World
London court to decide whether WikiLeaks founder Assange is extradited to the US
LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange faces a hearing Monday in the High Court in London that could end with him being sent to the U.S. to face espionage charges, or provide him another chance to appeal his extradition.
The outcome will depend on how much weight judges give to assurances U.S. officials have provided that Assange’s rights won’t be trampled if he goes on trial.
In March, two judges rejected the bulk of Assange’s arguments but said he could take his case to the Court of Appeal unless the U.S. guaranteed he would not face the death penalty if extradited and would have the same free speech protections as a U.S. citizen.
The court said that if Assange, who is an Australian citizen, couldn’t rely on the First Amendment then it was arguable his extradition would be incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, which also provides free speech and press protections.
The U.S. has provided those reassurances, though Assange’s legal team and supporters argue they are not good enough to rely on to send him to the U.S. federal court system.
The U.S., for example, said Assange could seek to rely on the rights and protections of the First Amendment but that a decision on that would ultimately be up to a judge. In the past, the U.S. said it would argue at trial that he was not entitled to the constitutional protection because he’s not a U.S. citizen.
“The U.S. has limited itself to blatant weasel words claiming that Julian can ‘seek to raise’ the First Amendment if extradited,” his wife, Stella Assange, said. “The diplomatic note does nothing to relieve our family’s extreme distress about his future — his grim expectation of spending the rest of his life in isolation in U.S. prison for publishing award-winning journalism.”
Assange, 52, has been indicted on 17 espionage charges and one charge of computer misuse over his website’s publication of a trove of classified U.S. documents almost 15 years ago. American prosecutors allege that Assange encouraged and helped U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks published.
His lawyers say he could face up to 175 years in prison if convicted, though American authorities have said any sentence would likely be much shorter.
Assange’s family and supporters say his physical and mental health have suffered during more than a decade of legal battles, including taking refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London from 2012 until 2019. He has spent the last five years in a British high-security prison.
Assange’s lawyers argued in February that he was a journalist who exposed U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sending him to the U.S., they said, would expose him to a politically motivated prosecution and risk a “flagrant denial of justice.”
The U.S. government said his actions went way beyond those of a journalist gathering information and put lives at risk in his bid to solicit, steal and indiscriminately publish classified government documents.
If Assange prevails Monday, it would set the stage for an appeal process likely to extend what has already been a long legal saga.
If the court accepts the word of the U.S., it would mark the end of Assange’s legal challenges in the U.K., though it’s unclear what would immediately follow.
His legal team is prepared to ask the European Court of Human Rights to intervene. But his supporters fear Assange could possibly be transferred before the court in Strasbourg, France, could halt his removal.
The court could also postpone issuing a decision.
If he loses in court, he still may have another shot at freedom.
President Joe Biden said last month that he was considering a request from Australia to drop the case and let Assange return to his home country.
Officials provided no other details but Stella Assange said it was “a good sign” and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the comment was encouraging.

World
Japan Trade Negotiator Akazawa to Visit US for Tariff Talks From Friday
World
Red Cross fighting to reach hostages, alleviate 'catastrophic' situation in Gaza

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has not had the opportunity for more than 590 days to visit hostages in Gaza and provide them with medical care. However, Communications Coordinator for the International Committee of the Red Cross Jacob Kurtzer tells Fox News Digital that the organization has been ready to provide hostages with medical assistance “from day one” — despite not being granted access to them.
“It’s no secret that the ICRC has not been able to visit hostages to carry out the work that’s mandated — to carry out our humanitarian work, to visit, to bring medicine,” Kurtzer told Fox News Digital. “I can assure you it’s not for lack of trying, and I can assure you that every single day, our colleagues here, our colleagues at headquarters, and our colleagues at other delegations are working to try to find a way to get access.”
International Red Cross (ICRC) vehicles drive in Deir el-Balah as they transport US-Israeli hostage Edan Alexander on May 12, 2025, after being handed over by Al-Qassam Brigades. Palestinian militant group Hamas said its armed wing handed over a US-Israeli hostage held in Gaza since October 2023 on Monday, ahead of a regional visit by US President Donald Trump. (EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images)
ISRAELI AMBASSADOR LASHES OUT AT UN OFFICIAL, CONDEMNS UK, FRANCE, CANADA STATEMENT ON AID
Since its establishment over 160 years ago, the ICRC has prided itself on serving as a neutral body focused on delivering aid and medical care. However, since the war in Gaza began, the ICRC has faced criticism from some for not pushing to visit the hostages and for its volunteers taking part in Hamas-led hostage release ceremonies.
When asked by Fox News Digital about the ceremonies, Kurtzer said that ICRC workers in Gaza have “very little ability to dictate the terms and the protocols of the release operations.” However, he added that the organization believes these hostage release operations “must be done in dignity and should be done privately.”
“So, certainly there were things that we saw that we didn’t like. We conveyed our views about those directly through what we call our bilateral and confidential dialogue,” Kurtzer said.
Despite facing mounting pressure and obstacles, the ICRC seems to be sticking to its mission. Kurtzer said that the organization is ready to “jump at” any opportunity to reach the hostages and provide them with assistance. However, Hamas has still not given them that opportunity.

A woman looks at posters with images of hostages kidnapped in the deadly Oct. 7 attack on Israel by the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Tel Aviv, Israel, April 16, 2024. (REUTERS/Hannah McKay)
ISRAEL FIRES BACK AT UK OVER SUSPENDED TRADE TALKS, REJECTS ‘EXTERNAL PRESSURE’
Kurtzer also addressed the ICRC’s position on access to Palestinian detainees held by Israel.
When discussing the lack of opportunities to visit the hostages who have been held in Gaza since Hamas’ brutal Oct. 7 massacre, Kurtzer also mentioned that the ICRC would like to have the opportunity to visit Palestinians being held by Israel. Fox News Digital then pressed Kurtzer on whether the ICRC saw the situation of hostages in Gaza and Palestinians being held in Israel as equivalent. Kurtzer later clarified the comments in a statement to Fox News Digital.
“The ICRC recognizes the distinction between hostages and detainees enshrined in international humanitarian law (IHL). Hostages are captured or held with the threat of being harmed or killed to pressure another party into doing something, as a condition for the hostage’s release or safety. Hostage-taking is a violation of IHL,” he said. “We provide assistance and work to alleviate suffering on all sides of a conflict. Under IHL, the ICRC must be notified of and granted access to Palestinians in Israeli custody, and we continue to seek this access.”

Palestinians continue their daily lives under harsh conditions amid the rubble of destroyed buildings in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza following the enforcement of a ceasefire agreement, on February 10, 2025. (Mahmoud ssa/Anadolu via Getty Images)
AT LEAST 82 KILLED IN ISRAELI STRIKES ON GAZA AS CRITICAL AID FAILS TO REACH PALESTINIANS
Beyond the hostages, ICRC is tasked with providing humanitarian assistance in Gaza, something Kurtzer said is urgently needed. He called the situation in the Strip “catastrophic.”
Kurtzer recalled the relief that the recent ceasefire provided those on the ground in Gaza.
“It provided hope. It provided hope for families on all sides. It provided hope to families of the hostages. It provided hope for people living inside Gaza,” Kurtzer said. However, the resumption of military action has “contributed to a sense of despair,” he said.

A truck loaded with humanitarian aid for the Gaza Strip makes its way to the Kerem Shalom crossing in southern Israel, Israel-Gaza border, Tuesday, May 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)
Since Kurtzer spoke with Fox News Digital, Israel has altered its position on humanitarian access, now allowing some aid trucks into Gaza. However, critics argue that the scale of assistance remains insufficient.
U.K. Foreign Minister David Lammy announced on Tuesday that his country was suspending trade talks with Israel over the handling of the war in Gaza. French President Emmanuel Macron also condemned Israel in a post on X. Additionally, U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher said the aid being allowed in was a “drop in the ocean.”
“We really believe that the path forward is one where humanitarian assistance is allowed in and we urgently and we appeal over and over again for the parties themselves to find a better path forward because what we’re seeing now is just really very, very devastating,” Kurtzer told Fox News Digital.
World
Blue Cards: Which EU country offers the highest minimum salary?

The latest report on Blue Cards shows that Germany welcomes the most workers from outside the EU among the bloc’s member states.
Berlin issued around 69,000 of these permits, or 78% of the EU’s total of 89,000.
Poland comes in second place with 7,000, followed by France at 4,000, says Eurostat.
The Blue Card is considered a golden ticket for highly skilled professionals from non-EU countries. Denmark and Ireland are the only countries that don’t issue these permits at all.
What kind of salary does a Blue Card guarantee?
This special visa also guarantees a minimum annual gross salary, even in countries without a statutory minimum wage, such as Italy, Sweden, Austria and Finland.
Thresholds vary widely. From a maximum of around €68,000 in the Netherlands to just over €16,000 in Bulgaria.
Also, the EU Blue Card directive proposes that the employer pay the cardholder a salary that’s at least 1.5 times the average of the respective country.
It’s called the “rule of thumb.” Figures for each country are indexed yearly.
Who is snapping up the most Blue Cards?
Indians lead the pack with 21,000 cards – almost a quarter of the total (24%), followed by Russians (9,000 or 11%), Turks (6,000 or 7%) and Belarusians (5,000 or 6%).
Qualifying for a Blue Card is relatively straightforward.
It requires either a university degree or three years of relevant work experience in the field related to the application. Blue Cards might also be issued after a cycle of studies attended in the EU.
The good news is, there are no language requirements.
The card also allows to travel freely within the Schengen Area, if the permit is issued by a Schengen country (Cyprus is the only exception among Blue Card countries).
Any other way to move to the EU for highly-skilled workers?
Blue Cards aren’t the only visas granting work and stay to non-EU workers.
In 2023, EU countries granted almost 11,000 “intra-corporate transfer permits,” allowing high-skilled citizens of third countries to move to EU branches of international companies.
The Netherlands issued a quarter (2,700) of them, followed by Germany and Hungary (both 1,900 or 18%), France (1,500 or 14%) and Spain (1,100 or 10%).
Most recipients were Indians (3,900 or 36% of all permits), Chinese (1,600 or 14%) and South Koreans (1,300 or 12%).
-
Education1 week ago
Harvard Letter Points to ‘Common Ground’ With Trump Administration
-
Culture1 week ago
Book Review: ‘Original Sin,’ by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson
-
News1 week ago
As Harvard Battles Trump, Its President Will Take a 25% Pay Cut
-
News1 week ago
Austin Welcomed Elon Musk. Now It’s Weird (in a New Way).
-
Education1 week ago
Video: Opinion | We Study Fascism, and We’re Leaving the U.S.
-
Culture1 week ago
Book Review: ‘Death Is Our Business,’ by John Lechner; ‘Putin’s Sledgehammer,’ by Candace Rondeaux
-
Politics1 week ago
Republicans say they're 'out of the loop' on Trump's $400M Qatari plane deal
-
News1 week ago
Menendez Brothers Resentenced to Life With Parole, Paving Way for Freedom