Northeast
Online data protection bills become law in Maryland
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore signed two measures into law on Thursday that are aimed at better protecting personal data online from Big Tech, including a bill making Maryland the second state to try to create strong limits on information collected on children.
The measure, known as the Maryland Kids Code, seeks to limit data that could be collected from children online and protect them from being flooded with harmful material they were not trying to find.
“Look, the bottom line is Big Tech has been preying on and victimizing our children for way, way too long,” said state Sen. Ben Kramer, a Democrat in the suburbs of the nation’s capital.
SENATE MULLS TIKTOK BAN AS TRUMP-ZUCKERBERG BATTLE BREWS IN BACKGROUND
Big Tech companies sought to assure lawmakers that the industry could take care of problem without interference from the government, Kramer noted. “But the fact of the matter is, leaving the fox to guard the chicken coop has left Big Tech fat and greedy, because they have prioritized cash over our kids,” the senator said.
Supporters say the new law aimed at protecting children was crafted to withstand court challenges like one that halted a California law. For example, the measure incorporates case law and established consumer protection law, supporters said.
Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel of NetChoice, said the group shares lawmakers’ desire to better protect children online. “But this goal can be achieved in ways that don’t violate the Constitution and leave a litany of serious, unintended consequences in their wake,” he said.
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore testifies in support of legislation aimed at making housing more affordable and protecting renters during a bill hearing on Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2024, in Annapolis, Md. (AP Photo/Brian Witte)
NetChoice is a commercial association whose members include Google, Amazon, Meta and TikTok. It challenged the California law.
“Unfortunately, the law Gov. Moore signed today will fail to accomplish its goal — creating a safer online environment for young Marylanders. An unconstitutional law will not keep anyone safe. By discounting the rights and privacy of their citizens, Maryland lawmakers have unfortunately signed onto a path that will make everyone worse off — especially children,” Szabo said in an email.
Under the law, businesses would not be able to profile a child by default, with some limited exceptions, or process personal data that is not reasonably necessary to provide an online product with which the child is actively and knowingly engaged.
Del. Jared Solomon, a bill sponsor, said lawmakers were careful to make sure the measure is not meant to moderate available content. He said protective language was added to ensure a child could not be prevented from searching for content online.
“If you want to go and you want to look for things that you probably shouldn’t be looking at, we are not scrubbing that from the internet,” Solomon, a Montgomery Democrat, said. “But what we are saying to companies is you should not be essentially be accumulating data on somebody and making assumptions that that is the content that they want to see.”
Design It For Us, a coalition advocating for safer social media and online platforms for children, praised the new law.
“We hope this will bring urgency to other states to pass and adopt much needed Kids Code legislation and end Big Tech’s power over our safety and privacy,” said Zamaan Qureshi, a co-chair of the group.
The governor, a Democrat, also signed the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024.
The new law will impose certain duties on businesses to protect an individual’s personal information. For example, a business in possession of personal information will be required to implement and maintain security procedures and practices to protect the information from unauthorized access, use, modification or disclosure.
“It puts guardrails up on the amount of data that companies can collect on people online and also what they do with that data, and it gives consumers more control over their own data,” said Del. Sara Love, a Montgomery County Democrat who sponsored the measure.
The new law also will create consumer protections and rights, as well as disclosure obligations, relating to online personal data controlled or processed by certain entities that conduct business in Maryland or provide services or products that are targeted to residents of the state.
A consumer also will have the right to opt out of the processing of personal data for the purposes of targeted advertising, the sale of personal data and certain profiling activities.
Read the full article from Here
Vermont
VT Lottery Mega Millions, Gimme 5 results for May 5, 2026
Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win
Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.
Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.
Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.
Here’s a look at May 5, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Vermont Mega Millions numbers from May 5 drawing
12-22-50-51-55, Mega Ball: 10
Check Vermont Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Gimme 5 numbers from May 5 drawing
09-16-19-33-39
Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 5 drawing
Day: 5-3-6
Evening: 0-8-2
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 5 drawing
Day: 1-4-8-3
Evening: 0-5-4-1
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 5 drawing
14-20-23-30-55, Bonus: 02
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.
For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.
All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.
Vermont Lottery Headquarters
1311 US Route 302, Suite 100
Barre, VT
05641
When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
- Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
- Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
- Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
- Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
- Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
- Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
- Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily
What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?
Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.
New York
In Attack on Mamdani, Vornado Chief Likens ‘Tax the Rich’ to Hate Speech
Steven Roth, the chief executive of Vornado Realty Trust, used an earnings call on Tuesday to castigate Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York for his “tax-the-rich” rhetoric, which he likened to a racial slur or a pro-Palestinian rallying cry.
“I must say that I consider the phrase ‘tax the rich’ — quote, tax the rich — when spit out with anger and contempt by politicians both here and across the country, to be just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs and even the phrase, ‘from the river to the sea,’” Mr. Roth said, referring to the pro-Palestinian phrase that some Jews believe amounts to a call for ethnic cleansing.
Mr. Roth said “tax the rich” suggests that the wealthy are evil and should be made targets, and he criticized the mayor for singling out Kenneth C. Griffin, a fellow tycoon, in his campaign to force rich New Yorkers to pay more to support the city’s programs.
Mr. Roth said Mr. Mamdani’s decision to film a social media video celebrating Gov. Kathy Hochul’s proposed pied-à-terre tax in front of Mr. Griffin’s multistory penthouse — in a building developed by Vornado — was “dangerous” and an “ugly, unnecessary video stunt.”
Mr. Griffin, who bought the penthouse in 2019 for $238 million, had no immediate comment.
Joe Calvello, a spokesman for the mayor, said in a statement that “Mayor Mamdani wants all New Yorkers to succeed,” including Mr. Griffin, “who is a major employer in our city and a powerful figure in our economy.”
He added: “That does not negate the fact, however, that our tax system is fundamentally broken. It rewards extreme wealth while working people are pushed to the brink.”
Mr. Mamdani, 34, ran for office promising to fund expansive new government programs by raising taxes on wealthy individuals and major corporations. Mr. Roth spent heavily against Mr. Mamdani and in favor of his opponent, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
But in the face of a budget gap, Mr. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, has instead said those same taxes are also necessary to balance the books.
Unfortunately for Mr. Mamdani, New York City does not control its own tax policy, and Ms. Hochul, who is facing re-election this year, has steadfastly refused to accede to Mr. Mamdani’s demands. But facing pressure from Mr. Mamdani’s base, she did embrace a longstanding proposal to tax expensive second homes in the five boroughs.
And so, on April 15, Tax Day, Mr. Mamdani stood in front of Mr. Griffin’s building and claimed victory.
“This is an annual fee on luxury properties worth more than $5 million, whose owners do not live full-time in the city, like for this penthouse, which hedge fund C.E.O. Ken Griffin bought for $238 million,” Mr. Mamdani said in the video, which has since been viewed 52 million times.
At the time Mr. Griffin bought it, the condo was the most expensive home in America.
Mr. Griffin, who is worth an estimated $50 billion, responded on Tuesday with pique.
“It was creepy and weird,” Mr. Griffin said of Mr. Mamdani’s comments during an onstage interview at an investment conference in Beverly Hills, Calif.
Mr. Griffin elaborated in a separate Tuesday interview on CNBC.
Mr. Mamdani “seems to have forgotten that the C.E.O. of another American company was assassinated just blocks from where I live in New York,” Mr. Griffin said, referring to the 2024 killing of Brian Thompson, the chief executive of UnitedHealthcare.
A week after Mr. Mamdani’s video, Gerald Beeson, the chief operating officer of Citadel, Mr. Griffin’s hedge fund, sent out a letter to his colleagues suggesting that the company might mothball a new $6 billion skyscraper headquarters on Park Avenue that it had been planning to build with Vornado, denouncing Mr. Mamdani’s rhetoric and noting Citadel’s existing contributions to the city.
“Over the past five years, our principals and team members (including nonresidents) have paid nearly $2.3 billion dollars in city and state taxes, providing funds to support the city’s infrastructure, schools, parks and first responders,” Mr. Beeson wrote.
Mr. Griffin said on Tuesday that the development would “probably” move forward, even as he said that Citadel has also decided to expand its office space in Miami, a move for which he also blamed Mr. Mamdani.
“We will add far more jobs in Miami over the next decade as an immediate and direct consequence of the mayor’s poor decision here, with respect to his posting of that video,” Mr. Griffin said.
Mr. Griffin has a history of leaving major American cities in the dust. He famously left Chicago amid rising crime and a feud with Gov. JB Pritzker.
Possibly aware of that, Mr. Mamdani has since softened his rhetoric on Mr. Griffin, even thanking him during a recent Police Department ceremony for funding a memorial wall for fallen officers.
And Mr. Roth on Tuesday offered a note of modest praise for Mr. Mamdani.
“Our mayor is young, smart and energetic,” Mr. Roth said. “With a little tweak here, a little tweak there, his leadership could make this great city even greater.”
But Mr. Griffin deserves an apology, Mr. Roth argued.
“The rich, whom the politicians are targeting, started with nothing, are the epitome of the American dream,” he said. “They are at the top of the great American economic pyramid for a reason. They should be praised and thanked.”
Rob Copeland contributed reporting.
Boston, MA
Two Boston city councilors slam Mayor Wu for cutting $724K from veterans budget: ‘Unconscionable’
Two Boston city councilors slammed the mayor for proposing a $724,000 cut to the veterans budget, saying that the city is breaking a promise to support veterans with services they have earned by risking their lives at war.
Councilors Ed Flynn and Erin Murphy sharply criticized the reduction in spending for veterans in the $4.9 billion city budget proposed by Mayor Michelle Wu for next fiscal year, saying the cut is particularly painful, given that the veterans department is so small.
“A 14% cut to the veterans budget is deeply concerning, especially when veterans services is already one of the smallest funded departments in the City of Boston,” Murphy said in a statement to the Herald. “Larger departments may be able to absorb reductions or shift resources, but there is very little room to maneuver in a department this small.
“Any cut can have a direct impact on the services, support, and outreach our veterans rely on,” Murphy added. “As a city, we have a responsibility to keep our promise to those who served our country.”
The veterans services office budget was proposed by Wu at $4.22 million for fiscal year 2027, compared to $4.94 million for this fiscal year, representing a 14.6%, or $723,753 reduction. The city budget is growing overall by 2.1%.
Murphy and Flynn plan to introduce a hearing order and resolution calling for the city to fully fund the veterans department, by restoring the proposed spending cut at Wednesday’s Council meeting. The resolution would likely come up for a vote, unless it is blocked by a councilor and sent to committee for a hearing.
Flynn said the last time there was a proposed cut to the veterans budget in Boston, veterans and military families organized and mobilized to urge Wu to restore the funding to the department.
In 2023, the City Council put forward and approved a series of amendments that would have cut $900,000 for the veterans department, leading to outcry from veterans and an apology from former Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson, who oversaw that year’s budget process as chair of the Ways and Means committee.
Wu vetoed the Council amendments, saying at the time that plans to cut from the veterans department “would reduce critical programming and limit our ability to fund future obligations.”
Flynn, a U.S. Navy veteran who served in Operation Enduring Freedom, said he was “shocked” that there hasn’t been any “outcry” from other councilors about the mayor’s proposed cut to the veterans budget, when speaking at a Council working session on the city’s budget last Friday.
He said he traveled recently to Washington D.C. to advocate against the Trump administration’s cuts to veterans services, and has to go there every month for the same purpose. He sees city councilors as having a “moral obligation” to advocate for veterans.
“This is my ninth budget that I’ve been involved in, and I have to say it’s one of the most disappointing when I see a cut of 14% to the veterans department,” Flynn said. “These are programs that veterans earn through their blood, sweat and tears, and major injuries. We’re not giving veterans anything. They’ve earned these rights.
“Government is about making this promise to veterans, that when you go to war, and you return from war, that government will be there for you,” Flynn added. “To have veterans programs cut by a large percent is very concerning — it’s unconscionable.”
Mayor Wu’s office defended her decision to make the spending reduction, stating that the Wu administration is not cutting any direct services to veterans and that the cut reflects broader fiscal constraints facing the city amid a budget crunch.
Wu’s office said the veterans department will continue to provide core services to all qualifying veterans and provide financial and medical assistance to qualifying veterans and their dependents with limited incomes for food, shelter, clothing, and medical care, as required by state law.
The reduction in funding is primarily due to the removal of two grant programs, Bridge The Gap and Hometown Heroes, along with reductions to non-personnel expenses, such as city-branded clothing and other promotional items, and event supplies and rentals, the mayor’s office said.
Wu’s office also pointed out that the veterans services department has returned an average surplus of $2 million allocated by the city in each of the last four fiscal years.
“As a city, our priority is ensuring that we deliver high-quality city services to all of our residents, including our veterans and their families,” city spokesperson Michael Osaghae said in a statement to the Herald. “Our veteran services department serves a critical role in connecting our veterans to essential services, such as legal support, essential benefits and medical assistance.
“Despite budget constraints, the city is not cutting any direct services for veterans — core assistance programs, services, and resources for our veterans and their families will not be impacted and remain fully funded,” Osaghae added.
The mayor’s office acknowledged the Council’s ability to amend the mayor’s proposed budget, saying that it will “welcome the opportunity for a fuller discussion on this important issue.”
-
Tennessee6 minutes agoRising fertilizer costs could hit Tennessee farmers, and possibly your grocery bill
-
Texas12 minutes agoWinning numbers drawn in Tuesday’s Texas All or Nothing Night
-
Utah18 minutes agoLitchfield Park man arrested in connection to missing Utah girl
-
Vermont24 minutes ago
VT Lottery Mega Millions, Gimme 5 results for May 5, 2026
-
Virginia30 minutes agoVirginia Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 Night results for May 5, 2026
-
Wisconsin42 minutes agoFormer Wisconsin basketball player Alie Bisballe transfers to Michigan State
-
West Virginia47 minutes ago
West Virginia Lottery results: See winning numbers for Mega Millions, Daily 3 on May 5, 2026
-
Wyoming54 minutes agoRep. Elissa Campbell announces reelection campaign for Wyoming House District 56