Connect with us

World

Croatia allowed in but Romania and Bulgaria still left out of Schengen

Published

on

Croatia allowed in but Romania and Bulgaria still left out of Schengen

Austria has blocked the accession of Romania and Bulgaria into Schengen, the passport-free space that has abolished border checks between the overwhelming majority of EU member states.

The Netherlands supported Romania’s bid however opposed Bulgaria’s.

Croatia, nonetheless, acquired unanimous backing and can be a part of the Schengen Space as of January 2023.

The votes came about in Brussels on Thursday afternoon throughout a high-stakes assembly of inside ministers.

Romania and Bulgaria “are fulfilling all the necessities. They’ve been ready for a very long time. The residents of Bulgaria and Romania should be absolutely a part of the Schengen space,” Ylva Johansson, European Commissioner for house affairs, mentioned after the assembly.

Advertisement

“I assumed, truly, that we might have the choice at this time. So, I feel that at this time is a day of disappointment.”

The destructive conclusion, which was broadly anticipated, represents a painful political defeat for each Romania and Bulgaria, who joined the European Union six years earlier than Croatia.

The European Fee, in command of assessing Schengen candidacies, has mentioned the 2 international locations are able to turn out to be a part of the passport-free space since at the least 2011.

The manager launched one other unconditional endorsement simply final month, whereas the European Parliament handed a brand new decision denouncing the exclusion as “discriminatory.”

Over the previous few years, international locations that had been beforehand against Schengen enlargement, equivalent to Finland, Denmark, Sweden and Belgium, softened their positions, growing the chances of a optimistic end result.

Advertisement

France and Germany, the bloc’s most influential states, voiced their assist for Romania and Bulgaria this 12 months.

However none of this was sufficient to beat the Austrian and Dutch reticence.

As Schengen accession requires unanimity, the small minority managed to dam the entire course of. The talk on Thursday took “longer than anticipated,” mentioned an EU diplomat, describing “sure bitterns within the room” as soon as the consequence turned clear.

Austria’s opposition, which has shocked many in Brussels because it solely emerged in current weeks, is predicated on a brand new inflow of asylum-seekers via the Western Balkan route.

“The system is at present not working. Austria bought (this 12 months) greater than 100,000 unlawful border crossings, 75,000 of them not registered, though we’re inland nation, in the midst of Europe – in the midst of the Schengen international locations,” mentioned Austrian Inside Minister Gerhard Karner.

Advertisement

“The system would not work. Which means we first need to considerably enhance the system at this level. Due to this fact, I’m in favour of suspending the vote and together with these international locations accordingly”.

Bucharest has vehemently countered Vienna’s claims, arguing Romania shouldn’t be a part of the Western Balkan route and that a number of stories issued by the European Fee and fact-finding missions of consultants have confirmed the nation is nicely ready to handle its exterior borders.

Frontex, the EU’s border management company, does take into account Romania and Bulgaria to be a part of the Western Balkan route, a spokesperson instructed Euronews. Within the first 10 months of this 12 months, the trail has seen greater than 128,000 border-crossing incidents, a 168% rise in comparison with the identical interval in 2021.

‘Their time will come quickly’

For its half, the Netherlands voted in opposition to Bulgaria’s accession bid over what it calls unaddressed rule-of-law issues and pending items of laws to deal with corruption and organised crime.

Bulgaria, which has had a caretaker authorities since August after a sequence of inconclusive elections, challenged these claims and mentioned the opposition was unrelated to the Schengen standards.

Advertisement

“Two member states expressed reservations however they have no specific issues with relations to Schengen,” Bulgarian Inside Minister Ivan Demerdzhiev instructed Euronews on the finish of the assembly, noting his nation was able to take the “vital steps” to persuade its skeptical companions.

“The argument of Austria is that Schengen shouldn’t be working and we should unite our efforts to make Schengen work because it has to, after which enlarge it with Bulgaria and Romania. Till then, Bulgaria shouldn’t be chargeable for the inner issues in Austria.”

On the similar time, Austria and the Netherlands threw their assist behind the third excellent candidate to affix Schengen: Croatia, whose analysis course of was accomplished again in 2020.

Croatia was earlier this 12 months additionally given the go-ahead to undertake the euro and can subsequently as of January 2023 be a member of the eurozone and the Schengen space. 

“Romania and Bulgaria are able to be Schengen members and I am very grateful to each international locations for all their work,” mentioned Czech Inside Minister Vít Rakušan, on behalf of the EU Council’s presidency. “I am satisfied their time will come quickly.”

Advertisement

Rakušan clarified that Romania and Bulgaria had been voted as one joint merchandise and that decoupling their bids was not attainable “from a authorized viewpoint.”

Ylva Johansson mentioned the European Fee would stay “optimistic” and make sure the accession takes place earlier than the tip of her mandate.

“Once we are united within the EU, we’re so sturdy, we will obtain a lot,” Johansson instructed reporters. “In relation to the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, we’re not united and that makes us very weak and that makes me additionally unhappy.”

Schengen allows cross-border journey with out the necessity to carry a passport or move via border controls. It at present encompasses 26 international locations, together with 22 EU member states, and nearly 420 million residents.

Becoming a member of Schengen is a authorized obligation for each EU nation.

Advertisement

Solely Eire, which negotiated an opt-out clause many years in the past, and Cyprus, which stays break up between north and south, haven’t utilized to enter the passport-free space.

This text has been up to date to incorporate new response.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025

Published

on

Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Rental homes will remain an attractive option next year to would-be homebuyers sidelined by high mortgage rates and rising home prices, analysts say.

American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes are two big real estate investment trusts poised to benefit from the trend, say analysts at Mizuho Securities USA and Raymond James & Associates.

Their outlooks boil down to a simple thesis: Many Americans will continue to have a difficult time finding a single-family home that they can afford to buy, which will make renting a house an attractive alternative.

It starts with mortgage rates. While the average rate on a 30-year mortgage fell to a two-year low of 6.08% in late September, it’s been mostly rising since then, echoing moves in the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.

The yield, which has hovered around 4.4% this week, surged after the presidential election, reflecting expectations among investors that President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed economic policies may widen the federal deficit and crank up inflation.

Advertisement

Analysts at Raymond James and Associates say they see mortgage rates remaining “higher for longer,” given the outcome of the election. Last week, they reiterated their “Outperform” ratings on American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes, noting “we are increasingly confident in the longer-term outlook for single-family rental fundamentals and the industry’s growth prospects.”

They also believe the two companies will continue to benefit from “outsized demographic demand for suburban homes,” and the monthly payment gap between renting and owning a home, which they estimate can be as much as 30% less to rent.

Analysts at Mizuho also expect that homeownership affordability hurdles will maintain “a supportive backdrop” and stoke demand for rental houses, helping American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes to maintain their tenant retention rates.

The companies are averaging higher new and renewal tenant lease rates when compared to several of the largest U.S. apartment owners, including AvalonBay, Equity Residential and Camden Property Trust, according to Mizuho. It has an “Outperform” rating on American Homes 4 Rent and a “Neutral” rating on Invitation Homes.

Shares in Invitation Homes are down 1.2% so far this year, while American Homes 4 Rent is up 4.4%. That’s well below the S&P 500’s 24% gain in the same period.

Advertisement

While individual homeowners and mom-and-pop investors still account for the vast majority of single-family rental homes, homebuilders have stepped up construction of new houses planned for rental communities.

In the third quarter, builders broke ground on about 24,000 single-family homes slated to become rentals. That’s up from 17,000 a year earlier. In the second quarter, single-family rental starts climbed to 25,000, the highest quarterly total going back to at least 1990, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data by the National Association of Home Builders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US briefed Ukraine ahead of Putin's 'experimental Intermediate-range ballistic' attack

Published

on

US briefed Ukraine ahead of Putin's 'experimental Intermediate-range ballistic' attack

A U.S. official on Thursday confirmed to Fox News Digital that Ukrainian authorities were briefed ahead of Russia’s “experimental Intermediate-range ballistic missile” attack that this type of weapon may be used against Ukraine in order to help it prepare.

Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed the attack Thursday evening local time in an address to the nation and said it was in direct response to the U.S. and the U.K. jointly approving Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range missiles to target Russia.

It remains unclear if there were any casualties in the attack on the city of Dnipro, which was originally reported as an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) strike, and which would have marked the first time such a weapon had been used during a time of war, sending panic across the globe. 

1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES

Putin and U.S. sources have since confirmed the strike was not an ICBM, but the Kremlin chief also claimed that the weapon used poses a significant challenge for Western nations. 

Advertisement

“The missiles attack targets at a speed of MACH 10. That’s 2.5 miles per second,” Putin said according to a translation. “The world’s current air defense systems and the missile defense systems developed by the Americans in Europe do not intercept such missiles.”

Fox News Digital could not immediately verify whether the U.S. or its NATO allies are capable of defending against this latest missile, dubbed the Oreshnik. 

But according to one U.S. official, Putin may be playing up his abilities in a move to intimidate the West and Ukraine. 

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is test-fired in northwestern Russia on Oct. 29. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

“While we take all threats against Ukraine seriously, it is important to keep a few key facts in mind: Russia likely possesses only a handful of these experimental missiles,” the official told Fox News Digital. “Ukraine has withstood countless attacks from Russia, including from missiles with significantly larger warheads than this weapon.

Advertisement

“Let me be clear: Russia may be seeking to use this capability to try to intimidate Ukraine and its supporters, or generate attention in the information space, but it will not be a game-changer in this conflict,” the official added. 

US EMBASSY IN KYIV CLOSED AS ‘POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’ LOOMS

Following President Biden’s position reversal this week to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) against the Russian homeland, Kyiv immediately levied strikes against a military arsenal in the Russian region of Bryansk, more than 70 miles from Ukraine’s border. 

While Ukrainian troops are the ones to officially fire the sophisticated missiles, the weapons system still relies on U.S. satellites to hit its target — an issue Putin touched on in his unannounced speech Thursday. 

“We are testing the Oreshnik missile systems in combat conditions in response to NATO countries’ aggressive actions against Russia. We will decide on the further deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles depending on the actions of the U.S. and its satellites,” he said.

Advertisement

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

dnipro

Firefighters work at the site of a Russian missile strike in Dnipro, Ukraine, on Thursday. (Press service of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Dnipropetrovsk region/Handout via Reuters)

Putin claimed Russia will alert Ukrainian citizens of an impending attack like the strike he carried out on Thursday, though it remains unclear if he issued a warning to the Ukrainians living in Dnipro. 

The Kremlin chief said the “defense industry” was targeted, though images released by the Ukrainian ministry of defense showed what appeared to be civilian infrastructure was also caught in the fray. 

The Pentagon on Thursday confirmed that Russia informed the U.S. of the impending attack, which corresponds with information obtained by Fox News Digital, but it is unclear if Moscow clarified which Ukrainian city was the intended target.

A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that the U.S. is committed to helping Ukraine bolster its air defense systems and has done so already by supplying Ukraine with hundreds of additional Patriot and Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

South Korea says Russia sent North Korea missiles in exchange for troops

Published

on

South Korea says Russia sent North Korea missiles in exchange for troops

South Korea’s national security adviser says North plans to use the weapons to defend its airspace over the capital.

Russia has provided North Korea with anti-air missiles and air defence equipment in return for sending soldiers to support its war against Ukraine, according to a top South Korean official.

Asked what the North stood to gain from dispatching an estimated 10,000 troops to Russia, South Korea’s national security adviser Shin Won-sik said Moscow had given Pyongyang economic and military technology support.

“It is understood that North Korea has been provided with related equipment and anti-aircraft missiles to strengthen Pyongyang’s weak air defence system,” Shin told South Korean broadcaster SBS in an interview aired on Friday.

At a military exhibition in the capital, Pyongyang, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Friday called for developing and upgrading “ultra-modern” versions of weaponry, and pledged to keep advancing defence capabilities, state media reported.

Advertisement

Russia this month ratified a landmark mutual defence pact with North Korea as Ukrainian officials reported clashes with Pyongyang’s soldiers on the front lines.

The treaty was signed in Pyongyang in June during a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It obligates both states to provide military assistance “without delay” in the case of an attack on the other and to cooperate internationally to oppose Western sanctions.

South Korea’s National Intelligence Service told lawmakers this week that the troops deployed to Russia are believed to have been assigned to an airborne brigade and marine corps on the ground, with some of the soldiers having already entered combat, the Yonhap news agency reported.

The intelligence agency also said recently that North Korea had sent more than 13,000 containers of artillery, missiles and other conventional arms to Russia since August 2023 to replenish its dwindling weapons stockpiles.

Experts say Pyongyang could be using Ukraine as a means of realigning foreign policy.

Advertisement

By sending soldiers, North Korea is positioning itself within the Russian war economy as a supplier of weapons, military support and labour – potentially bypassing its traditional ally, neighbour and main trading partner, China, according to analysts.

Russia can also provide North Korea access to its vast natural resources, such as oil and gas, they say.

North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui recently visited Moscow and said her country would “stand firmly by our Russian comrades until victory day“.

North Korea said last month that any troop deployment to Russia would be “an act conforming with the regulations of international law”, but stopped short of confirming that it had sent soldiers.

The deployment has led to a shift in tone from Seoul, which had so far resisted calls to send weapons to Kyiv. However, President Yoon Suk-yeol indicated South Korea might change its longstanding policy of not providing arms to countries in conflict.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending