Connect with us

World

Ukraine war is backdrop in US push for hypersonic weapons

Published

on

Ukraine war is backdrop in US push for hypersonic weapons

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

Lagging behind Russia in growing hypersonic weapons, the U.S. Navy is dashing to subject its first, with set up on a warship beginning as quickly as late subsequent yr.

America is in a race with Russia and China to develop these weapons, which journey at speeds akin to ballistic missiles however are tough to shoot down due to their maneuverability.

The Russian army says it already deployed hypersonic missiles, claiming on each Saturday and Sunday to have fired them on targets in Ukraine, marking the weapon’s first use in fight. The Pentagon couldn’t verify a hypersonic weapon was used within the assaults.

US DOESN’T ‘SEEM PREPARED’ FOR POSSIBILITY THAT PUTIN USES NUCLEAR WEAPONS: EXPERT

Advertisement

The American army is accelerating growth to catch up.

The U.S. weapon would launch like a ballistic missile and would launch a hypersonic glide car that may attain speeds seven to eight instances quicker than the pace of sound earlier than hitting the goal.

In Maine, Normal Dynamics subsidiary Tub Iron Works has begun engineering and design work on adjustments vital to put in the weapon system on three Zumwalt-class destroyers.

The work would start at a yet-to-be-named shipyard someday in fiscal yr that begins in October 2023, the Navy stated.

A standard hypersonic glide physique (C-HGB) launching from the Pacific Missile Vary Facility, in Kauai, Hawaii, March 19, 2020, throughout a Division of Protection flight experiment.
(Luke Lamborn/U.S. Navy through AP)

Advertisement

Hypersonic weapons are outlined as something touring past Mach 5, or 5 instances quicker than the pace of sound. That’s about 3,800 mph (6,100 kph). Intercontinental ballistic missiles far exceed that threshold however journey in a predictable path, making it potential to intercept them.

The brand new weapons are maneuverable.

Current missile protection programs, together with the Navy’s Aegis system, would have hassle intercepting such objects as a result of maneuverability makes their motion unpredictable and pace leaves little time to react.

Russia says it has ballistic missiles that may deploy hypersonic glide autos in addition to a hypersonic cruise missile.

UKRAINIAN POLICE OFFICER PLEADS FOR HELP FROM BIDEN, MACRON, AS HIS CITY IS ‘WIPED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH’

Advertisement

The U.S. is “straining simply to catch up” as a result of it did not put money into the brand new expertise, with solely a fraction of the ten,000 individuals who have been engaged on this system within the Eighties, stated U.S. Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Tenn., who’s chair of a subcommittee that screens this system.

“If we wish to pursue parity, we might want to again this effort with extra money, time and expertise than we at the moment are,” he stated.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine serves as a backdrop because the Pentagon releases its price range proposal that lays out its objectives for hypersonics and different weapon programs later this month.

The three stealthy Zumwalt-class destroyers to be outfitted with the brand new weapons have loads of area to accommodate them – due to a design failure that works to the Navy’s benefit on this occasion.

The ships have been constructed round a gun system that was supposed to make use of GPS-guided, rocket-boosted projectiles to pound targets 90 miles (145 kilometers) away. However these projectiles proved to be too costly, and the Navy canceled the system, leaving every of the ships with a ineffective loading system and a pair of 155-mm weapons hidden in angular turrets.

Advertisement

RUSSIA CLAIMS TO HIT UKRAINE WITH HYPERSONIC MISSILE, EXPERT WARNS IT IS PART OF PUTIN’S ‘STRATEGIC PLAN’

The retrofit of all three ships will doubtless price greater than $1 billion however will give a brand new functionality to the tech-laden, electric-drive ships that already price the Navy $23.5 billion to design and construct, stated Bryan Clark, a protection analyst on the Hudson Institute.

“The engineering just isn’t that arduous. It’ll simply take money and time to make it occur,” Clark stated.

The Navy intends to subject the weapons on the destroyers within the 2025 fiscal yr and on Virginia-class nuclear-powered assault submarines within the 2028 fiscal yr, the Navy stated.

The Lyndon B. Johnson travels down the Kennebec River on its way to sea on Jan. 12, 2022, in Phippsburg, Maine. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, files)

The Lyndon B. Johnson travels down the Kennebec River on its strategy to sea on Jan. 12, 2022, in Phippsburg, Maine. (AP Picture/Robert F. Bukaty, recordsdata)

The destroyers can be primarily based within the Pacific Ocean, the place they might be a deterrent to China, ought to it turn out to be emboldened by Russia’s assault on Ukraine and contemplate attacking Taiwan, Clark stated.

Advertisement

The U.S. deal with hypersonic weapons represents a pivot after hesitating prior to now due to technological hurdles. Adversaries, in the meantime, continued analysis and growth.

Russia fired off a salvo of Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles in late December, heralding the completion of weapon testing.

RUSSIA STILL ‘LARGELY STALLED’ ACROSS UKRAINE: US DEFENSE OFFICIAL

However Russia could also be exaggerating the aptitude of such tremendous weapons to compensate for weak spot in different areas, stated Loren Thompson, a protection analyst on the Lexington Institute.

Advertisement

In the intervening time, Russia doesn’t have most of the weapons, and it’s unclear how efficient they’re, he stated.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending