World
Russia claims 14 killed in attack on hospital in eastern Ukraine
Russia has accused the Ukrainian army of intentionally attacking a hospital in a Russian-held space of jap Ukraine in what it mentioned was a conflict crime that killed 14 folks and wounded 24 sufferers and medical workers.
There was no quick response to the allegations from Ukraine on Saturday.
The assault hit a hospital within the Russian-held settlement of Novoaidar and was carried out utilizing a US-supplied HIMARS rocket launch system, the Russian defence ministry mentioned in an announcement.
“A deliberate missile strike in opposition to a recognized functioning civilian medical facility is no doubt a critical conflict crime by the Kyiv regime,” it mentioned. “All these concerned within the planning and execution of this crime shall be discovered and held accountable.”
Civilian and army medics had been working within the hospital for a lot of months treating native folks and troopers, it mentioned.
Ukraine and its Western allies have accused Russian forces of frequent conflict crimes within the battle through which 1000’s of civilians have been killed and cities and cities diminished to rubble by artillery and air raids. Russia denies concentrating on civilians.
‘One more crime’
In the meantime, three folks have been killed and greater than a dozen others wounded following a Russian assault on town of Konstantynivka in jap Ukraine, the native governor mentioned on Saturday.
“The Russians fired at a residential neighbourhood, broken 4 multi-story buildings, a lodge, garages and civilian vehicles,” Donetsk Governor Pavlo Kyrylenko mentioned on social media.
Kyrylenko mentioned rescue employees and police have been on the scene, “serving to folks and punctiliously documenting yet one more crime by the Russian occupiers on our land”.
Photos posted on Kyrylenko’s Telegram account confirmed condominium buildings with blown-out home windows and particles scattered across the charred stays of a automotive.
In keeping with Ukraine’s defence ministry, Russia carried out assaults on Konstantynivka with a number of rocket launchers.
Nearly a 12 months into its invasion of Ukraine, Moscow is searching for to grab management of your complete Donetsk area, which it has already declared part of Russia.
‘Intentionally destroying cities’
Ukraine mentioned this week that Russian troops had stepped up their assaults within the east, notably on the cities of Vugledar and Bakhmut.
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the battles close to Bakhmut and Vuhledar, 200km (90 miles) to the south, as “extraordinarily acute”.
“The occupiers are usually not simply storming our positions, they’re intentionally and methodically destroying these cities and villages round them,” he mentioned.
Ukrainian troops are locked in a “fierce fight” with Russian troopers for management of Vuhledar as the 2 sides battle alongside the southern entrance. Either side claimed success within the small administrative centre of condominium blocks surrounded by flat fields.
“The encirclement and subsequent liberation of this metropolis solves many issues,” mentioned Denis Pushilin, the Moscow-appointed chief of the Donetsk area.
However Kyiv mentioned the city, which had a pre-invasion inhabitants of about 15,000, remained contested. “There’s fierce fight there,” Ukrainian army spokesman Sergiy Cherevaty informed native media.
‘Decisive strategic motion’
Bloomberg Information reported that Russia was searching for to show that its army can change the momentum of the conflict after months of battlefield setbacks by launching a full-out offensive.
It quoted unnamed Russian officers and advisers as saying the objective is to attain fast victories to achieve management of the jap areas that have been annexed final 12 months to strengthen Moscow’s hand at any future peace talks.
The US-based Institute for the Research of Conflict (ISW) assume tank agreed with the reporting.
“This report is according to ISW’s present evaluation and forecast that the Kremlin is probably going making ready to conduct a decisive strategic motion – almost certainly in Luhansk Oblast – within the subsequent six months supposed to regain the initiative and finish Ukraine’s present string of operational successes,” it mentioned.
“ISW beforehand assessed that the decisive strategic motion in Luhansk Oblast may very well be both a serious offensive or a Russian defensive operation to defeat and exploit a Ukrainian counteroffensive.”
One Ukraine official mentioned it’s attainable Russia will time its main offensive close to the anniversary of the beginning of the conflict final 12 months.
“It’s no secret that they’re making ready for a brand new wave by February 24,” Oleksiy Danilov, head of the Ukrainian Nationwide Safety and Protection Council, informed Radio Liberty on Friday.
The intention is to grab your complete Donbas – Donetsk and Luhansk – after which “to utterly transcend the borders of the areas”, mentioned Danilov.
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades