Connect with us

World

Brussels recommends EU-wide exit from controversial energy treaty

Published

on

Brussels recommends EU-wide exit from controversial energy treaty

In a notable U-turn, the European Fee has proposed a collective and coordinated exit of all 27 member states from the controversial Power Constitution Treaty (ECT), an obscure worldwide settlement that protects power buyers from sudden circumstances that may damage their revenue expectations.

With 53 signatories, it’s thought-about probably the most litigated funding deal on the planet.

The coverage change comes after the European Fee’s proposed reform to modernise the treaty collapsed in late November because of the opposition of Germany, France, Spain and the Netherlands, who had beforehand introduced plans to unilaterally withdraw.

The blocking minority left the reform course of in a no man’s land, with extra nations, reminiscent of Poland, Luxembourg, Belgium and Austria, voicing comparable plans to tug out.

The European Parliament handed final yr a decision urging the European Fee to put the groundwork for a method out.

Advertisement

In the long run, the manager, who had for months defended member states have been higher inside a revised ECT moderately than out, seems to have given in to the rising opposition.

“Regardless of the Fee’s profitable efforts to barter a modernised Power Constitution Treaty in step with the negotiating mandate given to us by the member states, there is no such thing as a certified majority within the Council to undertake the modernised Treaty,” a European Fee spokesperson informed Euronews.

“An unmodernised ECT just isn’t in step with the EU’s coverage on funding safety or the European Inexperienced Deal. On condition that it’s not possible to safe a majority in Council to undertake the modernised ECT, we contemplate that the EU, Euratom and member states ought to perform a coordinated withdrawal from the ECT.”

The manager offered governments with a roadmap on how one can proceed with a collective withdrawal on Tuesday afternoon.

No additional particulars on a doable timeline have been supplied.

Advertisement

The Power Constitution Convention, the inter-governmental organisation that oversees the treaty, didn’t instantly reply to a Euronews request for remark.

Spain, one of many settlement’s main detractors, brazenly welcomed the Fee’s about-face, saying it represented the acceptance of a standard European exit as “the one doable answer.”

The shift “opens the trail to resolve the easiest way to desert the Power Constitution Treaty,” mentioned a Spanish authorities official.

Why is the ECT so controversial?

Signed in Lisbon in December 1994, the ECT was designed to advertise cross-border cooperation within the power sector between the 2 sides of the previous Iron Curtain.

The treaty provided further ensures to Western buyers that have been trying to do enterprise in former Soviet states, which have been then transitioning in direction of a mannequin of market capitalism and had loads of fossil sources awaiting exploitation.

Advertisement

Beneath the ECT, buyers have been protected towards discriminatory entry, expropriation, nationalisation, breaches of contract and different sudden circumstances that might affect their revenue expectations.

The settlement grew over time and immediately has 53 signatories, together with the European Union. Main power exporters, like the US, Saudi Arabia and Russia, aren’t certain by the deal.

The treaty covers the principle elements of commerce in power items, funding, transit and effectivity.

One key provision, nevertheless, has grow to be the supply of intense criticism: a personal, behind-the-scenes arbitration system with legally-binding rulings.

This arbitration permits buyers and firms to sue governments and declare compensation over coverage modifications, reminiscent of net-zero targets, that threaten their enterprise ventures and revenues.

Advertisement

Events who exit the treaty stay susceptible to litigation for 20 years.

Critics say the ECT gives disproportionate safety for fossil gasoline infrastructure, value €344.6 billion in Europe alone, at a important time when pollution should be phased out to struggle the local weather disaster.

The European Court docket of Justice dominated the arbitration system violates EU regulation and should not be used to settle disputes between member states.

In a bid to align the treaty with the EU’s inexperienced agenda, which foresees a 55% discount in greenhouse emissions by 2030, the European Fee proposed a reformed textual content that may have restricted the sundown clause to 10 years for outdated investments and solely 9 months for brand new power initiatives.

The revised textual content would have additionally prohibited lawsuits between EU governments and EU buyers, that are estimated to signify virtually 75% of all authorized circumstances beneath the ECT.

Advertisement

An settlement on the draft was reached “in precept” in June final yr however later fell aside when member states ramped up their opposition.

Because the reform didn’t happen, EU nations will stay tied by the contentious 20-year-old sundown clause after their coordinated withdrawal.

“The truth that the Fee is now advocating for a coordinated EU withdrawal is encouraging. It could cut back the chance of problematic arbitration claims sooner or later,” Lukas Schaugg, a regulation analyst on the Worldwide Institute for Sustainable Improvement (IISD), informed Euronews.

“Hesitant member states ought to now conform to such a step.”

Amandine Van Den Berghe, a lawyer at ClientEarth, an environmental NGO, additionally welcomed the transfer, calling it the “cleanest method” to restrict the fallout from costly lawsuits filed over local weather insurance policies.

Advertisement

“The Fee ought to use the chance supplied by an EU withdrawal to encourage different ECT members, such because the UK, to neutralise the sundown clause and agree to finish fossil gasoline funding safety of their states for good,” Van Den Berghe mentioned in an e-mail.

This piece has been up to date to incorporate new reactions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

G20 summit calls for more aid to Gaza and an end to the war in Ukraine

Published

on

G20 summit calls for more aid to Gaza and an end to the war in Ukraine

RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Leaders of the world’s 20 major economies called for a global pact to combat hunger, more aid for war-torn Gaza and an end to hostilities in the Mideast and Ukraine, issuing a joint declaration Monday that was heavy on generalities but short of details on how to accomplish those goals.

The joint statement was endorsed by group members but fell short of complete unanimity. It also called for a future global tax on billionaires and for reforms allowing the eventual expansion of the United Nation Security Council beyond its five current permanent members.

At the start of the three-day meeting which formally ends Wednesday, experts doubted Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva could convince the assembled leaders to hammer out any agreement at all in a gathering rife with uncertainty over the incoming administration of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, and heightened global tensions over wars in the Mideast and Ukraine.

Argentina challenged some of the language in initial drafts and was the one country that did not endorse the complete document.

“Although generic, it is a positive surprise for Brazil,” said Thomas Traumann, an independent political consultant and former Brazilian minister. “There was a moment when there was a risk of no declaration at all. Despite the caveats, it is a good result for Lula.”

Advertisement

Condemnation of wars, calls for peace, but without casting blame

Taking place just over a year after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, the declaration referred to the “catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza and the escalation in Lebanon,” stressing the urgent need to expand humanitarian assistance and better protect civilians.

“Affirming the Palestinian right to self-determination, we reiterate our unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-State solution where Israel and a Palestinian State live side by side in peace,” it said.

It did not mention Israel’s suffering or of the 100 or so hostages still held by Hamas. Israel isn’t a G20 member. The war has so far killed more than 43,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to local health officials, and more than 3,500 people in Lebanon following Israel’s offensive against Hezbollah, according to Lebanon’s Health Ministry.

The omitted acknowledgment of Israel’s distress appeared to run contrary to U.S. President Joe Biden’s consistent backing of Israel’s right to defend itself. It’s something Biden always notes in public, even when speaking about the deprivation of Palestinians. During a meeting with G20 leaders before the declaration was hammered home, Biden expressed his view that Hamas is solely to blame for the war and called on fellow leaders to “increase the pressure on Hamas” to accept a cease-fire deal.

Biden’s decision to ease restrictions on Ukraine’s use of longer-range U.S. missiles to allow that country to strike more deeply inside Russia also played into the meetings,

Advertisement

“The United States strongly supports Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Everyone around this table in my view should, as well,” Biden said during the summit.

Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the meeting , and instead sent his foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov. Putin has avoided such summits after the International Criminal Court issued a warrant that obliges member states to arrest him.

The G20 declaration highlighted the human suffering in Ukraine while calling for peace, without naming Russia.

“The declaration avoids pointing the finger at the culprits,” said Paulo Velasco, an international relations professor at the State University of Rio de Janeiro. “That is, it doesn’t make any critical mention of Israel or Russia, but it highlights the dramatic humanitarian situations in both cases.”

The entire declaration lacks specificity, Velasco added.

Advertisement

“It is very much in line with what Brazil hoped for … but if we really analyze it carefully, it is very much a declaration of intent. It is a declaration of good will on various issues, but we have very few concrete, tangible measures.”

Fraught push to tax global billionaires

The declaration did call for a possible tax on global billionaires, which Lula supports. Such a tax would affect about 3,000 people around the world, including about 100 in Latin América.

The clause was included despite opposition from Argentina. So was another promoting gender equality, said Brazilian and other officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.

Argentina signed the G20 declaration, bit also had issues with references to the U.N.’s 2030 sustainable development agenda. Its right-wing president, Javier Milei, has referred to the agenda as “a supranational program of a socialist nature.” It also objected to calls for regulating hate speech on social media, which Milei says infringes on national sovereignty, and to the idea that governments should do more to fight hunger.

Milei has often adopted a Trump-like role as a spoiler in multilateral talks hosted by his outspoken critic, Lula.

Advertisement

Concrete steps for fighting global hunger

Much of the declaration focuses on eradicating hunger — a priority for Lula.

Brazil’s government stressed that Lula’s launch of the global alliance against hunger and poverty on Monday was as important as the final G20 declaration. As of Monday, 82 nations had signed onto the plan, Brazil’s government said. It is also backed by organizations including the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

A demonstration Sunday on Rio’s Copacabana beach featured 733 empty plates spread across the sand to represent the 733 million people who went hungry in 2023, according to United Nations data.

Viviana Santiago, a director at the anti-poverty nonprofit Oxfam, praised Brazil for using its G20 presidency “to respond to people’s demands worldwide to tackle extreme inequality, hunger and climate breakdown, and particularly for rallying action on taxing the super-rich.”

“Brazil has lit a path toward a more just and resilient world, challenging others to meet them at this critical juncture,” she said in a statement.

Advertisement

Long-awaited reform of the United Nations

Leaders pledged to work for “transformative reform” of the U.N. Security Council so that it aligns “with the realities and demands of the 21st century, makes it more representative, inclusive, efficient, effective, democratic and accountable.”

Lula has been calling for reform of Security Council since his first two terms in power, from 2003 to 2010, without gaining much traction. Charged with maintaining international peace and security, its original 1945 structure has not changed. Five dominant powers at the end of World War II have veto power — the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France — while 10 countries from different regions serve rotating two-year terms.

Virtually all countries agree that nearly eight decades after the United Nations was established, the Security Council should be expanded to reflect the 21st century world and include more voices. The central quandary and biggest disagreement remains how to do that. The G20 declaration doesn’t answer that question.

“We call for an enlarged Security Council composition that improves the representation of the underrepresented and unrepresented regions and groups, such as Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America and the Caribbean,” the declaration said.

The United States announced shortly before a U.N. summit in September that it supports two new permanent seats for African countries, without veto power, and a first-ever non-permanent seat for a small island developing nation. But the Group of Four – Brazil, Germany, India and Japan – support each other’s bids for permanent seats. And the larger Uniting for Consensus group of a dozen countries including Pakistan, Italy, Turkey and Mexico wants additional non-permanent seats with longer terms.

Advertisement

___

Associated Press writers Aamer Madhani in Rio de Janeiro, Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations and Isabel DeBre in La Paz, Bolivia contributed.

Continue Reading

World

Foul play ruled out month after body of Walmart employee found inside walk-in oven at Canada store

Published

on

Foul play ruled out month after body of Walmart employee found inside walk-in oven at Canada store

A month after the body of a Walmart employee was found inside a walk-in oven of a store in eastern Canada, police have determined that her death was not suspicious.

The Halifax Police Department released a statement to announce that an investigation into the death of the 19-year-old woman, who was found inside the walk-in oven of the Halifax Walmart on Oct. 19, was not suspicious and there was no evidence of foul play.

“We do not believe anyone else was involved in the circumstances surrounding the woman’s death,” Halifax Regional Police Constable Martin Cromwell announced in a video update on the department’s Facebook page on Monday.

Cromwell added that they did not have many details they could share and did not expect any other updates anytime soon. 

WALMART EMPLOYEE FOUND DEAD INSIDE WALK-IN OVEN AT CANADA STORE: POLICE

Advertisement

Authorities in Canada are continuing an investigation into the death of a 19-year-old employee at a Halifax Walmart bakery after police said there was no evidence of foul play. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images/File | GoFundMe)

“We acknowledge the public’s interest in this case and that there are questions that may never have answers,” said Cromwell. “Please be mindful of the damage public speculation can cause. This woman’s loved ones are grieving.”

Police have not yet released the name of the victim. However, the Gurudwara Maritime Sikh Society, an organization for Sikh immigrants, has identified the woman as Gursimran Kaur.

The group also created a GoFundMe page, which is no longer running, that raised more than $194,000 for Kaur’s family.

“Gursimran Kaur was only 19 years old, a young beautiful girl who came to Canada with big dreams,” a post on the website read.

Advertisement

IDENTITY OF ‘BADLY DECOMPOSED’ BODY FOUND IN OHIO CAR WASH RELEASED: REPORT

The Walmart logo on a store

A woman was found dead inside a large walk-in oven at a Walmart store’s bakery department in Canada. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images/File)

According to the post, Kaur and her mother both worked at Walmart for the last two years.

During the evening of her daughter’s disappearance, the society executive said Kaur’s mother tried to find her after not having contact with her for an hour but brushed it aside, assuming she was helping a customer.

Kaur’s phone was reportedly also not reachable. 

“Mother started panicking as it was unusual for her to switch her phone off during the day. She reached out to the onsite admin for help,” the post continued.

Advertisement

MISSOURI INFANT DIES AFTER MOTHER ‘ACCIDENTALLY’ PLACES BABY IN OVEN INSTEAD OF CRIB: POLICE

Walmart with police tape

It’s unclear how the woman died, authorities said. (KTTV)

Sadly, after a few hours, her daughter’s body was found inside a walk-in oven in the store’s bakery.

“Imagine the horror that her mother experienced when she opened the oven, when someone pointed it out to her!” the society executive described. “This family’s sufferings are unimaginable and indescribable.”

Both Kaur’s father and brother were both reportedly in India at the time of her death.

“Investigators met with family to share this update and extend condolences,” Halifax police said. “Our thoughts remain with them at this difficult time.”

Advertisement

A spokesperson for Walmart previously told Fox News Digital that the store “will be closed until further notice.”

The Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reported that the store reopened on Monday and that the bakery oven was being removed from the store.

Fox News Digital reached out to Walmart for comment on the latest news but did not immediately receive a response.

Stepheny Price is writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Hong Kong jails all 45 pro-democracy activists in largest security case

Published

on

Hong Kong jails all 45 pro-democracy activists in largest security case

BREAKING,

Academic Benny Tai sentenced to 10 years, while others receive sentences of between four and seven years.

Taipei, Taiwan – A Hong Kong court has sentenced a leading pro-democracy advocate to 10 years in prison and handed dozens of other activists jail terms of between four and seven years in the Chinese territory’s largest national security case.

Benny Tai, a legal scholar who played a leading role in Hong Kong’s 2019 antigovernment protests, was handed the lengthy sentence on Tuesday after prosecutors cast him as the “organiser” of a conspiracy by pro-democracy activists and politicians dating back to July 2020.

Tai and 44 others were previously found guilty of offences related to organising an official primary election to choose pro-democracy candidates for the city’s legislature.

Advertisement

The would-be legislators had hoped to vote down the city’s budget and force the city’s leader to dissolve the legislature.

Prosecutors alleged that the group plotted to “overthrow” the government.

Many of those arrested have been on remand since 2021, when they were first charged, due to numerous legal delays and the disruption caused by COVID-19.

Out of 47 defendants, 31 pleaded guilty.

In May, a court found 14 of the remaining activists guilty of subversion and acquitted two others, former district councillors Laurence Lau and Lee Yue-shu.

Advertisement

Under Hong Kong’s national security laws introduced in 2020, defendants charged as “primary offenders” face a maximum punishment of life imprisonment, while lower-level offenders and “other participants” face sentences of between three and five years and up to three years, respectively.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending