Connect with us

Washington

Washington Park shooting, Milwaukee man accused of reckless homicide

Published

on


A Milwaukee man is charged with first-degree reckless homicide for a 2023 fatal shooting at Washington Park.

Advertisement

Prosecutors accuse 22-year-old Shon Myers of shooting and killing a man after a fight broke out on the basketball court.

The shooting happened around 7:20 p.m. on May 5, 2023. The victim, since identified as Kearney Delinkko, was found shot near the basketball courts and taken to a hospital – where he died of his injuries a few days later. An autopsy conducted by Milwaukee County’s chief medical examiner determined Delinkko suffered three gunshots wounds and ruled the manner of death as homicide.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Advertisement

A witness told investigators he was playing basketball with Delinkko when two people got into an argument and “squared off” against the victim after a “hard layup,” a criminal complaint states. The witness said a man then came from outside the basketball fence, reached into his hoodie and shot the victim multiple times. That person then ran off.

The complaint states a second witness described a similar altercation prior to the shooting, in which someone pushed Delinkko and then started to fight him. During the fight, the witness said someone on the court told the shooter – who “was not on the court, and not dressed like he was going to play basketball” – to “shoot him like (expletive).”

Advertisement

Prosecutors said, in the days following the shooting, the victim’s family came across screenshots of people believed to have been present during the homicide. A man in that photo was later identified as the “instigator” on the basketball court, the complaint states, while a second man was identified as another person involved in the fight. Both of those men later spoke to police and admitted to involvement in the fight, but denied firing shots.

Police executed a search warrant at a known address for one of the two men, the complaint states, and recovered guns from the home. Officers spoke with a different resident of that home, whose cellphone data showed an attempt to sell a “throw-a-way” gun shortly after the shooting.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX6 News app for iOS or Android.

Advertisement

Prosecutors said the shooter was later identified as defendant Myers. The complaint alleges Myers got the gun from one of the two people involved in the fight – and later admitted to the shooting when he returned the gun to the resident who police spoke with during the search warrant.

Data from Myers’ cellphone also placed him in or near Washington Park before and at the time of the homicide, the complaint states. Investigators also reviewed Facebook messages, which stated Myers told people he was in some “serious (expletive)” in the days and weeks following the shooting. He and one of the men involved in the fight also unfriended each other on Facebook on May 5.

Advertisement

Myers was taken into custody on Feb. 2, 2024. Three days later, the complaint states Myers made a call from the jail in which he said someone “snitched” on him. He also said he would flee to Mississippi if he is released from jail. His initial court appearance was scheduled for Tuesday, Feb. 6.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey

Published

on

Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey


WASHINGTON TWP., N.J. — Officers in Washington Township, said they finished a DoorDash food delivery after arresting the driver who had warrants out for his arrest.

Body camera video shows officers stepping in to deliver the food themselves, a move the department in southern New Jersey later shared on its Facebook page.

“I thought something happened. Oh my God, I got so scared,” said the customer when she answered the door.

The DoorDash customer, seen on police body cam video, was instantly relieved and appreciative upon learning why officers were at her door.

Advertisement

“Arrested your driver, but, yeah, we delivered your food,” one of the officers said.

It turns out a Washington Township police officer stopped the DoorDash driver during routine patrols in front of a high school over the weekend.

“He made a stop on it for a violation,” said Washington Township Police Chief Patrick Gurcsik.

But then, Chief Gurcsik said the officer learned the driver had warrants out for his arrest in another county.

“He made the officers aware that he had two DoorDash meals in the car that he was in the middle of delivering,” Gurcsik said.

Advertisement

The officers went from cuffing the driver to ringing a doorbell to finish his delivery.

“I never heard of anything like that in the South Jersey area. It’s sort of a first for us here in Washington Township, definitely,” Gurcsik said.

Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey

It’s happened in other places, too, including in New Mexico last summer, when a motorcycle cop delivered someone’s Chick-fil-A order after arresting the driver.

“Hello, sir, got your DoorDash. Oh, thank you,” the officer said. “He’s a good kid, give him five stars. He just didn’t take care of a simple insurance ticket.”

Advertisement

And officers over in Arizona made a similar arrest during a traffic stop and were seen on body camera finishing the delivery.

“Your GrubHub, still delivered your pizza,” the officer said.

“We definitely serve the community in more ways than one,” Gurcsik said.

Copyright © 2026 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Holdout Democrats leave WA House support for income tax in doubt

Published

on

Holdout Democrats leave WA House support for income tax in doubt


The votes weren’t there yet late Wednesday for Democrats’ income tax bill in the Washington state House.Democratic members are withholding support for the proposed income tax on millionaires, saying they want to see if a new version of the controversial legislation, possibly due out Thursday, will satisfy their concerns.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Bill strengthening Washington child sex abuse material laws focuses on consciousness, AI

Published

on

Bill strengthening Washington child sex abuse material laws focuses on consciousness, AI


A bill aimed at tightening Washington’s laws on child sex abuse material is headed to Gov. Bob Ferguson’s desk after clearing the Legislature unanimously.

King County Prosecuting Attorney Leesa Manion said 2ESSB 5105 passed the House unanimously Tuesday night after the Senate unanimously approved it on Jan. 28, 2026.

SEE ALSO | Washington exempts clergy from reporting abuse learned in confession after settlement

Manion called the measure one of her public safety legislative priorities.

Advertisement

“People who peddle in the misery of sexually abused children must be held accountable,” Manion said. “I am grateful for the work of Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Laura Harmon – both in prosecuting these cases and advocating for these legal fixes – and Senators Tina Orwall and Manka Dhingra for championing this legislation.”

Manion’s office said the current state law has gaps that can prevent prosecutors from holding offenders accountable in some cases.

Under current law, prosecutors cannot charge defendants for creating images of child sex abuse unless the child victim was conscious or knew they were being recorded.

The office also said that possessing sexually explicit fabricated (AI) images of non-identifiable minors is not considered child sex abuse material under Washington law.

The bill would update RCW 9.68A.040 to remove the requirement that a child be aware of an abusive recording. It would also update the definition of child sex abuse material to include fabricated (AI) images of non-identifiable minors.

Advertisement

The legislation would also increase the statute of limitations to 10 years for depiction crimes. Manion’s office said the current statute of limitations is three years, and argued that because the images can remain online indefinitely, victims can be re-traumatized for decades.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending