Connect with us

World

New EU law will shield journalists from spyware and state interference

Published

on

New EU law will shield journalists from spyware and state interference

The European Fee has proposed a brand new regulation that will prohibit using spy ware towards journalists and state interference in editorial choices.

The laws goals to strengthen press freedom, guarantee a plurality of voices and improve transparency on media possession and conflicts of pursuits.

It comes at a time of reducing belief in media and growing threats towards information retailers and professionals throughout the continent.

A number of EU nations are beneath scrutiny over perceived threats to press freedom. The Greek authorities has admitted to tapping the telephone of an examine journalist; Slovenia has been condemned for slashing funds to the nationwide information company; and Hungary has been criticised for permitting extreme media focus within the palms of some homeowners.

The final decade has additionally seen a string of murders of investigative journalists, resembling Daphne Caruana Galizia in Malta, Ján Kuciak in Slovakia, Giorgos Karaivaz in Greece and Peter de Vries within the Netherlands

Advertisement

“That is the laws for the occasions we stay in – not the occasions we want to stay in,” mentioned Věra Jourová, the Fee’s vice-president for values and transparency, whereas unveiling the draft regulation.

“For some, it is going to be an excessive amount of. For others, it is going to be too little.”

Dubbed the Media Freedom Act, the laws envisions a brand new set of protections and rights for each journalists and media retailers, along with dos and don’ts for governments.

EU nations shall be forbidden from interfering in editorial decision-making, looking and seizing company premises, and conducting surveillance operations towards journalists and their kin.

Utilizing spy ware to infiltrate and observe a journalist’s machine can even be banned – programs like Predator and Pegasus have been used to assemble private data, extract recordsdata and passwords, and monitor conversations and textual content messages in actual time.

Advertisement

The ban, nonetheless, incorporates a notable exception that may allow spy ware “on the grounds of nationwide safety.”

EU officers insist the exception was inevitable and has been narrowed down as a lot as legally potential, inserting a excessive burden of proof on regulation enforcement to reveal their actions are justified.

“On no account will the actions of a journalist be regarded a threat to nationwide safety,” mentioned Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the inner market, who introduced the act subsequent to Jourová.

‘Prevention higher than the remedy’

The brand new guidelines will compel governments to make sure public media receives secure, dependable and enough funding to supply audiences neutral journalism, whereas top-level administration positions must be appointed by an “open and non-discriminatory” process.

The allocation of state promoting, an vital income, must be clear and proportionate with a view to forestall the partisan exploitation of media retailers.

Advertisement

“We would like really public state media – not state or get together media,” Jourová mentioned.

The act additionally imposes some obligations on media firms: they are going to be requested to reveal their possession and the potential conflicts of pursuits which may affect their editorial line and day-to-day reporting.

A European Board for Media Companies shall be set as much as oversee the act’s implementation, give skilled recommendation and ship non-binding opinions on how market concentrations can affect the media panorama.

In a joint assertion forward of the act’s presentation, the European Journal Media Affiliation (EMMA) and the European Newspaper Publishers’ Affiliation (ENPA) attacked the draft regulation and known as for its dismissal.

“It’s not acceptable and extremely problematic that in a proposal meant to guard media freedom the European Fee reveals plans to de facto override the precept of publishers’ editorial freedom (…) in addition to the liberty to take a position and conduct a enterprise,” the 2 associations wrote.

Advertisement

In the meantime, Reporters With out Borders praised the regulation for introducing new protections for journalists and the correct of residents to obtain “pluralistic and unbiased data for the advantage of the general public debate.”

“(The act) displays the European Fee’s will to protect the Union’s values towards highly effective private-sector companies, authoritarian states and exterior manipulation,” mentioned Christophe Deloire, the organisation’s secretary-general, who warned the textual content required additional enchancment.

Jourová and Breton harassed the Fee was not making an attempt to manage media themselves however set up the required safeguards to make sure free press can work independently and with out undue interference.

They argued the act supplies the manager with a authorized foundation to launch authorized motion towards member states who violate the principles, a course of that may result in a ruling by the European Court docket of Justice and hefty day by day fines.

“I’ve no phantasm this can be a silver bullet. This requires a collective effort from all sides,” Jourová mentioned. “Prevention is best than the remedy.”

Advertisement

The draft regulation shall be topic to amendments by the European Parliament and nationwide ministers. As soon as the co-legislators attain a compromise textual content, the Media Freedom Act shall be adopted and enter into pressure.

“This can be a matter of nice urgency,” mentioned Breton.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Israel's US ambassador says beeper operation will 'seem simple' compared to what is planned for Iran

Published

on

Israel's US ambassador says beeper operation will 'seem simple' compared to what is planned for Iran

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter said there will be some surprises amid the Jewish State’s conflict with Iran that will make Israel’s explosions of pagers and walkie-talkies used by members of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syria last year look “simple.”

“We’ve pulled off a number of surprises,” Leiter said during a Tuesday appearance on the TV network Merit Street.

“When the dust settles, you’re going to see some surprises on Thursday night and Friday that will make the beeper operation almost seem simple,” he continued.

Leiter was referring to near-simultaneous detonations of pagers used by members of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group that killed at least 12 people, including two children, and wounded nearly 3,000 on Sept. 17 in Lebanon and Syria. The following day, at least 25 people were killed and more than 600 were wounded when walkie-talkies were detonated in the region.

Advertisement

TRUMP, RUBIO CUTTING G7 TRIP SHORT, RETURNING TO DC AS CHATTER INDICATES IRANIANS FLEEING TEHRAN

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter said there will be some surprises that will make Israel’s beeper operation look “simple.” (Getty Images)

Israel was subsequently found to be behind the attacks, in which small amounts of explosives hidden in the devices were detonated. A U.S. official told The Associated Press at the time that Israel briefed the U.S. government after the attacks.

But then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the U.S. “did not know about, nor was it involved in, these incidents.”

Leiter on Tuesday also posted a video message on X that was recorded outside the Situation Room in the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., where he explained that Israel was “not in the business of regime change.”

Advertisement

MIKE JOHNSON CALLS OFF ISRAEL TRIP AMID IRAN CONFLICT

Yechiel Leiter

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter said Israel was “not in the business of regime change.” (Getty Images)

“Today we continue to peel back the surface-to-surface missile systems that are spread throughout Iran. We’ve reached the point where between a third and a half have been demolished,” he said. “We hit today the broadcast center in the middle of Tehran after we informed the people living in the vicinity to leave. Hundreds of thousands of Tehranis have escaped Tehran to be out of the line of danger. And we took out the broadcast system. This is very important because this serves the mullahs and their information campaign, the propaganda campaign throughout.”

“Iran, to incite the public and to warn the public against any kind of demonstrations against the government,” the ambassador continued. “A lot of questions have been asked today about regime change. In many of the interviews that I gave, that was the key question. We’re not in the business of regime change. We’re interested in neutralizing the threat to our existence through a nuclear weaponization program in Iran and a ballistic missile program.”

Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful, and U.S. intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency have said Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon.

Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the U.S.

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter said the Jewish State has “pulled off a number of surprises.” (Getty Images)

Advertisement

“If the Iranian people rise up and change their regime, that’s their choice,” Leiter said. “And if we play a role in facilitating that eventuality, then history will judge us favorably, I believe. It’s important also to emphasize that our economy remains strong and resilient despite the war, and the stock market in Israel once again, for the second day in a row, continued to rise.”

“We are working very hard to assist those stranded both in Israel wanting to leave and those wanting to get back to Israel, to their families, to their positions in society and the army,” he added. “And we’re hoping to find solutions through our neighbors in the next couple of days. We continue to press on. We continue to press forward. And we thank you for your support and prayers.”

Fox News’ Greg Norman and Jennifer Griffin contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Coal-hooked Poland constructs first ever offshore wind farm

Published

on

Coal-hooked Poland constructs first ever offshore wind farm

Published on

ADVERTISEMENT

Once reliant on coal for the majority of its electricity, the country of 36 million that currently holds the EU rotating presidency is trying to reduce its dependence on the fossil fuel.

With many mines becoming unprofitable and old infrastructure in decline, the Polish government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk has planned a gradual closure of coal facilities in the south of the country. As the coal regions of the country come to terms with this shift, northern Poland adjacent to the Baltic Sea is booming.

Ignacy Niemczycki, the deputy minister in the Chancellery, briefed a handful of Brussels-based journalists on board the Jantar passenger ship, telling Euronews that the wind farm should have a lifecycle of up to 30 years and be a major part of the energy transition.

“It’s in the interest of the Polish economy to invest in renewables, nuclear, and gas to stabilise the grid,” the minister told Euronews.

Advertisement

Baltic Power – a joint venture between ORLEN and Northland Power

Situated 23 kilometres off the northern coast near Choczewo and Łeba, the wind farm is among the most advanced renewable energy projects in the Polish Economic Zone. The final installed capacity of the project is expected to reach 1140 MW, enough to supply electricity to approximately 1.5 million Polish households.

Poland also to invest in nuclear

Renewables will only be one part of the Polish energy mix. Plans for the first ever nuclear plant, which will also be located on Poland’s northern Baltic Sea coast, were put in place under the former Law and Justice (PiS) government and have been continued by Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s current ruling coalition.

Niemczycki told Euronews that a second nuclear project is being considered and Poland is keeping a close eye on Canada as it experiments with the first ever mini nuclear plant, known as a Small Modular Reactor (SMR). SMRs could can potentially power up to 300 MW(e) per unit.

“We will see a major change in Poland’s energy mix over the next 15 years,” said Niemczycki. “Nuclear will become the new baseline, with renewables and gas providing flexibility and stability.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

France’s Macron Faces Dilemma With Intention to Recognize Palestinian State

Published

on

France’s Macron Faces Dilemma With Intention to Recognize Palestinian State

Turbulent relations between France and Israel are nothing new, but even by those historical standards the crisis caused by President Emmanuel Macron’s apparently imminent readiness to recognize a Palestinian state is acute.

The postponement, as a result of fighting between Israel and Iran, of a United Nations conference this week convened to explore the creation of a Palestinian state has deferred any announcement but appears to have redoubled Mr. Macron’s resolve. “Whatever the circumstances, I have stated my determination to recognize a Palestinian state,” Mr. Macron said on Friday. “That determination is whole.”

“We must reorganize it as soon as we can,” he said of the conference, which he was to chair with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia. French officials close to Mr. Macron say he has told the crown prince of his firm intention to recognize a Palestinian state.

Vilified by Israel as leading “a crusade against the Jewish state,” and spurned in his peacemaking efforts by the United States, which is implacably opposed to the conference and has urged countries to shun it, Mr. Macron is confronted by a diplomatic predicament that will test his renowned adaptability, viewed by some as wobbliness.

Mr. Macron — outraged, like much of the world, by the almost 56,000 Palestinians killed by Israel in Gaza since the start of the war, and by its near or total blockade of the strip in recent months — has spoken of “a moral duty and political requirement” to recognize a Palestinian state.

Advertisement

In the absence of Israeli plans for Gaza, and in the face of Israel’s bombardment of Iran aimed at destroying its nuclear program, Mr. Macron believes that only a strong political commitment to Palestinian statehood can open the way to a two-state peace, persuade Hamas to lay down its arms and eventually advance regional stability.

The Israeli view is the opposite: that French recognition would reward Hamas terrorism. A senior French envoy, speaking on condition of anonymity, said she was dressed down for several hours this month in Jerusalem by Ron Dermer, the Israeli minister of strategic affairs, and Tzachi Hanegbi, the national security adviser, who told her that Mr. Macron serves the ends of Hamas and “supports a terrorist state.”

“I suspect there is some relief at the postponement,” said Lakhdar Brahimi, a former Algerian foreign minister and long a senior U.N. diplomat, referring to the conference’s French and Saudi co-chairs. “What are they going to do without U.S. support? This will change nothing on the ground.”

The history of ties between Israel and France, which hesitated before recognizing the newborn state in 1949, only to provide critical military and technological support, has known many highs and lows. “This is a moment of particularly extreme tension,” said Miriam Rosman, an Israeli historian who wrote a book on the relationship. “Macron is neither consequential nor coherent and may be on the verge of a grave error.”

That is not the view of several officials in Mr. Macron’s entourage, including his diplomatic adviser, Emmanuel Bonne, and his Middle East adviser, Anne-Claire Legendre. They share the conviction of a growing number of European states, many previously supportive of Israel, that the most right-wing government in Israel’s history is leading the country down a blind alley at devastating cost in Palestinian lives.

Advertisement

For Israel, France is a point of particular sensitivity. Spanish, Irish and Norwegian recognition of a Palestinian state last year was one thing; French recognition would be of a different order, given the intensity of an emotional historical bond.

France is the only nuclear power and only permanent member of the U.N. Security Council in the European Union. Some 150,000 French citizens live in Israel, according to the foreign ministry; 48 of them were among the 1,200 people killed in the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack.

“There is fundamental French attachment and commitment to Israel that stems in part from the history of the Vichy regime,” said Gilles Kepel, a leading French expert on the Middle East. The regime, which led a rump France under Nazi occupation, deported 76,000 Jews to their deaths.

France made a critical contribution in the 1950s to Israel’s development of its unacknowledged nuclear bomb. It provided Mirage fighter jets that played an important role in Israel’s defense.

In 1967, however, President Charles de Gaulle called the Jews an “elite people, sure of itself and domineering.” Israel was outraged. Seeking to heal the wounds of the Algerian war, he set out to befriend the Arab world and imposed an arms embargo on Israel.

Advertisement

Support for Israel has since been tempered by an unbending French commitment to a Palestinian state, initially laid out before the Knesset in 1982 by President François Mitterrand, the first French head of state to visit Israel. Unlike the United States, France has been consistent in its rejection of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which has turned Palestinian statehood into an ever more distant chimera.

“Recognition and full admission of the Palestinian state to the United Nations are a precursor to a political solution,” said a French statement that reflected Mr. Macron’s thinking and was intended to set the framework for the conference in New York.

This amounts to the antithesis of the Israeli and American positions that any Palestinian state demands prior negotiation on security, borders, governance and other matters. But that approach has yielded nothing for a long time. Just this month, Israel announced it would build 22 new settlements in the West Bank, the largest expansion in two decades.

“The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognize a conjectural Palestinian state,” the Trump administration said in a cable last week first reported by Reuters.

On Thursday, Mr. Macron posted a statement on X lauding Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president, saying that a letter “of hope, courage and clarity” received from him last Tuesday “traced the path toward a horizon of peace.”

Advertisement

In the letter, Mr. Abbas called for Hamas to “hand over its weapons,” immediately free all hostages and leave Gaza. He also committed to reform the notoriously corrupt and ineffective Palestinian Authority.

The letter met several of the conditions set by Mr. Macron for French recognition of a Palestinian state. But other voices close to the president are pushing him in another direction.

“The very idea of Palestinian state can only be envisaged after Hamas has laid down its arms, its commanders in Gaza have gone into exile, and the people of the West Bank and Gaza have renounced their murderous dream of a Palestine stretching from the sea to the Jordan border,” said Bernard-Henri Lévy, a French author and intellectual who has the ear of Mr. Macron.

He suggested that Mr. Macron was still torn, buffeted from both sides, but leaning in the direction of delaying French recognition, which the president has said should not come in isolation. Germany, a close ally of both France and Israel, said this month that recognition would send “the wrong signal.”

As for Prince Mohamed of Saudi Arabia, he finds himself obliged to juggle his close relationship with President Trump and his determination to advance Palestinian statehood. While the prince has described Israel’s war in Gaza as “genocide,” Mr. Macron has gone through contortions to appear balanced since Oct. 7, 2023.

Advertisement

The French president governs the largest Muslim and Jewish populations in Western Europe. He is confronted by a far left that has made “Free Palestine” its slogan and by the inescapability of France’s historical debt to Jews.

“This is no gift” and comes “far, far too late,” Rima Hassan, a far-left French member of the European Parliament, who is of Palestinian descent, said in April of Mr. Macron’s stated intention to recognize a Palestinian state. She was recently detained by Israel when aboard a charity vessel trying to take aid to Gaza and was later released.

Now Mr. Macron, the “at-the-same-time” president, so-called for his endless equivocations, must make up his mind. Of the 193 U.N. members, 147 have already recognized a Palestinian state.

But, as Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to Washington, put it, “French recognition would bring greater diplomatic pressure on Israel and further erosion of our legitimacy, but not the creation of a Palestinian state any time soon, if ever.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending