World
Russia says 63 troops killed in attack on Donetsk barracks
Russia has mentioned that 63 of its troops had been killed throughout a Ukrainian New Yr’s Eve assault on a makeshift barracks within the partly-occupied Donetsk area.
The ministry mentioned in a press release on Monday that Ukraine’s army had launched six projectiles on the “provisional base” within the japanese metropolis of Makiivka utilizing the HIMARS guided rocket system equipped by the US.
Two of the missiles had been shot down by Russian air defences, it added, however 4 struck the constructing.
The ministry’s assertion got here after the Strategic Communications Division of Ukraine’s armed forces mentioned late on Sunday that 400 Russian troops had been killed within the assault and one other 300 had been wounded.
Footage posted on-line appeared to point out a constructing presupposed to be a vocational school in Russian-controlled Makiivka diminished to smouldering rubble.
Al Jazeera couldn’t independently confirm the footage or the numbers offered by both facet. If Ukraine’s tally had been confirmed, the toll would signify one of many single deadliest assaults on Russian forces since Moscow launched its invasion in late February.
Moscow-backed authorities in Donetsk additionally acknowledged casualties from the assault.
Daniil Bezsonov, a senior Russia-backed official within the area, mentioned the vocational school had been hit by HIMARS rockets a minute after midnight on Saturday.
“There have been lifeless and wounded,” Bezsonov mentioned late on Sunday in a put up on the Telegram messaging app. “The precise quantity continues to be unknown. The constructing itself was badly broken.”
Igor Girkin, a former Federal Safety Service officer who helped Russia annex the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea in 2014 after which organise pro-Russian separatist forces in japanese Ukraine, mentioned on Monday that “the variety of lifeless and wounded runs into many lots of.”
Girkin, who has bitterly criticised Russia’s army failures in Ukraine, mentioned ammunition had been saved in the identical constructing the place the recruits had been accommodated.
“This isn’t the one such [extremely dense] deployment of personnel and tools within the destruction zone of HIMARS missiles,” he mentioned on Telegram.
Russian bombardments
The developments had been reported towards the backdrop of a current wave of Russian bombardments of Ukrainian cities. Moscow has seen within the new 12 months with nightly assaults on city areas lots of of kilometres from the battle’s entrance traces, together with Kyiv.
After firing a barrage of missiles on Saturday, Russia launched dozens of Iranian-made Shahed assault drones on Sunday and Monday. Ukraine mentioned on Monday that it had shot down all 39 drones within the newest wave of assaults, together with 22 over the capital.
Ukrainian officers mentioned the intensified bombardment was an indication of Russia’s desperation as Ukraine’s means to defend its air area had improved with continued army assist from its Western allies.
“Now they’re searching for routes and makes an attempt to hit us by some means, however their terror techniques won’t work,” President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s chief of employees Andriy Yermak mentioned on Telegram. “Our sky will flip right into a protect.”
Zelenskyy on Sunday praised Ukrainians for exhibiting gratitude to their troops and each other and mentioned Russia’s efforts would show ineffective.
“Drones, missiles, every little thing else won’t assist them as a result of we stand united,” Zelenskyy mentioned. “They’re united solely by concern.”
Russia says its assaults, which have knocked out warmth and energy to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians in winter, purpose to cut back Ukraine’s means to struggle. The Ukrainian authorities says the assaults haven’t any army objective and are battle crimes supposed to hurt civilians.
Russia’s battle in Ukraine, the biggest in Europe since World Warfare II, has killed tens of hundreds of individuals, pushed hundreds of thousands from their houses and diminished huge swathes of the nation to rubble.
Regardless of the mounting bloodshed, Russian President Vladimir Putin has mentioned there will likely be no let-up in his nation’s offensive, and Moscow has not too long ago rejected a peace plan put ahead by Zelenskyy.
Zelenskyy’s 10-point proposal requires Russia to respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity and withdraw all of its troops from his nation.
However the Kremlin insists that Kyiv should settle for Russia’s annexation of 4 partly occupied Ukrainian areas – Luhansk and Donetsk within the east, and Kherson and Zaporizhia within the south – which Moscow unilaterally claimed as its personal in September.
Russia additionally says Ukraine should settle for the lack of Crimea.
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades