Connect with us

World

Fate of Ukrainian lands held by Russia still seems unclear

Published

on

Fate of Ukrainian lands held by Russia still seems unclear

TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — In response to Russian state TV, the way forward for the Ukrainian areas captured by Moscow’s forces is all however determined: Referendums on changing into a part of Russia will quickly happen there, and the joyful residents who had been deserted by Kyiv will be capable of prosper in peace.

In actuality, the Kremlin seems to be in no rush to seal the deal on Ukraine’s southern areas of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia and the japanese provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk, regardless that officers it put in there have already got introduced plans for a vote to affix Russia.

Because the warfare in Ukraine nears its six-month mark, Moscow faces a number of issues within the territory it occupies -– from pulverized civilian infrastructure that wants pressing rebuilding as colder climate looms, to guerrilla resistance and more and more debilitating assaults by Kyiv’s navy forces which have been gearing up for a counteroffensive within the south.

Analysts say that what might have been a transparent victory for the Kremlin is changing into one thing of a muddle.

“It’s clear that the scenario gained’t stabilize for a very long time,” even when referendums finally are held, says Nikolai Petrov, a senior analysis fellow in Chatham Home’s Russia and Eurasia Program. “There would be the guerrilla motion, there will probably be underground resistance, there will probably be terrorist acts, there will probably be shelling. … Proper now, the impression is that even the Kremlin doesn’t actually consider that by holding these referendums, it could draw a thick line below it.”

Advertisement

Moscow’s plans to include captured territories had been clear from the outset of the Feb. 24 invasion. A number of weeks in, separatist leaders of the self-proclaimed “individuals’s republics” of Donetsk and Luhansk, which the Kremlin acknowledged as unbiased states, voiced plans to carry votes on changing into a part of Russia. Whereas forces backed by Moscow management virtually all of Luhansk, some estimates say Russia and the separatists management about 60% of the Donetsk area.

Comparable bulletins adopted from Kremlin-backed administrations of the southern Kherson area, which is nearly fully occupied by Russians, and within the Zaporizhzhia area, massive swaths of that are below Moscow’s management.

Whereas the Kremlin coyly says it’s as much as the residents to determine whether or not they formally need to stay in Russia or Ukraine, lower-level officers talked about doable dates for the balloting.

Senior lawmaker Leonid Slutksy as soon as talked about July, though it didn’t happen. Vladimir Rogov, a Moscow-installed official within the Zaporizhzhia area, recommended the primary half of September. Kirill Stremousov, a Kremlin-backed official in Kherson, talked about scheduling it earlier than the tip of the 12 months.

As summer time wanes, there’s nonetheless no date for the referendums. Professional-Russian officers in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia say the votes will happen after Moscow takes full management of the remainder of the Donetsk area, however the Kremlin’s positive aspects there have been minimal not too long ago. Nonetheless, campaigns selling the votes are reportedly nicely underway.

Advertisement

Russian TV reveals cities with billboards proclaiming, “Along with Russia.” Stremousov reviews from Kherson virtually each day on social media about his journeys across the area, the place he meets individuals adamant about becoming a member of Russia. Within the Russian-controlled a part of Zaporizhzhia, the Moscow-installed administration already has ordered an election fee to organize for a referendum.

Balloting apart, there are different indicators that Russia is planning on staying.

The ruble has been launched alongside the Ukrainian hryvnia and has been used to pay out pensions and different advantages. Russian passports had been provided to residents in a fast-track citizenship process. Faculties had been reported to have switched to a Russian curriculum, beginning in September.

Russian license plates got to automotive homeowners by visitors police, with Kherson and Zaporizhzhia assigned Russian area numbers 184 and 185. The Russian Inside Ministry, which oversees the visitors police, didn’t responded to an Related Press request for remark to make clear how that was authorized, on condition that each areas are nonetheless a part of Ukraine.

Ukrainian officers and activists, in the meantime, paint an image that contrasts sharply with the Russian TV portrayal of a brilliant future for the occupied territories below Moscow’s beneficiant care.

Advertisement

Luhansk Gov. Serhiy Haidai instructed AP that 90% of the inhabitants within the province’s massive cities has left. Devastation and squalor “reigns” within the cities and cities seized by Russia, he mentioned, and there are only some villages not below Moscow’s management after weeks of exhausting battles.

Residents use “water from puddles” and construct “a bonfire within the yard to prepare dinner meals on, proper subsequent to rubbish, Haidai mentioned.

“Our folks that handle to return residence to gather their belongings don’t acknowledge cities and villages that used to blossom,” he added.

The scenario isn’t as dire within the southern metropolis of Kherson, which sits simply north of the Crimean Peninsula that Moscow annexed from Ukraine in 2014, in keeping with pro-Ukrainian activist Konstantin Ryzhenko. Kherson was captured with out a lot destruction early within the warfare, so most of its infrastructure is unbroken.

However provides of important items have been uneven, and costs for meals and drugs introduced in from Russia have spiked, Ryzhenko instructed AP, including that each are of “disgustingly low high quality.”

Advertisement

Early within the warfare, hundreds of Kherson residents repeatedly protested the occupation, however mass repressions compelled many both to flee town or to cover their views.

“Demonstrations have been inconceivable since Might. If you happen to publicly categorical something pro-Ukrainian, an opinion on no matter topic, you’re assured to be taken into detention, tortured and overwhelmed there,” Ryzhenko mentioned.

Melitopol Mayor Ivan Fedorov, whose metropolis within the Zaporizhzhia area additionally was occupied early within the warfare, echoed Ryzhenko’s sentiment.

Mass arrests and purges of activists and opinion-makers with pro-Kyiv views started in Might, mentioned Fedorov, who frolicked in Russian captivity for refusing to cooperate. Greater than 500 individuals in Melitopol stay in captivity, he instructed AP.

Regardless of that intimidation, he estimated that solely about 10% of those that stay within the metropolis would vote to affix Russia if a referendum takes place.

Advertisement

“The concept of a referendum has discredited itself,” Fedorov mentioned.

Kherson activist Ryzhenko believes a referendum could be rigged as a result of “they’re already speaking about voting on-line, voting at residence. … So, you perceive, the legitimacy of this voting will probably be nil.”

Russian political analyst Dmitry Oreshkin mentioned that as a result of so many individuals have left the occupied areas, “there will probably be nothing near a correct polling of the inhabitants about their preferences.”

However Ukrainian authorities nonetheless have to treat such votes as a critical concern, mentioned Vadim Karasev, head of the Kyiv-based Institute of International Methods suppose tank.

“After the referendums happen, Russia will contemplate the southern lands as a part of its personal territory and look at Ukrainian assaults as assaults on Russia,” Karasev mentioned in an interview.

Advertisement

He mentioned the Kremlin may also be utilizing the specter of referendums to stress Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to comply with negotiations on Moscow’s situations or else threat “shedding the south” and a big a part of its very important entry to the ocean.

Zelenskyy has mentioned that if Moscow goes forward with the votes, there will probably be no talks of any variety.

Within the meantime, Ukrainian forces proceed sporadic strikes in opposition to the Russian navy within the Kherson area. On Thursday, Ukraine’s Operational Command South reported killing 29 “occupiers” close to the city of Bilohirka, northeast of Kherson, in addition to destroying artillery, armored autos and a navy provide depot.

—-

Comply with the AP’s protection of the warfare at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Steven Spielberg Throws Apple Watch at ‘Sugarland Express’ 50th Anniversary and Remembers Finding ‘Jaws’ Script ‘Sitting Out’ in Producer’s Office

Published

on

Steven Spielberg Throws Apple Watch at ‘Sugarland Express’ 50th Anniversary and Remembers Finding ‘Jaws’ Script ‘Sitting Out’ in Producer’s Office

Apple, or at least its technology, was worried about the health and well-being of Hollywood’s greatest director.

In the middle of Steven Spielberg‘s Tribeca Festival talk on Saturday, where the filmmaker was celebrating the 50th anniversary of his debut feature, “The Sugarland Express,” he was interrupted by his Apple watch with a message that read “It looks like you’ve taken a hard fall.” Spielberg jokingly said “I’m not going to press the SOS [button]” before throwing it on the ground. “I’ll pick it up later,” he said, only to retrieve it a few minutes later when it started issuing some sort of distress signal.

Before the Q&A began, a taped message from “The Sugarland Express” star Goldie Hawn appeared on the screen, thanking Spielberg and reminiscing about the pivotal moment in her career—and his. The film was released in 1974, just one year before “Jaws,” and even though it received good reviews, Universal pulled it from theaters after two weeks because of lackluster box office results. “You’re the first audience to ever see ‘Sugarland Express’ in 50 years,” Spielberg said to a packed audience at the BMCC in Lower West Side Manhattan.

The three-time Academy Award-winning filmmaker told moderator and Variety Executive Editor Brent Lang that he was inspired to make the movie after reading an article with the headline “Modern Day Bonnie and Clyde” in a local Los Angeles Valley newspaper, The Citizens News. “It was the story of this couple in Texas, Bobby and Ila Fae Dent who, in order to get their baby back from child welfare, led a multi-car police chase through Texas, and it just seemed like an incredible story,” Spielberg said. He then sent the article to his friends Hal Barwood and Matthew Robbins and asked them if they wanted to work together and write a script.

But Universal wasn’t going to finance the film without a big star’s name above the title. “The movie wouldn’t have gotten made without her,” Spielberg said. Beyond her bankability, Spielberg felt that Hawn was a great fit for the role of Lou Jean Poplin, one of the naive cop car hijackers. “There was an element of the character, a bucolic element, that reminded me of the simplicity of Goldie’s heart,” he said.

Advertisement

However, filling out the rest of the ensemble inspired Spielberg and his casting director Shari Rhodes to look much farther afield from Hollywood. “I said to Shari, ‘Can you get some real people to be in this movie? Why does everybody have to be an actor? Why can’t you go into a bar and find Buster Daniels? Find a drunk for me,’” Spielberg joked. “She went into a bar, and she pulled this old guy out.” And he ended up being the well-lubricated passenger in the backseat when Hawn and her on-screen husband Clovis (played by William Atherton) steal a cop car and take a patrolman (Michael Sacks) hostage.

Since most of the film takes place in a car that is being followed by a caravan of police cars, news trucks, lookie-loos and well-wishers, Lang asked Spielberg if he thought of the movie during the O.J. Simpson Bronco chase. “I did! I did!” Spielberg replied. “I said, ‘Shit, they’re stealing my thunder!’”

“Sugarland Express” was also the beginning of his legendary collaborations with composer John Williams, and the pair have since worked together on “Jaws,” “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial,” “Jurassic Park,” “Schindler’s List” and many more. “I had been such a rabid fan of John’s scores, I used to collect soundtrack albums since I was a kid,” Spielberg said. “I vowed that if I ever get a chance to make a feature film, whoever this, I assumed he was British, guy John Williams, I want him to be the one to score it.”

He continued, “When ‘Sugarland’ was a reality…one of the first people I got in touch with was John. We met and had lunch and that was the beginning of…this is our 51st year working together.” To which the audience cheered.

Working on “Sugarland Express” with producers Richard Zanuck and David Brown led him to work with them again on “Jaws.”

Advertisement

“They had the galleys of this book in their office just sitting out called ‘Jaws’ I didn’t know what it was I was intrigued, and I went over to the assistant of Dick and I said, ‘Can I read this?’” Spielberg said. “I read it over the weekend and I was floored by it. I asked him if they would consider having me direct this, and there had already been a director assigned to it. Then about a month later when that didn’t work out they offered me the movie.”

In a year, when “Jaws” took a bite out of the box office, everyone would know Spielberg’s name and he’d be no one’s second choice to direct a movie about a shark, some dinosaurs or all manner of visitors from outer space.

Bonus trivia: The baby that Hawn and Atherton are trying to reunite with is played by Zanuck’s son, Harrison.

Continue Reading

World

Hezbollah bigger challenge than Hamas to Israel: ‘Crown jewel in the Iranian empire of terror’

Published

on

Hezbollah bigger challenge than Hamas to Israel: ‘Crown jewel in the Iranian empire of terror’

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

JERUSALEM — With Israel on the verge of a third full-blown war against Hezbollah because of the Lebanese organization’s constant firing of deadly missiles, drones and rockets, the differences and similarities between Hezbollah and Hamas are now under the microscope. 

The Islamic Republic of Iran finances the Mideast terrorist movements Hamas and Hezbollah, who have declared war on Israel and who are also responsible for committing numerous terrorist attacks against American civilians and military service personnel.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital contacted experts for a tale-of-the-tape analysis on Hamas, which is situated in the southern Gaza Strip, and Hezbollah, which is the de facto ruler of the Lebanese state on Israel’s northern border. Israel has fought two wars against Hezbollah, in 1982 and in 2006.

“Hezbollah is the crown jewel in the Iranian empire of terror and evil and is by far the most powerful Iranian proxy equipped with nation state capabilities and even with more firepower than several European militaries have today,” Jonathan Conricus, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former IDF spokesman told Fox News Digital.

HEZBOLLAH TERRORISTS LAUNCH MASSIVE ROCKET ATTACK ON ISRAEL AMID MOUNTING TENSIONS

In this Feb. 13, 2016, file photo, Hezbollah fighters hold flags as they attend the memorial for slain leader Sheik Abbas al-Mousawi, who was killed by an Israeli airstrike in 1992, in Tefahta village, south Lebanon. (AP Photo/Mohammed Zaatari, File)

Despite widespread poverty and economic instability in Iran, the Islamic Republic is also a generous funding source of Hezbollah, providing the Lebanese terrorist organization with over $700 million a year, according to the Israel Defense Forces and the U.S. State Department. Joint military cooperation between Iran’s regime and Hezbollah has been a longstanding feature in Lebanon, Syria and throughout Europe with respect to terrorism and war planning.

Advertisement

“In a military comparison, Hezbollah is far more powerful than Hamas across the board in every military metric. In terms of the amount of rockets they have, the range, the accuracy or the payload or size of the warhead, also in terms of the amount of personnel, armed fighters, their training and their equipment,” Conricus added.

Israeli artillery

Israeli soldiers fire a mobile howitzer in the north of Israel, near the border with Lebanon Jan. 15, 2024.  (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg)

Hezbollah has amassed a massive arsenal of an estimated 150,000 rockets and missiles that are aimed at the Jewish state. The IDF has degraded Hamas’ supply of 20,000 rockets and missiles since the start of the war. However, Hamas was capable of launching eight rockets from the city of Rafah into Israel two weeks ago. Fox News Digital reported last week that Hezbollah launched over 200 missiles, rockets and drones into Israel.

The economics of Hamas and Hezbollah have similarities and differences in the scope of funding and military training from Tehran.  

“Hezbollah and Hamas are both terror organizations funded mainly by Iran. Hezbollah’s loyalty is only to Iran. Hamas is for everyone who helps it,” said Edy Cohen, a Lebanese-born Israeli scholar of Hezbollah.

HEZBOLLAH BOMBARDS ISRAEL WITH ROCKETS, DRONES

Advertisement
Hezbollah terrorists training.

Hezbollah terrorist organization’s Radwan forces in training video. (Memri.org)

Cohen, a researcher at the Eitan, the Israeli Center for Grand Strategy, said “Hamas is under a sea blockage and cannot fly to other countries and cannot receive goods or arms easily. Hezbollah can.”

The number of terrorists fighting for both organizations varies. The IDF has reduced Hamas’ terrorist force by nearly 50% since the start of the war to between 9,000 and 12,000 combatants.

“Under the guidance of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, the group boasts a troop strength of 20,000 to 25,000 full-time fighters, with additional tens of thousands in reserves,” the IDF wrote on its website. “Hezbollah’s elite Radwan Unit is particularly noted for its combat proficiency and strategic importance in conflicts across the region. This particular unit … was established with assistance from Iran’s Quds force.”

Walid Phares, co-president of #EducateAmerica and a professor of Middle East Studies, told Fox News Digital the first principal difference between Hamas and Hezbollah is “Hamas comes from the Muslim Brotherhood organizationally and ideologically, so it is a Sunni extremist group, a chapter of Ikhwan among many chapters in the region.” 

Ikhwan is an Arabic word for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Advertisement
A Palestinian fighter from the armed wing of Hamas takes part in a military parade

A terrorist from Hamas takes part in a military parade to mark the anniversary of the 2014 war with Israel near the border in the central Gaza Strip July 19, 2023. (Reuters/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa/File Photo)

He added that “Hezbollah comes from an opposite side. They are Shiites, but Jihadi Shiites, made of Lebanese Shia Islamists who have been recruited (and funded) by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, or the Sepah Pasdaran as early as 1980. They were launched by the Islamic Republic in northern Bekaa that year and marched south all the way to the southern suburb of Beirut and then to the south after Israel started to withdraw.”

ODDS OF ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH WAR ‘INEVITABLE,’ EXPERTS FEAR: ‘TOTALLY PESSIMISTIC’

Benjamin Netanyahu

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the IDF Gibor base in Kiryat Shmona, where he was briefed by 769th Brigade Commander Avraham Marciano and Northern Command Home Front coordinator Brig.-Gen. (Res.) Alon Friedman June 5, 2024. (Israeli Government Press Office)

Phares, co-host of the popular “War and Freedom” podcast, said Hamas’ “ultimate goal is to destroy Israel, establish a Taliban-like emirate or state in Palestine, but, more importantly, have that Islamic entity join a new Caliphate across the region. Hamas as such is not a ‘nationalist’ group, but a Pan-Islamist organization.”

In contrast to Hamas, Phrase noted that Hezbollah believes “in exactly the doctrine of the Iranian regime. That is to establish a Khomeinist republic in Lebanon to join the sister Islamic Republic in Iran, and also in Iraq and Yemen, and eventually form a ‘parallel’ Shia Khomeinist (Jihadist) type of Caliphate, known as Imamate, Shia Islamists reject the Sunni Caliphate.” 

Terrorists from Hezbollah train in Lebannon

Hezbollah Radwan forces training in Southern Lebanon near the Israeli border. (AP/Hassan Ammar)

The Islamic revolutionary Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini founded the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979, with a mission to export his Shia Islamism across the world.

Advertisement

“So, they are at polar opposites ideologically, how did they come together and what is common between them. What is common is, first, that they both want to destroy the Zionist entity [Israel]. That’s the ultimate joint goal. Then, they both want to bring down all Arab regimes who are with peace or are obstructing their jihad. They are both enemies of America,” Phares said.

Iran military parade

An Iranian military truck carries surface-to-air missiles past a portrait of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during a parade on the country’s annual army day April 18, 2018, in Tehran. (Atta Kenare/AFP via Getty Images)

The Iranian regime’s financing of both terrorist movements is a crucial factor, according to Mideast experts, in understanding jingoism in the region and the destabilization of the Levant and the Islamic heartland in the Middle East. 

Qatar hosts the Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh, who told the Qatari-owned Al Jazeera network in 2022— two years before Hamas launched its Oct. 7 invasion into southern Israel — that Tehran funnels at least $70 million to Hamas each year.  

“Iran stands at the forefront of supporting the cause and [the] people of Palestine,” Haniyeh said in March.

NETANYAHU SAYS ISRAEL ‘PREPARED FOR VERY INTENSE ACTION’ AGAINST IRAN-BACKED HEZBOLLAH AMID RISING TENSIONS

Advertisement

The intense relations between Hamas and Hezbollah stem from the mid-1990s.

Counterterrorism expert Bruce Hoffman also noted in a June 14 article on the website of the Council of Foreign Relations that “some five hundred Hamas fighters were trained in Iran in preparation for the October 7 attacks, a reflection of Iran’s longstanding support of Hamas.”

Phares explained that Hamas and Hezbollah came together in 1994-1995 when “hundreds of Hamas cadres and leaders were exiled by Israel to south Lebanon. They were hosted by Hezbollah, who linked them up with the regime in Tehran. They were received, funded and armed. They were told the two Jihadisms can work together despite the Sunni and Shia divide. “

Hamas leader Sinwar.

Yahya Sinwar, center, the elected leader of Hamas, appears during a ceremony for fighters killed by Israeli air strikes at Yarmouk football stadium May 24, 2021, in Gaza City, Gaza.  (Laurent Van der Stockt/Getty Images)

He said Hamas embraced the Shia side to the “point that in 2011 they eventually sided with [Syria President Bashar] Assad’s (pro-Khomeinist) regime against Sunni Salafi Jihadi factions. That was a major crisis for Hamas, accused by Sunnis of betraying them. But, eventually, when Assad regained ground in Syria, and the Islamic Regime shifted the fight to Gaza, Hamas regained ‘Jihadi notoriety’ in the region.”

“Strategically speaking, Hezbollah is currently enjoying a situation where it has Israel exactly where it wants it. And Israel has indeed achieved quite a lot of military achievements. But, on the strategic level, Hezbollah is benefiting from an attrition in Israeli capabilities and from a very challenging diplomatic situation,” Conricus, the former IDF spokesman, noted.

Advertisement

A mural of Hassan Nasrallah with a red background and people cheering in front of it

Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah speaks via a video link as his supporters raise their hands during the Shiite holy day of Ashoura in the southern suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, Aug. 9, 2022. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

“As long as the international community fails to understand the severity and doesn’t act with urgency in order to facilitate a diplomatic deal that will return Israeli civilians to their homes safely, the only other option that remains is the military one, which Israel, unfortunately, will have to use in order to implement the responsibility of any government to safeguard the lives of its civilians. I hope that can be avoided, but currently that does not seem to be the case.”

The U.S. has sanctioned both Hamas and Hezbollah as foreign terrorist organizations. The EU has merely sanctioned Hezbollah’s so-called “military wing,” a terrorist entity, while France has blocked the designation of a full terror proscription of Hezbollah. The EU sanctioned Hamas as a terrorist organization in 2003.

Continue Reading

World

Al-Qaeda affiliate claims responsibility for June attack in Burkina Faso

Published

on

Al-Qaeda affiliate claims responsibility for June attack in Burkina Faso

The attack on June 11 was one of the deadliest suffered by the West African nation’s army.

An armed group linked to al-Qaeda, Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), has claimed responsibility for what it said was an attack on June 11 that killed more than 100 Burkina Faso soldiers in the Mansila area near the border with Niger, the SITE Intelligence Group said.

On Sunday, SITE quoted a JNIM statement as saying that five days ago “fighters stormed a military post in the town, where they killed 107 soldiers and took control of the site”.

Several videos shared online by JNIM showed raging gunfire around the army base. Another video showed a display of ammunition and dozens of weapons, and at least seven captured Burkina Faso soldiers.

June’s reported attack has been one of the deadliest suffered by the West African Sahel nation’s army.

Advertisement

Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel programme at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, told Al Jazeera that the government is trying to fight the armed groups but has not recruited professional soldiers to do so.

“They recruited 50,000 volunteers, many of whom got only a short period of training. So they’re kind of vulnerable to losses and it is not very efficient, unfortunately. Almost every day now, there are incidents like this,” he said.

“Right now you have 50-60 percent of [Burkina Faso’s] territory which is outside government control … The government is trying hard, they’re buying weapons, they have a military partnership with Russia but they’re not very successful.”

Niger and Mali are also struggling to contain fighting linked to al-Qaeda and ISIL (ISIS). The unrest is also threatening the stability of the Sahel region as the armed groups, who control swathes of territories in Burkina Faso and Mali, use them as bases to target southern coastal countries.

Laessing noted that while Mali and Niger have similar problems, their countries are much bigger.

Advertisement

“Burkina Faso is the smallest of the three and very densely populated … Whenever the army attacks, you have many more civilian victims, that makes it so brutal,” he said.

Over more than a decade, armed groups have killed thousands and displaced more than two million in Burkina Faso.

Moreover, the country has topped the recent Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) list of the world’s most neglected displacement crises.

The violence killed more than 8,400 people last year, double the number of deaths from the previous year, according to the NRC.

About two million civilians were trapped in 36 blockaded towns across Burkina Faso by the end of 2023.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending