Connect with us

World

Russian Soldiers Took Their City, Then Their Homes

Published

on

Russian Soldiers Took Their City, Then Their Homes

KYIV, Ukraine — For days, Roman Naumenko and his neighbors on the Pokrovsky condominium complicated outdoors Kyiv had been watching from a couple of quick miles away as Russian forces tried to take over a close-by airport.

“I noticed helicopters that had been firing, coming one after the opposite,” he stated. “It was an enormous shock. I couldn’t consider it was actual.”

Residents would stand outdoors their buildings filming the destruction with their cellphones.

Every day, Russian forces drew nearer and nearer to the condominium complicated. On March 3, one of many buildings was straight hit by a missile. Greater than 150 households had been nonetheless within the 14-building residential complicated on the time, a constructing supervisor informed The New York Occasions.

After which, later that very same day, troops had been actually at Mr. Naumenko’s doorstep.

Advertisement

“We noticed the Russian infantry on the safety digicam of our constructing,” he stated. “From that second, the Russians stayed.”

They made round 200 residents keep too, holding lots of them hostage within the basements of their very own buildings, forcing them at hand over their telephones and taking on their residences. Others had been capable of keep away from detection however nonetheless had been basically prisoners in their very own properties as Russian forces moved into the buildings, which had housed 560 households, and took up sniping positions.

The Occasions interviewed seven residents of the Pokrovsky condominium complicated within the city of Hostomel, about 10 miles northwest of Kyiv. All skilled the assault and the captivity firsthand earlier than discovering methods to flee. Utilizing their accounts, together with footage from safety cameras and cellphones, The Occasions was capable of piece collectively what it regarded and felt like as Russian forces closed in.

“It was actually scary,” stated Lesya Borodyuk, a 49-year-old resident, tearing up at one level as she spoke. “I wrote to my daughter. I used to be saying goodbye to her. I informed her that most likely we shall be bombed now.”

Exterior within the car parking zone, safety cameras confirmed not less than a dozen Russian troops and infantry combating automobiles. Troopers shuttled heavy machine weapons and compelled a person inside a constructing at gunpoint.

Advertisement

Ksenia, who requested to be recognized solely by her first identify, watched along with her husband and youngsters from their second-floor window as Russian forces arrived at their constructing.

“We didn’t know what might occur to us,” she stated. “It was only a whole state of worry.”

One group of troopers used rifles to smash open the entrance door of an condominium constructing. As soon as inside, they entered the elevator and destroyed its safety cameras. In some buildings, troopers went ground by ground tearing doorways off hinges and raiding residences, residents stated.

Inside a couple of hours, in response to the seven residents The Occasions spoke to, Russian troopers had seized your complete complicated and trapped near 200 civilians inside numerous buildings.

“Individuals had been kicked out of the residences,” stated Elena Anishchenko, who was planning to have a good time her 33th birthday with neighbors the day the troopers arrived. “They didn’t ask anybody something, they’d simply inform them to go to the basement.”

Advertisement

Lots of the residents had their telephones and laptops confiscated or destroyed.

“They informed us — ‘Don’t be mad at us, but when we discover your telephone, you can be shot on the spot,’” Ms. Anishchenko stated.

Reduce off from the skin world, Ms. Anishchenko stated she couldn’t learn the information or converse to her household.

Some residents like Ksenia had been capable of stay of their properties — maybe as a result of she had an toddler.

Others went unnoticed. Mr. Naumenko and his spouse hid on the seventh ground of their constructing. He nonetheless had his telephone, which he would activate as soon as a day to textual content his household that he was nonetheless alive.

Buddies and kinfolk of these trapped in Pokrovsky had been in agony. In discussion groups and through textual content messages, that they had seen clips and display photographs of Russian troopers as they seized the complicated. Then the messages from their family members simply stopped.

Iryna Khomyakova, a resident’s daughter, noticed the closed-circuit tv footage of the troopers getting into the elevator. Apprehensive, she known as her mom, who stated that Russian troopers had simply entered the constructing and that she was pressured with others into the basement.

“My mother’s telephone died,” she stated on March 9, and he or she hadn’t heard from her in days.

Advertisement

Hanna Yaremchuk informed The Occasions through textual content message that she was out of contact along with her father for days, including that he was additionally being held in a basement. She questioned: “Is he alive in any respect? !!! I have no idea!”

For these being detained, the flexibility to maneuver round relied on the guards.

Ms. Borodyuk and others in her basement had been permitted to go to their residences to get meals and heat garments to assist face up to the chilly of the brick basement. Neighbors had been permitted to prepare dinner collectively and intermingle.

The Russians guarding Ms. Anishchenko’s basement had been extra strict. They allowed the residents solely quick, supervised visits to their residences to get meals and provides for everybody.

“Individuals had been panicking,” Ms. Anishchenko stated, “Everybody was previous their breaking level.”

Advertisement

Finally, 100 or extra troopers had been patrolling outdoors the buildings, and a few had been even dwelling within the residences.

On the seventh ground, Mr. Naumenko and his spouse continued to evade detection. Current shelling within the space had blown out their home windows and the temperature had dropped beneath freezing. With no electrical energy, they improvised methods to prepare dinner, lighting oil in a saucer to heat up meals and utilizing a candle to warmth a can of water. With out warmth within the constructing, they slept absolutely dressed and sporting jackets.

Credit score…Roman Naumenko

In Ksenia’s condominium, every day concerned securing sufficient meals to feed her youngsters and surviving to the following morning. Her new life was a far cry from what she envisioned.

“We had been ready for this condominium for 4 years,” Ksenia stated. “We invested within the renovation. However even this doesn’t matter now.”

Exterior, the combating was relentless.

“We bought used to the sounds of taking pictures and we realized to inform one from the opposite,” Mr. Naumenko stated. “Whether or not it was far or shut. Whether or not it was going into our constructing or above the constructing. We might hear that.”

Advertisement

Contained in the condominium complicated, the troopers had been telling their prisoners that Ukraine was about to be liberated, Ms. Anishchenko stated.

Ms. Borodyuk recalled a extra senior Russian officer making an attempt to consolation a woman within the basement the place they had been detained. “He stated: ‘My daughter is 8 years outdated too. I like her very a lot. I miss her. Don’t be afraid, little lady, we are going to liberate you from Nazis.’”

Ms. Borodyuk stated a number of the youthful Russian troops didn’t even know why they had been in Ukraine. When captives requested one soldier why he was right here, he replied, weeping: “The place am I? What ought to I do?”

On March 9, Russia and Ukraine agreed to briefly set up a number of humanitarian corridors to permit civilians secure passage out of battle areas. However the Russian troopers at Pokrovsky failed to tell their prisoners.

Ms. Anishchenko heard by likelihood. Throughout a supervised meals go to to her condominium, she noticed a convoy transferring with white flags from the window and requested a Russian soldier what was taking place. He informed her there was a 72-hour no-strike hall in place. She and a few of her neighbors packed a bag and ran.

Advertisement
Credit score…The New York Occasions

On their method out, the scene was grim. “We noticed lifeless our bodies laying on the bottom,” she stated. “We noticed crashed and burned automobiles with our bodies inside.”

Mr. Naumenko turned his telephone on and noticed info in a WhatsApp group in regards to the humanitarian hall evacuation. He and his spouse shortly gathered their issues.

Whereas leaving the complicated, a soldier warned them that he wouldn’t shoot him, however these patrolling elsewhere would possibly.

They fled anyway and escaped unhurt — together with all the opposite residents The Occasions spoke with. Naumenko is now in Kyiv, the place he plans to remain — and maybe struggle.

“The issues I noticed in Hostomel had been a nightmare. I don’t need this to return right here,” he stated.

Advertisement

Movies edited by Dmitriy Khavin.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending