Connect with us

World

Despite dangers, deep roots make Appalachia hard to leave

Published

on

Despite dangers, deep roots make Appalachia hard to leave

GARRETT, Ky. (AP) — This tiny sliver of a city off a state freeway in jap Kentucky has been house to Brenda Francis and her husband, Paul, for many years.

Paul Francis was born 73 years in the past on this home, a yellow and brown one-story, which like many dwellings in Garrett is nestled in a valley between tall, forested hills. The retired faculty instructor loves it right here, and the couple was gifted the home by his dad and mom about 40 years in the past.

However after one other flood — this one possibly the worst they’ve seen — Brenda Francis mentioned she is finished. She joins many others on this nook of Appalachia who see this newest catastrophe as a devastating blow to their way of life. Some say they’re contemplating shifting away, regardless of their deep roots.

Francis, 66, mentioned her husband desires to remain: “However not me. I don’t wish to stay right here no extra, and he is aware of it. So we’re going to be getting out of right here.”

Kentucky’s Appalachian area has identified hardship. The coal economic system withered away and took the good-paying jobs with it. The opioid disaster flooded cities with thousands and thousands of ache capsules. Prospects had been so bleak that many individuals left, chopping the inhabitants in lots of counties by double digit percentages up to now 20 years. Within the Francis’ house county of Floyd, the inhabitants has declined by 15% since 2000. And family annual revenue in lots of the counties hit hardest by final week’s flooding is a bit more than half the nationwide common of about $65,000.

Advertisement

However many stayed, held by ties to their communities, households and their historical past right here. The flooding that hit the realm final week is making even a few of these stalwarts rethink, particularly in and round Garrett, a neighborhood of about 1,300 those who was based by a coal firm within the early 1900s.

The area’s robust social material and familial connections give pause to individuals contemplating shifting away from house, mentioned Ann Kingsolver, an Appalachian Research professor on the College of Kentucky.

“Social capital is basically necessary,” Kingsolver mentioned in an e mail message. “These are the assets that folks have by way of investing in social networks of kin and neighbors over a few years— a type of wealth past financial worth.”

When the 2008 monetary disaster hit, she mentioned, many younger individuals moved again to rural communities in Appalachia as a result of they’d a spot to stay and baby care choices.

Kingsolver mentioned there may be little accessible rental or motel area in these rural areas, however flooding victims usually get assist and shelter from family members and neighbors close by.

Advertisement

Pam Caudill lives on the identical road as her son, who’s been a giant assist for the reason that floodwaters reached 4 toes (1.2 meters) excessive in her house in Wayland, just some minutes from Garrett.

Her husband died of a coronary heart assault in Might, and the flooding has examined her resolve to stay in her small city.

“I’ve thought of it, however right here’s the factor: It took all the pieces that me and my husband may do to purchase a home,” she mentioned, weeping. “It’s laborious to let go of one thing that you simply labored so laborious for.”

So she and her son will as an alternative see what may be salvaged in her house and hope the muse stays stable.

“It was my husband’s house; it’s my youngsters’s house,” mentioned Caudill, who briefly relocated to a state park shelter over the weekend. “Wayland the city has at all times been their house.”

Advertisement

Two miles exterior Garrett, 104-year-old Annis Clark rode out the storm on her personal as she misplaced electrical energy and her basement flooded. She and her husband constructed their home within the ’50s, and he or she’s stayed lengthy after he died within the Eighties, her son, Michael Clark mentioned.

“She’s a survivor. I don’t know of another option to put it,” mentioned Clark, who attended Garrett Excessive College after which moved away to Lexington, the place he labored in tv manufacturing and operations. “I’ve little doubt she’s going to keep right here till she’s completed.”

Clark was shopping for provides for her Monday in close by Prestonsburg. He graduated from highschool in 1964, and mentioned a lot of his classmates moved away like he did to hunt jobs. In lots of elements of jap Kentucky, he mentioned, “except you wished to be a (coal) miner, your choices would sometimes be instructor.”

In Garrett, Brenda Francis despaired on the inches of mud that had flowed into the realm underneath their house, which was raised after a flood within the Fifties, when her husband’s dad and mom lived there.

“Whenever you become old, you’re not capable of clear all this up. We’re simply completely exhausted,” Francis mentioned. “How are we going to get this mud out of right here?”

Advertisement

Regardless of his spouse’s frustrations, Paul Francis was cheerfully cleansing up the household homestead, stacking toys in a ’70s pickup truck his father purchased model new. Sloshing round in rubber boots, he smiled as he ready to hook up a strain washer to scrub mud from his grandchildren’s toys.

Their grandchildren are one of many causes Brenda Francis desires to maneuver away, to greater floor in Prestonsburg, the place the kids stay. She mentioned they, like many on the town, haven’t any flood insurance coverage on their home — however they do have a attainable purchaser. She’s hoping the truth that the home’s dwelling areas stayed dry will make it a fascinating property.

Her grownup sons love the city of Garrett, however “they’re all grown and acquired their very own households now. They don’t wish to come again right here,” she mentioned as her husband’s strain washer hummed within the background.

“Who would wish to come?” she mentioned. “It nonetheless floods right here.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

NATO head and Trump meet in Florida for talks on global security

Published

on

NATO head and Trump meet in Florida for talks on global security

BRUSSELS (AP) — U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and the head of NATO have met for talks on global security, the military alliance said Saturday.

In a brief statement, NATO said Trump and its secretary general, Mark Rutte, met on Friday in Palm Beach, Florida.

“They discussed the range of global security issues facing the Alliance,” the statement said without giving details.

It appeared to be Rutte’s first meeting with Trump since his Nov. 5 election. Rutte had previously congratulated Trump and said “his leadership will again be key to keeping our Alliance strong” and that he looked forward to working with him.

Trump has for years expressed skepticism about the Western alliance and complained about the defense spending of many of its member nations, which he regarded as too low. He depicted NATO allies as leeches on the U.S. military and openly questioned the value of the alliance that has defined American foreign policy for decades. He threatened not to defend NATO members that fail to meet defense-spending goals.

Advertisement

Rutte and his team also met Trump’s pick as national security adviser, U.S. Rep. Michael Waltz, and other members of the president-elect’s national security team, the NATO statement said.

Rutte took over at the helm of NATO in October.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US scrambles as drones shape the landscape of war: 'the future is here'

Published

on

US scrambles as drones shape the landscape of war: 'the future is here'

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

FIRST ON FOX: The U.S. Army this week took steps to advance American military capabilities by ordering close to 12,000 surveillance drones small enough to fit in a backpack as the reality of battle shifts in favor of electronic warfare. 

Conflicts around the globe, particularly the war in Ukraine, have drastically changed how major nations think about conducting war, explained drone expert and former U.S. Army intelligence and special operations soldier Brett Velicovich to Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

The nearly three-year-long war in Ukraine has often depicted scenes not witnessed since World War II, with children loaded onto trains, veins of trenches scarring the eastern front and renewed concern over how the geopolitics of this conflict could ensnare the entire Western world. 

1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES

A UJ-22 Airborne (UkrJet) reconnaissance drone prepares to land during a test flight in the Kyiv region of Ukraine on Aug. 2, 2022. (Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images)

But Ukraine’s scrappy response to its often outnumbered and at times outgunned reality has completely changed how major nations look at the modern-day battlefield. 

“Think about how we fought wars in the past,” Velicovich, a Fox News contributor, said, pointing to the Vietnam War. “When you were fighting the enemy over that trench line, you didn’t know who was over that hill. You saw a red hat and you fired at it.” 

Advertisement

“Now you have the ability to see what’s over that hill and maneuver your forces quickly based on that,” he added. 

A report by The Wall Street Journal this week said the U.S. Army secured potentially its largest-ever purchase of small surveillance drones from Red Cat Holding’s Utah-based Teal Drones. 

This move is a significant step that the U.S. has been eyeing for more than a decade after terrorists first began employing small-drone tactics against the U.S. military in the Middle East.

According to Velicovich, who routinely visits Ukraine to advise on drone technology, the U.S. is trailing its top adversaries like Russia and China when it comes investment in drone capabilities.  

Ukraine soldiers drone trenches

Ukrainian soldiers look for a drone in a trench at their infantry position in the direction of Kupiansk, Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine, on March 10. (Diego Herrera Carcedo/Anadolu via Getty Images)

US BRIEFED UKRAINE AHEAD OF PUTIN’S ‘EXPERIMENTAL INTERMEDIATE-RANGE BALLISTIC’ ATTACK

Advertisement

While the U.S. invested heavily in sophisticated systems like Predator and Reaper drones — which are multimillion-dollar systems designed for intelligence collection and lengthy navigation flight times and possess missile strike capabilities — it is the small, cheaply made unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) which are changing battlefield dynamics. 

“These handheld, small UAS systems that you are able to take a drone with a bomb strapped to it [have become] basically an artillery shell now. It’s guided artillery shells,” Velicovich said in reference to Unmanned Aircraft Systems, which include not only the UAV, but also the controller manned from the ground. “Frankly, it’s changing how countries are going to fight wars in the future, and the U.S. has been so slow to get ahead of this.”

It has reportedly taken the U.S. Army some 15 years to start beefing up its Short Range Reconnaissance program with these backpack-sized drones, in part because there was a mental hurdle the Department of Defense needed to push through.

“It’s the mentality of senior leaders,” Velicovich explained. “These guys are hardened battle infantry guys. They didn’t grow up with fancy technology.”

“It really takes a lot of people understanding, changing their thought process. And that’s happening now because of the accelerating war in Ukraine, where they’ve seen how effective drones are,” he said, noting that drones can no longer be dismissed as gimmicks or toys of the future. 

Advertisement

“Now it’s real. Now it’s here, the future is here,” Velicovich said. “We will never fight another war without drones.”

drone

The U.S. Army has acquired nearly 12,000 Black Widow drones from Red Cat’s Teal Drones in a move to beef up its short-range reconnaissance capabilities as battlefield realities turn to electronic warfare. (Red Cat Holdings)

Teal Drones worked to develop a UAS system based on battlefield needs identified by the U.S. Army, and eventually created the drone that has been dubbed the Black Widow, explained Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson to Fox News Digital. 

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO ANNOUNCE $275 MILLION UKRAINE WEAPONS PACKAGE THIS WEEK

This sophisticated system is capable of being operated by a single man, can resist Russian jammers, has strike capabilities, and can fly in GPS-denied zones — an important factor that has been highlighted by the war in Ukraine.

“The Short Range Reconnaissance drone is really going to be able to help the warfighter be more lethal and be a safer soldier,” Thompson said.

Advertisement

The U.S. Army greenlighted the purchase of nearly 12,000 drones. Each soldier kitted out with the Black Widow technology will be given what is called a “system,” which includes two drones and one controller — all of which can fit in one’s rucksack. 

Each system, including the drones and controller, costs the U.S. government about $45,000.

But, as Johnson pointed out, Ukraine’s armed forces are going through about 10,000 drones a month — which suggests the U.S. will need to acquire far more than 12,000 drones. 

drone Ukraine

A soldier with the 58th Independent Motorized Infantry Brigade of the Ukrainian Army catches a drone while testing it so it can be used nearby as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continues, near Bakhmut, Ukraine, on Nov. 25, 2022. (Reuters/Leah Millis)

The war in Ukraine has shown that affordably made drones, particularly FPV drones, which stands for “first-person view,” can be made for as low as $1,000 a drone and frequently strapped with explosives and utilized as kamikaze drones. 

Advertisement

But drone warfare is about significantly more than sheer quantity — it’s a “power game.”

“This is a cat and mouse game,” Velicovich said, explaining that drone and counter-drone technology, like jamming systems, are constantly evolving. “This is playing out at a level that most people don’t realize.”

“It’s like we were almost peering into the future,” he continued. “We are seeing what’s happening on the ground now, there in Ukraine, and eventually we’ll have to fight a war similar to it, and we just need to be ready.”

Continue Reading

World

At least 11 killed and dozens injured in Israeli strikes on Beirut

Published

on

At least 11 killed and dozens injured in Israeli strikes on Beirut

The strikes came a day after heavy bombardment of Beirut’s southern suburbs and as heavy ground fighting between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants continues in southern Lebanon, with Israeli troops pushing further into the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

At least 11 people were killed and dozens more injured after Israeli airstrikes devastated parts of central Beirut on Saturday – with diplomats scrambling to broker a ceasefire in the country. 

The strike destroyed an eight-story building, leaving a crater in the ground, and was the fourth on the Lebanese capital in less than a week. 

Lebanon’s civil defence said the death toll was provisional as emergency responders were still digging through the rubble looking for survivors. 

A separate drone strike in the southern port city of Tyre killed one person and injured another, according to the country’s National News Agency. 

Israel’s military did not issue a warning for residents to evacuate prior to the strikes in central Beirut and would not comment on those strikes or on the one in Tyre. 

Advertisement

The news comes as heavy ground fighting between Israeli forces and Hezbollah militants continues in southern Lebanon, with Israeli troops pushing farther from the border. 

US envoy Amos Hochstein travelled to the region this week in an attempt to broker a ceasefire deal to end the more than 13 months of fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, which escalated into full-on war over the last two months. 

More than 3,500 people have been killed and over 15,000 wounded by Israeli bombardment in Lebanon, according to the Lebanese health ministry. 1.2 million people, or a quarter of the Lebanese population, were reportedly displaced by the fighting. 

On the Israeli side, about 90 soldiers and nearly 50 civilians have been killed by rockets, drones and missiles in northern Israel and in fighting in Lebanon. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending