Connect with us

World

Debunking the most viral misinformation about Russia’s war in Ukraine

Published

on

Debunking the most viral misinformation about Russia’s war in Ukraine

Even earlier than Russia launched its assault on Ukraine, false claims and deceptive rumours had been circulating on-line.

However as Russian forces have superior additional into Ukraine, the quantity of on-line misinformation has skyrocketed.

Each Moscow and Kyiv have been responsible of spreading misinformation amid the web data struggle of propaganda. However particular person social media customers have additionally fallen sufferer to false rumours and amplified unfounded allegations.

In occasions of battle and disaster, when individuals are hungry for particulars in regards to the struggle in Ukraine, misinformation may be equally as viral as verified info.

Here’s a choice of a few of the false claims that had been broadly circulating and have since been debunked by fact-checkers.

Advertisement

These movies don’t present Ukrainian cities being shelled

Inside hours of Russia launching its invasion, deceptive movies of unrelated explosions had been seen by hundreds of individuals.

One of many first movies that appeared on Twitter below the hashtag #нетвойне (#NoWar) falsely claimed to indicate a robust blast in a Ukrainian metropolis. The video has obtained greater than 112,000 views.

However the footage truly dates from August 2015 and exhibits a lethal explosion at a storage facility in Tianjin, China.

One other deceptive video — shared broadly on Fb, Instagram, and TikTok — exhibits footage of the deadly explosion at Beirut port in August 2020.

Customers had falsely claimed that the video confirmed “Ukrainian headquarters” being bombed by Russian forces.

Advertisement

Movies of the lethal blasts in each Tianjin and Beirut have repeatedly been shared as misinformation throughout different explosions and can possible even be shared sooner or later.

Neither are associated in any approach to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Their virality is proof that deceptive movies associated to the struggle in Ukraine are being taken out of context not simply from earlier conflicts or navy workouts, however from different historic, international occasions.

Pictures and movies are sometimes sources of misinformation as a result of they may catch an individual’s eye and draw their consideration greater than a worded social media put up.

The struggle in Ukraine just isn’t a hoax

The European Parliament on Wednesday known as for extra measures to curb Russian disinformation — intentionally false claims — in regards to the invasion of Ukraine.

Advertisement

Most propaganda reiterates the Kremlin stance that the invasion of Ukraine is a “particular navy operation” to supposedly “denazify” a “failed state”.

However different viral posts in Russia have falsely claimed that there isn’t any such battle in any respect and that Western sources are making a “hoax” battle.

One video of a information reporter standing in entrance of physique luggage was broadly shared by pro-Kremlin accounts. Within the footage, one of many physique luggage begins shifting.

Customers falsely claimed that the video confirmed proof that casualties had been being invented by “western propaganda”.

However the video was not filmed in Ukraine, and truly exhibits a “Fridays for Future” local weather change protest in Vienna, over a month in the past. Activists on the rally had used physique luggage for example future potential deaths because of Austria’s CO2 emissions.

Advertisement

Some on-line customers had even manipulated the audio of the clip or added graphics to falsely declare it was filmed in Ukraine, however open-source instruments present that the video was posted on YouTube by the Austrian information channel OE24 in February.

Different examples of misinformation have centred on “disaster actors” — people who find themselves supposedly employed to behave out scenes from an assault.

Professional-conspiracy customers have shared false claims that Ukrainian civilian residents had been staging their concern or accidents from real shelling incidents.

An instance of this was a video of a girl making use of blood-style make-up to the face of one other man. The incident was not filmed amid the continuing struggle in Ukraine however as an alternative from the set of a tv sequence known as “Contamin” in 2020.

Essentially the most high-profile of those “disaster actors” rumours was shared after a lethal assault on a maternity hospital within the metropolis of Mariupol on 9 March.

Advertisement

Customers had falsely claimed that the hospital was non-operational and {that a} lady had been “employed” to play the function of two pregnant ladies who had been filmed within the aftermath of the assault.

The declare was amplified on social media by Russia’s embassy in the UK, however their deceptive posts had been quickly eliminated by each Fb and Twitter.

On Monday, one of many pregnant ladies who the embassy claimed was a “disaster actor” died, in addition to her unborn youngster.

Regardless of this, Russian ambassadors and embassies are nonetheless intentionally sharing the false declare that actors and never victims had been pictured after the maternity hospital bombing in Mariupol.

Social media platforms are persevering with to try to take away or label deceptive content material about “disaster actors”.

Advertisement

No proof of the ‘Ghost of Kyiv’

Because the struggle in Ukraine started, tales of bravery have circulated, however not all people tales have been verified.

One well-known instance issues the so-called “Ghost of Kyiv”. This particular person is rumoured to have single-handedly introduced down six Russian planes on the very begin of the invasion.

The Ukrainian navy stated on 24 February that 5 Russian planes and a Russian helicopter had been shot down within the Luhansk area, however the report {that a} single Ukrainian pilot downed the plane is nevertheless unsubstantiated.

One broadly shared video clip falsely claimed to indicate the “Ghost of Kyiv” in motion over Kyiv however the footage was truly from the online game “Digital Fight Simulator (DCS) World”.

TikTok movies with the hashtag #ghostofkyiv reached 200 million views, whereas unverified rumours of the “Ghost” have been amplified by senior Ukrainian figures.

Advertisement

The nation’s former President Petro Poroshenko supposedly recognized the “Ghost of Kyiv” in a tweet, however the picture was as an alternative a 2019 picture displaying Ukrainian pilots testing new French helmets, as seen under.

The hearsay of the “Ghost of Kyiv” is definitely not an remoted case, with different unverified claims positing {that a} native cat — the so-called “Panther of Kharkiv” — supposedly working alongside Ukrainian troopers to detect Russian snipers. The creator of the put up has since acknowledged it as a joke.

Though unverified, uplifting tales like these can probably provide hope to Ukrainian residents throughout wartime.

However in line with some analysts, fantastical and false claims of Ukrainian success can hurt the nation, if there may be not an correct image of the realities of struggle.

Deceptive people tales could even draw consideration away from real acts of heroism by Ukraine’s navy and inhabitants.

Advertisement

From verified movies, it’s clear to see that each the Ukrainian navy and unusual civilians are placing up a fierce struggle towards the Russian invasion.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has himself additionally used his personal social media accounts to share video updates and debunk studies that he had left Kyiv.

However he additionally handed out honours to 13 border guards who had been mistakenly believed to have been killed whereas defending Snake Island. Ukraine’s Navy later acknowledged that the males had been “alive and nicely” and had been captured by Russia.

Each Ukrainian and Russian officers have been responsible of sharing misinformation throughout the struggle — whether or not intentional or not — most of which may be fact-checked utilizing broadly accessible open-source instruments.

As preventing on the bottom intensifies, each side have additionally redoubled efforts to regulate the narrative on-line.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025

Published

on

Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Rental homes will remain an attractive option next year to would-be homebuyers sidelined by high mortgage rates and rising home prices, analysts say.

American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes are two big real estate investment trusts poised to benefit from the trend, say analysts at Mizuho Securities USA and Raymond James & Associates.

Their outlooks boil down to a simple thesis: Many Americans will continue to have a difficult time finding a single-family home that they can afford to buy, which will make renting a house an attractive alternative.

It starts with mortgage rates. While the average rate on a 30-year mortgage fell to a two-year low of 6.08% in late September, it’s been mostly rising since then, echoing moves in the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.

The yield, which has hovered around 4.4% this week, surged after the presidential election, reflecting expectations among investors that President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed economic policies may widen the federal deficit and crank up inflation.

Advertisement

Analysts at Raymond James and Associates say they see mortgage rates remaining “higher for longer,” given the outcome of the election. Last week, they reiterated their “Outperform” ratings on American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes, noting “we are increasingly confident in the longer-term outlook for single-family rental fundamentals and the industry’s growth prospects.”

They also believe the two companies will continue to benefit from “outsized demographic demand for suburban homes,” and the monthly payment gap between renting and owning a home, which they estimate can be as much as 30% less to rent.

Analysts at Mizuho also expect that homeownership affordability hurdles will maintain “a supportive backdrop” and stoke demand for rental houses, helping American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes to maintain their tenant retention rates.

The companies are averaging higher new and renewal tenant lease rates when compared to several of the largest U.S. apartment owners, including AvalonBay, Equity Residential and Camden Property Trust, according to Mizuho. It has an “Outperform” rating on American Homes 4 Rent and a “Neutral” rating on Invitation Homes.

Shares in Invitation Homes are down 1.2% so far this year, while American Homes 4 Rent is up 4.4%. That’s well below the S&P 500’s 24% gain in the same period.

Advertisement

While individual homeowners and mom-and-pop investors still account for the vast majority of single-family rental homes, homebuilders have stepped up construction of new houses planned for rental communities.

In the third quarter, builders broke ground on about 24,000 single-family homes slated to become rentals. That’s up from 17,000 a year earlier. In the second quarter, single-family rental starts climbed to 25,000, the highest quarterly total going back to at least 1990, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data by the National Association of Home Builders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US briefed Ukraine ahead of Putin's 'experimental Intermediate-range ballistic' attack

Published

on

US briefed Ukraine ahead of Putin's 'experimental Intermediate-range ballistic' attack

A U.S. official on Thursday confirmed to Fox News Digital that Ukrainian authorities were briefed ahead of Russia’s “experimental Intermediate-range ballistic missile” attack that this type of weapon may be used against Ukraine in order to help it prepare.

Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed the attack Thursday evening local time in an address to the nation and said it was in direct response to the U.S. and the U.K. jointly approving Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range missiles to target Russia.

It remains unclear if there were any casualties in the attack on the city of Dnipro, which was originally reported as an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) strike, and which would have marked the first time such a weapon had been used during a time of war, sending panic across the globe. 

1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES

Putin and U.S. sources have since confirmed the strike was not an ICBM, but the Kremlin chief also claimed that the weapon used poses a significant challenge for Western nations. 

Advertisement

“The missiles attack targets at a speed of MACH 10. That’s 2.5 miles per second,” Putin said according to a translation. “The world’s current air defense systems and the missile defense systems developed by the Americans in Europe do not intercept such missiles.”

Fox News Digital could not immediately verify whether the U.S. or its NATO allies are capable of defending against this latest missile, dubbed the Oreshnik. 

But according to one U.S. official, Putin may be playing up his abilities in a move to intimidate the West and Ukraine. 

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is test-fired in northwestern Russia on Oct. 29. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

“While we take all threats against Ukraine seriously, it is important to keep a few key facts in mind: Russia likely possesses only a handful of these experimental missiles,” the official told Fox News Digital. “Ukraine has withstood countless attacks from Russia, including from missiles with significantly larger warheads than this weapon.

Advertisement

“Let me be clear: Russia may be seeking to use this capability to try to intimidate Ukraine and its supporters, or generate attention in the information space, but it will not be a game-changer in this conflict,” the official added. 

US EMBASSY IN KYIV CLOSED AS ‘POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’ LOOMS

Following President Biden’s position reversal this week to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) against the Russian homeland, Kyiv immediately levied strikes against a military arsenal in the Russian region of Bryansk, more than 70 miles from Ukraine’s border. 

While Ukrainian troops are the ones to officially fire the sophisticated missiles, the weapons system still relies on U.S. satellites to hit its target — an issue Putin touched on in his unannounced speech Thursday. 

“We are testing the Oreshnik missile systems in combat conditions in response to NATO countries’ aggressive actions against Russia. We will decide on the further deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles depending on the actions of the U.S. and its satellites,” he said.

Advertisement

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

dnipro

Firefighters work at the site of a Russian missile strike in Dnipro, Ukraine, on Thursday. (Press service of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Dnipropetrovsk region/Handout via Reuters)

Putin claimed Russia will alert Ukrainian citizens of an impending attack like the strike he carried out on Thursday, though it remains unclear if he issued a warning to the Ukrainians living in Dnipro. 

The Kremlin chief said the “defense industry” was targeted, though images released by the Ukrainian ministry of defense showed what appeared to be civilian infrastructure was also caught in the fray. 

The Pentagon on Thursday confirmed that Russia informed the U.S. of the impending attack, which corresponds with information obtained by Fox News Digital, but it is unclear if Moscow clarified which Ukrainian city was the intended target.

A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that the U.S. is committed to helping Ukraine bolster its air defense systems and has done so already by supplying Ukraine with hundreds of additional Patriot and Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

South Korea says Russia sent North Korea missiles in exchange for troops

Published

on

South Korea says Russia sent North Korea missiles in exchange for troops

South Korea’s national security adviser says North plans to use the weapons to defend its airspace over the capital.

Russia has provided North Korea with anti-air missiles and air defence equipment in return for sending soldiers to support its war against Ukraine, according to a top South Korean official.

Asked what the North stood to gain from dispatching an estimated 10,000 troops to Russia, South Korea’s national security adviser Shin Won-sik said Moscow had given Pyongyang economic and military technology support.

“It is understood that North Korea has been provided with related equipment and anti-aircraft missiles to strengthen Pyongyang’s weak air defence system,” Shin told South Korean broadcaster SBS in an interview aired on Friday.

At a military exhibition in the capital, Pyongyang, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Friday called for developing and upgrading “ultra-modern” versions of weaponry, and pledged to keep advancing defence capabilities, state media reported.

Advertisement

Russia this month ratified a landmark mutual defence pact with North Korea as Ukrainian officials reported clashes with Pyongyang’s soldiers on the front lines.

The treaty was signed in Pyongyang in June during a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It obligates both states to provide military assistance “without delay” in the case of an attack on the other and to cooperate internationally to oppose Western sanctions.

South Korea’s National Intelligence Service told lawmakers this week that the troops deployed to Russia are believed to have been assigned to an airborne brigade and marine corps on the ground, with some of the soldiers having already entered combat, the Yonhap news agency reported.

The intelligence agency also said recently that North Korea had sent more than 13,000 containers of artillery, missiles and other conventional arms to Russia since August 2023 to replenish its dwindling weapons stockpiles.

Experts say Pyongyang could be using Ukraine as a means of realigning foreign policy.

Advertisement

By sending soldiers, North Korea is positioning itself within the Russian war economy as a supplier of weapons, military support and labour – potentially bypassing its traditional ally, neighbour and main trading partner, China, according to analysts.

Russia can also provide North Korea access to its vast natural resources, such as oil and gas, they say.

North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui recently visited Moscow and said her country would “stand firmly by our Russian comrades until victory day“.

North Korea said last month that any troop deployment to Russia would be “an act conforming with the regulations of international law”, but stopped short of confirming that it had sent soldiers.

The deployment has led to a shift in tone from Seoul, which had so far resisted calls to send weapons to Kyiv. However, President Yoon Suk-yeol indicated South Korea might change its longstanding policy of not providing arms to countries in conflict.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending