Connect with us

World

Brittney Griner Doing Well in Prison, U.S. Says, but Is No Closer to Release

Published

on

Brittney Griner Doing Well in Prison, U.S. Says, but Is No Closer to Release

One of many final instances Brittney Griner, a two-time Olympic gold medalist and seven-time All Star heart for the ladies’s skilled basketball crew in Phoenix, appeared in public, it was on a Russian airport safety video.

She wore a Black Lives for Peace sweatshirt and rolled her baggage by way of safety, the place officers with Russia’s Federal Customs Service stated that they had present in her bag unlawful vape cartridges that contained cannabis oil. The authorities detained her on drug prices.

Now, a month later, as Ms. Griner — too tall at 6-foot-9 for her top-bunk mattress — languishes in a cell she shares with two Russian inmates additionally accused of drug trafficking in a pretrial detention heart close to Moscow, American officers have lastly been capable of see her.

“A consular official was capable of go to Brittney Griner right this moment and located her to be in good situation,” Jennifer L. Palmer, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, stated Wednesday. “We’ll proceed to do every little thing we will to see to it that she is handled pretty all through this ordeal.”

Some supporters in Moscow and Washington are cautious of elevating Ms. Griner’s profile too excessive, or linking her case to the battle in Ukraine and thus politicizing her as a pawn in an awesome energy battle. Household and buddies of Ms. Griner, who if convicted faces 10 years in jail, have adopted that recommendation, sustaining silence within the hopes of a back-channel decision.

Advertisement

Russia specialists largely concur, saying that given the cruel sanctions imposed on Russia by america and its Western allies, a public strain marketing campaign provides little leverage, whereas extra refined makes an attempt at de-escalation may yield some outcomes.

However as her detention has been extended to a minimum of Could, some annoyed supporters complain that the federal government just isn’t doing sufficient, and are calling for a extra vocal strain marketing campaign to free one of the outstanding and adorned athletes in American sports activities.

“That retains it within the public eye, in order that we the individuals can maintain demanding that the federal government do every little thing in its energy to assist Brittney,” stated Debbie Jackson, Ms. Griner’s highschool basketball coach in Houston, who stated she believed there can be extra consideration on her case if she had been a person enjoying within the N.B.A.

Ms. Griner might hardly be extra outstanding: championships in faculty {and professional} basketball; a No. 1 total choice within the 2013 draft; the Olympic medals; and 4 Euroleague crowns. And but, the prospect of her being detained has been met largely with silence.

That’s much more jarring as a result of her sport has taken on a repute for talking out and elevating social consciousness. Ms. Griner, the primary overtly homosexual athlete endorsed by Nike, contributed to that custom by serving to defeat a Texas invoice that mandated transgender individuals use restroom services in line with the gender of their delivery certificates.

Advertisement

The vacuum of shock across the case could also be a consequence, as Ms. Jackson and others consider, of Ms. Griner being a dominant girl within the W.N.B.A., quite than a male star within the N.B.A. Or it might be deference to the household’s want to maintain quiet and never upset any diplomatic efforts.

However what is evident, in accordance with Russia specialists, is that the timing of Ms. Griner’s detention made an already excruciating scenario worse.

“The household and advocates of individuals being held in Russia on trumped-up prices face a horrible dilemma: Will quiet outreach repay higher than a public strain marketing campaign?” stated Andrew S. Weiss, a Russia skilled on the Carnegie Endowment for Worldwide Peace.

“Any calculation they may make is vastly sophisticated by the pressures imposed by the battle in Ukraine,” he added, “and the near-total collapse of efficient traces of communication between the U.S. and Russian governments.”

In response to one State Division official, a part of the technique has been to maintain Ms. Griner’s case as low-key as potential to forestall the Russian authorities from seeing her as a invaluable asset that will increase their leverage. The official additionally stated rising deal with Ms. Griner might complicate her consular entry, which has been an issue for different People detained in Russia.

Advertisement

However Jason Rezaian, a author for The Washington Submit’s World Opinions part whom Iran unjustly imprisoned for 544 days, stated he fell squarely within the “amping up public strain camp,” particularly if an authoritarian authorities’s state-run information media publicized the detention.

Calling extra consideration to a case may make the roles of presidency officers “tougher, in that they’ve to handle this downside,” he stated. “They’d love nothing extra generally than to not should take care of these issues.”

Mr. Rezaian stated that in his personal expertise, but in addition in coordinating with different households held hostage by authoritarian governments, “everyone seems to be all the time instructed to maintain it quiet” to raised their probabilities of launch. However public strain, he stated, can work.

Nonetheless, different former hostages acknowledged that it was an especially troublesome choice.

“I believe it’s a query all households battle with. Six years on, I don’t assume I do know what the very best answer is, to be trustworthy,” Richard Ratcliffe, the husband of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a British-Iranian girl held for six years by the Iranian authorities, stated on Monday.

Advertisement

However Ms. Zaghari-Ratcliffe appeared to understand the advantages of getting one’s plight on the general public radar.

“It has been merciless what occurred to me,” she stated. However she added that though her launch had taken a very long time, others remained in jail and she or he “was the fortunate one who received to be acknowledged internationally.”

Within the meantime, Ms. Griner, 31, whose spouse, Cherelle, has appealed for privateness “as we proceed to work on getting my spouse house safely,” stays in jail, with restricted visibility.

“It’s our expectation that this not be a one-off go to,” Ned Worth, the State Division’s spokesman, instructed reporters in Washington.

Yekaterina Kalugina, a member of the general public monitoring group allowed to go to prisons and verify on inmate situations, had an opportunity to go to Ms. Griner final week. She stated in an interview that the basketball star “has a optimistic angle” and had acquired from her legal professionals shampoo for her dreadlocks and a few books, together with Dostoyevsky’s “Demons.”

Her two cellmates communicate some English, however the three, allowed a day by day stroll and a biweekly bathe, largely go their time watching Russian tv. Ms. Griner has been unable to ship a letter to her household in america, Ms. Kalugina stated, as a result of they can’t register on the Russian jail’s service web site.

Advertisement

“She doesn’t pull her hair out,” Ms. Kalugina stated. “She retains herself calm and dignified.”

The American embassy in Moscow stated it has now procured a privateness waiver to talk about Ms. Griner’s case.

The U.S. ambassador to Russia, John Sullivan, has pressed Ms. Griner’s case with Russian officers, when given the possibility. That occurred earlier this week, when Russia’s Overseas Ministry summoned Mr. Sullivan to precise anger at President Biden for calling President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia a “battle prison.”

Throughout the assembly, Mr. Sullivan, whose uncle served because the final U.S. ambassador in Tehran and was briefly held hostage within the American embassy throughout Iran’s 1979 revolution, demanded that the Kremlin observe worldwide regulation and permit consular entry to detained U.S. residents.

However past getting that entry, it’s not clear what strain — particularly publicly — would assist get Ms. Griner house.

Advertisement

Russia has for years sought the discharge of two intelligence brokers arrested by American officers. In an obvious response, Russia arrested Trevor Reed, a former U.S. Marine, who’s serving a nine-year sentence on prices of assaulting law enforcement officials, which his household argues had been politically trumped up.

In 2020, one other former Marine, Paul Whelan, acquired a 16-year jail sentence in an espionage trial that was itself secret. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken has introduced up their instances to his Russian counterpart, however america appears to have resisted a prisoner swap.

Ms. Griner’s case is far totally different. Like many W.N.B.A. gamers, she performs overseas within the low season to complement her wage, in her case for the Russian crew UMMC Ekaterinburg. Her detention would seem to set a harmful precedent for athletes, together with Russian athletes, in tournaments all over the world.

Ms. Griner was one of many first ladies to dunk a basketball in a school sport and holds the N.C.A.A. distinction, amongst women and men, for scoring a minimum of 2,000 factors and blocking 500 pictures. However throughout this month’s N.C.A.A. match, the showpiece occasion of the faculty season, her identify has hardly been uttered.

One exception was the N.B.A. participant Chris Boucher, a ahead for the Toronto Raptors, who final weekend introduced her scenario up in a postgame interview.

Advertisement

“I simply need to speak about Brittney Griner,” he stated. “She’s in Russia, and it’s like no one is speaking about it. So, it might be good to place consideration on that as a result of she’s nonetheless holed up over there.”

Jason Horowitz reported from Rome, Jonathan Abrams from Charlotte, N.C., and Ivan Nechepurenko from Istanbul. Stephen Citadel contributed reporting from London.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss

Published

on

Manhattan's Top Federal Prosecutor Williams Joins Law Firm Paul Weiss
By Sara Merken (Reuters) – Damian Williams, the former top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, will return to law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison as a partner in New York, the firm said on Friday. Williams was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in 2021 by …
Continue Reading

World

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Published

on

Trump issues warning to Maduro as Venezuelan leader enters third term, US expands sanctions

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump issued a warning ahead of the inauguration of contested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who took up the top job for a third term on Friday. 

Despite significant opposition both at home and abroad to the July election in which Maduro claimed victory without providing ballot-box proof, the Venezuelan leader, deemed a “dictator” by American lawmakers, is now set to hold office until 2031.

Advertisement

On Thursday, opposition leader María Corina Machado emerged from months of hiding to join hundreds of anti-Maduro protesters in the capital city of Caracas and demand that opposition candidate Edmundo González be sworn in instead.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro holds a news conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, July 31, 2024, three days after his disputed reelection. Maduro banned the social network X from Venezuela for 10 days after accusing it of being used by his opponents to create unrest after the election. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

TWO AMERICANS ARRESTED IN VENEZUELA ON EVE OF MADURO INAUGURATION OVER ‘TERRORISM’ CLAIMS

Machado was briefly detained by government security forces after they “violently intercepted” her convoy as she attempted to leave the protests, the Associated Press reported.

Trump took to social media to demand she remain “safe and alive.”

Advertisement

“Venezuelan democracy activist Maria Corina Machado and President-elect Gonzalez are peacefully expressing the voices and the will of the Venezuelan people with hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against the regime,” he wrote. “These freedom fighters should not be harmed, and must stay safe and alive.”

The opposition figure was apparently forced to record several videos before she was released, though the details of those recordings remain unclear. 

Maria Corina Machado

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado addresses supporters at a protest against President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025, the day before his inauguration for a third term. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos)

THOUSANDS OF VENEZUELAN OPPOSITION SUPPORTERS TAKE TO THE STREETS AHEAD OF MADURO’S THIRD INAUGURATION

Maduro’s supporters have reportedly denied that Machado was arrested.

On Friday, the Biden administration backed the efforts by the opposition leaders and, according to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, “President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia should be sworn in, and the democratic transition should begin.

Advertisement

“Today, Nicolás Maduro held an illegitimate presidential inauguration in Venezuela in a desperate attempt to seize power. The Venezuelan people and world know the truth – Maduro clearly lost the 2024 presidential election and has no right to claim the presidency,” the secretary said in a statement. “The United States rejects the National Electoral Council’s fraudulent announcement that Maduro won the presidential election and does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as the president of Venezuela. 

“We stand ready to support a return to democracy in Venezuela,” Blinken added. 

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on Friday slapped a new round of sanctions on the Maduro regime, this time targeting “officials who lead key economic and security agencies enabling Nicolás Maduro’s repression and subversion of democracy in Venezuela.”

Eight officials were named in the sanctions, including the recently appointed head of Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, Hector Obregon, as well as the nation’s transportation minister, Ramon Velasquez, according to a statement by the department.

“In addition, OFAC is sanctioning high-level Venezuelan officials in the military and police who lead entities with roles in carrying out Maduro’s repression and human rights abuses against democratic actors,” the statement said. 

Advertisement
A supporter of Venezuela's opposition holds his arms up and shouts with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro's inauguration.

A supporter of Venezuela’s opposition reacts while gathering with fellow supporters ahead of President Nicolas Maduro’s inauguration for a third term, in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 9, 2025. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria)

Maduro was also once again targeted by Washington’s sanctions, and the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction was increased to $25 million.

The same amount was offered up for the Venezuelan Minister of Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, along with a $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino. 

Members of the military and police were also named in the sanctions. 

Blinken confirmed on Friday that some 2,000 Maduro-aligned individuals have had visa-restrictions imposed on them.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Published

on

US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban

Justices at the United States Supreme Court have signalled scepticism towards a challenge brought by the video-sharing platform TikTok, as it seeks to overturn a law that would force the app’s sale or ban it by January 19.

Friday’s hearing is the latest in a legal saga that has pitted the US government against ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, in a battle over free speech and national security concerns.

The law in question was signed in April, declaring that ByteDance would face a deadline to sell its US shares or face a ban.

The bill had strong bipartisan support, with lawmakers citing fears that the Chinese-based ByteDance could collect user data and deliver it to the Chinese government. Outgoing US President Joe Biden ultimately signed it into law.

But ByteDance and TikTok users have challenged the law’s constitutionality, arguing that banning the app would limit their free speech rights.

Advertisement

During Friday’s oral arguments, the Supreme Court seemed swayed by the government’s position that the app enables China’s government to spy on Americans and carry out covert influence operations.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito also floated the possibility of issuing what is called an administrative stay that would put the law on hold temporarily while the court decides how to proceed.

The Supreme Court’s consideration of the case comes at a time of continued trade tensions between the US and China, the world’s two biggest economies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who is due to begin his second term a day after the ban kicks in, had promised to “save” the platform during his presidential campaign.

That marks a reversal from his first term in office, when he unsuccessfully tried to ban TikTok.

Advertisement

In December, Trump called on the Supreme Court to put the law’s implementation on hold to give his administration “the opportunity to pursue a political resolution of the questions at issue in the case”.

Noel Francisco, a lawyer for TikTok and ByteDance, emphasised to the court that the law risked shuttering one of the most popular platforms in the US.

“This act should not stand,” Francisco said. He dismissed the fear “that Americans, even if fully informed, could be persuaded by Chinese misinformation” as a “decision that the First Amendment leaves to the people”.

Francisco asked the justices to, at minimum, put a temporary hold on the law, “which will allow you to carefully consider this momentous issue and, for the reasons explained by the president-elect, potentially moot the case”.

‘Weaponise TikTok’ to harm US

TikTok has about 170 million American users, about half the US population.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, said that Chinese control of TikTok poses a grave threat to US national security.

The immense amount of data the app could collect on users and their contacts could give China a powerful tool for harassment, recruitment and espionage, she explained.

China could then “could weaponise TikTok at any time to harm the United States”.

Prelogar added that the First Amendment does not bar Congress from taking steps to protect Americans and their data.

Several justices seemed receptive to those arguments during Friday’s hearing. Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts pressed TikTok’s lawyers on the company’s Chinese ownership.

Advertisement

“Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the ultimate parent is, in fact, subject to doing intelligence work for the Chinese government?” Roberts asked.

“It seems to me that you’re ignoring the major concern here of Congress — which was Chinese manipulation of the content and acquisition and harvesting of the content.”

“Congress doesn’t care about what’s on TikTok,” Roberts added, appearing to brush aside free speech arguments.

Left-leaning Justice Elena Kagan also suggested that April’s TikTok law “is only targeted at this foreign corporation, which doesn’t have First Amendment rights”.

TikTok, ByteDance and app users had appealed a lower court’s ruling that upheld the law and rejected their argument that it violates the US Constitution’s free speech protections under the First Amendment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending