World
Ukraine war is backdrop in US push for hypersonic weapons
NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Lagging behind Russia in growing hypersonic weapons, the U.S. Navy is dashing to subject its first, with set up on a warship beginning as quickly as late subsequent yr.
America is in a race with Russia and China to develop these weapons, which journey at speeds akin to ballistic missiles however are tough to shoot down due to their maneuverability.
The Russian army says it already deployed hypersonic missiles, claiming on each Saturday and Sunday to have fired them on targets in Ukraine, marking the weapon’s first use in fight. The Pentagon couldn’t verify a hypersonic weapon was used within the assaults.
US DOESN’T ‘SEEM PREPARED’ FOR POSSIBILITY THAT PUTIN USES NUCLEAR WEAPONS: EXPERT
The American army is accelerating growth to catch up.
The U.S. weapon would launch like a ballistic missile and would launch a hypersonic glide car that may attain speeds seven to eight instances quicker than the pace of sound earlier than hitting the goal.
In Maine, Normal Dynamics subsidiary Tub Iron Works has begun engineering and design work on adjustments vital to put in the weapon system on three Zumwalt-class destroyers.
The work would start at a yet-to-be-named shipyard someday in fiscal yr that begins in October 2023, the Navy stated.
Hypersonic weapons are outlined as something touring past Mach 5, or 5 instances quicker than the pace of sound. That’s about 3,800 mph (6,100 kph). Intercontinental ballistic missiles far exceed that threshold however journey in a predictable path, making it potential to intercept them.
The brand new weapons are maneuverable.
Current missile protection programs, together with the Navy’s Aegis system, would have hassle intercepting such objects as a result of maneuverability makes their motion unpredictable and pace leaves little time to react.
Russia says it has ballistic missiles that may deploy hypersonic glide autos in addition to a hypersonic cruise missile.
UKRAINIAN POLICE OFFICER PLEADS FOR HELP FROM BIDEN, MACRON, AS HIS CITY IS ‘WIPED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH’
The U.S. is “straining simply to catch up” as a result of it did not put money into the brand new expertise, with solely a fraction of the ten,000 individuals who have been engaged on this system within the Eighties, stated U.S. Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Tenn., who’s chair of a subcommittee that screens this system.
“If we wish to pursue parity, we might want to again this effort with extra money, time and expertise than we at the moment are,” he stated.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine serves as a backdrop because the Pentagon releases its price range proposal that lays out its objectives for hypersonics and different weapon programs later this month.
The three stealthy Zumwalt-class destroyers to be outfitted with the brand new weapons have loads of area to accommodate them – due to a design failure that works to the Navy’s benefit on this occasion.
The ships have been constructed round a gun system that was supposed to make use of GPS-guided, rocket-boosted projectiles to pound targets 90 miles (145 kilometers) away. However these projectiles proved to be too costly, and the Navy canceled the system, leaving every of the ships with a ineffective loading system and a pair of 155-mm weapons hidden in angular turrets.
RUSSIA CLAIMS TO HIT UKRAINE WITH HYPERSONIC MISSILE, EXPERT WARNS IT IS PART OF PUTIN’S ‘STRATEGIC PLAN’
The retrofit of all three ships will doubtless price greater than $1 billion however will give a brand new functionality to the tech-laden, electric-drive ships that already price the Navy $23.5 billion to design and construct, stated Bryan Clark, a protection analyst on the Hudson Institute.
“The engineering just isn’t that arduous. It’ll simply take money and time to make it occur,” Clark stated.
The Navy intends to subject the weapons on the destroyers within the 2025 fiscal yr and on Virginia-class nuclear-powered assault submarines within the 2028 fiscal yr, the Navy stated.
The destroyers can be primarily based within the Pacific Ocean, the place they might be a deterrent to China, ought to it turn out to be emboldened by Russia’s assault on Ukraine and contemplate attacking Taiwan, Clark stated.
The U.S. deal with hypersonic weapons represents a pivot after hesitating prior to now due to technological hurdles. Adversaries, in the meantime, continued analysis and growth.
Russia fired off a salvo of Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles in late December, heralding the completion of weapon testing.
RUSSIA STILL ‘LARGELY STALLED’ ACROSS UKRAINE: US DEFENSE OFFICIAL
However Russia could also be exaggerating the aptitude of such tremendous weapons to compensate for weak spot in different areas, stated Loren Thompson, a protection analyst on the Lexington Institute.
In the intervening time, Russia doesn’t have most of the weapons, and it’s unclear how efficient they’re, he stated.
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades