A former Buckeye will be at a rival Big Ten school next season.

Following his entry into the NCAA Transfer Portal earlier this spring, senior offensive lineman Enokk Vimahi announced his commitment to Washington on Monday.

Vimahi appeared in just 35 games over his last five seasons with the Buckeyes, including Ohio State’s most recent bout against Missouri in the New Year’s Cotton Bowl Classic on Dec. 29, 2023.

Despite center Carson Hinzman being available that game, he didn’t see the field, leaving then-guard Matthew Jones to fill in. This allowed Vimahi to play all 57 snaps at right guard against the Tigers, joining Jones, Donovan Jackson, Josh Simmons and Josh Fryar as others to do so.

Vimahi arrived in Columbus as a 4-star recruit and the No. 1-ranked player in Hawaii in the 2019 class. He was also the No. 5 offensive guard nationally, per 247Sports.

The Kahuku, Hawaii, native received offers from Notre Dame, USC, Florida, Oregon, UCLA and Washington, among others, before committing to Ohio State.

Vimahi joins running back Dallan Hayden, receiver Kyion Grayes, safeties Cedrick Hawkins and Ja’Had Carter, and linebacker Nigel Glover as the other Ohio State players to enter the transfer portal after the spring Game. Carter and Glover remain uncommitted.

With Vimahi Leaving and Jones being signed by the Miami Dolphins as an undrafted free agent, the only remaining considered starters from a season ago are Simmons, Fryar and Jackson.

The Buckeyes also got Alabama center Seth McLaughlin in the first transfer portal window, as well as bring in freshmen twins Deonte and Devontage Armstrong.

WASHINGTON – The president of George Washington University called the ongoing protest encampment on campus unlawful and warned of the potential danger it is growing into.

President Ellen Granberg released a statement Sunday, nearly two weeks after the demonstrations over the Israel-Hamas war began on school grounds.

“There is a dire humanitarian crisis occurring in Gaza that must be addressed, and I am personally grief-stricken by the suffering and loss of innocent lives occurring on both sides of this conflict. I fully support and encourage our community to speak out and engage in controversial and critical dialogues on these crucial issues—as long as they occur within the limits of our university’s policies and the District’s laws,” Granberg’s statement said. “However, what is currently happening at GW is not a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment or our university’s policies. The demonstration, like many around the country, has grown into what can only be classified as an illegal and potentially dangerous occupation of GW property.”

Granberg also said that the protest is no longer a student demonstration adding that it has been absorbed “by individuals who are largely unaffiliated with our community and do not have our community’s best interest in mind.”

READ MORE: Protests continue at George Washington University after House Republicans spar with demonstrators

“We have offered an alternative demonstration site, requested the assistance of the DC Metropolitan Police Department, erected barriers to contain the protest, initiated academic and administrative consequences for trespassing GW students, expanded our security resources and personnel, and conducted regular and sustained dialogues with GW students connected to the camp,” Granberg  continued. “So far, all of these efforts have failed to end the encampment or deter the protesters from escalating the situation.”

READ MORE: GWU protest organizers vow to stay on campus until demands are met

She said the university is not equipped to handle the situation and must “rely on the support and experience of the DC Metropolitan Police Department.”

The demonstrations began on April 25. Since around the same time, colleges and universities around the country that have seen dozens of protests and hundreds of arrests at demonstrations over the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

Read The FULL STATEMENT From GW University President: 

Dear Members of the George Washington University Community,

It has been over a week since a group of students established an unauthorized protest encampment on GW’s University Yard. Since then, there have been many conversations about students’ rights to free expression and assembly and whether this is a peaceful protest. In this message, I want to directly address those conversations, share what we are experiencing on campus, and outline our desired outcomes moving forward. 

Before I begin, I want to make clear that I believe the issues at the heart of this protest are important and deserve our full attention and consideration. There is a dire humanitarian crisis occurring in Gaza that must be addressed, and I am personally grief-stricken by the suffering and loss of innocent lives occurring on both sides of this conflict. I fully support and encourage our community to speak out and engage in controversial and critical dialogues on these crucial issues—as long as they occur within the limits of our university’s policies and the District’s laws. However, what is currently happening at GW is not a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment or our university’s policies. The demonstration, like many around the country, has grown into what can only be classified as an illegal and potentially dangerous occupation of GW property. 

History has repeatedly shown that there are many effective ways for communities to express their differing viewpoints lawfully within the District of Columbia. In the last seven months alone, at GW, we have seen this play out on all sides of the war between Israel and Hamas. I know that some in our community and others across the country argue that this, too, is simply a peaceful protest – and, at certain times, this has been true. However, when protesters overrun barriers established to protect the community, vandalize a university statue and flag, surround and intimidate GW students with antisemitic images and hateful rhetoric, chase people out of a public yard based on their perceived beliefs, and ignore, degrade, and push GW Police Officers and university maintenance staff, the protest ceases to be peaceful or productive. All of these things have happened at GW in the last five days. 

It is also essential to highlight that at no point was this encampment lawful. From the moment GW students declared their intent to establish an encampment on University Yard, they were in direct violation of multiple university policies and were trespassing on a space explicitly reserved for the GW Law final examinations. The university, which is committed to protecting our students’ rights to free expression, informed them of this and quickly offered a secure alternative protest site where GW would support them in holding peaceful daytime demonstrations. This offer was repeatedly refused.

Finally, it is clear that this is no longer a GW student demonstration. It has been co-opted by individuals who are largely unaffiliated with our community and do not have our community’s best interest in mind. It is increasingly unsafe and a violation of university and city regulations to have so many unidentified and unvetted people from outside the GW community living on university property. 

Conventional protests that abide by municipal law and university policy should and do receive protection and respect, no matter the message’s viewpoint. As I have outlined, this is not what is happening at GW.

For these reasons, the George Washington University continues to tirelessly pursue every avenue available to resolve the situation swiftly and safely. We have offered an alternative demonstration site, requested the assistance of the DC Metropolitan Police Department, erected barriers to contain the protest, initiated academic and administrative consequences for trespassing GW students, expanded our security resources and personnel, and conducted regular and sustained dialogues with GW students connected to the camp. So far, all of these efforts have failed to end the encampment or deter the protesters from escalating the situation.  

As a university, we are not equipped to single-handedly manage an unprecedented situation such as this. The GW police force is, and should only be, prepared to protect our community during normal university operations and to respond to routine and urgent incidents. When unlawful activities go beyond these limits, we must rely on the support and experience of the DC Metropolitan Police Department. At this time, the District is in communication with the university, and the DC Metropolitan Police are providing an increased security presence on and around University Yard.

I understand and fully share the deep concern many feel about the status of the protest. Many are frustrated that it is continuing; some are willing for it to proceed indefinitely. At GW, our commitment remains to regain and maintain the safety and security of University Yard, pursue accountability for those who have destroyed university property and harassed our community, and return our university to normal operations. This includes, of course, allowing and promoting the free exercise of various viewpoints and means of expression by members of our community within the limits of university policies. We continue to ask for the full support of our partners, including the District of Columbia, in pursuing these aims. 

Sincerely, 
 

Ellen M. Granberg

President

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Visiting Columbia University last week to see the pro-Palestinian protests took me back to my own student days at the University of California at Berkeley, from 1987 to 1991.

As a journalist for the Daily Californian, the university’s independent, student-run newspaper, I covered a lot of protests for causes as varied as divesting from South Africa, ending U.S. proxy wars in Central America, getting the ROTC off campus and staying out of the 1991 Gulf War (“no blood for oil”). But underlying all of the transitory passions of the day, I detected a powerful nostalgia for the 1960s — that heady era when mere students could imagine they were heroic figures in the vanguard of historical change. It often felt as if the students of my generation were simply historical reenactors of past glories for whom the act of protest was more important than the causes for which they protested.