Connect with us

World

Nine Mass Shootings

Published

on

Nine Mass Shootings

Many crime consultants outline a mass taking pictures as an occasion by which 4 or extra persons are shot. Final weekend, there have been a surprising variety of them — at the least 9 — throughout the U.S.

In Norfolk, Va., an argument exterior a pizzeria led to a taking pictures that killed two individuals, together with a 25-year-old newspaper reporter who was a bystander. Within the farming group of Dumas, Ark., a gunfight broke out at an annual automobile present, killing one particular person and injuring 27. In downtown Austin, Texas, 4 individuals suffered gunshot wounds in the course of the last weekend of the SXSW competition.

The burst of weekend violence continues a development that started nearly two years in the past, early within the Covid-19 pandemic, and reveals no indicators of easing, as my colleagues Tim Arango and Troy Closson report. Murders have risen greater than 30 % since 2019, latest knowledge suggests. They’re nonetheless far beneath the degrees of the Seventies, ’80s and early ’90s however have reached the very best level in additional than 20 years.

“We will’t endure this anymore, we simply merely can’t,” Dan Gelber, the mayor of Miami Seaside, mentioned after two shootings final weekend led the town to impose a midnight curfew.

What explains the crime wave? There is no such thing as a totally satisfying reply, however consultants level to a number of believable partial explanations. They embrace: Social isolation and frustration brought on by the pandemic. A way of lawlessness stemming from police violence (just like the homicide of George Floyd). Law enforcement officials’ timidity in response to latest criticism of them. And an increase in gun gross sales in the course of the pandemic.

Advertisement

But the crime wave appears each too broad and too distinctly American for any one among these components to be a tidy clarification.

Gun crime isn’t the one type of violent crime that’s rising, for instance. Nor are the crime will increase restricted to locations the place police brutality has been worst. As for the pandemic, if it had been the one trigger, you’ll count on crime to have surged in lots of international locations. As an alternative, it has held pretty regular in Britain, Canada, France, Japan and elsewhere.

The closest factor that I’ve heard to a persuasive reply comes from historical past. Criminologists and historians who’ve studied previous crime waves — like Gary LaFree, Richard Rosenfeld and Randolph Roth — level out that they typically happen when persons are feeling pissed off with society, authorities and their fellow residents. This frustration can feed a breakdown in societal norms and an increase in what the sociologist Émile Durkheim known as “anomie.”

Roth, taking a look at murder charges within the U.S. and Western Europe over the previous 400 years, argues that crime tends to extend if individuals lose belief in society’s establishments and fundamental equity. When empathy for different residents — or “fellow feeling,” as Roth and others name it — declines and anomie rises, crime additionally rises. The American crime will increase of the Sixties and ’70s had been a great instance, criminologists say.

Most residents don’t commit crimes, after all. However social alienation makes some individuals extra prepared to interrupt the foundations and act violently. A broader sense of dysfunction can create a so-called ethical vacation, as The Atlantic’s Graeme Wooden has written.

Advertisement

Once I was speaking about this concept with colleagues yesterday, German Lopez — who’s written in regards to the crime wave on this e-newsletter — identified that the anomie concept can really feel unsatisfying as a result of it’s ephemeral and unprovable. Nevertheless it additionally suits the info higher than any different, German added.

By many measures, People are feeling pissed off with their authorities, their financial system and their fellow residents. Practically 80 % are dissatisfied with the nation’s course, in accordance with Gallup. Individuals spend hours screaming at each other on social media. Many People think about individuals with opposing political concepts to be so mistaken that they don’t deserve the suitable to precise their views. Polls additionally present an alarming diploma of skepticism about democracy and openness to political violence.

Together with these indicators of alienation, a variety of habits has deteriorated. Alcohol abuse and drug overdoses have elevated. People’ blood stress is up, and measures of psychological well being are down. Car crashes have surged.

In every of those circumstances, the pandemic appears to be enjoying a job: The tendencies both started or accelerated shortly after Covid overwhelmed each day life within the spring of 2020. However the pandemic seems to be solely a part of the story. This nation’s latest dysfunction is larger than Covid. It’s a darkish new type of American exceptionalism.

“They perceive you right here”: This Occasions Opinion video takes you inside a Belgian summer time camp for kids who’ve misplaced a liked one.

Advertisement

While you hear the phrases “jazz membership,” a selected picture involves thoughts. It in all probability consists of dim lighting and intently packed tables. You might even think about this to be in New York, deemed the jazz capital of America.

Most of New York’s conventional golf equipment (suppose Village Vanguard or the Blue Observe) have survived the pandemic. However younger bandleaders, lots of whom discovered giant audiences on streaming companies, are additionally spreading jazz to completely different areas within the metropolis.

The Alphabet Metropolis venue Nublu, which describes itself as “a bit of clubhouse the place mates get collectively and simply play music,” hosts Monday nights that mix jazz, digital music and rock. And the Haitian restaurant Cafe Erzulie, on the border of Bushwick and Mattress-Stuy, has bluish-green partitions with palm-leaf patterns moderately than the darkish vibe of a jazz bar.

“Updating our sense of the place this music occurs is likely to be elementary to re-establishing jazz’s place in tradition,” Giovanni Russonello writes in The Occasions, “particularly at a second when the tradition appears prepared for a brand new wave of jazz.” See a number of the new artists and areas right here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending