World
Explosions rock Ukraine’s Kyiv in early hours of New Year’s Day
Quite a few explosions have rocked the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, minutes after midnight on New Yr’s Day.
The assaults on Kyiv on Sunday adopted a barrage of no less than 20 cruise missiles fired at targets throughout Ukraine in what officers there referred to as “Terror on New Yr’s Eve”.
The brand new assault set off air raid sirens throughout the nation, and a few individuals in Kyiv took to their balconies shouting “Glory to Ukraine! Glory to the heroes”.
Kyiv’s Mayor Vitali Klitschko mentioned on Telegram that the primary blasts of the brand new 12 months started roughly half-hour after midnight, hitting two districts. He mentioned there have been no speedy reviews of casualties.
The town army administration mentioned that 23 Russian-launched “air objects” had been destroyed and that air defence programs had been working.
Earlier within the night, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy mentioned Ukrainians would combat till victorious within the battle that’s now in its eleventh month.
“We combat and can proceed to combat. For the sake of the principle phrase: ‘victory’,” he mentioned within the emotional deal with. “I wish to say to all of you: Ukrainians, you might be unbelievable! See what we have now achieved and what we’re doing!”
“We combat as one workforce — the entire nation, all our areas. I like you all. I wish to thank each invincible area of Ukraine,” he added.
The sooner spherical of assaults on Kyiv broken the Lodge Alfavito and a residential constructing, killing no less than one individual and wounding no less than a dozen others. Klitschko mentioned a Japanese journalist was among the many wounded and was taken to a hospital.
Filmmaker Yaroslav Mutenko, 23, who lives in an condo complicated close to Lodge Alfavito, mentioned he was within the bathe getting ready to go to a New Yr’s Eve social gathering when he heard a increase. He mentioned there had been related explosions within the space throughout a earlier assault in October, however nothing as loud as Saturday’s explosion.
As he watched rescue staff cordon off the road in entrance of the resort, he informed the AFP information company that he nonetheless deliberate to go to the social gathering at a pal’s home.
“Our enemies the Russians can destroy our calm however they can’t destroy our spirit,” he mentioned. “Why do I’m going have a good time with buddies? As a result of this 12 months I perceive that it is very important have individuals close to.”
Raids had been additionally reported within the southern metropolis of Mykolaiv the place a neighborhood official mentioned seven individuals had been injured.
Governor Vitaliy Kim mentioned on Telegram mentioned Russia had focused civilians with the raids, one thing Moscow has beforehand denied. “In accordance with immediately’s tendencies, the occupiers are putting not simply crucial [infrastructure] … in lots of cities [they are targeting] merely residential areas, motels, garages, roads,” he mentioned.
The assaults got here at an unusually quickened rhythm, one which alarmed officers simply 36 hours after Russia launched a barrage of missiles on Thursday to break power infrastructure services.
Ukrainian International Minister Dmytro Kuleba highlighted the cruel civilian toll of this newest offensive – that “this time, Russia’s mass missile assault is intentionally focusing on residential areas, not even the power infrastructure”. “Struggle felony Putin ‘celebrates’ New Yr by killing individuals,” he added, calling for Russia to be disadvantaged of its everlasting seat on the United Nations Safety Council.
Ukraine’s human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets described the assault as “Terror on New Yr’s Eve”.
Ukraine’s defence ministry in the meantime responded with a message of defiance.
“With every new missile assault on civilian infrastructure, an increasing number of Ukrainians are satisfied of the necessity to combat till the whole collapse of Putin’s regime,” it mentioned on Telegram.
Curfews starting from 7pm to midnight native time remained in place throughout Ukraine, making celebrations for the beginning of 2023 unimaginable in public areas.
A number of regional governors posted messages on social media warning residents to not break restrictions on New Yr’s Eve.
World
Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
World
Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions
World
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.
Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.
The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.
The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.
But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.
During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.
President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.
That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.
In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.
Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.
“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.
Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.
‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US
TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.
The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.
China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.
Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.
Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.
“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.
“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”
“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.
Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.
TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades