Connect with us

Wyoming

One couple relocated from Wyoming to South Carolina but moved after 5 months due to cost of living and traffic

Published

on

One couple relocated from Wyoming to South Carolina but moved after 5 months due to cost of living and traffic


  • Morgan and Dawson Mitchell moved to Charleston in March.
  • They planned to stay for a while, but the cost of living made it difficult.
  • They relocated to Mississippi to help build their financial future instead.

Morgan and Dawson Mitchell were sick of the cold when they decided to move to Charleston, South Carolina.

The Mitchells are originally from Mississippi but moved to a small town in Wyoming in 2022. By the end of 2023, the couple said they were ready for their next adventure.

Advertisement

After visiting Charleston in January of the same year, they decided it would be ideal for their next move.

“Charleston seemed like a great place to have good weather and move back to the South a little closer to family and friends,” Dawson, 27, said.

“I love beach towns,” Morgan, 28, added. “And I was in the wedding and events industry, and that’s really, really big in Charleston, so I was super interested in it.”

When Morgan was offered a job in the events industry in Charleston in March 2023, it seemed like the perfect chance to relocate. Dawson worked as a bartender and server when they arrived in Charleston, and he was hired as an HVAC sales representative three months into their move.

Advertisement

But just five months after they relocated, the Mitchells discovered Charleston didn’t live up to the hype for them.

Charleston challenges

The Mitchells told Business Insider that the cost of living in Charleston almost prevented them from moving there.

According to Zillow, the median rent in the city is $2,800, but the Mitchells didn’t want a place that cost more than $2,000 a month, so they struggled to find an apartment.

“That was just shocking to us being from rural areas,” Dawson said, adding that it was important to stay within their budget, as they knew they could afford a mortgage for less in other areas.

Advertisement

Eventually, they found an apartment to sublet on Facebook Marketplace with five months left on its lease for $1,850 each month.


A couple stands in a snowy field. The man holds a Christmas tree and the woman holds a dog.

The cost of living in Charleston was difficult for the Mitchells.

Morgan and Dawson Mitchell



“It was very much like, ‘Let’s just do it for five months,’” Morgan said. “‘If we don’t like it, if it doesn’t work out, we don’t have to stay.”

Advertisement

Once they moved to Charleston, the cost of living continued to be a pain point for the Mitchells regarding expenses like eating out or gas prices. They said gas was particularly frustrating because they found themselves stuck in the car more than they anticipated.

Their rental was just eight miles from the office where Morgan worked, but she said she spent at least 45 minutes in the car each way to and from her job.

“It’s very low country, so there’s not a whole lot of open land to build new roads and infrastructure,” Dawson said.

“For us, our quality time together is really important, and we were stuck in the car separate for so long,” Morgan said. “We have Banjo, our dog, so by the time we made it home, it was like, ‘OK, go take him out, cook dinner, time for bed.’”

Advertisement

“All of our free time dwindled,” she added.

Morgan said she spent most of her birthday visit to King Street, a major shopping destination in the city, in July trying to park.

“I almost gave up,” she said. “I was just trying to take myself to Sephora for a nice little treat, and I had to make rounds for 45 minutes trying to find a parking spot.”

Missing Southern charm

The Mitchells also hoped that moving to Charleston would help them reconnect with the Southern culture they had been missing while living in Wyoming.

Advertisement

But they said Charleston didn’t feel as Southern as they thought it would. They said they had few chances to connect with other Southerners during their time there.

Despite life’s difficulties in Charleston, the Mitchells tried to prepare to stay longer term.

“We did put an offer in on a house, and we were really excited to stay there for a couple of years, and then that fell through,” Morgan said.

They said they could have renewed their lease on their rental, but the management company that owned it increased their rent to $2,250 a month, which they weren’t willing to pay.

Advertisement

The Mitchells couldn’t find another apartment under $2,000 that fit their needs. They said the only options they found were in areas where they would not have felt comfortable walking Banjo at night.

Soon, it felt like they weren’t destined to stay in Charleston as they had thought.

“We love and kind of take pride in the fact that we’ve bopped around and moved all around and like going on these little adventures,” Morgan said. “But we did want to be closer to family; his grandparents are getting older.”

The Mitchells also plan to invest in real estate, but given the cost of living in Charleston, they didn’t feel like they could launch that career there.

Advertisement

“We started taking all these things as signs, and we’re like, ‘We have this opportunity to get out and go somewhere cheaper and build our savings,’” Morgan said.

Returning home

Morgan and Dawson ultimately moved back to Louisville, Mississippi, when their lease in Charleston expired on August 1.

When the Mitchells spoke to BI, they had just signed a new lease in Louisville on an apartment that costs just $1,350 a month — $900 less than they would have paid on their similar Charleston unit.

Morgan and Dawson also started new jobs when they moved. Morgan is now a social media manager at a medical facility, and Dawson is working remotely as a loan originator. Dawson said the HVAC company he worked for in Charleston offered him a slight raise when he put in his notice, but it wasn’t enough to entice them to stay.

Advertisement

“We just knew it wasn’t the right thing,” Dawson said.

Despite moving twice in such a short period, the Mitchells told BI they have no regrets about their stint in Charleston.

“I think it was just one of those things that we had to try it for ourselves to be able to come back here,” Morgan said.

Though they can still see themselves moving around throughout their lives, the Mitchells said they are excited about the financial opportunities returning to Mississippi offers them.

Advertisement

“We chose to come back to Mississippi because our money will go so much further,” Dawson said. “We can buy two properties for what half a property in Charleston would cost.”

“We’re always going to look back and be like, ‘What a fun summer we had,’ but we knew it wasn’t long-term,” Morgan said, reflecting on their time in Charleston. “So we might as well just come back here and start building our savings the best we can.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wyoming

LDS Church breaks ground on controversial Cody Wyoming Temple after extensive legal battle

Published

on

LDS Church breaks ground on controversial Cody Wyoming Temple after extensive legal battle


CODY, Wyoming (ABC4) — After a year-long legal battle, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints broke ground on the Cody Wyoming Temple on Friday, Sept. 27.

The temple was announced in the Oct. 2021 General Conference of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, headquartered in Salt Lake City. This will be the state’s third temple. Other temples include the Casper Wyoming Temple and Star Valley Wyoming Temple.

This groundbreaking comes after a citizen challenge was appealed and dismissed earlier this month in Wyoming District Court, putting an end to a year-plus-long legal battle. Last year, the group “Preserve Our Cody Neighborhoods” decided to sue the city over the permit being given to the Church to build the temple with a 101-foot spire.

Why Lake Powell’s Dangling Rope Marina permanently closed, and what’s coming next

Advertisement

Wyoming Public Media reported that the group “felt the Planning and Zoning board had violated city codes. [The neighborhood group] said the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints’ plans to build the Temple… presents several issues.”

Earlier this year, the same group sued for a second time, claiming the city was “stonewalling” the process. The Cowboy State Daily reported the neighborhood group stated that the now-former city planner Todd Stowell manipulated Planning and Zoning Board members. Stowell resigned earlier this year amidst the controversy, he cited different reasons for leaving his position that didn’t pertain to the Cody Temple.

The outlet reported members of the Cody Planning and Zoning Board suspected the city planner and attorney had conflicts of interest with the church that influenced the advice they gave. The filing further accused Stowell showed bias toward the church to gain approval for a temple being considered by the board. Stowell is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Several filings were made in the year-plus legal battle between residents and the church.

At the end of August, the courts ruled in favor of the Church.

Advertisement

“In late August, the court ruled in favor of the city’s zoning process, and the citizen challenge was dismissed, preliminary construction work is now underway,” the church said in a statement earlier this month.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to ABC4 Utah.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wyoming

Deadlock’s new hero only wants one thing: A sovereign nation in the US state of Wyoming

Published

on

Deadlock’s new hero only wants one thing: A sovereign nation in the US state of Wyoming


One of my favourite things to do in Deadlock is to read up on each hero’s lore. Some are as simple as “Jacob Lash is an asshole,” while others give a detailed description of a hero’s journey and the tragedies they’ve overcome, like Bebop turning to a life of crime to pay for his creator’s medicine. And Deadlock’s latest addition is no different. 

Mirage is the newest hero Valve has added to Deadlock. He’s a bodyguard for the Djinn ambassador Nashala Dion, who is currently in New York City on a diplomatic mission: Finding a safe home for their kind and, for some reason, the best candidate for a new sovereign land is Wyoming. I’ve never set foot in the US, so I can’t speak on what Wyoming is like compared to the rest of the States, but it does seem like a random choice for a new utopia.

But other than having Wyoming in his sights, Mirage seems to be pretty useful on the battlefield. Tornado is his primary attack, transforming him into a whirlwind that can launch enemies into the air and deal damage. Mirage’s other abilities are Fire Scarabs and Djiinn’s Mark. One launches bugs that drain enemy life force, and the other is a passive ability that increases the multiplier on your chosen target. Finally, his ultimate lets him teleport to allies or enemies, giving him a speed boost for a short time after.

Others are also having just as much fun as I am learning the story behind Deadlock’s most specific real estate agent, as well as other heroes: “I hope they keep it random,” one player says. “It’s so much fun to sift through the lore when you suddenly get blindsided by ‘Is it cannibalism to eat werewolves?’ My only hope for Deadlock’s story is that it doesn’t stay in lore purgatory like Overwatch when they can’t have anything happen, so it’s just constantly alluding to future and past events that will never get expanded upon.” 

Advertisement

I’m not sure where Deadlock’s story is going, but I’d like it to keep an easy-going attitude as it progresses. I’m having great fun discovering more weird tidbits as I explore the map, read heroes’ lore, and browse the papers available on the newspaper stands. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming Lags in Clean Energy Jobs, According to New Report – Inside Climate News

Published

on

Wyoming Lags in Clean Energy Jobs, According to New Report – Inside Climate News


In the first full year since President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, clean energy jobs in the U.S. grew at a faster clip than jobs across the rest of the economy, according to a new report by a business nonprofit. But there are few signs of that expansion in Wyoming, long the nation’s largest purveyor of coal and a hotbed of fossil fuel development, where clean energy job growth has been halting. 

E2, a business policy organization and the report’s author, compiled its Clean Jobs America report using data it helped collect for the U.S. Department of Energy’s most recent U.S. Energy and Employment Report, which detailed economic trends for the calendar year 2023. The group found that clean energy jobs grew by 4.5 percent and accounted for one in every 16 new jobs added, bringing the total number of clean energy workers in the U.S. to almost 3.5 million. The rest of the economy grew jobs by 1.5 percent. 

“Thanks to the game-changing policies and incentives created by the IRA, clean energy companies are leading an American economic revolution the likes of which we haven’t seen in generations,” said Bob Keefe, executive director of E2, in a statement accompanying the report’s release.

Election 2024

Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.

Advertisement

One of the largest onshore wind farms in the country is being developed in south central Wyoming. But none of the “330 major clean energy projects” announced after the IRA was signed in August 2022 are scheduled to be completed in the state. According to E2’s report, Wyoming has the second-fewest clean energy jobs, behind only Alaska.

Measured per capita, the state’s clean energy job growth rate actually ranked second from the top. But this was more a function of its low population skewing the data. With a paltry number of clean energy workers in Wyoming to start with, adding just a few hundred new jobs registers as substantial growth.  

With so much federal money available and some high-quality renewable energy resources, Wyoming’s low participation in the clean energy economy is conspicuous.

“Wyoming is missing out and could really be capitalizing on clean energy as a growth sector,” said Kate Groetzinger, the communications manager for the Center for Western Priorities. She added that growing its clean energy sector did not necessarily have to come at the expense of fossil fuels, though the Center for Western Priorities would still like to see the state ramp down its production and use of coal, oil and natural gas.

The Wyoming Energy Authority, the state entity responsible for implementing and overseeing energy policy, did not respond with a comment for this story. 

Advertisement

Wind has long been Wyoming’s most developed renewable sector, accounting for the vast majority of its clean energy projects—there are 35 wind projects and more than 1,000 turbines in the state—even as state legislators routinely threaten legislation that would create a less friendly business environment for the industry. 

“Wyoming is one of the eight remaining states with more fossil fuel jobs than clean energy jobs.”

— Michael Timberlake, E2 spokesperson

Solar has followed a different trajectory in Wyoming. The state is home to only two utility-scale solar farms, one of which environmentalists say has been detrimental to wildlife since it came online in 2018. But there are signs the industry is poised to grow in the state: There are four new utility-scale solar projects in Wyoming’s permitting pipeline, and the Bureau of Land Management’s recently updated Western Solar Plan makes almost 4 million acres of public land in Wyoming available for development.

Though the Cowboy State had one of the highest rates of clean energy jobs per capita, placing third behind Vermont and Massachusetts in E2’s report, those jobs made up a smaller portion of its total energy and motor vehicle jobs than most other states.

“Wyoming is one of the eight remaining states with more fossil fuel jobs than clean energy jobs,” said Michael Timberlake, a spokesperson for E2. Wyoming’s clean energy jobs made up only 18 percent of all energy and motor vehicle jobs in the state, a much lower ratio than also-sparsely-populated Vermont, where clean energy jobs make up over 70 percent of all its energy and motor vehicle jobs.

Advertisement

For a state with such a staunch energy reputation, Wyoming’s rank toward the bottom of most clean energy job metrics caught Groetzinger by surprise. “This report is a good reality check” for Wyoming, she said, and it “shows that Governor Gordon should be paying at least as much attention to clean energy generation as he is to carbon capture.”

Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, has sought to make Wyoming a hotbed for carbon capture projects, mainly as a lifeline for the state’s fossil fuel industry. Under his administration, the state legislature has passed laws mandating that fossil fuel-fired power plants add carbon capture technology, even as the costly technology threatens to raise electricity rates in the state.

In a blow to the nascent industry, Project Bison, a large carbon capture plant planned in the state, announced earlier this month it had “paused” construction because it was unable to acquire enough access to clean energy. 

Gordon’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Despite Wyoming’s low clean energy job growth, the rest of the West added green jobs at the second-highest rate in the county. The region trailed only the South in both jobs added and total clean energy jobs, with a 4.2 percent growth rate.

Advertisement

Businesses in the U.S. are “just getting started,” taking advantage of the IRA, said Keefe. “The biggest threats to this unprecedented progress are misguided efforts to repeal or rollback parts of the IRA, despite the law’s clear benefits both to American workers and the communities where they live.”

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Advertisement

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending