World
The EU plans to digitise and monetise its borders. Here’s how
The European Union’s plans to roll out a price and automated biometric scanning for non-EU travellers intention to safe the bloc’s border however have raised considerations about surveillance and potential delays.
The 2 methods Brussels needs to introduce would, as soon as energetic, monitor all non-EU travellers’ entry and exit to the bloc. It can additionally introduce a €7 price and pre-travel registration requirement for 1.4 billion individuals who beforehand loved visa-free feeless entry to the bloc.
The initiative comes after a earlier try and tighten EU border safety did not safe consensus among the many union’s 27 international locations.
Issues have additionally been raised over the price and delays of the EU’s new Entry and Exit System (EES) and European Journey Data and Authorisation System (ETIAS).
Regardless of the problem of introducing such methods, “the Fee attaches nice significance to the well timed supply of EES, ETIAS and SIS” (Schengen Data System), and goals to introduce the brand new system by the tip of 2023, a spokesperson instructed Euronews.
The EU’s Entry and Exit System
The EES will log the entry and exit of all non-EU travellers as they enter the bloc, in addition to refusal of entry.
Automated kiosks finishing up biometric registration will exchange bodily passport stamping, with travellers being subjected to a facial picture and fingerprinting of 4 fingers.
This EES knowledge will then be saved for 3 years, or 5 years in instances of people that overstay.
Presently, non-EU residents from visa-exempt international locations, together with British nationals post-Brexit, can solely spend 90 days inside any 180 days within the bloc with out requiring a visa.
Presently, there isn’t any method of realizing if a traveller has overstayed the allowed 90 days besides by trying on the dates of entry and exit stamps in an individual’s passport.
The Fee says this technique is gradual and error-prone, because the entry and exit stamps could also be unreadable or counterfeit.
Whereas some international locations, together with Spain, Portugal, and Cyprus, have launched nationwide entry and exit monitoring methods, these can’t monitor whether or not a non-EU nationwide leaves the EU by way of one other nation.
The overwhelming of border administration by irregular migration in recent times, which has allowed asylum seekers and migrants to journey onward inside the Schengen space, has additionally created tensions between EU international locations.
This is the reason the Fee believes an EU-wide EES system, which won’t apply to residents from the EU or Schengen space, is required.
A lot delayed and combined opinions
Regardless of this, the EES, its introduction and its price have confronted vital criticism; although criticism of any venture of its dimension and significance must be anticipated.
The EES was initially meant to launch in 2022, then postponed until Might 2023, and is now slated to be delivered by the tip of 2023.
Whereas the EU’s govt insists it is going to lower ready instances at borders, member states have wildly completely different opinions.
Some international locations, corresponding to Lithuania agree with the Fee, however many extra don’t.
Austria said in November that “the extra duties ensuing from the EES regulation will result in a pointy enhance in course of instances. Presently, we count on course of instances to double in comparison with the present scenario.”
This concern is shared by Germany, which mentioned that “passenger flows on the border crossing factors had been analysed in shut cooperation with the aviation trade. It’s estimated that management instances for passengers will enhance considerably by the introduction of EES.”
The scheme has additionally been criticised by digital rights NGOs, specialists, advocates and lecturers on the European Digital Rights (EDRi) group.
Chloé Berthélémy, Senior Coverage Advisor at EDRi referred to as for “the prohibition of biometric mass surveillance and different biometric surveillance practices that disproportionately curtail rights and freedoms.”
She additionally warned in opposition to “the securitisation of migration points and the strengthening of ‘Fortress Europe’” and the dangers posed by potential cyber assaults on centralised digital id databases.
Nonetheless, a Fee spokesperson instructed Euronews that “safeguards are in place to make sure the rights of travellers near to the safety of their non-public lives and private knowledge. Their private knowledge will solely be retained within the EES for so long as crucial and for the aim(s) for which it was collected.”
They insisted that the gathering of biometric knowledge can considerably cut back instances of mistaken id, discrimination, racial profiling, and other people trafficking in addition to countering severe crime and terrorism.
The EU’s ETIAS Scheme
The second scheme, ETIAS, which is being developed carefully with the EES and depends on knowledge supplied by the EES can be launched some months after the primary scheme.
ETIAS will see travellers from non-EU international locations who presently take pleasure in visa-exempt journey to the bloc pressured to use for EU journey authorisation and pay a €7 cost earlier than arriving.
The Fee states that greater than 95% of ETIAS purposes can be robotically accredited inside a couple of minutes of submission.
Except revoked, journey authorisations will final for 3 years and for a number of journeys to the bloc, after which stage travellers might want to reapply.
Australia, Canada, and the USA all have related schemes already in place.
The Fee argues that the price of the system, which is presently set to be launched in November, “ought to” be coated by the €7 price which can go to the EU’s funds.
In 2018, vacationer lodging institutions within the EU recorded 168 million arrivals from third international locations. If every one among these arrivals was a first-time journey to the EU and the ETIAS scheme had been in place, it will’ve generated over €1.1 billion in income.
Nonetheless, the eventual income can be a lot decrease than this determine. Firstly, these below 18 and over 70 do not need to pay the price and the price additionally covers a number of journeys over 3 years. So somebody who paid the price to go to Spain in 2024 wouldn’t should pay once more until 2027, even when visiting different EU locations.
World
NATO head and Trump meet in Florida for talks on global security
BRUSSELS (AP) — U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and the head of NATO have met for talks on global security, the military alliance said Saturday.
In a brief statement, NATO said Trump and its secretary general, Mark Rutte, met on Friday in Palm Beach, Florida.
“They discussed the range of global security issues facing the Alliance,” the statement said without giving details.
It appeared to be Rutte’s first meeting with Trump since his Nov. 5 election. Rutte had previously congratulated Trump and said “his leadership will again be key to keeping our Alliance strong” and that he looked forward to working with him.
Trump has for years expressed skepticism about the Western alliance and complained about the defense spending of many of its member nations, which he regarded as too low. He depicted NATO allies as leeches on the U.S. military and openly questioned the value of the alliance that has defined American foreign policy for decades. He threatened not to defend NATO members that fail to meet defense-spending goals.
Rutte and his team also met Trump’s pick as national security adviser, U.S. Rep. Michael Waltz, and other members of the president-elect’s national security team, the NATO statement said.
Rutte took over at the helm of NATO in October.
World
US scrambles as drones shape the landscape of war: 'the future is here'
FIRST ON FOX: The U.S. Army this week took steps to advance American military capabilities by ordering close to 12,000 surveillance drones small enough to fit in a backpack as the reality of battle shifts in favor of electronic warfare.
Conflicts around the globe, particularly the war in Ukraine, have drastically changed how major nations think about conducting war, explained drone expert and former U.S. Army intelligence and special operations soldier Brett Velicovich to Fox News Digital.
The nearly three-year-long war in Ukraine has often depicted scenes not witnessed since World War II, with children loaded onto trains, veins of trenches scarring the eastern front and renewed concern over how the geopolitics of this conflict could ensnare the entire Western world.
1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES
But Ukraine’s scrappy response to its often outnumbered and at times outgunned reality has completely changed how major nations look at the modern-day battlefield.
“Think about how we fought wars in the past,” Velicovich, a Fox News contributor, said, pointing to the Vietnam War. “When you were fighting the enemy over that trench line, you didn’t know who was over that hill. You saw a red hat and you fired at it.”
“Now you have the ability to see what’s over that hill and maneuver your forces quickly based on that,” he added.
A report by The Wall Street Journal this week said the U.S. Army secured potentially its largest-ever purchase of small surveillance drones from Red Cat Holding’s Utah-based Teal Drones.
This move is a significant step that the U.S. has been eyeing for more than a decade after terrorists first began employing small-drone tactics against the U.S. military in the Middle East.
According to Velicovich, who routinely visits Ukraine to advise on drone technology, the U.S. is trailing its top adversaries like Russia and China when it comes investment in drone capabilities.
US BRIEFED UKRAINE AHEAD OF PUTIN’S ‘EXPERIMENTAL INTERMEDIATE-RANGE BALLISTIC’ ATTACK
While the U.S. invested heavily in sophisticated systems like Predator and Reaper drones — which are multimillion-dollar systems designed for intelligence collection and lengthy navigation flight times and possess missile strike capabilities — it is the small, cheaply made unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) which are changing battlefield dynamics.
“These handheld, small UAS systems that you are able to take a drone with a bomb strapped to it [have become] basically an artillery shell now. It’s guided artillery shells,” Velicovich said in reference to Unmanned Aircraft Systems, which include not only the UAV, but also the controller manned from the ground. “Frankly, it’s changing how countries are going to fight wars in the future, and the U.S. has been so slow to get ahead of this.”
It has reportedly taken the U.S. Army some 15 years to start beefing up its Short Range Reconnaissance program with these backpack-sized drones, in part because there was a mental hurdle the Department of Defense needed to push through.
“It’s the mentality of senior leaders,” Velicovich explained. “These guys are hardened battle infantry guys. They didn’t grow up with fancy technology.”
“It really takes a lot of people understanding, changing their thought process. And that’s happening now because of the accelerating war in Ukraine, where they’ve seen how effective drones are,” he said, noting that drones can no longer be dismissed as gimmicks or toys of the future.
“Now it’s real. Now it’s here, the future is here,” Velicovich said. “We will never fight another war without drones.”
Teal Drones worked to develop a UAS system based on battlefield needs identified by the U.S. Army, and eventually created the drone that has been dubbed the Black Widow, explained Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson to Fox News Digital.
BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO ANNOUNCE $275 MILLION UKRAINE WEAPONS PACKAGE THIS WEEK
This sophisticated system is capable of being operated by a single man, can resist Russian jammers, has strike capabilities, and can fly in GPS-denied zones — an important factor that has been highlighted by the war in Ukraine.
“The Short Range Reconnaissance drone is really going to be able to help the warfighter be more lethal and be a safer soldier,” Thompson said.
The U.S. Army greenlighted the purchase of nearly 12,000 drones. Each soldier kitted out with the Black Widow technology will be given what is called a “system,” which includes two drones and one controller — all of which can fit in one’s rucksack.
Each system, including the drones and controller, costs the U.S. government about $45,000.
But, as Johnson pointed out, Ukraine’s armed forces are going through about 10,000 drones a month — which suggests the U.S. will need to acquire far more than 12,000 drones.
The war in Ukraine has shown that affordably made drones, particularly FPV drones, which stands for “first-person view,” can be made for as low as $1,000 a drone and frequently strapped with explosives and utilized as kamikaze drones.
But drone warfare is about significantly more than sheer quantity — it’s a “power game.”
“This is a cat and mouse game,” Velicovich said, explaining that drone and counter-drone technology, like jamming systems, are constantly evolving. “This is playing out at a level that most people don’t realize.”
“It’s like we were almost peering into the future,” he continued. “We are seeing what’s happening on the ground now, there in Ukraine, and eventually we’ll have to fight a war similar to it, and we just need to be ready.”
World
At least 11 killed and dozens injured in Israeli strikes on Beirut
The strikes came a day after heavy bombardment of Beirut’s southern suburbs and as heavy ground fighting between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants continues in southern Lebanon, with Israeli troops pushing further into the country.
At least 11 people were killed and dozens more injured after Israeli airstrikes devastated parts of central Beirut on Saturday – with diplomats scrambling to broker a ceasefire in the country.
The strike destroyed an eight-story building, leaving a crater in the ground, and was the fourth on the Lebanese capital in less than a week.
Lebanon’s civil defence said the death toll was provisional as emergency responders were still digging through the rubble looking for survivors.
A separate drone strike in the southern port city of Tyre killed one person and injured another, according to the country’s National News Agency.
Israel’s military did not issue a warning for residents to evacuate prior to the strikes in central Beirut and would not comment on those strikes or on the one in Tyre.
The news comes as heavy ground fighting between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants continues in southern Lebanon, with Israeli troops pushing farther from the border.
US envoy Amos Hochstein travelled to the region this week in an attempt to broker a ceasefire deal to end the more than 13 months of fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, which escalated into full-on war over the last two months.
More than 3,500 people have been killed and over 15,000 wounded by Israeli bombardment in Lebanon, according to the Lebanese health ministry. 1.2 million people, or a quarter of the Lebanese population, were reportedly displaced by the fighting.
On the Israeli side, about 90 soldiers and nearly 50 civilians have been killed by rockets, drones and missiles in northern Israel and in fighting in Lebanon.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science3 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology5 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle6 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World5 days ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government