Connect with us

World

Putin rages against West in speech decried as absurd propaganda

Published

on

Putin rages against West in speech decried as absurd propaganda

Russian President Vladimir Putin has made a combative state-of-the nation speech, blaming the West for the struggle in Ukraine forward of the primary anniversary of the invasion he ordered.

Putin spoke on Tuesday in entrance of a crowd of 1,400 individuals in Moscow, addressing members of each homes of parliament, navy commanders and troopers whereas video screens have been additionally put up in massive cities throughout the nation.

In addition to warning the West of a world confrontation, Putin sought to justify the invasion, saying it had been compelled on Russia and he understood the ache of the households of those that had fallen in battle.

He additionally mentioned Russia would droop participation within the New START treaty, the final main pillar of post-Chilly Battle nuclear arms management between Moscow and Washington, which limits their strategic nuclear arsenals.

Putin mentioned Russia wanted to be prepared to check nuclear weapons if america strikes to take action itself.

Advertisement

Nearly instantly, international powers reminiscent of NATO urged Moscow towards withdrawing.

The New START treaty, which was signed in Prague in 2010, caps the variety of strategic nuclear warheads that the US and Russia might deploy and the deployment of land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers to ship them.

Russia has the most important stockpile of nuclear weapons on the planet with shut to six,000 warheads, in line with consultants. Collectively, Russia and the US maintain about 90 % of the world’s nuclear warheads – sufficient to destroy the planet many instances over.

In 2021, New START was prolonged for 5 extra years after US President Joe Biden took workplace.

Al Jazeera’s James Bays, reporting from Brussels, says arms negotiation has been tougher lately attributable to tensions between Moscow and the West.

Advertisement

“NATO allies say that Russia wasn’t actually complying with New START anyway,” he mentioned. “However it’s fascinating that Putin has determined to droop participation on this treaty, … and I believe in all probability that’s for worldwide consumption at this stage.

“I believe there was a component of this speech that was aimed on the worldwide group as a result of though Europe appears to be very a lot on the identical web page with the US by way of assist for Ukraine, past Europe … with regards to the difficulty of when ought to the struggle cease and when ought to there be negotiations, many imagine a ceasefire ought to come quickly, if not now.

“That’s the distinction that Putin was probably making an attempt to take advantage of in his speech.”

 

Advertisement

In his wide-ranging and offended speech, Putin additionally condemned same-sex marriage and forged the federal government in Kyiv as taking the Ukrainian individuals “hostage” for failing to handle their wants.

“I want to repeat, they began the struggle, and we used drive to be able to cease it,” Putin mentioned, insisting that Moscow had tried to settle the battle in japanese Ukraine’s Donbas area, which had been simmering since early 2014, by peaceable means however was finally compelled to take motion.

“We have been doing every little thing attainable to unravel this drawback peacefully, negotiating a peaceable approach out of this tough battle, however behind our backs, a really totally different state of affairs was being ready,” the Russian chief mentioned.

The West and aspiring NATO and European Union member Ukraine strongly reject that narrative and say NATO’s enlargement eastwards after the Chilly Battle isn’t any justification for what they are saying is an imperial-style land seize doomed to failure.

“The individuals of Ukraine have turn into the hostage of the Kyiv regime and its Western overlords, who’ve successfully occupied this nation within the political, navy and financial sense,” Putin mentioned. “They intend to rework an area battle right into a part of worldwide confrontation. That is precisely how we perceive all of it, and we are going to react accordingly as a result of on this case we’re speaking in regards to the existence of our nation.”

Advertisement

Putin claims Russia is locked in an existential battle with the West, which, he says, needs to carve up Russia and steal its huge pure sources.

“The Western elite doesn’t conceal their aim, which is to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia,” the president mentioned. “It means to complete us ceaselessly.”

The 70-year-old Kremlin chief mentioned Russia would by no means yield to Western makes an attempt to divide its society, including {that a} majority of Russians assist the struggle.

Polling by the Levada Centre signifies round 75 % of Russians again Russian actions in Ukraine whereas 19 % don’t and 6 % have no idea. Three-quarters of Russians count on their nation to be victorious.

However many diplomats and analysts doubt the figures.

Advertisement

Marwan Kabalan, a tutorial and author, informed Al Jazeera that Putin’s speech was geared toward appeasing Russians as a result of Moscow has not achieved its navy targets in Ukraine.

“He underestimated the ability of Ukraine’s navy” and Western assist, in addition to the “will of Europeans” to free themselves of Russian vitality provides, Kabalan mentioned.

“He can not inform the individuals of Russia any excellent news about this,” he mentioned. “This particular operation as he calls it has been occurring now for nearly a 12 months and the aims haven’t been achieved.

INTERACTIVE_MAPING_MAJOR_BATTLES_RUSSIA_UKRAINE_FEB9_2023 copy 6
(Al Jazeera)

Russian forces have suffered three main battlefield reversals for the reason that struggle started however nonetheless management round one-fifth of Ukraine.

In the meantime, a rivalry inside components of Russia’s navy elite appears to be growing with Yevgeny Prigozhin, head of the Wagner Group, a personal navy drive, criticising Russian navy officers for depriving his fighters of munitions.

Advertisement

Reactions to Putin’s speech

A number one official within the US denounced the claims in Putin’s speech.

“No one is attacking Russia,” White Home nationwide safety adviser Jake Sullivan informed reporters. “There’s a sort of absurdity within the notion that Russia was beneath some type of navy menace from Ukraine or anybody else.”

Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior adviser to Ukraine’s president, mentioned Putin’s speech demonstrated his “irrelevance and confusion”.

“He careworn that RF [the Russian Federation] is in ‘taiga impasse’, has no promising options and gained’t have any. As a result of in all places there are ‘Nazis, Martians and conspiracy theories’,” Podolyak tweeted.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni referred to as the speech “propaganda” and mentioned she had hoped for one thing extra constructive.

Advertisement

“Part of my coronary heart hoped for some totally different phrases, for a step forward. It was propaganda,” Meloni mentioned throughout a go to to the Ukrainian metropolis of Irpin.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending