Connect with us

World

Russians are blocked at US border, Ukrainians are admitted

Published

on

Russians are blocked at US border, Ukrainians are admitted

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

About three dozen would-be asylum seekers from Russia discovered themselves blocked from coming into the U.S. on Friday whereas a gaggle of Ukrainians flashed passports and have been escorted throughout the border.

The scene mirrored a quiet however unmistakable shift within the differing remedy of Russians and Ukrainians who enter Mexico as vacationers and fly to Tijuana hoping to enter the U.S. for an opportunity at asylum.

The Russians – 34 as of Friday – had been camped a number of days on the busiest U.S border crossing with Mexico, two days after metropolis of Tijuana officers gently urged them to go away.

ATTORNEYS HELP UKRAINIAN IMMIGRANTS STAY IN US, BRING FAMILY MEMBERS FROM WAR-TORN HOME

Advertisement

They sat on mats and blankets, checking smartphones, chatting and snacking, with sleeping baggage and strollers close by as a stream of pedestrian border crossers filed previous them. 5 younger ladies sat and talked in a circle, some with stuffed animals.

Days earlier, some Russians have been being admitted to the U.S. on the San Ysidro crossing, whereas some Ukrainians have been blocked. However by Friday, Russians have been denied whereas Ukrainians have been admitted after quick waits.

“It’s very exhausting to know how they make choices,” mentioned Irina Zolinka, a 40-year-old Russian girl who camped in a single day together with her household of seven after arriving in Tijuana on Thursday.

Irina Zolinka, who’s looking for asylum within the U.S., cries close to the San Ysidro Port of Entry into the USA, in Tijuana, Mexico, Thursday, March 17, 2022.
(AP Photograph/Gregory Bull)

Erika Pinheiro, litigation and coverage director for advocacy group Al Otro Lado, mentioned the U.S. started admitting all Ukrainians on humanitarian parole for one 12 months round Tuesday, whereas on the identical time blocking all Russians. There was no official announcement.

Advertisement

A Homeland Safety Division memo dated March 11 however not publicly launched till Thursday advised border officers that Ukrainians could also be exempt from sweeping asylum limits designed to stop unfold of COVID-19. It says choices are to be made case-by-case for Ukrainians however makes no point out of Russians.

“The Division of Homeland Safety acknowledges that the unjustified Russian warfare of aggression in Ukraine has created a humanitarian disaster,” the memo states.

BORDER PATROL TOLD TO CONSIDER EXEMPTING UKRAINIANS AT SOUTHERN BORDER FROM TITLE 42 RESTRICTIONS: REPORT

Homeland Safety indicated in a press release Friday that anybody deemed “significantly weak” could also be admitted for humanitarian causes on a case-by-case overview, no matter nationality.

Russian migrants in Tijuana sat off to the facet of a line of a whole bunch of border residents ready to stroll throughout the border to San Diego on Friday. The road was unimpeded.

Advertisement

A 32-year-old Russian migrant who hadn’t left the border crossing since arriving in Tijuana along with his spouse about 5 days earlier had no plans to go away, fearing he could miss any sudden alternative.

A couple from Russia seeking asylum in the U.S. wait in Tijuana, Mexico, Thursday, March 17, 2022.

A pair from Russia looking for asylum within the U.S. wait in Tijuana, Mexico, Thursday, March 17, 2022.
(AP Photograph/Gregory Bull)

Inside hours of arriving, the migrant, who recognized himself solely as Mark as a result of he feared for his household’s security in Russia, noticed three Russian migrants admitted to the USA. After six hours, U.S. authorities returned his passport and mentioned solely Ukrainians have been being admitted.

“Ukrainians and Russians are struggling due to one man,” Mark mentioned, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. He fled shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

U.S. officers have expelled migrants greater than 1.7 million occasions since March 2020 with no likelihood to see asylum beneath sweeping authority aimed toward stopping unfold of COVID-19. However the public well being authority, often called Title 42, is seldom used for migrants of some nationalities who’re tough to expel for monetary or diplomatic causes.

I’M IN POLAND HELPING UKRAINIAN REFUGEES, AND SEEING THIS CRISIS FIRSTHAND IS SHOCKING

Advertisement

However to assert asylum, migrants have to be on U.S. soil and U.S. officers are blocking passage apart from these it needs to confess.

Even earlier than Russia’s invasion, the USA was seeing a rise in Russian and Ukrainian asylum seekers, most attempting to enter at official crossings in San Diego somewhat than attempting to cross illegally in deserts and mountains.

Greater than 1,500 Ukrainians entered the U.S. on the Mexican border from September by February, in line with U.S. Customs and Border Safety, about 35 occasions the 45 Ukrainians who crossed throughout the identical interval a 12 months earlier.

A Russian woman hugs her son as they wait near the San Ysidro Port of Entry leading into the United States on March 17, 2022.

A Russian girl hugs her son as they wait close to the San Ysidro Port of Entry main into the USA on March 17, 2022.
(AP Photograph/Gregory Bull)

Ukrainians who can attain U.S. soil are just about assured a shot at asylum. Solely 4 of the 1,553 who entered within the September-February interval have been barred beneath the general public well being order that lets the U.S. expel migrants with no likelihood at humanitarian safety.

The variety of Russian asylum seekers coming into at U.S land crossings from Mexico surpassed 8,600 from September by February, about 30 occasions the 288 the identical time a 12 months earlier. All however 23 have been processed beneath legal guidelines that enable them to hunt asylum.

Advertisement

Mexican officers have been cautious of migrants sleeping on the border. Final month they dismantled a big migrant camp with tents and tarps in Tijuana that blocked a walkway to San Diego.

Desperate to cease one other camp from forming, town distributed a letter on Wednesday asking migrants to go away their campsites for well being and security causes and supplied free shelter in the event that they couldn’t afford a lodge.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending