Connect with us

Wyoming

Wisconsin Anglers Get Their Guns Back – Wyoming Anglers Say They’d…

Published

on

Wisconsin Anglers Get Their Guns Back – Wyoming Anglers Say They’d…


After 25 years, Wisconsin anglers won back the right to carry guns while fishing, but some Wyoming anglers said it would be stupid to ever give that right up in the first place.

Particularly where grizzlies are lumbering about, a .44 magnum could be part of the well-equipped Wyoming angler’s kit.

Even so, don’t entertain any thoughts of leveling your hand-cannon at a trout in a “make my day” moment with a menacing snarl like Clint Eastwood’s “Dirty Harry” character.

It remains patently illegal to shoot fish with a firearm in Wyoming or Wisconsin.

Advertisement

Indeed, people who try to blast fish with guns might very well be why Wisconsin banned anglers from carrying firearms in 1999.

It is legal to shoot some species of fish with a bow in Wyoming, although it used to be illegal for bowhunters to carry firearms here, but now it’s allowed.

Questions about what is and isn’t allowed are good reasons to double-check hunting and fishing regulations before heading out with your fly rod, pistol, bow — or all three at once.

Wisconsin Ban Overturned

Wisconsin’s ban on anglers carrying firearms had long irritated gun rights advocates there.

The conservative activist group Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty finally made a successful push against it, suing on the grounds that it violated the Second Amendment.

Advertisement

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources on Wednesday agreed to overturn the ban, and the lawsuit was dropped, the Washington Times reported.

DRN spokeswoman Molly Meister told the Times that the ban hadn’t really been enforced since 2011, when Wisconsin legalized carrying concealed weapons.

The issue of anglers carrying firearms may be a debate in other states, but not Wyoming. (Getty Images)

A Matter Of Safety

Wisconsin banning anglers from carrying didn’t make sense in the first place, and in Wyoming such a ban would be stupid, Vince Vanata of Cody told Cowboy State Daily.

That’s because some of Wyoming’s best fishing is in the middle of prime grizzly habitat, said he retired Marine and law enforcement officer.

“If you’re fishing on the ground on the North Fork west of Buffalo Bill Reservoir, you’d better carrying a pistol and/or bear spray,” he said.

Advertisement

“You can see grizzlies from the gate at Yellowstone all the way down to Buffalo Bill. And they all like to head right down to the river,” he said. “If you’re fishing from a boat, it’s not that big of a deal. But if you’re on the ground, you need to be prepared.

“One day, we had to retreat into out camper because a bear came right into the campground” at Newton Creek on the Shoshone National Forest.

Nic George of Sheridan said grizzlies aren’t a concern in most of the places he goes fishing, but he carries a pistol nonetheless because mountain lions might be around.

Anglers tend to be quiet and intensely focused on what they’re doing, he told Cowboy State Daily.

“That makes you a prime target for mountain lions, which is a good reason to carry a firearm while fishing,” he said.

Advertisement

It’s legal to bowfish in Wyoming, but only for species that Game and Fish lists as non-game species, such as suckers and carp. Game fish, such as trout, may be caught with traditional fishing tackle only.

Bowhunters Can Carry Sidearms

Vanata also likes to hunt with a bow, and said he was happy when Wyoming lifted a ban on bowhunters carrying firearms several years ago.

“Do you lose your Second Amendment rights when you’re bowhunting?” Vanata said.

He said he understands game wardens’ misgivings about some unethical bowhunters trying to cheat and use their pistols to kill elk.

But gun rights and the need for archers to protect themselves from grizzlies and other large predators outweighs that, he said.

Advertisement

Wyoming Game and Fish regulations allow bowhunters to carry sidearms for personal protection. But firearms may not be used to kill, or even to finish off, big game animals during archery-only hunting seasons.

George said he has an ultra-light Smith & Wesson .44 magnum that he carries when he goes archery hunting in northwest Wyoming.

Its featherweight frame makes the revolver great for carrying on long hikes in the backcountry. But a magnum cartridge in such a light handgun makes for wicked recoil, George said.

“If I ever ran into a grizzly, I’d almost be tempted to just try bludgeoning the bear with it, because it kicks so hard,” he said with a laugh.

Mark Heinz can be reached at mark@cowboystatedaily.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Wyoming

Wyoming power plant booming with suspected UFO, drone sightings — but still no answers after over a year

Published

on

Wyoming power plant booming with suspected UFO, drone sightings — but still no answers after over a year


Fleets of drones and suspected UFOs have been spotted hovering over a Wyoming power plant for more than a year, while a local sheriff’s department is still searching for clues.

Officials with the Sweetwater County Sheriff’s Office recorded scores of beaming, drone-like objects circling around the Red Desert and Jim Bridger Power Plant in Rock Springs over the last 13 months — though they didn’t specify how many, the Cowboy State Daily reported.

Multiple drone or suspected UFO sightings have been reported at the Jim Bridger Power Plant in Rock Springs, Wyoming. UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Sheriff John Grossnickle was one of the first to witness the spectacles, and last saw the mind-boggling formation on Dec. 12, his spokesperson Jason Mower told the outlet.

The fleets periodically congregate over the power plant in coordinated formations, Mower claimed.

Advertisement

The sheriff’s office hasn’t been able to recover any of the suspected UFOs, telling the outlet they’re too high to shoot down.

The law enforcement outpost’s exhaustive efforts to get to the truth haven’t yielded any results, even after Grossnickle enlisted help from Wyoming US Rep. Harriet Hageman — who Mower claimed saw the formation during a trip to the power plant.

Hageman could not be reached for comment.

A spokesperson for the Sweetwater County Sheriff’s Office said that the drones typically hover too high up for them to shoot down. X/@JerzyBets

“We’ve worked with everybody. We’ve done everything we can to figure out what they are, and nobody wants to give us any answers,” Mower said, according to the outlet.

At first, spooked locals bombarded the sheriff’s office with calls about the confounding aerial formations. Now, though, Mower said that people seem to have accepted it as “the new normal.”

Advertisement

Mower noted that the objects, which he interchangeably referred to as “drones” and “unidentified flying objects,” have yet to pose a danger to the public or cause any damage to the power plant itself.

John Grossnickle, the sheriff of Sweetwater County, claimed he saw the objects. LinkedIn/John Grossnickle

“It’s like this phenomenon that continues to happen, but it’s not causing any, you know, issues that we have to deal with — other than the presence of them,” he told the outlet.

The spokesperson promised the sheriff’s office would “certainly act accordingly” if the drones pose an imminent harm.

Meanwhile, Niobrara County Sheriff Randy Starkey told the Cowboy State Daily that residents of his community also reported mystery drone sightings over Lance Creek — more than 300 miles from the Jim Bridger Power Plant — starting in late October 2024 and ending in early March.

Another sheriff’s office one county over also reported similar sightings over a creek. phonlamaiphoto – stock.adobe.com

Starkey said he’s “just glad they’re gone,” according to the outlet.

Advertisement

Drone sightings captured the nation’s attention last year when they were causing hysteria in sightings over New Jersey.

Just days into his second term, President Trump had to clarify that the drones were authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration to quell worries that they posed a national security threat.

Still, the public wasn’t convinced, but the mystery slowly faded as the sightings plummeted.

In October, though, an anonymous source with an unnamed military contractor told The Post that their company was responsible for the hysteria.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Barrasso bill aims to improve rescue response in national parks

Published

on

Barrasso bill aims to improve rescue response in national parks


Much of Wyoming outside of Yellowstone and Grand Teton also struggles with emergency response time.

By Katie Klingsporn, WyoFile

Wyoming’s U.S. Sen. John Barrasso is pushing legislation to upgrade emergency communications in national parks — a step he says would improve responses in far-flung areas of parks like Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. 

“This bill improves the speed and accuracy of emergency responders in locating and assisting callers in need of emergency assistance,” Barrasso told members of the National Parks Subcommittee last week during a hearing on the bill. “These moments make a difference between visitors being able to receive quick care and continue their trip or facing more serious medical complications.”

The legislation directs the U.S. Department of the Interior to develop a plan to upgrade National Park Service 911 call centers with next-generation 911 technology. 

Advertisement

Among other things, these upgrades would enable them to receive text messages, images and videos in addition to phone calls, enhancing their ability to respond to emergencies or rescues in the parks. 

A rescue litter is delivered to Jenny Lake Climbing Rangers. A new report compiled by ranger George Montopoli and his daughter Michelle Montopoli show trends in search and rescue incidents in Grand Teton National Park. Photo: Courtesy of Grand Teton National Park

Each year, rangers and emergency services respond to a wide range of calls — from lost hikers to car accidents and grizzly maulings — in the Wyoming parks’ combined 2.5 million acres. 

Outside park boundaries, the state’s emergency service providers also face steep challenges, namely achieving financial viability. Many patients, meantime, encounter a lack of uniformity and longer 911 response times in the state’s so-called frontier areas. 

Improving the availability of ground ambulance services to respond to 911 calls is a major priority in Wyoming’s recent application for federal Rural Health Transformation Project funds. 

Barrasso’s office did not respond to a WyoFile request for comment on the state’s broader EMS challenges by publication time. 

Advertisement

The bill from the prominent Wyoming Republican, who serves as Senate Majority Whip, joined a slate of federal proposals the subcommittee considered last week. With other bills related to the official name of North America’s highest mountain, an extra park fee charged to international visitors, the health of a wild horse herd and the use of off-highway vehicles in Capitol Reef National Park, Barrasso’s “Making Parks Safer Act” was among the least controversial. 

What’s in it

Barrasso brought the bipartisan act along with Sens. Angus King (I-Maine), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) and John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.). 

The bill would equip national park 911 call centers with technological upgrades that would improve and streamline responses, Barrasso said. He noted that hundreds of millions of visitors stream into America’s national parks annually. That includes more than 8 million recreation visits to Wyoming’s national parks in 2024. 

“Folks travel from across the world to enjoy the great American outdoors, and for many families, these memories last a lifetime,” he testified. “This is a bipartisan bill that ensures visitors who may need assistance can be reached in an accurate and timely manner.”

President Donald Trump, seated next to U.S. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyoming, meets with members of Congress on Feb. 14, 2018, in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington, D.C. Photo: White House

The Park Service supports Barrasso’s bill, Mike Caldwell, the agency’s associate director of park planning, facilities and lands, said during the hearing. It’s among several proposals that are “consistent with executive order 14314, ‘Making America Beautiful Again by Improving our National Parks,’” Caldwell said. 

“These improvements are largely invisible to visitors, so they strengthen the emergency response without deterring the park’s natural beauty or history,” he said.

Advertisement

Other park issues 

National parks have been a topic of contention since President Donald Trump included them in his DOGE efforts in early 2025. Since then, efforts to sell off federal land and strip park materials of historical information that casts a negative light on the country, along with a 43-day government shutdown, have continued to fuel debate over the proper management of America’s parks.  

Several of these changes and issues came up during the recent National Parks Subcommittee hearing. 

A person walks the southwest ridge of Eagle Peak in Yellowstone National Park during the 2024 search for missing hiker Austin King. Photo: Jacob W. Frank // NPS

Among them was the recent announcement that resident fee-free dates will change in 2026. Martin Luther King Day and Juneteenth will no longer be included in those days, but visitors won’t have to pay fees on new dates: Flag Day on June 14, which is Trump’s birthday and Oct. 27, Theodore Roosevelt’s birthday. 

Conservation organizations and others decried those changes as regressive. 

At the hearing, Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM), assured the room that “when this president is in the past, Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth will not only have fee-free national park admission, they will occupy, again, incredible places of pride in our nation’s history.”

Improvements such as the new fee structure “put American families first,” according to the Department of the Interior. “These policies ensure that U.S. taxpayers, who already support the National Park System, continue to enjoy affordable access, while international visitors contribute their fair share to maintaining and improving our parks for future generations,” Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said in an announcement.

Advertisement

WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Evacuations spread from fires in South Dakota, Wyoming due to strong winds from coast-to-coast storm

Published

on

Evacuations spread from fires in South Dakota, Wyoming due to strong winds from coast-to-coast storm


Large, fast-moving fires are causing evacuations in South Dakota and Wyoming due to the impacts of a coast-to-coast storm.

The FOX Forecast Center said winds have been gusting up to 70 mph in the Pennington County, South Dakota area, which has caused the wildfire to spread rapidly.

COAST-TO-COAST STORM CAUSES TRAVEL ISSUES DUE TO HURRICANE-FORCE WINDS, HEAVY RAIN ACROSS NORTHWEST

Advertisement

The blaze, known as the Greyhound Fire, is approximately 200 acres in size. The fire is burning two to three miles south of Keystone and is moving east, according to the Pennington County Sheriff’s Office.

Highway 40 and Playhouse Road are closed as crews work to contain the fire.

People living along the highway between Playhouse Road and Rushmore Ranch Road have been evacuated, officials said.

Advertisement

TWO KIDS WAITING FOR THE BUS CRITICALLY INJURED DUE TO STRONG WINDS IN IDAHO

Crews are asking anyone in an evacuation zone to leave the area. Officials are advising people in the area to check the Pennington County Public Safety Hub.

People in the Winchester Hills area of Cheyenne, Wyoming, have also been evacuated due to a grass fire.

Advertisement

The FOX Forecast Center said winds are gusting up to 75 mph in the area.

The National Weather Service has issued a Fire Warning and says there is a shelter at South High School for evacuated residents.

Check for updates on this developing story.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending