World
No Leopard tanks for Ukraine as NATO allies fail to agree
The USA and its allies didn’t agree on supplying coveted German battle tanks to Ukraine as Russia issued veiled threats the struggle might escalate in Europe.
NATO and defence leaders from about 50 nations met on the American Ramstein Air Base in Germany on Friday, the most recent in a collection of arms-pledging conferences since Russia invaded Ukraine 11 months in the past.
European leaders on the assembly once more pressed Germany to provide the inexperienced mild for the supply of German-made Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine to drive again Moscow’s forces – though no determination was made.
The failure to agree to supply the tanks could sign rising divisions inside NATO over supplying such weapons.
Germany’s defence minister Boris Pistorius denied Berlin was unilaterally blocking the supply of the Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine, however mentioned his authorities was prepared to maneuver rapidly on the difficulty if there have been consensus amongst allies.
“There are good causes for the deliveries and there are good causes towards, and in view of your complete state of affairs of a struggle that has been ongoing for nearly one 12 months, all professionals and cons have to be weighed very rigorously,” he mentioned, with out elaborating on the explanations.
Strain has been constructing on Berlin to supply tanks to Kyiv that Ukraine sees as key within the struggle towards Russia.
The impression “there’s a united coalition and that Germany is standing in the way in which is flawed”, Pistorius mentioned, including “there are a lot of allies who say we share the view that I’ve put ahead right here.”
Pistorius mentioned whereas there was no determination but on whether or not to ship the Leopard tanks, “We are going to make our choices as quickly as potential.”
“I’m very certain that there shall be a call within the quick time period however … I don’t know the way the choice will look,” he mentioned.
Leopard tanks are seen as particularly appropriate as they’re extensively in use, which means a number of nations might every chip in a few of their tanks to help Ukraine.
‘Trigger for remorse’
Russia, in the meantime, mentioned the West supplying battle tanks to Ukraine is not going to change the course of the struggle and Kyiv’s allies will remorse their “delusions” that such a transfer will show victorious on the battlefield.
“Now we have repeatedly mentioned that such provides is not going to basically change something, however will add issues for Ukraine and the Ukrainian individuals,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov advised reporters.
Requested whether or not the provision of more and more superior weapons to Ukraine meant the battle was escalating, he added, “We see a rising oblique and generally direct involvement of NATO nations on this battle.
“We see a devotion to the dramatic delusion that Ukraine can succeed on the battlefield. It is a dramatic delusion of the Western neighborhood that may greater than as soon as be trigger for remorse.”
Peskov mentioned the way in which to stop escalation was to heed the strategic issues that Russia expressed in late 2021, simply earlier than it invaded Ukraine.
Earlier than launching its February 24, 2022, invasion, Moscow blamed NATO for undermining the area’s safety and despatched an inventory of safety calls for to america.
Russia requested NATO and its allies to ban Ukraine and former Soviet nations from becoming a member of the alliance, and known as on NATO to cut back actions in Jap Europe.
Kyiv and Western nations have mentioned these have been baseless pretexts for an “imperial-style land seize” in Ukraine.
‘Choice have to be made’
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy mentioned on Friday there was “no different” however for the West to provide Ukraine battle tanks.
“The companions are principled of their perspective – they are going to help Ukraine as a lot as is critical for our victory,” mentioned Zelenskyy in his night tackle.
“Sure, we are going to nonetheless should battle for the provision of contemporary tanks, however day-after-day, we make it extra apparent that there is no such thing as a different, {that a} determination about tanks have to be made.
“The one factor value emphasising in all that is the time, the supply time. Every association have to be carried out as rapidly as potential – for our defence.”
US defence chief Lloyd Austin urged allies to step up help for Ukraine.
“Russia is regrouping, recruiting, and making an attempt to re-equip,” he mentioned in the beginning of the Ramstein assembly. “This isn’t a second to decelerate. It’s a time to dig deeper. The Ukrainian individuals are watching us.”
The US introduced an extra $2.5bn in army assist for Ukraine on Thursday, a bundle that may embody extra armoured autos and ammunition.
Finland introduced a brand new donation of greater than 400 million euros ($434m) value of defence gear for Ukraine, not together with the German-made Leopard 2 tanks, which it mentioned it might additionally ship if there’s an settlement with allies.
Poland mentioned will present Ukraine with extra Soviet-made T-72 tanks and a few infantry autos.
“We should do every part to assist Ukraine so the struggle doesn’t spill over to NATO territory,” defence minister Mariusz Blaszczak mentioned.
The inflow of latest weapons, tanks, and armoured carriers comes as Ukraine has confronted intense fight within the nation’s east across the metropolis of Bakhmut. The battles are anticipated to accentuate within the coming months.
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades