Washington
Transit users 18 and younger ride free under new Washington program
Washingtonians 18 and beneath quickly gained’t must pay to make use of public transit throughout most — if not all — of Washington state.
In March, the Legislature accredited $3 billion in extra cash for transit that will roll out over the following 16 years.
However about half of the cash comes with a selected situation hooked up: Transit businesses should let folks 18 and beneath board buses and trains free.
Businesses that undertake a zero-fare-for-youth coverage by Oct. 1 can obtain their lower of $1.45 billion in new transit help grants. Businesses that don’t undertake such a coverage is not going to qualify.
The requirement is embedded in a brand new statewide transportation package deal, which is able to spend $17 billion on bridges, highways, transit, and bike and pedestrian enhancements between now and 2038.
Native Angle
C-Tran can be among the many transit businesses in Washington offering free bus rides to passengers age 18 and youthful in alternate for a share of $3 billion in state funding, based on an company spokesman.
“C-Tran does intend to take part on this program,” Eric Florip mentioned Thursday. “We consider now we have a superb place to begin with our present Youth Alternative Move program, which supplies free native service to most center college and highschool college students in Clark County already.
“The precise particulars of increasing that to all youth riders aren’t finalized but, however the grant program is actually an important alternative for C-Tran and different transit businesses in Washington,” he mentioned.
Florip additionally famous that C-Tran has already carried out a short lived fare discount this yr for all riders on all native and specific routes.
—Mark Bowder
State Sen. Marko Liias, who chairs the Senate Transportation Committee, mentioned his aim with the youth-ride-free coverage is to foster a brand new technology of transit riders, in addition to assist decrease transportation prices for households throughout Washington state.
Liias mentioned getting younger folks within the behavior of utilizing public transit also needs to assist curb carbon emissions, that are a significant driver of local weather change.
“For me and for teenagers rising up within the suburbs like me, getting your driver’s license at 16 was your ticket to freedom,” mentioned Liias, D-Lynnwood, who grew up simply outdoors Mukilteo in Snohomish County.
“I need to train the following technology that an ORCA move is your ticket to freedom,” mentioned Liias, referring to the playing cards that can be utilized to pay for transit throughout the Puget Sound.
Though the state has set an Oct. 1 deadline for transit businesses to undertake zero-fare insurance policies for younger riders, Liias mentioned there’s some flexibility about when these insurance policies should really be carried out. He hopes all transit businesses will begin letting riders 18 and beneath board free by no later than spring of 2023.
Justin Leighton, the chief director of the Washington State Transit Affiliation, mentioned transit businesses across the state are busy creating zero-fare insurance policies that they’ll put into place by autumn.
Whereas many transit businesses nonetheless want their governing boards to approve their particular plans, to this point, not one of the native transit businesses represented by Leighton’s group — 30 in all — has determined to forgo the state grant cash by refusing to develop insurance policies to let folks 18 and beneath journey free, he mentioned.
Many businesses really need to begin letting youngsters board free even prior to Oct. 1 — ideally, by the point a brand new college yr will get underway, Leighton mentioned.
Different businesses might take a couple of additional months to cease charging fares, as they determine tips on how to implement the brand new coverage, he mentioned.
“The massive drawback actually is, how can we confirm age?” Leighton mentioned. He mentioned transit businesses don’t need drivers and different transit employees to must test IDs to verify riders’ age through the boarding course of.
“We additionally don’t need to be moving into fights with 17-year-olds who seem like they’re 20,” Leighton added.
Ina Percival, supervisor of promoting and enterprise growth at King County Metro, mentioned even when folks beneath 18 journey free, Metro should monitor these riders to make sure the company is offering sufficient service and assembly riders’ wants. Transit businesses additionally should report yearly what number of instances younger folks journey free beneath the brand new program, which would require some sort of monitoring system, she mentioned.
To make that occur, Metro is now brainstorming methods to get ORCA playing cards into the fingers of all younger folks, which is able to most probably contain partnering much more carefully with faculties, Percival mentioned.
Whereas some cities inside King County Metro’s jurisdiction, together with Seattle, already provide free ORCA ridership playing cards to center and highschool college students, that’s not the case in all places.
Metro can also be methods it may probably let riders who’re 18 and beneath use a specialised cellular app to board buses and trains, Percival mentioned.
“The aim right here is basically to empower younger folks to have the ability to use transportation to profit themselves and their households,” Percival mentioned. That features serving to youngsters get to and from extracurricular actions and jobs, she mentioned.
The plan to let younger folks journey free didn’t obtain common help on the Legislature this yr.
State Rep. Andrew Barkis, R-Olympia, mentioned he stays involved in regards to the problem of implementing this system, in addition to how a lot it would price when it comes to misplaced fare income.
Barkis mentioned offering extra state cash for transit whereas requiring fewer folks to pay to journey shifts the burden of paying for transit onto individuals who might by no means use it. That features individuals who stay in rural areas, the place there are few transit choices obtainable, he mentioned.
“We’re transferring to a state of affairs the place a element of how we fund our transit is being eliminated, and that’s fare field restoration,” mentioned Barkis, the rating Republican on the Home Transportation Committee.
For the transit businesses themselves, the cash they anticipate to obtain by way of the brand new state grant program is projected to far exceed the price of letting youngsters and 18-year-olds journey free, mentioned Matthew Sutherland, advocacy director on the Transportation Selections Coalition, a bunch that supported the brand new coverage.
King County Metro, for example, stands to obtain about $31 million per yr from the brand new state grant program, however estimates it would lose solely about $10 million in income every year from misplaced fare collections.
Pierce Transit, in the meantime, initiatives shedding $1 million in fare income every year, however expects to obtain about $8.2 million a yr from the brand new grant program.
“It’s an absolute win-win for each transit company,” Sutherland mentioned. “They get cash to assist help their operations, and so they get to extend affordability and entry for teenagers.”
The zero-fare for 18 and beneath program should lengthen to each kind of transit service an company gives, not simply buses and trains. Ferries can be included, too.
The corresponding state grant cash can be utilized to purchase new buses, construct new transit amenities, develop transit service and even stave off service cuts.
The cash can’t be used to merely supplant native funding. Meaning a transit company can’t lower native gross sales taxes that at present pay for transit, then use the state grant cash to backfill the misplaced income.
Washington
Confirmed: Cardinal McElroy to be appointed Washington archbishop
Cardinal Robert McElroy of San Diego will be announced as the new archbishop of Washington, D.C., The Pillar has confirmed.
After reporting January 4 that multiple U.S. bishops had said that the appointment was imminent, The Pillar has separately confirmed that Pope Francis has selected McElroy to succeed Cardinal Wilton Gregory in the capital see.
The announcement is expected Monday, according to sources close to the process.
McElroy’s appointment follows a lengthy and contentious process to find a successor for the Washington archdiocese, which involved a protracted standoff between some American cardinals and the apostolic nunciature.
The Pillar has previously reported that following a meeting in October in which McElroy joined Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago and Joseph Tobin of Newark to meet with Pope Francis during the synod on synodality in October, Francis was said to have decided against appointing McElroy.
Instead, Francis tasked former Washington archbishop Cardinal Donald Wuerl to identify a suitable candidate.
Wuerl, sources close to the process have confirmed to The Pillar, suggested Bishop Sean McKnight of Jefferson City, with Cardinal Gregory also signing off on the recommendation. However, in the weeks following the presidential election result, which saw Donald Trump reelected to the White House, Francis agreed to revisit McElroy’s candidacy.
As Bishop of San Diego and as a cardinal, McElroy has been outspoken on various subjects touching the political area, most especially immigration.
In addition to the political sensitivities of the role, McElroy will also assume leadership of more than half a million Catholics in the DC area and southern Maryland, becoming their third archbishop since 2018.
McElroy turns 71 in February and succeeds Cardinal Gregory, 77, who was appointed to succeed Cardinal Donald Wuerl in 2019, whose resignation was accepted by Pope Francis following the scandal surrounding Wuerl’s own predecessor, Theodore McCarrick, the previous year.
Despite promises of transparency by Gregory at the time of his appointment, the archdiocese has so far declined to answer repeated questions about McCarrick’s tenure, especially money raised and spent via his personal “archbishop’s fund” during his time in Washington.
McElroy has himself faced questions about McCarrick in the past, with some expressing concerns about how he responded to a 2016 warning about the now-laicized former cardinal.
In addition to lingering questions about McCarrick, McElroy will also have to reckon with a process of financial restructuring in the Washington archdiocese.
In December last year, several local priests told The Pillar that chancery officials had painted a bleak picture of archdiocesan finances, announcing sweeping reforms of its parish assessment system to bridge a multi-million dollar deficit.
As Bishop of San Diego, McElroy has at times raised eyebrows on the national stage, calling for the synod on synodality to debate issues like the sacramental ordination of women, despite Pope Francis repeatedly saying such issues were not up for discussion.
The cardinal has previously made calls for “comprehensive inclusion” in Eucharistic reception.
Following the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 2023 instruction Fiducia supplicans on the blessing of persons on same-sex relationships, which Rome agreed to allow the bishops of Africa to not implement in their own dioceses, McElroy hailed the “diverging pastoral paths” taken by the Church in different countries as a model of healthy decentralization, rather than a sign of contradiction within the Church.
Last year, McElroy issued a controversial homeschooling policy in the San Diego diocese, barring local Catholic home schooling groups from using parish facilities.
Cardinal McElroy was ordained a priest for the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 1980, serving as secretary to Archbishop John Quinn. After several years in parish ministry, Quinn named him vicar general of the archdiocese in 1995.
McElroy was named auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of San Francisco in 2010, and made Bishop of San Diego in 2015. Pope Francis created him a cardinal in 2022.
Washington
Buccaneers Claim 3 Seed in NFC Playoff Field, Face Commanders in Wild Card Round
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers not only captured a fourth straight NFC South title on Sunday, but they also improved their overall position in the playoff standings and kept alive the possibility of two home games in the postseason.
While the Buccaneers secured their own playoff spot with a Week 18 win over the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Rams had already clinched the NFC West title the Week before. That put the Rams into the third overall seed in the NFC playoff field coming into the final weekend, but a loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday allowed Tampa Bay to leap them for that spot. Both the Buccaneers and Rams finished with 10-7 records but Tampa Bay won the tiebreaker for positioning based on a better record against conference opponents (8-4 to 6-6).
As the #3 seed, the Buccaneers will host a playoff game in the Wild Card round against the team that claimed the #6 seed. That proved to be Washington after the Commanders beat the Cowboys on Sunday to improve to 11-6. The NFL will announce the date and time of the game later on Sunday evening.
The Buccaneers will be taking part in the playoffs for a fifth straight season, the longest such run in franchise history, but this is the first time in that span that they will start out as the #3 seed. They earned the top Wild Card spot in 2020 and, coincidentally, started their playoffs at Washington after the Commanders won the NFC East with a 7-9 record. The Bucs won the NFC South each year from 2021 to 2023 and in those seasons was seeded second, fourth and fourth.
Tampa Bay could still be at home for two playoff games. If they win next weekend and the second-seeded Philadelphia Eagles lose to Green Bay, the Buccaneers would go into the Divisional Round as the second-highest remaining seed behind the winner of the Detroit-Minnesota game on Sunday night. That team would enjoy a bye in the first round and then play at home against the lowest of the remaining seeds. The Buccaneers would get the next seeded team up from the bottom, which would be either Minnesota/Detroit or Los Angeles.
Washington
Washington Post cartoonist quits over rejected Trump sketch
What’s New
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes resigned from The Washington Post after the editorial team rejected one of her cartoons criticizing The Post‘s billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.
Writing on her Substack blog on Friday, Telnaes said it was the first time her work was censored due to its point of view, prompting her decision to leave
Newsweek has contacted The Washington Post via email for comment.
Why It Matters
Telnaes’ resignation highlights concerns over press freedom and the influence of billionaire owners on editorial decisions in major news outlets, including at the LA Times and The Washington Post.
Critics argue that billionaire owners could censor critical commentary, undermining journalism’s role in holding power accountable.
What To Know
The cartoon in question depicted Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, LA Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong, and The Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, all billionaires, and Micky Mouse, representing Disney, kneeling before a statue of Donald Trump, offering sacks of cash.
Telnaes posted a rough of the cartoon in the blog post:
Telnaes described the decision to reject the cartoon as a “game changer” for her relationship with the paper.
But Post Opinions editor David Shipley, in a statement to Politico, said the cartoon was rejected to avoid repetition, because a column and a satirical piece on the same subject had already been published.
In her blog post, Telnaes outlined her career as an advocate for press freedom in various roles, having served on advisory boards for organizations supporting editorial cartoonists.
She emphasized the importance of holding power accountable and warned against efforts to “curry favor with an autocrat-in-waiting.”
What People Are Saying
Elizabeth Warren, Senator, on X: “@AnnTelnaes resigned after The Washington Post editorial page killed her cartoon. It’s worth a share. Big Tech executives are bending the knee to Donald Trump and it’s no surprise why: Billionaires like Jeff Bezos like paying a lower tax rate than a public school teacher.”
David Shipley, Washington Post Opinions Editor, in a statement to Politico: “My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column — this one a satire — for publication. The only bias was against repetition.”
Ann Telnaes, Cartoonist, on Substack: “For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post.”
What Happens Next
With Donald Trump set to assume the presidency, The Post faces increased scrutiny over its ability to maintain editorial independence under Bezos’s ownership. Telnaes’ departure raises questions about how the paper will approach coverage of Trump’s administration, particularly regarding its willingness to challenge powerful figures.
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture5 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports5 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics3 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics1 day ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?