Connect with us

World

Zelenskyy evokes Holocaust as he appeals to Israel for aid

Published

on

Zelenskyy evokes Holocaust as he appeals to Israel for aid

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

Ukraine’s president on Sunday referred to as on Israel to take a stronger stand in opposition to Russia, delivering an emotional attraction that in contrast Russia’s invasion of his nation to the actions of Nazi Germany.

In a speech to Israeli lawmakers over Zoom, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated it was time for Israel, which has emerged as a key mediator between Ukraine and Russia, to lastly take sides. He stated Israel ought to comply with its Western allies by imposing sanctions and offering arms to Ukraine. 

A protester in Habima Sq. holds an outline of Russian President Vladimir Putin in Tel Aviv, Israel.
(AP Photograph/Maya Alleruzzo)

“One can ask for a very long time why we are able to’t settle for weapons from you or why Israel didn’t impose sanctions in opposition to Russia, why you aren’t placing strain on Russian enterprise,” he stated. “It’s your alternative, expensive brothers and sisters.”

Advertisement

Zelenskyy, who has fastidiously catered a collection of comparable parliamentary speeches to his audiences, made frequent references to the Holocaust as he tried to rally help. The comparisons drew an offended condemnation from Israel’s nationwide Holocaust memorial, which stated Zelenskyy was trivializing the Holocaust.

UKRAINE’S ZELENSKYY WARNS OF ‘THIRD WORLD WAR’ IF PEACE TALKS WITH RUSSIA FAIL 

Zelenskyy accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of making an attempt to hold out a “closing resolution” in opposition to Ukraine — utilizing the Nazi time period for its deliberate genocide of 6 million Jews throughout World Battle II. 

People gather in Habima Square in Tel Aviv, Israel, to watch Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a video address to the Knesset, Israel's parliament

Folks collect in Habima Sq. in Tel Aviv, Israel, to observe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a video handle to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament
(AP Photograph/Maya Alleruzzo, Pool)

“You bear in mind it and can always remember it for positive,” he stated. “However it is best to hear what’s coming from Moscow now. They’re saying the identical phrases now: ‘closing resolution.’ However this time it is about us, concerning the Ukrainian query.”

Zelenskyy, who himself is Jewish, additionally famous {that a} Russian missile slammed into Babi Yar — the spot of a infamous Nazi bloodbath in 1941 that now hosts Ukraine’s important Holocaust memorial.

Advertisement

“The folks of Israel, you noticed how Russian rockets hit Babi Yar. what this place means, the place the victims of the Holocaust are buried,” he stated. 

People gather in Habima Square in Tel Aviv, Israel, to watch Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a video address to the Knesset, Israel's parliament

Folks collect in Habima Sq. in Tel Aviv, Israel, to observe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a video handle to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament
(AP Photograph/Maya Alleruzzo)

Using such delicate language was a transparent try by Zelenskyy to attach along with his viewers. Israel was based in 1948 as a refugee for Jews within the wake of the Holocaust. The nation is residence to tens of hundreds of aged survivors, and plenty of of its leaders are youngsters of survivors.

Putin has additionally sought to color his enemies in Ukraine as neo-Nazis as he tries to legitimize his conflict in Ukraine. However historians, noting that Ukraine is a democracy led by a Jewish president, have condemned his use of such terminology as disinformation and a cynical ploy to additional the Russian chief’s goals.

Israeli International Minister Yair Lapid, whose late father was a Holocaust survivor, thanked Zelenskyy for the speech.

“We’ll proceed to help the Ukrainian folks as a lot as we are able to and we are going to by no means flip our backs to the plight of people that know the horrors of conflict,” Lapid stated. 

Advertisement
People gather in Habima Square in Tel Aviv, Israel, to watch Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a video address to the Knesset, Israel's parliament.

Folks collect in Habima Sq. in Tel Aviv, Israel, to observe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a video handle to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament.
(AP Photograph/Maya Alleruzzo)

However Yad Vashem, Israel’s nationwide Holocaust memorial, which had beforehand condemned Putin’s Nazi references, additionally harshly criticized Zelenskyy, with out naming him.

“Propagandist discourse accompanying the present hostilities is saturated with irresponsible statements and utterly inaccurate comparisons with Nazi ideology and actions earlier than and through the Holocaust,” it stated. “Yad Vashem condemns this trivialization and distortion of the historic info of the Holocaust.”

UKRAINE WAR IS BACKDROP IN US PUSH FOR HYPERSONIC WEAPONS 

The Israeli public has been largely supportive of Ukraine since Russia invaded its western neighbor on Feb. 24. A number of thousand folks, many holding Ukrainian flags, gathered in a central Tel Aviv sq. to observe his speech on a big display.

However Israel’s authorities has been far more cautious because it carves out a task as a mediator within the conflict. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett paid a shock go to to Moscow to satisfy with Putin on March 5. Since then, he has spoken to the Russian chief at the very least twice and to Zelenskyy at the very least six instances, in keeping with his workplace.

Advertisement

Whereas Israel’s overseas minister has strongly condemned the invasion, Bennett has used extra tepid language to take care of an air of neutrality.

With giant Jewish populations in each Ukraine and Russia, Israel is cautious of antagonizing both aspect. Israel additionally has good working relations with the Russian navy in neighboring Syria — the place either side’ keep a particular hotline to verify their air forces don’t come into battle. 

Israel has delivered tons of humanitarian support to Ukraine and is ready to open a particular subject hospital in western Ukraine later this week. Nevertheless it has rejected pleas to offer arms or impose sanctions in opposition to Russia or its oligarchs, a few of whom are Jewish and have robust ties to Israel.

Zelenskyy stated it was time for this to vary.

Advertisement

“Everybody in Israel is aware of that your missile protection is one of the best. Everybody is aware of that your weapons are robust, everybody is aware of that you’re nice and you know the way to defend your nationwide pursuits, pursuits of your folks and you’ll undoubtedly assist defend ours,” he stated.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending