Connect with us

World

Brussels proposes to stop Russian oil imports by the end of the year

Published

on

Brussels proposes to stop Russian oil imports by the end of the year

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Fee, has at the moment unveiled a proposal to impose an EU-wide ban on Russian oil imports, one in every of Moscow’s most important sources of income.

The embargo might be structured and gradual, giving member states as much as six months to section out purchases of Russian crude and till the top of the yr to cease shopping for all kinds of refined oil merchandise.

The ban will apply to all Russian oil traded each by way of ports and pipelines.

“Allow us to be clear: it won’t be straightforward. Some member states are strongly depending on Russian oil. However we merely need to work on it,” mentioned von der Leyen whereas talking earlier than the European Parliament on Wednesday morning.

“We maximise stress on Russia, whereas on the similar time minimising collateral harm to us and our companions across the globe. As a result of to assist Ukraine, our personal economic system has to stay robust.”

Advertisement

A part of the sixth bundle of EU sanctions, the oil embargo represents probably the most impactful penalty the bloc has imposed on Russia for the reason that begin of the Ukraine conflict on 24 February and has the potential to deprive the Kremlin of one in every of its most dependable sources of earnings.

The unconventional measure threatens to additional destabilise the entire European economic system, which has already entered a interval of deceleration and record-breaking inflation because of the battle.

The European Union is Russia’s prime oil consumer, shopping for round 3.5 million barrels of crude and refined merchandise every day. Final yr, the bloc spent greater than €73 billion on Russian oil, the best expenditure on fossil fuels by a big margin.

Von der Leyen’s announcement follows days of intense behind-the-scenes diplomacy between the chief and representatives of member states, a few of whom stay uneasy concerning the backlash the measure is anticipated to set off in opposition to the European economic system.

Given how inter-linked oil markets are world wide, the transfer from Brussels may simply have spill-over results past the continent, hitting middle- and low-income international locations alongside the best way.

Advertisement

The embargo might be additional mentioned by ambassadors over the approaching days and can enter into drive solely after its unanimous approval and publication within the EU’s official journal.

Germany has been a key issue behind the decision-making course of: the nation just lately lifted its opposition after managing to slash its dependency on Russian oil from 35% earlier than the conflict to 12% in Could.

“After two months of labor, I can say Germany is just not in opposition to an oil ban on Russia. After all, it’s a heavy load to bear, however we’re prepared,” Robert Habeck, Germany’s vice-chancellor and economic system minister, instructed reporters on Monday.

“We have now to arrange the hubs, we have now to arrange the pipelines,” he mentioned. “So, time is useful, however different international locations have greater issues.”

Germany is without doubt one of the international locations linked to the Druzhba pipeline, an enormous conduit operated by Russia’s state-controlled big Transneft, that additionally connects Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Austria.

Advertisement

Throughout consultations, Hungary and Slovakia raised considerations concerning the ban’s unfavorable penalties for his or her nationwide economies, in keeping with diplomatic sources consulted by Euronews. The 2 international locations, that are extremely depending on Russian pipeline oil, have pushed to be granted an additional yr to finish the phase-out.

However the particular remedy would not seem like sufficient for the Hungarian authorities, which had mentioned additional sanctions on fossil fuels have been a “crimson line.”

“We don’t see any plans or ensures on how a transition may very well be managed primarily based on the present proposals, and the way Hungary’s vitality safety could be assured,” wrote Zoltán Kovács, the Hungarian authorities’s worldwide spokesperson, on a tweet reacting to the information.

Italy, Greece and Austria careworn the necessity to have enough time to adapt their vitality provide chains, whereas Greece, Malta, Cyprus, Belgium and the Netherlands identified potential financial losses for his or her native delivery industries, Euronews understands.

On the opposite facet of the desk, Poland insisted on slapping a full embargo on each oil and gasoline imports, a twin situation that may in all chance set off a deep recession throughout the continent.

Advertisement

“We’re depriving the Russian economic system of its skill to diversify and modernise. Putin wished to wipe Ukraine from the map. He’ll clearly not succeed,” von der Leyen mentioned.

“Quite the opposite: Ukraine has risen up in unity. And it’s his personal nation, Russia, he’s sinking.”

All eyes on suppliers

The protracted timeline envisioned by the Fee — nearly 9 months earlier than the full ban takes place — is designed to permit member states to seek out new suppliers. The earlier sanction in opposition to Russian fossil fuels, the coal ban, launched a deadline of simply 4 months.

All eyes flip now to different oil-producing international locations, together with Iraq, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, Norway, the US and the UK, who might be anticipated to fill the massive hole left by Russia.

The Group of the Petroleum Exporting Nations (OPEC), which works together with Moscow, has beforehand warned an embargo on Russian oil would create a market disruption similar to the Nineteen Seventies vitality disaster, which prompted a protracted, painful interval of stagflation within the West.

Advertisement

“We may doubtlessly see the lack of greater than seven million barrels per day of Russian oil and different liquids exports,” OPEC Secretary-Common Mohammad Barkindo mentioned throughout a gathering final month with EU officers. “Contemplating the present demand outlook, it could be practically not possible to exchange a loss in volumes of this magnitude.”

An analogous however much less stark warning was issued by Janet Yellen, the US Treasury Secretary, who mentioned “we should be cautious after we take into consideration a whole European ban” on Russian oil.

Yellen mentioned the measure would possibly set off a spike in worldwide costs that, in a counterproductive means, would carry more cash into Moscow’s coffers and assist cushion the affect from Western sanctions.

A gaggle of specialists at Bruegel, a Brussels-based economics assume tank, argued in a latest paper that the sudden elimination of so many oil barrels from the market will represent a “critical international provide shock.”

“With already tight oil markets, it’s not clear that suppliers would have the ability or keen to make up the shortfall,” the specialists wrote, casting doubt over OPEC’s willingness to assist Europe climate the storm.

Advertisement

The EU seems to be keen to bear the brunt of its choice, aware of how the continued buy of Russian fossil fuels is denting the affect of the earlier rafts of sanctions.

Though the bloc has focused nearly all conceivable sectors of the Russian economic system, from the Central Financial institution to microchips and vodka, the aggression reveals no indicators of abating. 

Ukraine has for weeks been calling on the 27 to boycott Russian oil, arguing the taxes the federal government receives from the exports are financing the army marketing campaign.

“Oil is so vital for us due to its direct affect on the Russian skill to proceed and improve aggression in opposition to Ukraine,” Taras Kachka, Ukraine’s commerce consultant, instructed Euronews final month.

“[An oil embargo] signifies that there might be a restricted capability to pay salaries to the Russian troopers. It will likely be not possible to supply weapons by Russian factories, logistics, and so on,” he added.

Advertisement

In addition to the oil embargo, President von der Leyen additionally proposed to take away Sberbank, Russia’s largest financial institution, and two different “main banks” from SWIFT, the Belgium-based system that permits monetary transactions world wide, and to ban three further Russian state-owned broadcasters.

The Fee president, who in early April travelled to Kyiv and visited the scene of the Bucha massacres, mentioned the sixth bundle of sanctions will impose journey bans and asset freezes on these concerned within the alleged conflict crimes and the “inhuman siege” of the port metropolis of Mariupol.

“This sends one other vital sign to all perpetrators of the Kremlin’s conflict: We know who you might be, and you’ll be held accountable,” von der Leyen mentioned.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Video: How Internet Access Is Transforming Life in This Amazon Tribe

Published

on

Video: How Internet Access Is Transforming Life in This Amazon Tribe

Since September, the Marubo, an isolated Amazon tribe, were connected to high-speed internet through Elon Musk’s Starlink. Jack Nicas, The New York Times’s Brazil bureau chief, visited the tribe’s remote Indigenous villages to see what the internet has changed for them.

Continue Reading

World

Russia not 'bluffing' with nuclear threats as Biden greenlights limited military strikes, Medvedev says

Published

on

Russia not 'bluffing' with nuclear threats as Biden greenlights limited military strikes, Medvedev says

A senior ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin says Russia is not bluffing about using tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine and warned that the conflict could spill over into other countries.

Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of the Security Council of Russia, made the comments after President Biden quietly authorized Kyiv to launch U.S.-supplied weapons at military targets just over the border in Russia that are supporting an offensive against the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv.

“This is, alas, neither intimidation nor bluffing,” Medvedev said Friday, speaking on the potential to use strategic nuclear weapons, per Reuters.

UKRAINE SEEKS TO STRIKE RUSSIAN TARGETS WITH WESTERN WEAPONS, ZELENSKYY SAYS

Dmitry Medvedev, a senior ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, says Russia is not bluffing about using tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine and warned that the conflict could spill over into other countries. President Biden, left, quietly authorized Kyiv to launch U.S.-supplied weapons at military targets just over the border. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images  |  Photo by Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Russia has been using staging locations just across the border to enable its attacks against Ukraine and Biden has given Ukraine the go-ahead to use American weaponry to hit back at Russian forces hitting them or preparing to hit them. Germany has also backed the move.

The White House says the policy is limited and prohibits the use of army tactical missile systems (ATACMS) or long-range strikes inside Russia. 

In March, the U.S. quietly delivered long-range ATACMS to Ukraine for the first time – which the Ukrainians have since deployed against Russian military forces inside Ukraine.

Medvedev said Friday that “Russia regards all long-range weapons used by Ukraine as already being directly controlled by servicemen from NATO countries.”

“This is no military assistance, this is participation in a war against us. And such actions could well become a casus belli (an act that provokes a war),” Medvedev said Friday, per Reuters. 

Advertisement

Medvedev, who served as Russian president from 2008 and 2012, said that the West’s ongoing support of Ukraine could lead to an escalation of the 27-month-old full-scale invasion.

“The current military conflict with the West is developing according to the worst possible scenario. There is a constant escalation when it comes to the firepower of NATO weapons being used. Therefore, nobody today can rule out the conflict’s transition to its final stage,” Medvedev said.

KYIV’S FORCES ARE UP AGAINST A CONCERTED RUSSIAN PUSH IN EASTERN UKRAINE, A MILITARY OFFICIAL SAYS

Dmitry Medvedev

Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of the Security Council of Russia, speaks during an interview with Russian media at a residence outside Moscow, Russia, on March 23, 2023. (Sputnik/Yekaterina Shtukina/Pool via REUTERS)

The comments come as depleted Ukrainian troops are losing ground in the war – and just weeks after the U.S. agreed to send an extra $60 billion in aid to the war-torn country. In the border region of Kharkiv, Ukraine has endured a Russian onslaught this month that has stretched Kyiv’s outgunned and outmanned forces.

The White House says that Russia’s forward progress has stalled and that Russia will not be able to capture Kharkiv. 

Advertisement

Russia has only moved forward by a few kilometers and its forces are under relentless barrage by the Ukrainians and suffering at an extraordinary cost, the White House tells Fox News. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday that it’s only a matter of time before Ukraine utilizes the Western weaponry to strike Russian territory.

The developments and threats of escalation came just weeks after Gen. Charles Brown, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said NATO military trainers will eventually be sent to Ukraine, according to a report in the New York Times.

Ukrainian officials have asked their U.S. and NATO counterparts to help train 150,000 new recruits closer to the front line for faster deployment, per the report. 

Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., told Fox News Digital at the time that deploying military trainers would lead to a wider war in the region.

Advertisement

Friday’s comments by Medvedev are not the first time he has taken a hardline stance against the West. In January, he warned the U.K. that putting boots on the ground in Ukraine would amount to a declaration of war against Russia.

Zelenskyy and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, greets Secretary of State Antony Blinken, right, prior to their meeting in Kyiv on May 14, 2024. (Ukrainian Presidential Press Office via AP)

In January, he also raised the prospect of nuclear war, warning NATO allies that a defeat for Russia in Ukraine could provoke a nuclear war. 

“The loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war can provoke the beginning of a nuclear war,” he said in a Telegram post.

“Nuclear powers have [never] lost major conflicts on which their fate depends,” the Kremlin official added. 

Advertisement

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin, as well as Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Businesswoman Halla Tomasdottir set to become Iceland’s next president

Published

on

Businesswoman Halla Tomasdottir set to become Iceland’s next president

Tomasdottir wins 34.6 percent of the votes to become the Nordic country’s second female president.

Halla Tomasdottir, a businesswoman and investor, has won Iceland’s presidential election, topping a crowded field of candidates in which the top three finishers were women, the country’s national broadcast service reports.

Tomasdottir, 55, was elected to the largely ceremonial post with 34.3 percent of the vote, defeating former Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdottir, with 25.2 percent, and Halla Hrund Logadottir, with 15.5 percent, RUV said on Sunday.

Tomasdottir is currently on leave as chief executive of The B Team, a global nonprofit co-founded by UK business tycoon Richard Branson to promote business practices focused on humanity and the climate, and has offices in New York and London.

Iceland’s president holds a largely ceremonial position in the parliamentary republic, acting as a guarantor of the constitution and national unity. He or she, however, has the power to veto a legislation or submit it to a referendum.

Advertisement

Tomasdottir campaigned as someone who was above party politics and could help open discussions on fundamental issues such as the effect of social media on the mental health of young people, Iceland’s development as a tourist destination and the role of artificial intelligence.

She will replace President Gudni Th Johannesson, who did not seek re-election after two four-year terms. Tomasdottir will take office on August 1.

Iceland’s second woman president

Iceland, a Nordic island nation located in the North Atlantic, has a long tradition of electing women to high office.

Vigdis Finnbogadottir was the first democratically elected female president of any nation when she became Iceland’s head of state in 1980.

The country has also seen two women serve as prime minister in recent years, providing stability during years of political turmoil.

Advertisement

Johanna Sigurdardottir led the government from 2009 to 2013, after the global financial crisis ravaged Iceland’s economy.

Jakobsdottir, 48, became prime minister in 2017, leading a broad coalition that ended the cycle of crises that had triggered three elections in four years. She resigned in April to run for president.

In the country of 380,000 people, any citizen gathering 1,500 signatures can run for office.

While Jakobsdottir was at times seen as the favourite, political observers had suggested that her background as prime minister could weigh against her.

Among the other main candidates in the field of 13 were a political science professor, a comedian, and an Arctic and energy scholar.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending