ATLANTA — Fulton County District Attorney Fani T. Willis (D) made a fiery appearance on the witness stand Thursday, challenging defense attorneys who she said spread “lies” about a romantic relationship she had with the special prosecutor she appointed to lead the election interference case against Donald Trump.
Georgia
Fani Willis accuses defense of lying in fiery testimony at Georgia hearing
In an extraordinary two-hour appearance, a visibly angry Willis sparred with defense counsel who have sought to disqualify her and her office over allegations that she engaged in an improper personal relationship with Nathan Wade, the outside lawyer she appointed to lead the case.
Willis, who initially fought to avoid sworn testimony, appeared during a day-long evidentiary hearing on the misconduct claims that currently threaten to disrupt the Georgia case against Trump, one of four criminal cases the former president is facing. She overruled her staff attorneys, who had objected to her appearance.
What resulted was a stunning scene: The fate of a criminal case against the former president and his allies, who are accused of conspiring to try to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, seemed to be in the balance as two of the prosecutors leading the case were questioned about their sex lives and finances by defense attorneys representing those they had indicted. There was talk of thousand-dollar cash stashes, Willis’s preference of Grey Goose versus wine and her admission that “hand-holding” was not her kind of romance.
At times, the hearing offered a preview of what the sprawling racketeering case might look like if it moves forward — as a crowd of defense attorneys took turns questioning the witnesses, passing notes and whispering to one another in the gallery like a team united in a common goal. At one point, one of the defense attorneys was seen pumping a fist in celebration.
From the witness stand, Willis angrily confronted an attorney for Trump co-defendant Mike Roman, a former campaign aide who first raised allegations of misconduct, accusing the attorney of being “dishonest” and of making “highly offensive” claims about her and Wade. At one point, Willis waved copies of Roman’s filings in the case, describing them as full of “lies, lies, lies.”
“You’ve been intrusive into people’s personal lives,” Willis told Ashleigh Merchant, Roman’s attorney. “You’re confused. You think I’m on trial. These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020. I’m not on trial. No matter how hard you try to put me on trial.”
“Merchant’s interests are contrary to democracy, your honor, not to mine,” Willis told Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee, who called a brief recess to cool temperatures in the room.
McAfee, who scheduled another day of testimony for Friday, offered few hints about what he may be thinking as he considers the motions to remove Willis — a move that probably would delay if not outright kill the case. McAfee must decide if there’s a conflict of interest or appearance of one. He said he would not be ruling on the motions on Friday but gave no other timetable.
A former state and federal prosecutor, McAfee was occasionally stern with Willis, his former boss — urging her to maintain decorum. But he also quickly cut off defense attorneys when they strayed.
Willis’s appearance came at the end of a day of explosive testimony, including from a former friend and co-worker of Willis’s who testified that Willis’s relationship with Wade began years before she appointed him to the case.
Willis and Wade both testified Thursday that their relationship began in early 2022, months after he was tapped to lead the investigation in November 2021.
Robin Bryant-Yeartie, a longtime Willis associate who had a falling-out with Willis after she resigned from the district attorney’s office in 2022, said there was “no doubt’ in her mind that Willis and Wade were involved in a romantic relationship beginning in late 2019. She testified under oath that she had talked to Willis about Wade and had personally seen them “hugging, kissing” before Nov. 1, 2021 — the date Wade joined the Trump case as a special prosecutor.
Willis forcefully rebutted Bryant-Yeartie’s claim, calling it a “lie.” She testified that she and Bryant-Yeartie had known each other since college but were not close friends. As Willis faced violent threats related to the Trump investigation and other cases, she fled her home and took over a lease for an Atlanta-area condo that Bryant-Yeartie had rented. Roman’s attorney suggested that Willis and Wade had lived there together, which both denied.
“I have not spoken to Robin in over a year,” Willis said. “I certainly do not consider her a friend now. I think that she betrayed our friendship.”
Both Willis and Wade, who also spent hours on the stand Thursday, testified that their romantic relationship did not begin until around March 2022 and ended in the summer of 2023 — before the August indictments against Trump and others were made public.
Wade said things ended around June 2023. When Trump attorney Steve Sadow pressed Wade on whether the romantic relationship had continued at any point after that, Wade said no.
“We’re very good friends, probably closer than ever because of these attacks,” Wade testified. “But if you’re asking me about sexual intercourse, the answer is no.”
Wade testified that he never spent the night at Willis’s condo, never rode in her vehicle with her security detail and never spent time at her condo with other members of her staff, including her security detail.
Wade also said he never discussed his personal relationship with Willis with anyone in social circumstances. “Our relationship wasn’t a secret. It was just private,” Wade said.
But Willis testified that while they had no longer had a physical relationship by June or July, she didn’t consider the romance over until early August after they had a “hard conversation.” “I just think men and women think differently,” Willis said.
“Mr. Wade is my friend right now. Mr. Wade, I would say, has been my friend since 2020. I think he started out as like a mentor and a professional colleague. He became my friend and somebody that I really respected,” Willis testified. “I feel very indebted to Mr. Wade for taking on the task of this job, and he is certainly my friend and one of the people that I respect the most.”
The hearing came more than a month after Roman claimed in a court filing that Willis and Wade had been involved in an “improper, clandestine personal relationship” that has financially benefited them both. Roman claimed Willis may have broken the law by hiring Wade, an outside attorney with scant experience prosecuting criminal cases, and then allowing him to pay for “vacations across the world” with her that were unrelated to their work on the case. Roman’s filing, which offered no proof to substantiate the sensational claims, called for the prosecutors to be disqualified and for the charges against him to be dismissed.
The allegations against Wade and Willis were underpinned by a bitter divorce battle between Wade and his estranged wife. Bank records made public as part of Wade’s divorce proceedings and introduced as evidence by Merchant on Thursday show Wade purchased plane tickets for himself and Willis on two occasions — a trip to Aruba purchased in October 2022 and a second trip purchased in April 2023 to San Francisco.
Wade said in a Feb. 2 affidavit that he and Willis had split travel expenses “equally” — a claim that he reaffirmed Thursday. An attached exhibit included receipts for airline tickets for a trip to Miami in December 2022 that Willis bought for herself and Wade. He insisted that Willis had not benefited from his salary as a special prosecutor.
On Thursday, Wade confirmed he had taken those trips and claimed that Willis had reimbursed him in cash. He also confirmed a third trip to Belize in 2023 for his birthday and said that although he had booked the tickets, Willis had repaid him for those costs in cash.
That claim drew a loud snicker from Trump co-defendant David Shafer, the former chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, who was admonished by McAfee.
Under follow-up questioning from Craig Gillen, Shafer’s attorney, Wade claimed he did not deposit the cash Willis gave him and had no records that documented that cash.
“Do you have a little place in your house where you stack up all this cash that you apparently got to repay you for these benefits you bestowed on her?” Gillen asked.
“If I answered that, I’d put myself in jeopardy,” Wade replied. “If I tell the world that I have cash someplace in my home, don’t you think that that could be problematic?”
Wade also claimed that he and Willis had taken several day trips together — including to Alabama and Tennessee — to escape the stress of the case.
“If you’ve ever spent any time with Ms. Willis, you understand that she’s a very independent, proud woman,” Wade testified. “So she’s going to insist that she carries her own weight. And it actually was a point of contention between the two of us. She is going to pay her own way.”
Wade added that he didn’t keep track of such expenses. “In a relationship, ma’am — particularly men — you don’t go asking back for anything,” Wade said. “You’re not keeping a ledger.”
Defense attorneys pressed both Willis and Wade at length on their use of cash. Willis testified that she had been raised by her father to keep cash on hand and that she often carried cash on trips and to pay friends for dinners and other expenses.
“Mr. Wade is used to women that, as he told me one time, only thing a woman can do for him is make him a sandwich. We would have brutal arguments about the fact that I am your equal. I don’t need anything from a man,” Willis testified at one point. “A man is not a plan. A man is a companion. And so there was tension always in our relationship, which is why I was giving him his money back. I don’t need anybody to foot my bills. The only man who’s ever foot my bills completely is my daddy.”
Pressed on filings in his divorce case where Wade indicated “none” when he was asked to disclose gifts to a romantic partner, Wade said he answered truthfully, claiming that he and his estranged wife, Joycelyn Mayfield Wade, had agreed to divorce after she had an affair in 2015. He said that the couple agreed not to formally file until their kids were older but that he was “free to have a relationship.”
“In 2015, my marriage was irretrievably broken, so I did not have a relationship with anyone during the course of my marriage,” Wade said.
Andrea Hastings, an attorney for Joycelyn Wade, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Hastings had previously described allegations of an affair by her client as “false.”
Wade said he ultimately filed for divorce in November 2021 — one day after he signed a contact to lead the election-interference case — because his estranged wife had been living in Texas and was back in Atlanta and that was the earliest date he could formally serve her the divorce papers.
In response, Sadow indicated he might subpoena Joycelyn Wade to testify — though McAfee quickly told him he would determine later if that is relevant.
Trump appeared to be paying close attention to the testimony, posting video clips from the courtroom and Fox News commentators on social media. One clip zoomed into a television and showed Bryant-Yeartie stating the relationship between Willis and Wade began in 2019. Another featured Wade answering questions from Gillen, asking if Wade had “entertained” Willis.
Willis was set to return to the stand Friday, where she is set to face questions from the prosecution. Special prosecutor Anna Cross told McAfee that prosecutors planned to present between four and five hours of rebuttal witnesses.
Mark Berman, Marianne LeVine and Azi Paybarah in Washington, Yvonne Wingett Sanchez in Phoenix, and Patrick Marley in Madison, Wis., contributed to this report.
Georgia
Georgia’s Utility Regulator Rushes Deal for Georgia Power Before Public Hearing – CleanTechnica
Support CleanTechnica’s work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.
ATLANTA, Georgia — An hour before hearing testimony from the public and advocacy groups, the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) posted a settlement agreement approving Georgia Power’s plan to build the most expensive gas plants in the country, leaving Georgians to foot the bill.
The settlement, which the PSC is expected to vote on during its Dec. 19 meeting, approves Georgia Power’s “Requests for Proposals,” or RFP, despite clear warnings from the Sierra Club, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, and PSC’s own staff that Georgia Power’s plan hinges on a data center bubble. The utility’s proposal is expected to cost at least $15 billion in capital costs, though the total costs have yet to be publicly disclosed. The proposed settlement would dramatically increase Georgian’s energy bills for years to come for data centers that might not even be built. Several counties in Georgia have already passed moratoriums on data centers, awaiting more insight into their potential impact on local communities.
“This proposed settlement is the largest single investment in electric infrastructure in the state’s history. It calls for building the most expensive gas plants in the country and will result in higher prices for consumers and more pollution in our communities. It will cause temperatures to go up, more frequent and more powerful storms, and deadlier floods and heatwaves,” said Dekalb County resident Lisa Coronado during the Dec. 10 hearing. “But Georgia Power doesn’t care about any of that. When the temperatures go up, Georgia Power makes more money because Georgians run their air conditioning more often. When climate-change fueled storms wreck our infrastructure, Georgia Power passes repair costs onto us.”
The settlement includes promises of “downward pressure” for ratepayers’ bills, but Georgia Power’s claim that typical ratepayers will eventually see a reduction of $8.50 per month is short-sighted. First, Georgia Power has made similar promises in the past and continued to raise rates. Second, the proposed rate decrease would only cover three years, whereas ratepayers will have to pay for gas plants for 45 years.
In response, the Sierra Club released the following statement:
“The PSC’s own expert staff said Georgia building gas plants was not in the best interest of ratepayers,” said Adrien Webber, Sierra Club Georgia Chapter Director. “At a time when the PSC should be fighting for affordability for Georgians, they instead push through a plan that will continue to squeeze Georgia families already struggling to make ends meet. As we consider our next steps, it’s clear that the people of Georgia demand change from our PSC and the Sierra Club will continue to fight to make that change happen.
“‘Georgia Power’s agreement is still based on the idea that data center projects are coming, which is not guaranteed,” Webber continued. “The PSC’s own staff saw Georgia Power’s plan as overbuilding for projects that may or may not appear, threatening to leave the cost for ratepayers to pick up. It’s infuriating that Georgia Power and the PSC refuse to even take public comment or insight from advocates into consideration before coming to this agreement. Filing this agreement just an hour before the second round of hearings shows that the PSC refuses to be held accountable to the people of Georgia.”
About the Sierra Club: The Sierra Club is America’s largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization, with millions of members and supporters. In addition to protecting every person’s right to get outdoors and access the healing power of nature, the Sierra Club works to promote clean energy, safeguard the health of our communities, protect wildlife, and preserve our remaining wild places through grassroots activism, public education, lobbying, and legal action. For more information, visit www.sierraclub.org.
Sign up for CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy
Georgia
Joe Beasley, Georgia civil rights leader, dead at 88:
Joseph Beasley, a longtime Georgia human rights activist, has died, just a few weeks before what would have been his 89th birthday.
Born to sharecroppers in Fayette County, Georgia, Beasley said in interviews that a history lesson opened his eyes to the power of activism.
“When I was able to attend school in a segregated, one-room school house, I learned about the Haitian Revolution that began with the rebellion of African slaves in 1791 and ended when the French were defeated at the Battle of Vertieres in 1803,” Beasley wrote in African Leadership Magazine in 2015. “The battle effectively ended slavery there and got me energized. I remember thinking as I read about it that it was possible to have a different life.”
A veteran of the U.S. Air Force who attended graduate school at Clark Atlanta University, Beasley first joined the Jesse Jackson-founded Operation PUSH in 1976, according to nonprofit The History Makers. In 1979, he moved back to his home state of Georgia to work as the executive director of the organization’s Atlanta chapter. He continued with the organization for decades, eventually being named Southern Regional Director. At the same time, he began serving as the human service director at Atlanta’s Antioch Baptich Church North.
Beasley’s work took him across Georgia and around the world. He traveled to South Africa to register voters ahead of Nelson Mandela’s historic electoral victory in 1994 and went to Haiti to monitor the nation’s second democratic election the next year, The History Makers said.
“Joe Beasley’s legacy runs deep — from growing up on a Georgia plantation to serving 21 years in the Air Force, to becoming a powerful voice for justice through Rainbow PUSH,” Attorney Gerald Griggs wrote. “He spent his life fighting for civil rights at home and abroad. A true global servant for our people.”
Beasley also founded and led African Ascension, an organization with the goal of linking Africans on the continent with those in the diaspora.
“He devoted his life to uplifting our people, confronting injustice, and standing steadfast on the front lines of the struggle for human and civil rights not only in Georgia, but across the globe,” the Georgia NAACP wrote on Facebook. “His voice was bold, his spirit unbreakable, and his impact immeasurable.”
Beasley’s funeral arrangements have not yet been announced.
Georgia
Georgia lawmakers push bipartisan plan to make social media, AI safer for children
Georgia Senate takes up AI use by children
Georgia lawmakers are joining states nationwide pressing for tougher laws to hold social media companies accountable for children’s safety on their platforms and when interacting with AI.
ATLANTA – Georgia lawmakers say they are drafting legislation to make social media safer for children after a Senate committee spent months hearing from community members and experts. The proposals are expected to be taken up during the upcoming legislative session.
What we know:
Georgia lawmakers are joining states nationwide in pressing for tougher laws to hold social media companies accountable for children’s safety on their platforms and when those users interact with artificial intelligence.
The Senate Impact of Social Media and Artificial Intelligence on Children and Platform Privacy Protection Study Committee spent months hearing from parents and experts about how to make the internet safer for kids.
What they’re saying:
Democratic state Sen. Sally Harrell, who co-chairs the committee, said it adopted its final report Wednesday.
She said lawmakers are working on bipartisan bills to address growing concerns about how social media, gaming, AI and other online platforms are affecting Georgia children. The proposals include legislation to prevent companies from using addictive design features in social media and games, as well as requirements for developers to test chatbots to ensure they are safe for children to interact with.
“Congress should be acting,” Harrell said. “This should be a congressional issue. It should be dealt with nationally. But Congress isn’t doing anything. They haven’t done anything to help our kids be safe online for almost 30 years. And so the states really feel like we have to take leadership on this.”
What’s next:
Lawmakers stressed that this is a bipartisan effort and encouraged the public to work with them, noting they are already receiving pushback from some of the companies that own and operate major social media platforms.
The Source: The details in this article come from the meeting of the Senate Impact of Social Media and Artificial Intelligence on Children and Platform Privacy Protection Study Committee. Democratic state Sen. Sally Harrell spoke with FOX 5’s Deidra Dukes.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire