Connect with us

News

Zuckerberg grilled about Meta’s strategy to target ‘teens’ and ‘tweens’

Published

on

Zuckerberg grilled about Meta’s strategy to target ‘teens’ and ‘tweens’

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives at the Los Angeles Superior Court ahead of the social media trial tasked to determine whether social media giants deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive to children on Feb. 18, 2026. Zuckerberg is scheduled to testify Wednesday.

Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg was clearly getting testy.

“That’s not what I’m saying at all,” said the tech billionaire. “I think you’re misunderstanding what I’m saying,” Zuckerberg responded. “You’re mischaracterizing what I’m saying,” he shot back.

The executive was testifying on Wednesday before a jury in Los Angeles in a marquee social media trial accusing Meta of deliberately designing features of Instagram to addict children, and the legal team for the family suing was intent on showing that Zuckerberg’s fingerprints were all over the company’s big decisions.

Advertisement

Mark Lanier, a Texas trial lawyer and pastor with a folksy courtroom demeanor, directed Zuckerberg’s attention to a 2020 internal Meta document showing that 11-year-olds were four times as likely to keep coming back to Facebook, compared to older users. Instagram’s minimum age for signing up is 13.

“People who join Facebook at 11 years old? Lanier asked Zuckerberg. “I thought y’all didn’t have any of those?”

Lanier then went over Meta internal documents highlighting goals to increase the time 10-year-olds spend on Instagram.

“I don’t remember the context of this email from more than ten years ago,” Zuckerberg said. “I think the way we should build things is to build useful services for people to connect with their family and friends and learn about the world.”

One 2018 internal Meta document stated “If we wanna win big with teens, we must bring them in as tweens,” Lanier pointed out, saying that undercut Meta’s own policies.

Advertisement

The legal team representing the plaintiff, a 20-year-old California woman known in court documents as “Kaley,” attempted to demonstrate that the top-down goal of Meta has always been to encourage users to get on their platforms as young as possible, and once there, to figure out ways to keep them around. Often features like “beauty filters,” made the app more alluring, Lanier argued.

When the company hired experts who affirmed that such appearance-enhancing filters contributed to body-image issues among young girls, Zuckerberg would not dispense with the filters tools, calling getting rid of them was “paternalistic.”

Under questioning in court, the billionaire Facebook founder responded: “What we allowed was letting people use those filters if they wanted but deciding not to recommend them to people,” he said. “So that was the balance we came to to let people express themselves the way they want.”

Kaley, who’s also identified as KGM in court documents, often used these filters, which her lawsuit says contributed to body dysmorphia and other mental health issues.

Had Zuckerberg looked at Kaley’s Instagram posts before the trial, Lanier asked? His staff had shown him some, he responded.

Advertisement
Files are brought inside the Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb 18, 2026 as part of a major trial involving Meta and Google over whether their products harm young people.

Files are brought inside the Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb 18, 2026 as part of a major trial involving Meta and Google over whether their products harm young people.

Jill Connelly/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jill Connelly/Getty Images

Advertisement

That’s when Lanier, who is known for orchestrating spectacles at trial, had five lawyers unspool a roughly 20-foot collage of hundreds of photos that Kaley posted to Instagram. Lanier implored Zuckerberg to dwell on the posts. Other observers in the room, including the media, were not able to see the photos.

When it was time for Meta’s lawyer to ask Zuckerberg questions, he emphasized that the company does not have an incentive for people to have harmful experiences on its services.

“From a business perspective, people think if we maximize the amount of attention people spend, that that’s good for us,” Zuckerberg said. “But if people feel like they’re not having a good experience, why would they keep using the product?”

Keeping users safe, especially teen users, has always been a priority, Zuckerberg said.

Advertisement

“Questions about well-being I consider part of this for sure,” he said. “If you build a community and people don’t feel safe, that’s not sustainable and eventually people go and join another community.”

1,600 other plaintiffs

The appearance of Zuckerberg, the star witness of the trial, came in the second week of what’s expected to be a six-week proceeding. Other tech executives, social media specialists, addiction experts and others have also testified.

Kaley, the plaintiff, is expected to deliver the most emotional testimony later in the trial. Her lawsuit claims she began using social media at age 6, including YouTube, Instagram, TikTok and Snap. After becoming hooked on the platforms, she said her body image issues, depression and suicidal thoughts worsened. The suit points to features like beauty filters, infinite scroll and auto-play as being tantamount to a “digital casino.” Evidence of the harms of these features were concealed from the public, the lawsuit says.

Julianna Arnold, whose daughter died from fentanyl she bought from someone on Instagram, talks about watching Mark Zuckerberg testify outside the Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb. 18, 2026.

Julianna Arnold, whose daughter died from fentanyl she bought from someone on Instagram, talks about watching Mark Zuckerberg testify outside the Los Angeles Superior Court on Feb. 18, 2026.

Jill Connelly/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Jill Connelly/Getty Images

In response, Meta and Google, which owns YouTube, have said the accusations over-simplify the complexity of adolescent mental health issues. The companies argue social media use does not directly cause young people to be mentally unwell, so they should not be held legally liable for a user’s mental health struggles.

Advertisement

Kaley’s legal team called expert witnesses who described multiple studies linking regular social media use with worsening depression, anxiety and body image issues.

The jury will determine to what degree social media platforms should be held legally culpable for plaintiff Kaley’s struggles. The trial is a bellwether case tied to 1,600 similar suits filed by families and school districts. How the jury decides is expected to influence settlement talks in all those pending cases.

While debates about social media addiction have raged for decades, it has taken until now for a major trial on the issue to unfold largely due to a federal legal shield that has protected Silicon Valley. A law known as Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act has allowed tech companies to fend off lawsuits over what users post to their sites. Social media firms have also won legal battles, including a key Supreme Court case, that have found how companies curate content on platforms is a type of protected free speech.

Despite these protections, the plaintiff’s lawyers in the Los Angeles case found a way to legally attack tech giants: by treating social media apps as unsafe products, viewing Instagram, YouTube and other services as defective under product liability law. The argument is that tech companies deliberately designed social media sites as harmful and dismissed internal warnings that the services could be problematic for teenagers.

The jury will ultimately have to assess Zuckerberg’s credibility, which was under attack on Wednesday.

Advertisement

Lanier, Kaley’s lawyer, brought up an internal document showing how Meta communications staffers have pushed Zuckerberg to portray himself as more “human” and “relatable,” and “empathetic, and less “fake,” and “corporate,” and “cheesy.”

When questioned about his performance in various other public settings, whether in courtrooms or before Congress, Zuckerberg showed some humility.

He said: “I think I’m known to actually be pretty bad at this,” which drew some laughter from the courtroom.

News

Reflections on America’s 250th birthday

Published

on

Reflections on America’s 250th birthday

The nation’s capital may be the focal point of the 250th Independence Day celebration, but people all across America have plans to mark the occasion, from boisterous public parades to quiet personal reflections on history.

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

As the United States turns 250 years old, Americans across the country are spending the holiday thinking about what the big birthday means to them, with reflections and celebrations as diverse as the nation itself.

NPR’s member station reporters fanned out to collect snapshots of the occasion from sea to shining sea.

In one ‘City of Presidents,’ Main Street is decorated for a party

At least two cities in the U.S.call themselves the “City of Presidents” and Cuba City, in Wisconsin, is one of them, largely due to its patriotic Main Street decorations. Every year from Memorial Day through Veteran’s Day, red, white, and blue shields, one for each U.S. president, are prominently displayed high up on the light poles lining Main Street.

Advertisement

It’s a tradition that began in 1976 to commemorate the country’s bicentennial, says Donna Rogers, who is president of the ongoing project but admitted that when it first started, she wasn’t particularly tuned-in to the display.

“I was raising three little boys and working at John Deere, so I didn’t really pay too much attention to community service at that time,” she said.

Donna Rogers shows off one of Cuba City's presidential lampposts.

Donna Rogers shows off one of Cuba City’s presidential lampposts.

Susan Bence/WUWM


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Susan Bence/WUWM

A few years later, she was tapped to help keep the initiative alive.

When she thinks of the country’s history, she says the signing of the Declaration of Independence and abolition of slavery top her list, plus a current event–

Advertisement

“Of course, now, our nation’s 250th birthday. I think those three would be the three most important things in history to me,” she said, quickly adding “[the] right for women to vote, don’t forget that, right?”

Rogers and Cuba City are pulling out all the stops for the 250th, with a parade and a mac-and-cheese festival, because “that was some of our founding fathers favorite foods, along with turkey and cranberries and other items.”

She laughed and admitted she googled that. True or not, Rogers says they’ll go all-out to celebrate the 250th in her “City of Presidents”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Family-owned company prepares to put on the largest fireworks display in history: “It is the biggest show that we’ve ever done”

Published

on

Family-owned company prepares to put on the largest fireworks display in history: “It is the biggest show that we’ve ever done”

Washington — There are fireworks, and then there’s what’s in store for Saturday in Washington, D.C.

When the sun goes down on Independence Day, the skies of Washington are expected to fill with a record-setting 850,000 individual fireworks for a 40-minute spectacle like no one has seen before.

A company called Pyrotecnico will attempt the biggest fireworks show in history, using five generations of family know-how and a background in Super Bowls and large musical acts to help America celebrate its 250th birthday with a bang.

“I mean, it is the biggest show that we’ve done,” Rocco Vitale, president of Pyrotecnico, told CBS News. “…My earliest memories of fireworks displays and doing the Fourth of July was here.”

Pyrotecnico has been planning this year’s show since January, using computers to simulate the display. But now it’s time for the real thing.

Advertisement

Vitale gave CBS News an exclusive look at his not-so-secret weapons: eight barges out on the Potomac River, each one ready to light up the night sky.
 
“Each firing location has a communication device, and its all set on GPS. And once the time of the show is put into the system, it goes at that time,” Vitale explained.

According to Freedom 250, the organizer of the “Salute to America 250 Celebration & Fireworks” on the National Mall, President Trump will deliver remarks at 9:45 p.m. Eastern Time, and the fireworks display will get underway at 10:45 p.m. The event is expected to draw hundreds of thousands of people.


Join CBS for “The Great American Block Party 250,” a primetime special on Saturday, July 4, hosted by CBS Evening News anchor Tony Dokoupil and Entertainment Tonight’s Nischelle Turner, featuring live musical performances, celebrations around the country, and the largest fireworks show in history in the skies over the nation’s capital. Tune in July 4 at 8 p.m. ET on CBS and stream it on Paramount+ and CBS News 24/7.

Continue Reading

News

Oregon ER doctors win a ‘David and Goliath’ battle against a national company

Published

on

Oregon ER doctors win a ‘David and Goliath’ battle against a national company

A national physician staffing firm tried to take over the contract held by Eugene Emergency Physicians to work in local hospitals. The local physicians used a new state law to oppose the move.

sorbetto/Digital Vision Vectors/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

sorbetto/Digital Vision Vectors/Getty Images

For the latest stories on the science of healthy living, subscribe to NPR’s Health newsletter.

In between shifts in the emergency room, Dr. Dan McGee was in an Oregon courtroom. He was fighting for his practice — Eugene Emergency Physicians (EEP). The group of more than 40 doctors and physician assistants work at multiple emergency departments; it was being replaced by a national company.

“This was big time, David and Goliath stuff,” McGee said. “You see 14 of their lawyers sitting there and you see three of ours.”

Advertisement

Those lawyers argued that ApolloMD, the national company, violated Oregon’s corporate practice of medicine law. The 2025 law bans corporations from taking control of a medical practice’s operations and finances.

The case garnered national interest because Oregon’s new law targets the loopholes large staffing firms have been employing to circumvent state corporate medicine laws.

Money for control

Most states have laws requiring that doctors own medical practices, not corporations. These rules aim to put patient interests ahead of profit motives. Over the last several years, companies have used a model where a doctor technically owns the local practice, but as Erin Fuse Brown, a professor at Brown University, explains, those physician owners are often not involved in care and cede hiring, firing and other operational functions to the corporation.

Fuse Brown said these arrangements are attractive to hospitals because these companies often promise more revenue and take over the responsibilities that come with running an ER.

“There’s worry that these investors or these corporate management companies should not be totally controlling the operations and the clinical decisions of those who are trained to deliver patient care,” Fuse Brown said.

Advertisement

The connection to patient care concerned Dr. Jonas Pologe, who works for Eugene Emergency Physicians, in the Eugene, Ore., area. ApolloMD offered local doctors jobs, but Pologe worried that if he pushed back on decisions ApolloMD made, he could lose work hours.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending