World
US warns of expanding Iran, Russia defence ‘partnership’
The USA has accused Russia of offering superior navy help to Iran, together with air defence programs, because it warned of deepening defence ties between Moscow and Tehran, with Russia utilizing Iranian drones to hit targets in Ukraine.
White Home Nationwide Safety Council spokesman John Kirby cited US intelligence assessments for the allegations, saying Russia was providing Iran “an unprecedented degree of navy and technical help that’s remodeling their relationship right into a full-fledged protection partnership”.
Washington has beforehand condemned safety cooperation between Iran and Russia however on Friday described an intensive relationship involving gear resembling helicopters and fighter jets in addition to drones, with the latter objects leading to new US sanctions.
Kirby mentioned Russia and Iran have been contemplating organising a drone meeting line in Russia for the Ukraine battle, whereas Russia was coaching Iranian pilots on the Sukhoi Su-35 fighter, with Iran probably receiving deliveries of the airplane inside the 12 months.
“These fighter planes will considerably strengthen Iran’s air drive relative to its regional neighbours,” Kirby mentioned.
Western powers have accused Iran of supplying drones to Russia for its struggle towards Ukraine, as Moscow batters the nation’s power infrastructure looking for a bonus within the bloody battle.
Kirby mentioned the US would sanction three Russian-based entities energetic in “the acquisition and use of Iranian drones”.
The sanctions apply to the Russian Aerospace Forces, the 924th State Centre for Unmanned Aviation and the Command of the Army Transport Aviation.
“The USA will proceed to make use of each instrument at our disposal to disrupt these transfers and impose penalties on these engaged on this exercise,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken mentioned in an announcement on the sanctions.
Final month, Tehran admitted it had despatched drones to Russia however insisted they have been equipped earlier than Moscow’s Ukraine invasion.
‘Sordid offers’
The US additionally believes Iran is contemplating the sale of “a whole bunch of ballistic missiles” to Russia, Kirby mentioned.
The UK’s overseas secretary James Cleverly took intention on the “sordid offers” between Moscow and Tehran, saying in an announcement that Iran had despatched drones to Russia in alternate for “navy and technical help” from Moscow.
This “will enhance the chance it poses to our companions within the Center East and to worldwide safety,” Cleverly mentioned, promising that “the UK will proceed to show this determined alliance and maintain each international locations to account”.
For its half, Moscow has accused the West of supplying weapons to Ukraine which might be ending up within the arms of dangerous actors, not solely in Europe but in addition in Africa and the Center East.
Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, referred to the current feedback by Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari who mentioned weapons and fighters from Ukraine have been making their strategy to the Lake Chad area and serving to violent teams.
Al Jazeera’s Kristen Saloomey mentioned the UK’s ambassador to the UN, Barbara Woodward, didn’t immediately handle Nebenzya’s claims, which have been made forward of a UN Safety Council assembly on Friday, however said that Ukraine had a proper to defend itself from Russia.
“She went on to say that the UK believes that purchasing weapons from Iran is in violation of worldwide agreements and past the drones, she alleged that Russia is now making an attempt to get ballistic missiles from Iran and likewise making an attempt to make offers with international locations like North Korea,” Saloomey mentioned, talking from the UN headquarters in New York.
‘Disappointing’ Merkel assertion
In the meantime, President Vladimir Putin mentioned that any nation that launches a nuclear assault on Moscow can be “worn out” and that Russian weapons may forcefully reply.
He additionally expressed his disappointment at former German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s current statements on Ukraine and on the Minsk agreements.
The events to the Minsk agreements, which led to a ceasefire deal between Ukraine and Russian-backed separatists in japanese Ukraine in 2014 and 2015, had betrayed Russia by supplying Ukraine with weapons, Putin mentioned.
In an interview printed in Germany’s Zeit journal on Wednesday, Merkel mentioned the Minsk agreements had been an try to “give Ukraine time” to construct up its defences.
Russia interpreted Merkel’s statements to imply that the Minsk peace plan was solely concluded to provide Ukraine time to arm itself and put together for struggle with Russia.
“Truthfully, this was completely surprising for me. It’s disappointing. I frankly didn’t count on to listen to one thing like this from the previous German chancellor,” Putin advised journalists in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
“I’ve all the time assumed that the management of the federal republic of Germany would behave sincerely in direction of us,” Putin mentioned.
“However it nonetheless appeared to me that the management of Germany was all the time honest in its efforts to discover a resolution based mostly on the ideas that we agreed on and that have been reached, amongst different issues, within the framework of the Minsk course of.”
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades