Wyoming
Summit weighs new destinations for carbon pipeline: Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas
What is the Summit Carbon Solutions pipleine project?
Ames, Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions wants to build a pipeline across several states to trap carbon dioxide from ethanol plants and bury it.
With Summit Carbon Solutions’ planned route effectively blocked by South Dakota’s ban on the company’s use of eminent domain, opponents question where it intends to sequester the carbon dioxide a $9 billion pipeline it proposes would collect from Iowa and other Midwestern ethanol plants.
The sequestration site is supposed to be in North Dakota, but reaching that state is problematic without running the pipeline through South Dakota, where Ames-based Summit not only faces the eminent domain ban but has yet to obtain a permit.
Attorneys at a Polk District Court hearing Friday, Oct. 10, puzzled over the pipeline’s route as they debated whether Judge Scott Beattie should move forward with a judicial review of Summit’s Iowa permit for pipeline construction or, as Summit requests, return the case to the Iowa Utilities Commission so the panel can consider the company’s request to amend its permit.
That would make it possible for the company to consider other possible sites for sequestering the carbon emissions.
Bret Dublinske, a Summit attorney, said Friday that North Dakota used to be the only option. But now Tallgrass Energy is capturing carbon with its Trailblazer pipeline through Nebraska and sequestering it in Wyoming, and Colorado and Kansas, along with Nebraska, are seeking federal approval to store carbon, he said.
“We’re asking for permission to explore all options,” Dublinske said.
Iowa regulators made approval of Summit’s permit contingent on it getting a permit to build the pipeline through South Dakota. The state’s regulators have twice rejected the company’s application, most recently, because it lacked a viable route after the ban on allowing it to use eminent domain, which would have enabled it to obtain access to property for the project from unwilling landowners.
Christina Gruenhagen, the Iowa Farm Bureau’s government relations counsel, said the project should go back to the state regulators to determine if it’s viable.
“It’s not clear whether this pipeline is still going to North Dakota, or will go around South Dakota, whether it’s going to stop in Nebraska, go to Wyoming, go to Kanas, we don’t know,” Gruenhagen said.
She said it raises questions about the use of eminent domain in Iowa, which some lawmakers want to strike down, and if the pipeline serves a public purpose.
“At this point, we don’t know whether that pipeline can be completed to achieve the public purpose of sequestering carbon dioxide,” she said.
Here’s what to know about the discussion at Friday’s hearing.
What is Summit saying about its route and sequestration plans?
Summit spokesperson Sabrina Zenor said in a text Friday that the company’s proposed permit amendment “keeps open the option to transport CO2 west through Nebraska or north through South Dakota, which is part of our original permit.”
Summit wants to remove North Dakota as the sequestration location, change the pipeline size in some areas and add a customer.
Taking the pipeline through Nebraska could make Nebraska, Wyoming, Kansas and Colorado possible sequestration options.
Summit announced plans four years ago to build the 2,000-mile pipeline to capture carbon dioxide from dozens of ethanol plants in Iowa, South Dakota, Minnesota and Nebraska, liquefy it under pressure, and sequester it deep underground in North Dakota.
Despite the challenges that have emerged, the company has said it remains committed to the project. Proponents say the pipeline would significantly lower the carbon footprint of ethanol made in Iowa and other states it serves, expand markets and qualify the corn-derived fuel as low carbon, making it eligible for generous federal tax credits.
“Our focus is on supporting as many ethanol partners as possible and building a strong foundation that helps farmers, ethanol plants, and rural communities access the markets they’ll depend on for decades to come,” Zenor said in her text Friday.
What’s the issue before the Polk District Court?
Nine Iowa counties, the Sierra Club’s state Chapter, landowners and others are challenging the Iowa Utilities Commission’s decision last year to give Summit a permit to build nearly 700 miles of pipeline across the state.
Wally Taylor, the Sierra Club’s attorney; Brian Jorde, an Omaha attorney representing dozens of landowners; and others argued that the issues Beattie will consider are broader than those included in Summit’s proposed permit amendment.
Additionally, Jorde said that Summit should have known in 2023 that it would have difficulty getting a pipeline permit in South Dakota. The company lost its first permit request two years ago and legislative restrictions already were being proposed, he said. “They have done this to themselves,” Jorde said. “They have charted their own course, and now they want a redo.”
Dublinske said that argument doesn’t hold up: North Dakota also initially rejected Summit’s pipeline permit request in 2023, but the company won approval a year later.
Attorney: Summit seeks a ‘wholesale reboot’ of final order
Jason Craig, an attorney for the Iowa counties, said Summit seeks to move the case back to the utilities commission to “pursue an entirely new contested case proceedings — to change the project, change the route, change the pipe engineering, change the conditions of the permit” and consolidate the original pipeline with its proposed expanded route.
“That amendment will require full hearing procedures and will result in a separate final decision,” he said. “That’s not supplementing the record, your honor. That’s a wholesale reboot of the final order.”
But Beattie expressed concern that if he moves forward with the judicial review, yet the permit also is amended, appellate courts could have “two independent and separate records that could result in conflicting matters.”
“Doesn’t it make more sense to send it back, let the commission sort all that out, put it in one clear package, and then move forward?” Beattie said.
Craig said landowners deserved to have the judge review the case instead of sending it back to the commission for “potentially years more” delay.
Beattie said he expects to issue a decision within a couple of weeks.
Donnelle Eller covers agriculture, the environment and energy for the Register. Reach her at deller@registermedia.com.
Wyoming
Elections committee forwards 7 more election revamp bills to session
Legislative attempts to bolster the integrity of Wyoming elections, which some officials statewide insist are already trustworthy, aren’t disappearing anytime soon.
That’s after Wyoming lawmakers on the interim Joint Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee forwarded seven bills that would revamp the way the state runs and operates its election processes. Wyoming voted for Pres. Trump more than any other state in 2024.
The seven bills could make recounts more common, restrict ballot harvesting, require more signatures for independent candidates to get onto general election ballots, allow for more hand count audits, and ban the use of student and non-photo IDs when voting.
The seven draft bills include:
Sen. Bill Landen (R-Casper) said one of his constituents told him the ID bill could make it harder for his 87-year-old mom to vote.
“I circle back and go, ‘Well, what exactly are we doing here?’” said Landen.
Supporters of the legislation, like Wyoming Freedom Caucus member Rep. Steve Johnson (R-Cheyenne), repeated the contention that the bills are about bolstering election integrity in a state where some feel its elections could be manipulated and that policy should be reshaped based on that possibility.
The latest suite of bills to reconfigure state elections come as doubts about election integrity have increased following false claims that the 2020 general election was stolen from Pres. Donald Trump.
Johnson quoted from the Wyoming Constitution during discussion of the independent candidates bill.
“Article Six, Section Thirteen: ‘Purity of elections to be provided for,’” he read, continuing, “that’s the major cause [of why] we’re here. We want our elections to be free and fair and honest. And there’s a lot of people that don’t think that necessarily all the elections are free and fair.”
Critics said repeated discussions of the need for election integrity are themselves undermining confidence in elections.
“The comments about the decrease in confidence reminds me of the man who murdered his parents and then threw himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan,” said Gail Symons, who operates the Wyoming civics website Civics307 and ran unsuccessfully for a state House seat in Sheridan in the last primary. “We’re losing confidence because we are always talking about how people don’t have confidence.”
The bill that would expand the use of hand counting for certain recounts caught her attention in particular, she added.
“There’s unambiguous evidence,” she said. “They are less accurate, less reliable, more time consuming, dramatically more expensive and logistically unsustainable. All of these bills are based … on assumption, supposition, speculation, conjecture, fallacy, unsubstantiated theories, baseless claims and debunked conspiracy theories.”
Officials like Secretary of State Chuck Gray have said similar election bills are about preventing voter fraud and restoring election integrity.
But a Wyoming Public Radio investigation published in October shows only 7.5% of all formal election complaints sent to Gray’s office since he took office in January 2023 to late July 2025 alleged such fraud.
The committee voted to sponsor all seven election bills in the upcoming budget session beginning on Feb. 9. They join another three election bills previously backed by the committee.
Redistricting update
After finishing consideration of the election bills, the committee turned its attention to a report from its Reapportionment Subcommittee on alternative redistricting methods for the state Legislature.
That panel was created after a bill passed in the last general session directing lawmakers to study differences in how the state and federal constitutions carve up legislative districts across the Equality State.
The issue at hand has to do with the fact that the Wyoming Constitution says counties should have at least one representative and one senator, and that districts should follow county lines.
But a federal district court case in 1991 concluded Wyoming’s districts violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution that requires equal voting weight for citizens, otherwise known as “one person, one vote.”
That case led to Wyoming’s current multi-county districts for House and Senate seats.
In the end, despite constituent suggestions in Weston County for how to get around the discrepancy, the subcommittee’s report says, “the Subcommittee does not see a path to compile [comply] with both constitutions on this issue. A reapportionment plan that has districts with greater than ten percent population deviation is extremely unlikely to survive a constitution[al] challenge under current federal court precedent.”
That said, the report ends with an entreaty to the Management Council for further study of solutions to the problem in 2026.
“It is possible that there may be actions of Congress which could help to address this issue and possibly other solutions which have not yet been presented,” the report says. “The Subcommittee requests that the Joint Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee submit this as an interim topic to the Management Council for the 2026 interim and that Management Council approves further study on this reapportionment topic.”
All bills besides the biennium budget and a possible redistricting bill will need a two-thirds majority vote for introduction in their chamber of origin just to see the light of day in February.
This reporting was made possible by a grant from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, supporting state government coverage in the state. Wyoming Public Media and Jackson Hole Community Radio are partnering to cover state issues both on air and online.
Wyoming
Wyoming Public Schools approve $30M bond proposal, sinking fund millage renewal
WYOMING, MI — Voters on Tuesday, Nov. 4, approved both a $30 million bond proposal and a 10-year sinking fund millage renewal for Wyoming Public Schools.
The bond passed with 813 votes (59.91%) to 544 votes (40.09%), while the millage passed with 835 votes (61.62%) to 520 votes (38.38%), according to the unofficial vote totals from the Kent County Clerk’s Office.
The 2025 bond proposal totals $29.75 million to complete projects identified in the WPS Master Facilities Plan, including new learning spaces for students, air conditioning and secure entrances in remaining buildings, updates to the elementary media center, and a gym addition at Gladiola Elementary School.
The previous bond requests came at no tax increase to residents. The 2025 request will decrease taxes from the current rate of 5.65 mills to 5.50 mills in 2026, WPS Superintendent Craig Hoekstra said.
For a home with a $100,000 taxable value, that equals $550 a year, according to WPS.
The millage proposal was to renew the school system’s current sinking fund millage of .4595 mills — less than 46 cents on each $1,000 of taxable property value — for 2026 through 2035.
For a home with a $100,000 taxable value, that amounts to $45.95 in taxes per year. The millage was expected to raise approximately $630,427 in the first year for repairs, safety, technology replacements and buses, according to WPS.
All election results are unofficial until verified by the Board of County Canvassers.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Wyoming
Wyoming lawmakers advance election reform bills despite feasibility warnings
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — The Wyoming Legislature’s Joint Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Committee voted Monday to sponsor a sweeping package of six election reform bills that boost manual ballot counting and expand poll watcher authority.
The bills advanced despite stern warnings from county clerks that the changes could prove logistically impossible to implement by the 2026 election cycle. Critics argued the package restricts ballot access and competition for independent candidates.
The committee’s action sponsors six working draft measures that focus on shifting the election process toward increased hand counting of ballots and enhanced oversight.
Lawmakers first approved “26LSO-0043, Random hand count audits of election results,” 11–2. The bill requires county clerks to conduct a hand count audit in one randomly selected precinct after primary and general elections to compare manual results to electronic tabulation.
The committee also voted 11–2 to sponsor “26LSO-0044, Elections-hand counting for recounts,” which mandates automatic hand recounts in close statewide and legislative races. Rep. Mike Yin, D-Teton County, and Sen. Cole Case, R-Lander, cast the dissenting votes on both measures.
Malcolm Ervin, Platte County clerk and president of the County Clerks Association, urged the committee to consider a later effective date for the changes. The bill requires the Secretary of State to adopt rules for the audits by July 1, 2026.
“I hate to be the one that comes up here and says I worry that this as written can’t be implemented effectively in ’26, but that is the reality,” Ervin said, adding the state should bear the cost of the new recount method.
A speaker from Sheridan County, Elena Campbell, supported transparency but sought more expansive audits, saying: “If the mechanics of voting are shrouded in complexity or lack transparency, trust in the electoral outcome diminishes, eroding the foundation of our very republic.”
The contested “26LSO-0045, Poll watchers-polling stations observation” passed 9–4. The bill expands poll watcher authority, clarifying they can observe all election procedures, including setup and shutdown. It allows one poll watcher per political party for each precinct served at multi-precinct locations.
Sen. Bill Landen, R-Natrona County, was strongly opposed, calling the bill excessive.
“To me, this is the bottom dweller of the whole bunch,” he said. “We’ve had testimony that, in many of the circumstances, we don’t even have venues that will hold all of these people. This is a very comprehensive bill that asks an awful lot out of our county clerks. … I don’t think it’s needed. I think it’s overkill and it does nothing for the integrity of elections in my view.”
Fremont County Clerk Julie Freese detailed the potential logistical burdens, saying her 32 precincts “could mean 96 poll watchers. This is more than my largest vote center has judges for.”
Rep. Steve Johnson, R-Laramie County, supported the measure.
“We need to provide for purity of these elections. We need to let the people know that these elections are accurate and competent,” he said.
The committee also voted 9–3 to sponsor “26LSO-0048, Elections-acceptable identification revisions,” requiring all acceptable ID for in-person voting to include a photograph. It repeals Medicare/Medicaid and public school/university IDs as acceptable forms. Secretary of State Chuck Gray said the goal was to achieve “true voter ID” to prevent voter impersonation.
Richard Garrett of AARP Wyoming asked the committee to consider alternatives for elderly voters who might struggle to get photo IDs. Garrett offered several proposals, including one modeled after Arkansas law.
“In Arkansas, we actually find that nursing home residents without a photo ID are allowed to vote at the polling place with documentation of nursing home residency provided by a long-term care facility administrator, attesting the voter is a resident of the facility,” he said. “Nebraska also allows for the same provision.”
The bill aimed at independent candidate requirements, “26LSO-0046, Elections-independent candidate requirements,” also passed 10–3, increasing the required number of signatures to 5% for district races and aligning the filing deadline with partisan candidates. Landen, Yin and Case voted no.
“What this does is close the door on independent candidates, and ultimately the question is what are we afraid of?” Yin said. “This is literally restricting access to the general election ballot in a way that kind of just says that we’re afraid of competition. … Out of all of the bills that we have so far, this is the most rankling one just because it says we’re scared, and I think it makes it very apparent that we’re scared as a legislature.”
The final bill sponsored was “26LSO-0047, Elections-voting machine and voting system tests,” which passed 11–1, with Yin again dissenting. The bill clarifies testing procedures and removes the previous presumption that voting machines were properly prepared.
The committee tabled “26LSO-0049, Election transparency,” an omnibus bill that would have mandated paper ballots and lowered the period for early in-person absentee voting.
The body previously supported “26LSO-0041, Ballot drop boxes-prohibition” during its August meeting. Under that proposed change, marked absentee ballots must be mailed or hand delivered to the clerk, explicitly banning the use of receptacles by officials.
Related
-
Milwaukee, WI1 week agoLongtime anchor Shannon Sims is leaving Milwaukee’s WTMJ-TV (Channel 4)
-
News1 week agoWith food stamps set to dry up Nov. 1, SNAP recipients say they fear what’s next
-
Culture1 week agoVideo: Dissecting Three Stephen King Adaptations
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoFOX 13’s Aaron Levine wins back-to-back Jeopardy! episodes
-
Seattle, WA4 days agoESPN scoop adds another intriguing name to Seahawks chatter before NFL trade deadline
-
Education1 week agoOpinion | New York City Mayoral Candidates: Who Would Be Best?
-
San Diego, CA1 week agoAdd Nick Hundley, Ruben Niebla to list of Padres’ managerial finalists
-
Business6 days agoCommentary: Meme stocks are still with us, offering new temptations for novice and unwary investors
