World
Russia’s military brass accused of ‘treason’ by Wagner chief
Yevgeny Prigozhin, proprietor of the mercenary firm Wagner, has accused Russia’s prime navy leaders of excessive treason after alleging they held again much-needed ammunition for the battle in Ukraine and declined to supply air assist.
Prigozhin’s Wagner Group is spearheading the battle for the city of Bakhmut in Ukraine’s jap Donetsk area.
“There’s merely direct opposition occurring [to attempts to equip Wagner fighters]. This may be equated to excessive treason,” Prigozhin mentioned in a voice message posted on his Telegram channel on Tuesday.
“The chief of the final workers and the defence minister are giving orders proper and left, not simply to not give Wagner PMC [private military company] ammunition however to not assist it with air transport.”
Prigozhin has been certainly one of defence minister Sergey Shoigu’s most fiery critics, insisting his personal males are far more practical than the common military. Russian Chief of the Normal Employees Valery Gerasimov was appointed final month to run the battle in Ukraine.
His voice rising to a shout, Prigozhin accused the navy brass of deciding “individuals ought to die when it’s handy for them”, and mentioned Wagner fighters have been “dropping like flies” within the absence of essential provides.
Senior officers additionally declined Wagner’s requests for particular spades to dig trenches, he added.
Public outbursts
Prigozhin, a catering tycoon who used his wealth to construct a non-public military, has assumed a extra public position for the reason that begin of the battle in Ukraine a yr in the past.
He has revelled in being sanctioned by the West, publicly insulted Russia’s prime navy commanders, tried to parlay battlefield success into political affect, and detailed his recruitment of convicts for Wagner’s ranks.
Prigozhin has additionally cast a casual alliance with fellow hardliners together with the Chechen chief Ramzan Kadyrov, and accused the defence ministry of making an attempt to take credit score for Wagner’s successes in jap Ukraine.
However his star seems to be waning. He was stripped this yr of the suitable to recruit prisoners amid indicators of a Kremlin transfer to curb his affect.
Russias defence ministry denied limiting ammunition shipments to volunteers on the entrance however made no point out of the Wagner drive.
“Makes an attempt to create a cut up inside the shut mechanism of interplay and assist between models of the Russian [fighting] teams are counterproductive and work solely to the advantage of the enemy,” the ministry mentioned in a press release afterward Tuesday.
Alexey Muraviev, a Russia skilled at Curtin College in Australia, informed Al Jazeera that Prigozhin is looking for to safe navy contracts from the Russian authorities.
“Clearly, it [criticism] is going on at a time when the Kremlin is readjusting its technique in Ukraine, and Prigozhin desires a significant slice of this cake. Successfully, he desires to monopolise Russia’s operations in Ukraine by saying, ‘I would like all of it. Give me what I want.’”
‘Do away with nonsense’
It was the second such message directed at defence officers printed by Prigozhin in two days.
In an obscenity-peppered message on Monday, he complained unnamed officers have been denying Wagner provides out of private animosity to him, and he was required to “apologise and obey” with a purpose to rectify the scenario.
The defence ministry has beforehand mentioned Wagner just isn’t beneath its management although the militia depends upon the state for some arms and logistics.
Tatiana Stanovaya, head of the R.Politik political consultancy, mentioned Prigozhin’s outburst on Monday seemed like “an act of desperation” aimed toward “getting by way of to Putin”.
It was not clear whether or not he had Prigozhin in thoughts however Putin in a speech on Tuesday mentioned he wished an finish to infighting.
“We should do away with – I need to emphasise this – any interdepartmental contradictions, formalities, grudges, misunderstandings, and different nonsense,” Putin informed the political and navy elite.
In a separate submit, Prigozhin mentioned afterward Tuesday he had been too busy to observe Putin’s speech and will due to this fact not touch upon the president’s remarks relating to Russia’s “particular navy operation” in Ukraine.
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades