Connect with us

World

‘Sacrifice zone’: The fight to prevent Canadian corporate abuses

Published

on

‘Sacrifice zone’: The fight to prevent Canadian corporate abuses

Montreal, Canada – Enzo Brizuela describes his hometown as a “sacrifice zone”.

The 33-year-old geologist was born, raised and lives in Andalgala, a small city in Argentina’s mineral-rich province of Catamarca, close to the northwestern border with Chile. He says the world is residence to a quiet inhabitants that primarily lives off agriculture and cattle-herding.

It’s also the place a bunch of mining corporations, led by a Canadian agency, is hoping to dig up thousands and thousands of ounces of copper and gold – one thing Brizuela and plenty of of his neighbours concern will contaminate water sources and hurt the setting.

“We dwell in a sacrifice zone,” Brizuela informed Al Jazeera in a latest interview over Zoom. “However I’m proud to say that Andalgala can be [home to] a powerful and decided individuals, as a result of we’ve been opposed to those large-scale mining [proposals] since 1970.”

The most recent of a number of tasks developed within the Andalgala space in the course of the previous many years, the MARA open-air mine is within the superior exploration part. Canadian agency Yamana Gold – which is being acquired by a South African firm – presently owns 56.25 p.c of the challenge, whereas Swiss-Anglo firm Glencore and Newmont Corp, a US agency, personal the remaining.

Advertisement

The businesses stated on the challenge web site that they’ve obtained administrative and judicial permits, and that they’re taking neighborhood considerations under consideration to make sure “actually accountable, sustainable and revolutionary mining”.

However neighborhood advocates have stated a number of dozen individuals have been detained within the context of their opposition to mining within the area throughout greater than a decade, together with for protests in opposition to the MARA challenge. Most just lately, some have been accused of setting hearth to native firm places of work – an allegation they stated is unfounded.

A spokesperson for Yamana Gold declined Al Jazeera’s request for remark.

Brizuela, who stated he’s going through 4 felony complaints together with the burning of the workplace, informed Al Jazeera {that a} crackdown on human rights defenders was beneath method – and getting worse. “The activists which are working exhausting to attempt to … channel the details about the dangers of mega-mining are being persecuted and struggling violence,” he stated. “That is clearly a marketing campaign of concern.”

Advertisement

World footprint

For years, Canadian corporations have been accused of being complicit in, or failing to research or stop, alleged rights abuses and environmental harms of their operations exterior of the nation.

Corporations in Canada’s extremely worthwhile mining sector, specifically, have borne a lot of the criticism: Human rights teams have documented a variety of abuses, together with rape, assault, killings and slavery, in addition to air pollution linked to Canadian mining actions all over the world.

Whereas these allegations usually are not new, a marketing campaign to stress Ottawa to do extra is gaining momentum as activists and environmental defenders are going through a surge in lethal violence and threats globally.

“The federal government of Canada must resolve if it’s going to proceed to path behind and drag its toes and let corporations function with impunity, or if it’s going to do one thing to rein in company abuse,” stated Emily Dwyer, coverage director on the Canadian Community on Company Accountability.

Canada “is residence to nearly half of the world’s publicly listed mining and mineral exploration corporations”, Pure Assets Canada, a federal ministry, stated on its web site, whereas their work overseas accounts for many of the income. In 2020, 730 Canadian mining and exploration corporations had property in 97 overseas nations valued at $150bn (188.2 billion Canadian {dollars}), the ministry reported.

Advertisement

The USA was atop the checklist of nations residence to essentially the most Canadian mining corporations in 2020 at 21.3 p.c, whereas Chile, Panama, Brazil and Peru rounded out the highest 5. Zambia got here in subsequent with 5 p.c, adopted by Mexico, Argentina, Mali and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

In 2019, Canada created the workplace of the Canadian Ombudsperson for Accountable Enterprise (CORE), a put up tasked with monitoring the implementation of United Nations and OECD pointers on enterprise practices involving Canadian corporations within the garment, mining and oil and gasoline sectors. The workplace has the ability to advise corporations, assessment allegations of rights abuses, and make suggestions for redress, together with an apology or monetary compensation.

It additionally launched a web-based complaints submission system final 12 months. “It is a essential step ahead in our mission to assist promote and defend human rights and Canada’s repute on the earth,” the ombudsperson, Sheri Meyerhoffer, stated in a press release in March 2021. “Our new on-line portal is a simple method for individuals and communities overseas to boost points and considerations.”

CORE says it assessed the admissibility of 16 complaints between April 1 and the tip of June. Two different complaints have been closed in that interval – one as a result of inadequate info offered by the complainant, and the opposite as a result of the events resolved the difficulty – whereas it additionally obtained 45 inquiries, most of which fell exterior the scope of its duties.

Advertisement

However rights advocates have slammed the workplace as toothless.

“The workplace isn’t unbiased from authorities … and it doesn’t have actual powers to independently examine,” Dwyer informed Al Jazeera. “The powers that it wants [include] the ability to compel paperwork and testimony, in any other case it’s very difficult to count on that that workplace will have the ability to get on the info that it wants to research.”

She added that Canada has continued to primarily depend on “voluntary approaches” to reply to abuse allegations, resembling offering recommendation to corporations and providing mediation, for instance. “However we’re hopeful to see some motion quickly in a special course,” Dwyer stated.

Legislative proposals

A spokesman for World Affairs Canada, the overseas affairs ministry, informed Al Jazeera that the federal government anticipated Canadian corporations working overseas “to abide by all related legal guidelines, to respect human rights of their operations, and to undertake finest practices and internationally revered pointers on accountable enterprise conduct”.

Advertisement

The Canadian Ombudsperson for Accountable Enterprise (CORE) “ought to be given enough time to ship on her present mandate”, James Emmanuel Wanki additionally stated in an e-mail. “As soon as it turns into absolutely operational, it might be able to tackle circumstances. Using a non-judicial mechanism such because the CORE doesn’t preclude individuals from pursuing civil treatments earlier than Canadian courts,” Wanki stated.

In the meantime, the federal government has sought to strengthen safeguards associated to Canadian provide chains and different enterprise practices. For instance, in June, the Home of Commons unanimously consented to a second studying of a invoice that may prohibit Canada from importing items produced with pressured or youngster labour.

Invoice S-211, which was despatched to committee for additional assessment, additionally would require authorities and personal entities to submit annual reviews on measures taken “to forestall and scale back the chance that pressured labour or youngster labour is utilized by them or of their provide chains” and provides the minister of public security and emergency preparedness the ability to compel an entity to offer info.

“Unanimous consent at this stage is a transparent signal that the Home understands the significance of this difficulty,” Seamus O’Regan, Canada’s federal minister of labour, tweeted after the second studying in parliament on June 1.

Federal politicians additionally launched two items of laws in late March that respectively intention to determine a commissioner put up with the ability to compel testimony and paperwork in investigations into company abuses, in addition to make corporations accountable for any failures to make sure their practices don’t trigger human rights violations, amongst different issues. Human rights and non secular teams have urged members of parliament to again these payments to make sure larger accountability.

Advertisement

Entry to justice

But, whereas just a few civil circumstances have established that victims can search redress in Canada for abuses linked to corporations’ work overseas, rights advocates have stated makes an attempt to hunt accountability in Canadian courts stay time-consuming and dear.

In 2019, a Canadian mining firm publicly apologised to Guatemalan protesters who had sued in Canada, and acknowledged that their rights have been infringed upon when safety brokers injured demonstrators on the agency’s mine in Guatemala. The case was hailed as a landmark that confirmed that “Canadian courts are the suitable discussion board for human rights claims arising from the overseas actions of Canadian mining corporations”, Joe Fiorante, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, stated on the time.

Advertisement

A 12 months later, Canada’s Supreme Courtroom dominated {that a} Canadian firm that owned a mine in Eritrea may very well be sued in Canada. The choice got here after three Eritrean staff sued Nevsun Assets Ltd, alleging that they have been pressured to work on the mine and subjected to “violent, merciless, inhuman and degrading therapy”. The corporate later settled out of courtroom, Amnesty Worldwide stated.

Canada’s Supreme Courtroom dominated in 2020 {that a} Canadian mining agency may very well be sued in Canada for pressured labour and different abuses that allegedly passed off at a mine it owned in Eritrea [File: Thomas Mukoya/Reuters]

Nonetheless, Dwyer stated regardless of these precedent-setting rulings, “there has nonetheless not been a single case … that has gone by the Canadian courtroom system the place an organization has been discovered accountable for abuse”.

“What’s really wanted is an obligation to forestall human rights violations from taking place all through an organization’s provide chains, an obligation on corporations to do due diligence – to take measures to establish, mitigate, deal with and treatment abuses and dangers which are in your provide chain – and actual enforcement of these obligations by entry to Canadian courts,” she stated.

In the meantime, again in Argentina, Brizuela stated his neighborhood’s battle will proceed.

“We’re combating in order that our subsequent generations have the pure setting similar to we had,” he informed Al Jazeera. “We wish to preserve the water in order that it’s pure, to preserve the air – as a result of that’s how we inherited it. We wish to give them a spot referred to as Andalgala.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Video: How Internet Access Is Transforming Life in This Amazon Tribe

Published

on

Video: How Internet Access Is Transforming Life in This Amazon Tribe

Since September, the Marubo, an isolated Amazon tribe, were connected to high-speed internet through Elon Musk’s Starlink. Jack Nicas, The New York Times’s Brazil bureau chief, visited the tribe’s remote Indigenous villages to see what the internet has changed for them.

Continue Reading

World

Russia not 'bluffing' with nuclear threats as Biden greenlights limited military strikes, Medvedev says

Published

on

Russia not 'bluffing' with nuclear threats as Biden greenlights limited military strikes, Medvedev says

A senior ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin says Russia is not bluffing about using tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine and warned that the conflict could spill over into other countries.

Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of the Security Council of Russia, made the comments after President Biden quietly authorized Kyiv to launch U.S.-supplied weapons at military targets just over the border in Russia that are supporting an offensive against the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv.

“This is, alas, neither intimidation nor bluffing,” Medvedev said Friday, speaking on the potential to use strategic nuclear weapons, per Reuters.

UKRAINE SEEKS TO STRIKE RUSSIAN TARGETS WITH WESTERN WEAPONS, ZELENSKYY SAYS

Dmitry Medvedev, a senior ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, says Russia is not bluffing about using tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine and warned that the conflict could spill over into other countries. President Biden, left, quietly authorized Kyiv to launch U.S.-supplied weapons at military targets just over the border. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images  |  Photo by Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Russia has been using staging locations just across the border to enable its attacks against Ukraine and Biden has given Ukraine the go-ahead to use American weaponry to hit back at Russian forces hitting them or preparing to hit them. Germany has also backed the move.

The White House says the policy is limited and prohibits the use of army tactical missile systems (ATACMS) or long-range strikes inside Russia. 

In March, the U.S. quietly delivered long-range ATACMS to Ukraine for the first time – which the Ukrainians have since deployed against Russian military forces inside Ukraine.

Medvedev said Friday that “Russia regards all long-range weapons used by Ukraine as already being directly controlled by servicemen from NATO countries.”

“This is no military assistance, this is participation in a war against us. And such actions could well become a casus belli (an act that provokes a war),” Medvedev said Friday, per Reuters. 

Advertisement

Medvedev, who served as Russian president from 2008 and 2012, said that the West’s ongoing support of Ukraine could lead to an escalation of the 27-month-old full-scale invasion.

“The current military conflict with the West is developing according to the worst possible scenario. There is a constant escalation when it comes to the firepower of NATO weapons being used. Therefore, nobody today can rule out the conflict’s transition to its final stage,” Medvedev said.

KYIV’S FORCES ARE UP AGAINST A CONCERTED RUSSIAN PUSH IN EASTERN UKRAINE, A MILITARY OFFICIAL SAYS

Dmitry Medvedev

Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of the Security Council of Russia, speaks during an interview with Russian media at a residence outside Moscow, Russia, on March 23, 2023. (Sputnik/Yekaterina Shtukina/Pool via REUTERS)

The comments come as depleted Ukrainian troops are losing ground in the war – and just weeks after the U.S. agreed to send an extra $60 billion in aid to the war-torn country. In the border region of Kharkiv, Ukraine has endured a Russian onslaught this month that has stretched Kyiv’s outgunned and outmanned forces.

The White House says that Russia’s forward progress has stalled and that Russia will not be able to capture Kharkiv. 

Advertisement

Russia has only moved forward by a few kilometers and its forces are under relentless barrage by the Ukrainians and suffering at an extraordinary cost, the White House tells Fox News. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday that it’s only a matter of time before Ukraine utilizes the Western weaponry to strike Russian territory.

The developments and threats of escalation came just weeks after Gen. Charles Brown, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said NATO military trainers will eventually be sent to Ukraine, according to a report in the New York Times.

Ukrainian officials have asked their U.S. and NATO counterparts to help train 150,000 new recruits closer to the front line for faster deployment, per the report. 

Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., told Fox News Digital at the time that deploying military trainers would lead to a wider war in the region.

Advertisement

Friday’s comments by Medvedev are not the first time he has taken a hardline stance against the West. In January, he warned the U.K. that putting boots on the ground in Ukraine would amount to a declaration of war against Russia.

Zelenskyy and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, greets Secretary of State Antony Blinken, right, prior to their meeting in Kyiv on May 14, 2024. (Ukrainian Presidential Press Office via AP)

In January, he also raised the prospect of nuclear war, warning NATO allies that a defeat for Russia in Ukraine could provoke a nuclear war. 

“The loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war can provoke the beginning of a nuclear war,” he said in a Telegram post.

“Nuclear powers have [never] lost major conflicts on which their fate depends,” the Kremlin official added. 

Advertisement

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin, as well as Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Businesswoman Halla Tomasdottir set to become Iceland’s next president

Published

on

Businesswoman Halla Tomasdottir set to become Iceland’s next president

Tomasdottir wins 34.6 percent of the votes to become the Nordic country’s second female president.

Halla Tomasdottir, a businesswoman and investor, has won Iceland’s presidential election, topping a crowded field of candidates in which the top three finishers were women, the country’s national broadcast service reports.

Tomasdottir, 55, was elected to the largely ceremonial post with 34.3 percent of the vote, defeating former Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdottir, with 25.2 percent, and Halla Hrund Logadottir, with 15.5 percent, RUV said on Sunday.

Tomasdottir is currently on leave as chief executive of The B Team, a global nonprofit co-founded by UK business tycoon Richard Branson to promote business practices focused on humanity and the climate, and has offices in New York and London.

Iceland’s president holds a largely ceremonial position in the parliamentary republic, acting as a guarantor of the constitution and national unity. He or she, however, has the power to veto a legislation or submit it to a referendum.

Advertisement

Tomasdottir campaigned as someone who was above party politics and could help open discussions on fundamental issues such as the effect of social media on the mental health of young people, Iceland’s development as a tourist destination and the role of artificial intelligence.

She will replace President Gudni Th Johannesson, who did not seek re-election after two four-year terms. Tomasdottir will take office on August 1.

Iceland’s second woman president

Iceland, a Nordic island nation located in the North Atlantic, has a long tradition of electing women to high office.

Vigdis Finnbogadottir was the first democratically elected female president of any nation when she became Iceland’s head of state in 1980.

The country has also seen two women serve as prime minister in recent years, providing stability during years of political turmoil.

Advertisement

Johanna Sigurdardottir led the government from 2009 to 2013, after the global financial crisis ravaged Iceland’s economy.

Jakobsdottir, 48, became prime minister in 2017, leading a broad coalition that ended the cycle of crises that had triggered three elections in four years. She resigned in April to run for president.

In the country of 380,000 people, any citizen gathering 1,500 signatures can run for office.

While Jakobsdottir was at times seen as the favourite, political observers had suggested that her background as prime minister could weigh against her.

Among the other main candidates in the field of 13 were a political science professor, a comedian, and an Arctic and energy scholar.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending