Connect with us

Washington

UK and Australia urge Washington to ease secrecy rules in security pact

Published

on

UK and Australia urge Washington to ease secrecy rules in security pact


Australia and the UK are urging the Biden administration to calm down restrictions on the sharing of know-how and knowledge that they are saying danger undercutting the trilateral Aukus safety pact.

A number of individuals acquainted with the discussions mentioned Canberra and London need to make sure the second pillar of Aukus — which incorporates co-operation in areas equivalent to hypersonic weapons — doesn’t fall behind the primary, which is the landmark deal to assist Australia procure nuclear-powered submarines.

President Joe Biden, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese and UK prime minister Rishi Sunak are anticipated to disclose how and the place the submarines shall be constructed at a joint occasion within the US on March 13.

Officers are optimistic the US has discovered methods to share carefully guarded nuclear-propulsion secrets and techniques with Australia. US nationwide safety adviser Jake Sullivan just lately mentioned he felt “superb” concerning the prospects. However there may be concern that the second pillar, which incorporates undersea capabilities and digital warfare, faces obstacles which have slowed its momentum.

Advertisement

These hurdles relate to know-how switch, licensing necessities below the Worldwide Site visitors in Arms Laws (Itar), and a classification known as “NoForn” that bars data sharing with non-US nationals.

“The UK and Australia are pushing the US to do what must be completed to make sure that Aukus is successful and to resolve legacy points, together with on export controls, know-how switch and ‘NoForn’,” mentioned one individual acquainted with the talks. The individual mentioned there was a willingness to share far more delicate know-how when it comes to nuclear propulsion for the submarines.

“We want to ensure constraints don’t cease us getting all of the wins we wish in Pillar Two,” the individual mentioned. “If we can not repair these points for Aukus, then how are we ever going to have the ability to repair them?”

Stacie Pettyjohn and Becca Wasser of the Middle for a New American Safety just lately wrote that “NoForn” because it utilized to 5 Eyes, an intelligence sharing community comprised of the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, meant even the closest allies had been “marginalised and excluded from many discussions and occasions”.

The reform debate has existed for a very long time. When he launched an effort to overtake the system in 2010, then defence secretary Robert Gates cited Frederick the Nice saying: “He who defends all the pieces, defends nothing”.

Advertisement

However the concern has taken on extra significance over the previous two years as Washington presses allies to do extra with the US within the Indo-Pacific, in an effort to counter China and put together for a attainable battle over Taiwan.

The US has made progress up to now yr, together with by persuading the Philippines to grant entry to 4 army bases. Allies argue that Washington should overhaul its laws to maintain tempo with the rising co-operation and to reinforce interoperability between their militaries.

Ely Ratner, the highest Pentagon Asia official, mentioned the administration was revising its “antiquated methods” and making an attempt to alter a tradition whereby components of the forms beforehand mentioned: “No, we are able to’t share that.”

“The reply from the coverage and technique perspective being, ‘No, we’re going to must share that’ . . . when it comes to attending to the type of extra succesful, built-in future we wish within the Indo-Pacific,” Ratner instructed the Hudson Institute.

The state division mentioned the US was “dedicated” to facilitating “safe switch of applied sciences” which might be essential for Aukus. It identified that export licences for the Aukus companions already moved quicker than for different international locations. A pilot programme known as “Open Common Licence” eases some bureaucratic crimson tape, it added — though some specialists word it’s only for non-classified applied sciences.

Advertisement

One British official mentioned London wished the pilot programme “prolonged considerably” to exhibit its potential. He added that compliance with Itar alone prices the UK lots of of hundreds of thousands of kilos a yr.

“NoForn” restrictions additionally trigger operational complications. In a single instance, UK pilots flying US helicopters are generally barred from getting safety briefings. “They’re flying blind,” mentioned one individual acquainted with the method.

Some US officers say they need to share extra however stress the necessity to stop any safety lapses. Australian ambassador Arthur Sinodinos just lately instructed the Middle for Strategic and Worldwide Research (CSIS) think-tank that Canberra had proven the US its measures to stop know-how leaking. He additionally praised efforts by the US, saying an understanding concerning the want for motion had “permeated” the federal government.

However critics say extra must be completed. “It beggars perception that Australia and the US will be quickly shifting in direction of endeavor mixed strategic (nuclear) bomber operations from new bases in Australia and but the US stays unable or unwilling to share with Australia what’s most frequently the case legacy know-how,” mentioned Ashley Townshend, an Indo-Pacific safety knowledgeable on the Carnegie Endowment for Worldwide Peace, referring to older, less-sensitive know-how.

Many specialists imagine that finally Congress must legislate to overtake Itar.

Advertisement

“They really feel that they’ve already completed some discount of boundaries utilizing present administrative authorities, however in some unspecified time in the future they’re going to have to return to Congress,” mentioned Joe Courtney, a Connecticut lawmaker who’s the highest Democrat on the Home Seapower and Projection Forces committee.

Courtney mentioned nascent talks with the administration had been “selecting up pace” however known as for extra political assist.

“There’s undoubtedly a necessity for this to be far more of a spotlighted, high-visibility precedence from the president to [defence secretary Lloyd] Austin,” he mentioned, including {that a} trilateral chief occasion could be “fabulous”.

Charles Edel, a CSIS Australia knowledgeable, mentioned the March 13 announcement needed to be “sufficiently bold and thrilling” to create momentum to deal with the more durable regulatory points. However he cautioned: “It’s additionally fairly attainable the announcement shall be seen as the top of the story by many and that momentum will peter out”.

Comply with Demetri Sevastopulo on Twitter

Advertisement

 





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Washington pharmacists prescribe abortion pills through new pilot program • Oklahoma Voice

Published

on

Washington pharmacists prescribe abortion pills through new pilot program • Oklahoma Voice


A Washington state-based nonprofit has launched a program training pharmacists to prescribe abortion medications via telehealth, a model that organizers hope other states will adopt to expand abortion access.

Abortion is broadly legal in Washington state up to the point of fetal viability, which is generally considered to be between 24 and 26 weeks of pregnancy. But Dr. Beth Rivin, president and CEO of nonprofit Uplift International, said there are still many individuals who face barriers to abortion access in Washington because of where they live, how much money they make and other factors. Those people can benefit most from having access to telehealth, Rivin said, and having pharmacists available helps increase that availability.

The nonprofit partnered with an online pharmacy called Honeybee Health to launch what they’re calling the Pharmacist Abortion Access Project. Ten pharmacists were recruited and trained to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol, the standard U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medication abortion regimen, to patients in Washington up to 10 weeks’ gestation.

Rivin said the team created its training protocol with Dr. Sarah Prager, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington. The program also has a list of clinics where patients can be referred if any in-person follow-up care is necessary, including ultrasounds, blood tests or other exams.

Advertisement

“If (patients) had questions, the platform allowed for messaging between the pharmacist and the individual, and patients were followed up with at one week and four to five weeks after prescriptions were written,” Rivin said.

Over the past two years, anti-abortion groups have increasingly called for more state legislation targeting abortion drugs, alleging telemedicine for abortion pills is dangerous to a pregnant person’s health. Research has repeatedly shown that telehealth prescriptions are just as safe as in-person treatment, with one recent study showing 99.7% of patients out of a sample of 6,000 did not experience any serious complications. Similarly, 97.7% didn’t need any form of additional follow-up care.

“Research confirms that medication abortion can be prescribed through telehealth just as safely as in person, and it confirms that pharmacists can specifically prescribe medication abortion,” Rivin told States Newsroom. “The training they undergo through (the project) mirrors the training that other providers receive.”

The Heritage Foundation, the conservative group behind a set of policies known as Project 2025, has gathered several examples of abortion pills given to pregnant women without their consent. Using those examples, the organization recommends states ban telemedicine and mail-order abortion pills and strengthen or enact laws targeting abortion coercion. There have also been calls to use a dormant federal law called the Comstock Act to ban abortion pills from being sent by mail altogether.

Proof of residency not required to obtain pills by mail  

By the end of the Washington pilot program, which took place between Oct. 31 and Nov. 26, 2024, the pharmacists successfully prescribed medication abortion to 43 people who were deemed eligible. To qualify, aside from the applicable medical protocol, the patient needed to be 18 or older and have a Washington address where the medication could be mailed. The recipient of the medication does not need to prove they are a Washington resident, but a valid Washington address must be provided. Washington has shield laws preventing states where abortion is illegal from investigating medical providers if a resident of that state obtains an abortion in Washington.

Advertisement

Following the success of the pilot, Uplift International said it plans to expand the program across Washington and explore pharmacists prescribing medication abortion in person from brick-and-mortar pharmacies.

Rivin said the hope is that the project paves the way for other states to implement the same model, especially as President-elect Donald Trump takes office and Republicans in Congress may eye more federal abortion restrictions.

“It is the first step toward mainstreaming pharmacists as prescribers of medication abortion in person,” Rivin said.

Don Downing, a clinical pharmacy professor emeritus at the University of Washington and co-director of the project, said Washington has one of the most progressive pharmacy laws in the country. State law has recognized pharmacists as health care providers since 1979, allowing them to prescribe many medications approved by the FDA.

Washington shares that progressive pharmacy law status with one of its border states, Idaho, where pharmacists can also prescribe medications for minor ailments such as cold sores and allergies, as well as drugs for treatment of illnesses such as flu and strep throat. Downing said Idaho’s pharmacy laws are actually even more progressive than Washington’s.

Advertisement

However, Idaho has an abortion policy that could hardly be more different. It is the only state in the Northwest with a near-total abortion ban, a civil enforcement law allowing family members to sue medical providers who perform an abortion, and a so-called “abortion trafficking” law making it a felony to take a minor to a state with legal abortion access without parental permission.

Ironically, Downing said the pilot team announced the project in Idaho during an annual pharmacy meeting held at a resort in Coeur d’Alene with pharmacists from Montana, Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Alaska.

“We presented the idea of pharmacists becoming much more involved in medication abortion access at that meeting, and it was surreal because Idaho at that time was just pouncing on women’s access to abortion,” Downing said.

Providing prescriptions via telehealth first was the priority, he said, because after conducting several listening sessions before launching the pilot, the consensus among women interviewed was that they preferred the privacy of an online experience.

“If you’re in a small town, if you go to the doctor’s office, you go to the school nurse, a pharmacy, there’s a good chance you’re going to see a neighbor, a relative, and someone is for sure going to ask you what you’re doing there today,” Downing said. “Women nationwide are increasingly saying, if I can get it online the same way we buy from Amazon, if I can do this without running into my aunt, so much the better.”

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

As some Washington law enforcement leaders vow to help with mass deportations, immigration advocates prepare to resist

Published

on

As some Washington law enforcement leaders vow to help with mass deportations, immigration advocates prepare to resist


A Washington law that’s designed to protect immigrant rights could see new challenges as President-elect Donald Trump takes office. The state’s sanctuary law restricts how local law enforcement can aid federal immigration officials.

Yet some Washington state counties appear eager to help Trump fulfill his promise of mass deportations.

“I don’t care if this is a blue state, a sanctuary state… they have an obligation,” Klickitat County Sheriff Bob Songer said in a video uploaded to his department’s social media page on Dec. 11.

Advertisement

The “they” Songer is talking about are government agencies he thinks should fall in line with Trump’s deportation plans, which could target millions nationwide.

RELATED: Western Washington groups scramble to admit refugees before Trump’s inauguration

The state’s Keep Washington Working Act, passed in 2019, prohibits local law enforcement from asking people their immigration status or holding someone for immigration agents. The law, however, does allow local officers to work with federal immigration officials in certain instances, such as taking down a human or drug trafficking ring, or if a person lands in state prison.

Trump’s incoming administration has signaled it plans to start mass deportations with a focus on people who’ve committed crimes. But like Trump, Songer said he wouldn’t rule out targeting people who have illegally crossed the border or overstayed a visa. Those offenses can become a federal crime if done enough times.

Advertisement

A Department of Homeland Security report estimates 340,000 Washington residents are in the country without legal immigration status.

“This sheriff is not going to refuse to help ICE — we will be there with ICE to do the job,” Songer said in the video.

Days after Songer posted his video, the head of Washington’s Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs pushed back. Steve Strachan said the work of deportations is under the jurisdiction of the federal government — not local sheriffs.

“There is no direct federal authority… over local law enforcement. That is the unique and special nature of our system in America,” he later told KUOW’s Soundside.

RELATED: Washington sheriffs may face pressure between federal agencies and state law under Trump administration

Advertisement

Three other Washington counties have already been given a warning from the state Attorney General’s Office for violating the Keep Washington Working Act.

In the last four years, the AG has found Adams, Clark, and Grant counties have collectively worked with ICE more than a thousand times in potential violation of state law. In Adams and Grant counties, none of those interactions with ICE were connected to a criminal matter.

The Washington Immigrant Solidarity Network, an immigrant advocacy group, has also fielded concerns in other counties for similar activity, including Franklin, Lincoln, and Whatcom counties.

“We know that Keep Washington Working is not perfect, so we are trying to ensure that we’re out doing outreach in those specific counties,” said Yahaira Padilla, a deportation defense coordinator for the organization.

Advertisement

The immigration journey: How long does it take to feel like an American?

When someone gets arrested and detained, her job is to help connect them with bail or legal help. She hears stories about which counties are potentially violating the Keep Washington Working Act, she said.

If a local or state law enforcement officer begins asking about immigration status, people can invoke the right to remain silent, and can refuse to sign any documents until they speak with a lawyer, Padilla said.

She added that it’s important to set up a family plan in the event someone is arrested or detained, and part of that includes calling her organization’s hotline for help.

Advertisement

“I’m a mother, and that’s something that I never want to think about… creating a plan for the worst to come. But we have to make sure that we are prepared,” Padilla said.

As a survivor of family separation and DACA recipient she said, her ties to this work are deeply personal.

“My story, like so many of our communities, is woven into the broader fight for immigrant justice,” she said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Crews fighting fire at scrap yard in Washington County

Published

on

Crews fighting fire at scrap yard in Washington County


WASHINGTON COUNTY, Ohio (WTAP) – First responders are on the scene of a fire at a scrap yard in Washington County.

Not much information is known at this time, but what we do know is the fire is at Guernsey Scrap Recycling.

According to the Reno Volunteer Fire Department Fire Chief Jon Bradford, departments from Reno, Williamstown, Devola, Salem, Little Muskingum, and Marietta are on the scene. All of those departments are shuttling water to the scene.

Scrap yard fire(none)

The fire is contained in one area of the facility. Reno VFD is using the MOV Drone Works drone to help fight the fire. The owner of the scrap yard is in a crane helping to move items to assist firefighters.

Advertisement

It is not known what started the fire. And Chief Bradford says nobody was injured, and nobody is at risk.

WTAP has a reporter on the scene and will have more information as it becomes available.

See an error in our reporting? Send us an email by clicking here!



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending