Washington
Washington Employers: Prepare for Hiring Practice Shifts as New Background Check Requirements Take Effect in 2026 + 2027 – Jackson Lewis
Takeaways
- The amended Washington Fair Chance Act prohibits employers from requesting an individual’s criminal background information before a conditional offer of employment is made.
- All employers are covered by the new law, and the new requirements are effective beginning 07.01.26 and 01.01.27, depending on the size of the employer.
- Employers have time to prepare and should consider taking proactive steps.
Related link
Article
In the 2025 legislative session, Washington State expanded its Fair Chance Act in a number of different ways to impose additional limits on employers’ criminal background inquiries of applicants and employees. The changes go into effect for medium and large employers in July 2026 and for small employers in January 2027, giving employers plenty of time to get ready.
Employers with employees in the City of Seattle are already subject to most of these new requirements and restrictions. Therefore, the changes to state law will supplement those Seattle requirements and apply to employers throughout the State.
Timing of Inquiries
Unless otherwise required by law, only post-offer criminal history inquiries and criminal background checks will be permitted. Previously, an employer could potentially inquire earlier, after a candidate was deemed “otherwise qualified.” If a candidate voluntarily discloses a conviction prior to any offer, the employer must provide notification of the law and an Attorney General Fair Chance Act guide for employers and job applicants.
Once receiving information about a candidate’s criminal history, an employer must proceed with caution. The use of automatic disqualifiers for employment cannot be relied upon unless permitted by law.
In addition, the fact that someone has a pending or prior arrest record should not be considered. For individuals convicted of a crime, Washington law will require a legitimate business reason for denying employment.
Individualized Assessment
Washington employers will be required to follow a specific individualized assessment process prior to denying employment. The process mandates:
- Notifying and identifying the record on which the employer relied for purposes of assessing its legitimate business reason;
- Holding the position open a minimum of two business days to provide the individual a reasonable opportunity to correct or explain the rehabilitation, good conduct, work experience, education, and training (“individual assessment factors”); and
- If, after giving the individual a reasonable opportunity to provide additional information, the employer makes a tangible adverse employment decision (such as rescinding a conditional offer or rejecting someone otherwise qualified), the employer must provide the individual with a written decision, including specific documents as to its reasoning and assessment of each of the relevant factors. This analysis would also include considering the impact of the conviction in the position or business operations, and its consideration of the individualized assessment factors.
Exclusions
The law recognizes a variety of exclusions, such as:
- Federal contract recipients;
- Employers hiring persons who will have unsupervised access to children under 18, vulnerable adults, or vulnerable persons as defined by statute; or
- Employers such as financial institutions that are expressly permitted or required under federal or state law to inquire into, consider, or rely upon information about an individual’s criminal record for employment purposes.
Employers should consult with legal counsel to determine if they fall within an applicable exclusion.
The restrictions apply to applicants for Washington-based employment and to Washington-based employees, regardless of whether an employer is based in Washington.
Enforcement
The law will be enforced by the state attorney general, which already enforces existing provisions of the law. The new law allows the attorney general to assess increased penalties. The attorney general may seek other damages, fees, and costs, as well.
Key Steps for Employers
Employers have time to prepare and should consider taking proactive steps:
- Review recruitment processes to ensure they do not request criminal background information before a conditional offer of employment is made.
- Determine which forms will require updating in 2026.
- Review any contracts in place with third parties to ensure compliance with this fair chance initiative.
Employers should keep in mind their obligations under the federal and state fair credit reporting acts if they plan to obtain criminal history reports from third-party vendors.
Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to provide employers assistance with this and other workplace issues.
Washington
Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey
WASHINGTON TWP., N.J. — Officers in Washington Township, said they finished a DoorDash food delivery after arresting the driver who had warrants out for his arrest.
Body camera video shows officers stepping in to deliver the food themselves, a move the department in southern New Jersey later shared on its Facebook page.
“I thought something happened. Oh my God, I got so scared,” said the customer when she answered the door.
The DoorDash customer, seen on police body cam video, was instantly relieved and appreciative upon learning why officers were at her door.
“Arrested your driver, but, yeah, we delivered your food,” one of the officers said.
It turns out a Washington Township police officer stopped the DoorDash driver during routine patrols in front of a high school over the weekend.
“He made a stop on it for a violation,” said Washington Township Police Chief Patrick Gurcsik.
But then, Chief Gurcsik said the officer learned the driver had warrants out for his arrest in another county.
“He made the officers aware that he had two DoorDash meals in the car that he was in the middle of delivering,” Gurcsik said.
The officers went from cuffing the driver to ringing a doorbell to finish his delivery.
“I never heard of anything like that in the South Jersey area. It’s sort of a first for us here in Washington Township, definitely,” Gurcsik said.
Police finish DoorDash delivery after arresting driver in New Jersey
It’s happened in other places, too, including in New Mexico last summer, when a motorcycle cop delivered someone’s Chick-fil-A order after arresting the driver.
“Hello, sir, got your DoorDash. Oh, thank you,” the officer said. “He’s a good kid, give him five stars. He just didn’t take care of a simple insurance ticket.”
And officers over in Arizona made a similar arrest during a traffic stop and were seen on body camera finishing the delivery.
“Your GrubHub, still delivered your pizza,” the officer said.
“We definitely serve the community in more ways than one,” Gurcsik said.
Copyright © 2026 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.
Washington
Holdout Democrats leave WA House support for income tax in doubt
Washington
Bill strengthening Washington child sex abuse material laws focuses on consciousness, AI
SEATTLE — A bill aimed at tightening Washington’s laws on child sex abuse material is headed to Gov. Bob Ferguson’s desk after clearing the Legislature unanimously.
King County Prosecuting Attorney Leesa Manion said 2ESSB 5105 passed the House unanimously Tuesday night after the Senate unanimously approved it on Jan. 28, 2026.
SEE ALSO | Washington exempts clergy from reporting abuse learned in confession after settlement
Manion called the measure one of her public safety legislative priorities.
“People who peddle in the misery of sexually abused children must be held accountable,” Manion said. “I am grateful for the work of Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Laura Harmon – both in prosecuting these cases and advocating for these legal fixes – and Senators Tina Orwall and Manka Dhingra for championing this legislation.”
Manion’s office said the current state law has gaps that can prevent prosecutors from holding offenders accountable in some cases.
Under current law, prosecutors cannot charge defendants for creating images of child sex abuse unless the child victim was conscious or knew they were being recorded.
The office also said that possessing sexually explicit fabricated (AI) images of non-identifiable minors is not considered child sex abuse material under Washington law.
The bill would update RCW 9.68A.040 to remove the requirement that a child be aware of an abusive recording. It would also update the definition of child sex abuse material to include fabricated (AI) images of non-identifiable minors.
The legislation would also increase the statute of limitations to 10 years for depiction crimes. Manion’s office said the current statute of limitations is three years, and argued that because the images can remain online indefinitely, victims can be re-traumatized for decades.
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Wisconsin4 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Maryland5 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida5 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Oregon6 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling