |
20 |
20 |
|
|
21 |
8-3 |
21 |
NR |
|
|
22 |
6-3 |
22 |
24 |
|
|
23 |
6-4 |
18 |
19 |
|
|
24 |
9-1 |
24 |
22 |
|
|
25 |
9-1 |
NR |
25 |
|
|
NR |
9-2 |
NR |
23 |
Others receiving votes: USC 68, Iowa 47, Seton Hall 46, LSU 19, Kentucky 19, UCLA 16, Clemson 14, California 13, Saint Mary’s 12, Arizona State 5, Villanova 5, Notre Dame 4, Indiana 4, Miami (Ohio) 4, Miami (Fla.) 4, Utah State 2, Saint Louis 1, Wisconsin 1.
How good is Nebraska?
I caught Nebraska in person earlier this season when it beat New Mexico and Kansas State in Kansas City, Mo., and I’ve been a believer since. It’s a classic Fred Hoiberg team with a playmaking big, tons of shooting and awesome offensive execution. But what also stood out was how hard the Huskers played, and the defense is better than many of his best teams of the past at Iowa State.
The numbers are starting to back that up. The Huskers are up to 28th in adjusted defensive efficiency, the highest ranking ever for a Hoiberg defense. All this team was missing was signature wins, and it got two this past week, crushing Wisconsin 90-60 and then winning on the road at No. 18 Illinois on a last-second shot.
HE HIT IT‼️
Jamarques Lawrence’s 3-pointer right before the buzzer sends No. 23 @HuskerMBB to a dramatic win at No. 13 Illinois. pic.twitter.com/PhSr8kmnQn
— Big Ten Network (@BigTenNetwork) December 13, 2025
Arkansas could keep climbing
Arkansas fell out of my rankings for a few weeks early in the season because its computer numbers were bad after a few close calls against mid-majors. It was obvious the talent was there, but the Razorbacks just weren’t sharp early. They’re starting to play up to their talent, and I moved them up to 14th this week, which is one spot below where I had them in the preseason.
John Calipari’s best teams always have an NBA-level point guard, and he has one in Darius Acuff, who is averaging 17.7 points and 5.7 assists. Calipari also has three big wings who could develop into pros — Meleek Thomas, Karter Knox and Billy Richmond III — and as I wrote about in my weekly rankings, Trevon Brazile is playing the best ball of his career. This team is deeper and more talented than last year’s group, which got hot late and made the Sweet 16. Might still be a little low on this group.
Best team not ranked: Iowa
Iowa has yet to make the AP Top 25, but I’ve ranked the Hawkeyes the last three weeks and would argue their case was made even stronger last week in a loss. Iowa led Iowa State by 13 in the first half last Thursday at Hilton Coliseum and ended up taking a 4-point loss, which actually moved it up in the computer models. The Hawkeyes now rank 20th at KenPom and Bart Torvik, 19th in the NET and 21st at Evan Miya.
As the Hawkeyes proved against Iowa State, they are a tough out. Similar to Drake last year, Ben McCollum’s second Division I team gives nothing in transition, is hard to score against in the half court and is exhaustingly patient offensively waiting for a great shot to develop.
I can understand why my fellow voters aren’t there yet. With Ole Miss being a disappointment, you could argue Iowa is missing a signature win. The first opportunity is Jan. 3 when Iowa hosts UCLA.
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa3 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Miami, FL1 week agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Minnesota1 week agoTwo Minnesota carriers shut down, idling 200 drivers