Connect with us

Washington

Washington courts mostly not using Tiffany Hill Act to protect people

Published

on

Washington courts mostly not using Tiffany Hill Act to protect people


VANCOUVER — In April 2020, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee signed the Tiffany Hill Act into regulation, named after a Vancouver mom who was murdered by her estranged, abusive husband.

The regulation permits courts to order individuals accused of home violence to put on GPS ankle units, which might be monitored by officers and linked to an app on the sufferer’s telephone, alerting them when the offender is close by.

Two years later, most Washington courts are usually not using that possibility.

In September 2019, Tiffany Hill’s husband Keland Hill was arrested after pushing her right into a wall and making an attempt to forestall her from calling 911. He was launched from jail the following day and informed to not contact Tiffany, however Keland violated the no-contact order a number of instances within the months following his arrest.

Advertisement

In November 2019, detectives discovered a GPS tracker on Tiffany’s automobile and Keland was arrested once more. Investigators decided Tiffany was in excessive hazard and requested Keland be held on $2 million bail, however a decide set it at solely $250,000.

He bailed out of jail on Nov. 21, 2019. 5 days later, he shot and killed Tiffany in entrance of her three youngsters and her mom within the car parking zone of Sarah J. Anderson Elementary, the place her children went to highschool.

Hill then led deputies on a chase and took his personal life.

Advertisement

Tiffany’s family members mentioned know-how permitting her to trace her abuser’s location might have saved her life, and others like her, had it been out there.

In November 2021, KGW reached out to all 39 counties in Washington, asking prosecuting attorneys and courts what number of instances that they had ordered the usage of these monitoring units — and acquired responses from fewer than half.

Of the counties that did reply, nearly none are using the regulation. The exception is Clark County, the place the regulation originated, which has greater than a dozen offenders being monitored.

When requested why they aren’t ordering this monitoring, most counties mentioned value was the most important barrier. The offender in a home violence case has to foot the invoice for the monitoring, which might value as much as $20 a day. Many courts are apprehensive to order it if a defendant can’t afford it.

Some courts cited a scarcity of entry to distributors, particularly in additional rural elements of the state, however there are 5 authorized distributors that say they do cowl your entire state of Washington.

Advertisement

Some jurisdictions mentioned they had been unaware a regulation had even been handed.

A number of prosecutors mentioned they wish to see GPS know-how being issued, however judges of their jurisdiction are simply not ordering it.

Six months later, little had modified when KGW adopted up with prosecutors in counties that had not been ordering GPS monitoring — in these counties, there had been no new instances the place the courts had ordered monitoring beneath the Tiffany Hill Act.

Advertisement

At a time when home violence advocates say they’re seeing extra individuals searching for assist from abusive conditions, that is regarding.

“In some locations, knowledge seems to be prefer it’s taking place as a result of individuals haven’t been capable of entry providers, they haven’t been recording. They haven’t been calling for assist,” Elizabeth Montoya with the Washington State Coalition Towards Home Violence informed KGW. “And in different communities we’re seeing numbers means, means up. What I hear anecdotally from applications all through our state is that the degrees of violence that folk expertise are growing as a result of a variety of components… stressors within the residence, financial instability, crises like this simply type of create an ideal storm for violence to escalate.”

Montoya mentioned these instruments are nice in concept, however there must be forethought and follow-through on the subject of placing it into follow.

Advertisement

“It doesn’t shock me that it has not been carried out, however solely as a result of we all know that it’s a wrestle to get these items carried out. That’s one thing that we’re at all times type of eager about as these sorts of legal guidelines transfer by way of the legislature,” Montoya mentioned. “There are such a lot of actually necessary and actually good concepts on the market to deal with home violence and to answer it successfully. However we additionally actually have to consider, what’s implementation going appear like?”

State Sen. Lynda Wilson, R-Vancouver, is a survivor of home abuse and initially sponsored the Tiffany Hill Act. After KGW reached out for her perspective on how little the regulation was getting used, Wilson secured $2 million from the state’s $15 billion price range surplus to be allotted to assist counties order GPS monitoring of accused abusers. The cash would assist offset the associated fee in case the place offenders can’t afford to pay the associated fee themselves.

“I don’t need cash to intrude, to be a purpose why somebody shouldn’t be capable of get to the monitoring,” Wilson mentioned. “We all know that on this case, due to Tiffany Hill, we really feel fairly assured that she would’ve lived if she had this. And I hear from ladies on a regular basis and I understand how necessary that is. I don’t need cash to get in the best way, so I simply continued to ask for it. We had a wholesome price range this yr, so we had been capable of do it.”

Wilson mentioned King County, the biggest in Washington, has taken steps to start utilizing the monitoring and sufferer notification software program. She hopes as they begin to use it, it is going to spur discussions with judges and prosecutors in different counties.

“I’m very grateful that Clark County was the primary to implement it as a result of they’re truly doing such an ideal job with it that different counties can study from that,” Wilson mentioned. “I wish to determine a technique to get that info on the market.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Confirmed: Cardinal McElroy to be appointed Washington archbishop

Published

on

Confirmed: Cardinal McElroy to be appointed Washington archbishop


Cardinal Robert McElroy of San Diego will be announced as the new archbishop of Washington, D.C., The Pillar has confirmed.

Cardinal Robert Walter McElroy

After reporting January 4 that multiple U.S. bishops had said that the appointment was imminent, The Pillar has separately confirmed that Pope Francis has selected McElroy to succeed Cardinal Wilton Gregory in the capital see.

The announcement is expected Monday, according to sources close to the process.

McElroy’s appointment follows a lengthy and contentious process to find a successor for the Washington archdiocese, which involved a protracted standoff between some American cardinals and the apostolic nunciature.

Advertisement

The Pillar has previously reported that following a meeting in October in which McElroy joined Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago and Joseph Tobin of Newark to meet with Pope Francis during the synod on synodality in October, Francis was said to have decided against appointing McElroy.

Instead, Francis tasked former Washington archbishop Cardinal Donald Wuerl to identify a suitable candidate.

Wuerl, sources close to the process have confirmed to The Pillar, suggested Bishop Sean McKnight of Jefferson City, with Cardinal Gregory also signing off on the recommendation. However, in the weeks following the presidential election result, which saw Donald Trump reelected to the White House, Francis agreed to revisit McElroy’s candidacy.

As Bishop of San Diego and as a cardinal, McElroy has been outspoken on various subjects touching the political area, most especially immigration.

Subscribe now

Advertisement

In addition to the political sensitivities of the role, McElroy will also assume leadership of more than half a million Catholics in the DC area and southern Maryland, becoming their third archbishop since 2018.

McElroy turns 71 in February and succeeds Cardinal Gregory, 77, who was appointed to succeed Cardinal Donald Wuerl in 2019, whose resignation was accepted by Pope Francis following the scandal surrounding Wuerl’s own predecessor, Theodore McCarrick, the previous year.

Despite promises of transparency by Gregory at the time of his appointment, the archdiocese has so far declined to answer repeated questions about McCarrick’s tenure, especially money raised and spent via his personal “archbishop’s fund” during his time in Washington.

McElroy has himself faced questions about McCarrick in the past, with some expressing concerns about how he responded to a 2016 warning about the now-laicized former cardinal.

In addition to lingering questions about McCarrick, McElroy will also have to reckon with a process of financial restructuring in the Washington archdiocese.

Advertisement

In December last year, several local priests told The Pillar that chancery officials had painted a bleak picture of archdiocesan finances, announcing sweeping reforms of its parish assessment system to bridge a multi-million dollar deficit.

As Bishop of San Diego, McElroy has at times raised eyebrows on the national stage, calling for the synod on synodality to debate issues like the sacramental ordination of women, despite Pope Francis repeatedly saying such issues were not up for discussion.

The cardinal has previously made calls for “comprehensive inclusion” in Eucharistic reception.

Following the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 2023 instruction Fiducia supplicans on the blessing of persons on same-sex relationships, which Rome agreed to allow the bishops of Africa to not implement in their own dioceses, McElroy hailed the “diverging pastoral paths” taken by the Church in different countries as a model of healthy decentralization, rather than a sign of contradiction within the Church.

Last year, McElroy issued a controversial homeschooling policy in the San Diego diocese, barring local Catholic home schooling groups from using parish facilities.

Advertisement
Cardinal Robert McElroy presides at a liturgy during the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress. Credit: RECongress/YouTube.

Cardinal McElroy was ordained a priest for the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 1980, serving as secretary to Archbishop John Quinn. After several years in parish ministry, Quinn named him vicar general of the archdiocese in 1995.

McElroy was named auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 2010, and made Bishop of San Diego in 2015. Pope Francis created him a cardinal in 2022.

Subscribe now



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Buccaneers Claim 3 Seed in NFC Playoff Field, Face Commanders in Wild Card Round

Published

on

Buccaneers Claim 3 Seed in NFC Playoff Field, Face Commanders in Wild Card Round


The Tampa Bay Buccaneers not only captured a fourth straight NFC South title on Sunday, but they also improved their overall position in the playoff standings and kept alive the possibility of two home games in the postseason.

While the Buccaneers secured their own playoff spot with a Week 18 win over the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Rams had already clinched the NFC West title the Week before. That put the Rams into the third overall seed in the NFC playoff field coming into the final weekend, but a loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday allowed Tampa Bay to leap them for that spot. Both the Buccaneers and Rams finished with 10-7 records but Tampa Bay won the tiebreaker for positioning based on a better record against conference opponents (8-4 to 6-6).

As the #3 seed, the Buccaneers will host a playoff game in the Wild Card round against the team that claimed the #6 seed. That proved to be Washington after the Commanders beat the Cowboys on Sunday to improve to 11-6. The NFL will announce the date and time of the game later on Sunday evening.

The Buccaneers will be taking part in the playoffs for a fifth straight season, the longest such run in franchise history, but this is the first time in that span that they will start out as the #3 seed. They earned the top Wild Card spot in 2020 and, coincidentally, started their playoffs at Washington after the Commanders won the NFC East with a 7-9 record. The Bucs won the NFC South each year from 2021 to 2023 and in those seasons was seeded second, fourth and fourth.

Advertisement

Tampa Bay could still be at home for two playoff games. If they win next weekend and the second-seeded Philadelphia Eagles lose to Green Bay, the Buccaneers would go into the Divisional Round as the second-highest remaining seed behind the winner of the Detroit-Minnesota game on Sunday night. That team would enjoy a bye in the first round and then play at home against the lowest of the remaining seeds. The Buccaneers would get the next seeded team up from the bottom, which would be either Minnesota/Detroit or Los Angeles.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Post cartoonist quits over rejected Trump sketch

Published

on

Washington Post cartoonist quits over rejected Trump sketch


What’s New

Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Washington Post after the editorial team rejected one of her cartoons criticizing The Post‘s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.

Writing on her Substack blog on Friday, Telnaes said it was the first time her work was censored due to its point of view, prompting her decision to leave

Newsweek has contacted The Washington Post via email for comment.

The Washington Post building in Washington D.C., February 21, 2019. Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Post after the editorial team rejected one of her cartoons criticizing The Post’s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Why It Matters

Telnaes’ resignation highlights concerns over press freedom and the influence of billionaire owners on editorial decisions in major news outlets, including at the LA Times and The Washington Post.

Advertisement

Critics argue that billionaire owners could censor critical commentary, undermining journalism’s role in holding power accountable.

What To Know

The cartoon in question depicted Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, and The Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, all billionaires, and Micky Mouse, representing Disney, kneeling before a statue of Donald Trump, offering sacks of cash.

Telnaes posted a rough of the cartoon in the blog post:

Why I'm Quitting the Washington Post - Cartoon Illustration by Ann Telnaes

Telnaes described the decision to reject the cartoon as a “game changer” for her relationship with the paper.

But Post Opinions editor David Shipley, in a statement to Politico, said the cartoon was rejected to avoid repetition, because a column and a satirical piece on the same subject had already been published.

In her blog post, Telnaes outlined her career as an advocate for press freedom in various roles, having served on advisory boards for organizations supporting editorial cartoonists.

Advertisement

She emphasized the importance of holding power accountable and warned against efforts to “curry favor with an autocrat-in-waiting.”

What People Are Saying

Elizabeth Warren, Senator, on X: “@AnnTelnaes resigned after The Washington Post editorial page killed her cartoon. It’s worth a share. Big Tech executives are bending the knee to Donald Trump and it’s no surprise why: Billionaires like Jeff Bezos like paying a lower tax rate than a public school teacher.”

David Shipley, Washington Post Opinions Editor, in a statement to Politico: “My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column — this one a satire — for publication. The only bias was against repetition.”

Ann Telnaes, Cartoonist, on Substack: “For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post.”

What Happens Next

With Donald Trump set to assume the presidency, The Post faces increased scrutiny over its ability to maintain editorial independence under Bezos’s ownership. Telnaes’ departure raises questions about how the paper will approach coverage of Trump’s administration, particularly regarding its willingness to challenge powerful figures.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending