World
Socialists elect Nicolas Schmit as lead candidate for EU elections
The Party of European Socialists (PES) has elected Nicolas Schmit as its lead candidate for the EU elections amid worries of a far-right surge.
Schmit, the current European Commissioner for jobs and social rights, received the mandate by acclamation on Saturday afternoon at the end of the party’s congress in Rome. The 70-year-old politician from Luxembourg led the internal race uncontested, as he was the only name put forward.
“We will not allow that Europe will take the path of austerity and social repression as it did during the financial crisis. This is the main argument, this why we want to win these elections, together, in all 27 member states,” Schmit told the audience at La Nuvola, on the outskirts of Rome, as he took the stage surrounded by young activists.
“I want voters to know that social democrats will keep fighting for all citizens and will respect their commitments and promises.”
As a result, Schmit will face off against his boss, Ursula von der Leyen, the lead candidate of the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP).
Both are part of the so-called Spitzenkandidaten system, under which the parties that take part in the elections to the European Parliament are supposed to select a top aspirant to preside the European Commission, the bloc’s most powerful and influential institution. Some groups follow the template, while others choose to ignore it.
The upcoming race, however, will be deeply uneven: Ursula von der Leyen is the indisputable frontrunner thanks to the strong reputation she has built throughout her first mandate at the Commission’s held, from which she spearheaded transformational policies to cope with climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the energy crisis and China’s assertive behaviour.
Schmit, for his part, has kept a low profile since his arrival in Brussels in 2019, when von der Leyen assigned him the portfolio of jobs and social rights. Among his most notable projects were the launch of a €100-billion programme for short-time work schemes during the coronavirus lockdowns and a directive to ensure minimum wages are set at “adequate levels.” His proposal to improve the conditions of platform workers, those who service apps like Uber, Deliveroo and Glovo, is currently stuck in negotiations among member states and is close to plunging into limbo.
Schmit’s cabinet is one of the teams overseeing the freezing of EU funds for Hungary over persistent rule-of-law deficiencies. The Commissioner faced the ire of the Parliament after the executive released €10.2 billion in cohesion funds for Budapest, despite the antagonistic attitude of Viktor Orbán, and pleas by civil society. As of today, Hungary is still denied access to roughly €21 billion in cohesion and recovery funds.
Speaking before the PES top ranks, including Germany’s Olaf Scholz, Spain’s Pedro Sánchez, Portugal’s António Costa and Denmark’s Mette Frederiksen, the anointed candidate attempted to build his power base and vowed to defend the party’s core values and priorities: labour rights, gender equality, climate action and social justice.
“We are the movement that fights against precariousness, especially the lives and jobs of young people,” he said. “We will fight for the Green Deal with a red heart.”
Still, Schmit has virtually no chance of taking over the Commission. The Socialists and Democrats (S&D), the group in the European Parliament that encompasses PES members, is projected to finish second at the June elections. The latest estimate by Europe Elects, a poll aggregator, shows a considerable distance between the S&D (from 154 seats in 2019 to 140 in 2024) and the EPP (from 182 to 180).
Asked about the recognisability gap between himself and von der Leyen, Schmit said he had a “lot of esteem” for the president but insisted “we’re both candidates.”
“We will see,” he said. “The campaign will start and then I invite everyone to judge.”
‘The very soul of Europe is at risk’
Even more worrying for socialists, the forecasts also predict a strong rise of hard-right and far-right parties, which would tilt the hemicycle decisively towards conservative ideas and away from the progressive causes that socialists favour.
During von der Leyen’s first mandate, the grand coalition between EPP, S&D and the liberals from Renew Europe proved instrumental to advance far-reaching, ambitious proposals to speed up the transition to climate neutrality, rein in the excesses in the digital world, reform the bloc’s migration and asylum policy, ensure continued financial support for Ukraine, ramp up domestic production of cutting-edge technology, and decrease dependencies on unreliable suppliers, like Russia and China.
But in the past year, the grand coalition began to wobble and shake, as the EPP adopted a more confrontational attitude against the Green Deal, one of von der Leyen’s flagship initiatives, claiming the multiple pieces of legislation approved to slash the bloc’s greenhouse gas emission have created excessive red tape for the private sector, made it harder to invest and risked the loss of competitiveness.
The fierce battle over the Nature Restoration Law, a regulation to gradually rehabilitate the EU’s degraded ecosystems, laid bare the simmering tension between conservatives and socialists, with bitter recriminations and finger-pointing. Although the EPP eventually lost that fight, it enabled the group to re-position itself as a “pro-business” and, particularly, a “pro-farmers party,” a stance that the recent protests have only reinforced.
Von der Leyen’s withdrawal of a contentious law to halve the use of chemical pesticides, an important source of nitrogen emissions, was warmly celebrated by EPP lawmakers last month. The move marked the first major defeat under the Green Deal.
In response to this ideological shift, socialists have ratcheted up their rhetoric, warning the EPP is moving away from the mainstream centre and normalising talking points of the extreme right for purely electoral purposes. The alliances struck between mainstream conservatives and hard-right formations in countries like Italy, Sweden and Finland are evidence of this increasingly blurred line, socialist leaders said at Rome.
In his speech, Schmit made it clear his political family will not cooperate with Identity and Democracy (ID) or the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), the two most Eurosceptic groups in the European Parliament. The candidate then asked the EPP and the liberals to “be coherent with yourself” and “stay faithful to your own history, to your European commitment” before striking any new alliances.
“We will fight those propagating hate and division in our societies, those who fuel fears and prepare the return of nationalism,” Schmit said. “The normalisation of the extreme right, as we have seen it in the Netherlands, is dangerous and irresponsible.”
A similar message was echoed by Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who spoke of “ghosts of the past” that are creeping over the European institutions and longing for a time that “never existed.”
“The far right is growing all over Europe, in many places supported by conventional right that is imitating its arguments and populist techniques,” Sánchez told the congress.
“The very soul of Europe is at risk. And once again, it’s up to us, the social democrats, to defeat that threat and ensure that history continues to advance in the right direction.”
Despite the difficult prospects ahead, socialists joined forces to reclaim their legacy, arguing the main policy responses provided to the most recent crises, including the €750-billion recovery fund and the joint procurement of coronavirus vaccines, had been inspired by social democracy and therefore justified the validity of their ideology.
“These elections are crucial for the future of Europe. It is up to us to provide progressive and fair solutions to the main challenges threatening our societies and our people,” said Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, referring to migrant smuggling, social dumping, corporate tax evasion and children poverty.
“Our next step is to demonstrate how our social democratic goals of social justice, economic (equality), green ambition and security go hand in hand.”
The elections to the European Parliament will be held between 6 and 9 June. About 350 million eligible voters will be called to cast their ballots across 27 member states.
In the immediate aftermath of the elections, EU leaders are expected to gather in a crucial summit to divvy up the bloc’s top jobs: president of the European Commission, president of the European Council and high representative for foreign and security policy.
With the Commission all but guaranteed to land on the EPP’s camp, socialists are aiming to secure the European Council’s presidency, currently occupied by Charles Michel, a liberal politician from Belgium.
This article has been updated with more information about the PES Congress.
World
The View Co-Host/Former Trump Staffer Alyssa Farah Griffin Reveals She Voted for Kamala Harris — Watch Her Explain Why
ad
World
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fires Defense Minister Yoav Gallant
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has fired his defense minister, Yoav Gallant, the Israeli leader announced Tuesday.
Netanyahu cited significant differences between their views on how to proceed in Gaza and Lebanon, as well as a lack of trust between the pair. Netanyahu’s office shared a letter, written in Hebrew, that was delivered to Gallant on Tuesday notifying him of his removal.
“Over the past few months, this trust has cracked between me and the Minister of Defense. Significant gaps were discovered between me and Gallant in the management of the military campaign, and these gaps were accompanied by statements and actions that contradict the decisions of the government and the decisions of the cabinet,” he said, according to a translation from Hebrew.
Netanyahu later announced that Minister Israel Katz would replace Gallant as defense minister.
“The security of the State of Israel always was, and will always remain my life’s mission,” Gallant said in a statement Tuesday.
IRAN AND RUSSIA CLOSE IN ON DEAL AS TEHRAN THREATENS REVENGE AGAINST ISRAEL
Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid condemned Gallant’s firing in a statement.
“Netanyahu is selling out Israel’s security and the IDF’s fighters for [his own] disgraceful political survival. The ultra-right-wing government prefers the [draft] dodgers over the those who serve,” Lapid accuses — calling on his party’s supporters and “all Zionist patriots to take to the streets tonight in protest,” she wrote on social media.
Israeli NGO The Movement for Quality Government in Israel echoed Lapid’s condemnation, calling the move a “serious blow to national security.”
The move comes as Israel is engaged in multiple conflicts, fighting Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, as well as exchanging long-range blows with Iran.
Netanyahu warned Iran last week that Israel may target Tehran’s nuclear program if the country moves forward with another attack on Israel.
“The supreme objective that I have set for the IDF and the security services is to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons,” Netanyahu said while speaking at a course graduation ceremony for soldiers in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). “Halting the nuclear program has been – and remains – our chief concern.”
ISRAEL CEASE-FIRE PLAN FOR LEBANON SEEKS TO BYPASS UN, AS US MEDIATORS TRAVEL TO JERUSALEM FOR TALKS
“I have not taken, we have not taken, and we will not take, our eyes off this objective,” he added.
Netanyahu’s suggestion that Israel could next target Iranian nuclear facilities is in line with other comments made by the IDF that vowed to escalate its attack “capabilities” and target hit list should Iran follow through with another attack on the Jewish state.
The U.S. – Israel’s chief ally in its fight against Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran – has repeatedly warned Jerusalem against hitting Iran’s energy infrastructure, in particular, its nuclear and oil facilities, out of concern it could prompt an outright regional war.
Reports from last week suggested that Iran could be waiting until after the U.S. presidential election.
Fox News’ Caitlin McFall contributed to this report.
World
Fact Check: Would Donald Trump force states to monitor women’s pregnancies?
EXPLAINER
Kamala Harris often claims that a Trump administration would interfere with pregnancies. But is that really true?
By
Published On 5 Nov 2024
On multiple occasions in her closing pitch to voters, Vice President Kamala Harris said her opponent, former President Donald Trump, would intrude on women’s pregnancies.
As she denounced Trump’s record on reproductive rights, she said on October 29 that he would “force states to monitor women’s pregnancies”. She urged listeners to “Google Project 2025 and read the plans for yourself”, referring to a conservative policy blueprint assembled by some of Trump’s supporters.
Harris repeated the line the following night at a rally in Madison, Wisconsin.
Harris’s statement echoed a similar one by her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who said that Project 2025 would require women to “register with a new federal agency when you get pregnant”.
The Harris campaign again pointed to Project 2025 when asked for evidence of Harris’s claim.
Project 2025 is a policy blueprint for the next Republican administration developed by Trump’s allies, including The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, and at least 140 people who worked in the Trump administration. It is not a Trump campaign document.
Project 2025 does not call on states or the federal government to monitor pregnancies from the moment they are discovered. The plan would call for more comprehensive monitoring of pregnancies that end in foetal death, such as abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths, than the US government currently requires.
The manual proposes stronger state-based abortion data as part of its broader push to refashion the Health and Human Services Department into a “Department of Life”.
Project 2025 proposes the federal government withhold money from states that do not report more detailed abortion data to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The document calls for the Health and Human Services Department to “use every available tool, including the cutting of funds”, to ensure states report the following:
- The number of abortions within their borders.
- The weeks of gestation the abortion took place.
- The reason for the abortion.
- The pregnant woman’s state of residence.
- The method of the abortion.
It says these statistics should be separated by category, including spontaneous miscarriage, treatments that incidentally result in foetal death (such as chemotherapy), stillbirths and induced abortion.
Currently, states are not required to submit abortion data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the majority do, except for California, Maryland and New Hampshire. To collect individual state data, most state vital statistics agencies have designed a form that abortion providers use for reporting.
Harris’s statements in recent days have become less specific and even less accurate than in her speech at the Democratic National Convention. Then, she said Trump “plans to create a national anti-abortion coordinator and force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions”. That is not true.
Trump has distanced himself from Project 2025 in recent months, and he has not called for monitoring pregnancy outcomes or pregnancies broadly.
When Trump was asked in April whether states should monitor or punish women who have illegal abortions, Trump said some states “might” choose to do that but maintained that it was up to them.
Our ruling
Harris said Trump would “force states to monitor women’s pregnancies”.
The claim is wrong on two counts. Trump has not proposed forcing states to monitor pregnancies. It is also not an accurate depiction of a Project 2025 policy proposal.
Project 2025 recommends the federal government require states to report complete data on pregnancies that end in foetal death and to use federal funding as leverage to ensure compliance.
This data would reflect certain pregnancy outcomes, including abortions, miscarriages and stillbirths. It would not involve the government tracking the progress of all pregnancies from start to finish.
The statement is inaccurate. We rate it false.
-
News1 week ago
Sikh separatist, targeted once for assassination, says India still trying to kill him
-
Culture1 week ago
Freddie Freeman wallops his way into World Series history with walk-off slam that’ll float forever
-
Technology1 week ago
When a Facebook friend request turns into a hacker’s trap
-
Business4 days ago
Carol Lombardini, studio negotiator during Hollywood strikes, to step down
-
Health5 days ago
Just Walking Can Help You Lose Weight: Try These Simple Fat-Burning Tips!
-
Business4 days ago
Hall of Fame won't get Freddie Freeman's grand slam ball, but Dodgers donate World Series memorabilia
-
Business1 week ago
Will Newsom's expanded tax credit program save California's film industry?
-
Culture3 days ago
Yankees’ Gerrit Cole opts out of contract, per source: How New York could prevent him from testing free agency