Connect with us

Washington

Ramsey, Washington and Dakota counties all seek property tax levy hikes

Published

on

Ramsey, Washington and Dakota counties all seek property tax levy hikes


Ramsey, Washington and Dakota counties all are seeking property tax levy increases this year, as they deal with higher costs in areas such as construction, labor and healthcare as well as the end of federal pandemic money.

Homeowners and other property owners in the east metro have seen the proposed hikes on their property tax statements. There is a distinction between the levies imposed by counties and those from their city, county, school district and other special taxing jurisdictions. Up to a dozen different taxing authorities — including mosquito control districts — contribute to the total payment due at the bottom of a tax statement.

“They’re looking at a tax statement that comes from us, but it includes the city, the school district,” said Ramsey County Commissioner Rafael Ortega, who said he, too, has shouldered years of sizable property tax increases.

Ortega noted home prices have soared in recent years in higher-end neighborhoods like St. Paul’s Highland Park, while many long-undervalued properties in poorer neighborhoods are effectively playing catch-up as their estimated market values spike. Values also have shifted, leveled off or dropped for commercial office buildings, apartment buildings, industrial properties and small businesses in St. Paul while rising for St. Paul homeowners.

Advertisement

“I’ve been paying 15% increases on both mine and my mother’s properties for the last five years,” Ortega said. “You take a place like the East Side that has such low values, but their taxes jump higher because of the increase in assessed value. They’ve been undervalued for so long.”

Beyond growing home values, Ramsey and several other counties experienced deep cuts to state County Program Aid over time, and between 2006 and 2018 in particular.

Increased costs

Construction costs that soared during the pandemic as prices rose for materials and equipment have yet to abate, and a labor shortage continues. Meanwhile, counties are facing rising costs for everyday labor and healthcare. In surveys conducted by the Association of Minnesota Counties, one county reported its health insurance costs ballooning by almost 18% next year.

“That’s a 6.8% tax levy increase alone,” said Matt Hilgart, the government relations manager for the association.

For most counties, “the amount of their budget that is financed with property taxes has grown,” Hilgart said. “There isn’t one single reason why. While some state local government aid has grown very recently after decades of lack of funding or incremental increases, general expenditure spending has also grown.”

Advertisement

Counties “carry out the majority of core social services delivery for most of Minnesota, and I think it’s fair to say some of those mandates have grown over time,” Hilgart said. “Counties across the state, and including Ramsey County, are having to hire more social workers, case managers, and more child protection workers to fulfill both new mandates and increased community needs. These costs show up as wage increases, but in reality, it’s driven by the state mandate to provide certain services.”

Here’s a round-up of proposed property tax levy increases in Washington, Dakota and Ramsey counties as well as how their budgets have grown in the past 10 years.

Ramsey County

In St. Paul, a median-value single-family home had an estimated market value of $267,400 for taxes payable this year. That value will go up 3% to $275,300 for taxes payable in 2025. That owner would see overall property taxes — city, county, school district, Met Council and more — go up $337, an 8.8% increase.

Nearly 46% of the county’s proposed 2025 budget is funded by property tax, an increase of less than 1%, or $17.6 million, compared to the current fiscal year. The rest comes from intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and other sources.

The proposed county budget for 2025 is $848.6 million.

Advertisement

Ramsey County’s public truth-in-taxation hearing will be held at 6 p.m. Dec. 11 at the Hallie Q. Brown Community Center, 270 N. Kent St. in St. Paul. Doors open at 5:30 p.m. and interpreters will be available. County commissioners plan to approve the 2025 supplemental budget and property tax levy at their Dec. 17 board meeting.

The Ramsey County Board set next year’s maximum tax levy increase at 4.75% in September, though it could be altered up to the final vote.

Ramsey County budget

• 2015: $622.8 million.

• 2016: $645 million.

• 2017: $660.8 million.

Advertisement

• 2018: $714 million.

• 2019: $738 million.

• 2020: $741.7 million.

• 2021: $763.1 million.

• 2022: $774 million.

Advertisement

• 2023: $785.7 million.

• 2024: $808.5 million.

• 2025: $848.6 million (proposed).

Washington County

Washington County’s 2025 budget is $361.6 million, or $9.65 million less than in 2024. The proposed tax levy increase is 5.9%.

Of the total county budget, property taxes cover $140.48 million, or 38.8%.

Advertisement

There was a decrease in Washington County in the estimated median-value single-family home’s market value from $422,400 in 2024 to $411,400 in 2025. The median increase from 2024 to 2025 for the county portion of taxes is approximately $24, or 2.6%.

The county’s truth-in-taxation hearing was Nov. 26. The county board will vote on the final tax levy and budget at the Dec. 17 board meeting at the Washington County Government Center in Stillwater.

Washington County budget

• 2015: $228.7 million.

• 2016: $219.2 million.

• 2017: $211.2 million.

Advertisement

• 2018: $224.3 million.

• 2019: $288.1 million.

• 2020: $282.2 million.

• 2021: $288.5 million.

• 2022: $316 million.

Advertisement

• 2023: $378.9 million.

• 2024: $371.3 million.

• 2025: $361.6 million (proposed).

Dakota County

The recommended 2025 maximum levy of $167.7 million for Dakota County represents a 9.9% increase from the amount levied in 2024, according to officials with Dakota County Finance.

A median-value single-family home in Dakota County carried an estimated market value of $372,000 in 2025 and 2024. Per the proposed levy, the owner would see their taxes go up 5.87%, or $39.62, to total $714.35 next year as compared to $675 in 2024.

Advertisement

“In 2024, the county maintained the lowest levy per capita in the state of Minnesota and the lowest property tax rate among the seven metropolitan counties,” reads the staff report in county budget documents.

Nearly 30% of the county’s 2024 budget was funded by property tax, which according to the county, “is the largest and most stable source of funding.” The proposed budget for 2025 is $532.9 million, with an operating budget of $377.5 million.

The county’s truth-in-taxation hearing was Tuesday night. The county board is expected to vote Dec. 17 on the final budget and levy.

Dakota County budget

• 2015: $245 million.

• 2016: $269 million.

Advertisement

• 2017: $246 million.

• 2018: $249 million.

• 2019: $262 million.

• 2020: $278 million.

• 2021: $294 million.

Advertisement

• 2022: $290 million.

• 2023: $306 million.

• 2024: $336 million.

• 2025 $377.5 million (proposed).

Advertisement



Source link

Washington

Utah Starts Road Trip with Win in Washington | Utah Mammoth

Published

on

Utah Starts Road Trip with Win in Washington | Utah Mammoth


Both of Utah’s power play units scored in the win. Sergachev scored his 10th goal of the season on the power play 13 and a half minutes into the first period. Peterka scored his 21st of the season, on the man-advantage, in the final two minutes of the middle frame. 

Peterka has three power play goals in the 2025-26 campaign while Sergachev has matched a career-high with five power play goals this season. Overall, Utah’s power play has scored six goals in the last six games. That output matches the Mammoth’s total from their previous 18 games (per Mammoth PR). Tourigny discussed what’s changed with the team’s performance in recent games.

“(The) puck gets in,” Tourigny laughed. “But, no, I think there’s a number of things. The most important thing is we’re aggressive. We’re attacking.

“…If you look at our goal, the first one, it’s a direct play to the net and then on the loose puck recovery we take a shot with traffic and we score,” Tourigny continued. “On the second one, it’s a slot pass, a great shot by (Peterka). I think we had that attack mindset.”

Advertisement

Guenther, who is on the Mammoth’s top power play unit, agreed with Tourigny’s assessment of attacking more.

“I think just attacking, less predictable,” Guenther explained. “Shooting it more, I think (it is) just work really. Trying to play like a 5-on-5 mindset but on the (power play).”

The Mammoth made several line changes for tonight’s game and the new lines started to find chemistry, despite it being the first game with these changes. 

“I like them,” Tourigny said of the changes. “Obviously (Guenther) got a goal, but Cooley’s line was really good. I was looking at the expected goals at the end, I think they were above 90%. So that’s pretty, pretty awesome. Then I think (Barrett Hayton’s) line worked really hard. They’re heavy on pucks and they play well defensively. I did like (Michael Carcone’s) line in (the) previous three games, and I did like them again tonight.”

When Washington pushed back with a power play goal and multiple close chances in the third period, Utah fought hard against the momentum swing to secure the win. 

Advertisement

“I thought we did a pretty good job,” Keller explained. “Weathering the storm as much as we could. They’re a great veteran team. They made it hard on us. They pressured us all over the ice, but I was proud of the way we fought there towards the end.”

Utah’s bench was positive and calm throughout the game, especially late in the third. This helped the Mammoth through the momentum swings. Keller, who had two assists in the win, was one of the key voices for the Mammoth.

“He’s one of the guys who was really positive on the bench,” Tourigny explained. “(All the players) were but (Keller) was really vocal. He was really good energy on the bench. So that was really good.”

Additional Notes from Tonight (per Mammoth PR)

  • Guenther had two points in the win (1G, 1A) and the forward has earned a team-high nine points (5G, 4A) through six road games in 2026. He has become the third Mammoth skater to reach the 50-point mark this season (28G, 23A) and established a new career-high in goals.
  • Sergachev has 18 power play points this season (5G, 13A) and is tied with Keller for the team lead this season.
  • Keller has recorded multiple primary assists in a game for the seventh time this season and the 27th time in his NHL career. He has now tallied multiple points in four of his last six contests (2G, 8A), with three multi-assist outings over that span.

The Mammoth continue their five-game road trip in Philadelphia on Thursday night. Game time is 5 p.m. MT and available to watch on Mammoth+ and Utah16.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Commanders 2026 Mock Draft Madness 5.0

Published

on

Commanders 2026 Mock Draft Madness 5.0


The views and opinions expressed in this article do not reflect the opinion of the team.

In anticipation of the 2026 NFL Draft, which will be held April 23 – 25 at Acrisure Stadium in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, here’s a compilation of various league experts’ predictions about what the Washington Commanders will do with the No. 7 overall pick. Check back weekly until the draft for more updates.

Expert: Nate Davis, USA Today

Selection: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (March 2)

Advertisement

Analysis: Is he the best defender in this draft? Arguably. Can he play exceptionally in the slot, box or center field? Yep. And Washington could need a leader who can make plays behind the line given the potential departure of LB Bobby Wagner, who will be 36 next season, in free agency.

Expert: Brent Sobleski, Bleacher Report

Selection: Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (March 2)

Analysis: At Miami last season, he was easily one of the top two or three players in all of college football. He has explosive power and quickness to work up and down the line of scrimmage. His play is everything a team wants in a high first-round selection.

Expert: Jordan Reid, ESPN

Advertisement

Selection: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State (March 3)

Analysis: Downs is one of the smartest football players I’ve ever studied. His football IQ, versatility on the back end and sure tackling ability make him a worthy selection at this spot even though a safety hasn’t been drafted in the top 10 since 2017 (Jamal Adams). Washington gave up a lot of explosive passing plays last season, with opponents averaging 8.1 yards per attempt (third worst in the NFL). The Commanders also had a mere eight interceptions in 2025, which was the fourth worst in the league. Downs could help them improve in both areas.

Expert: Lance Zierlein, NFL.com

Selection: Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami (March 2)

Analysis: This pick would fade the historical norm for edge defenders with shorter arms, but Bain can rush the passer and is a block destructor against the run. Just a damn-good football player.

Advertisement

Expert: Jaime Eisner, The Draft Network

Selection: Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State (March 2)

Analysis: Sonny Styles is the kind of dynamic player the Commanders desperately need on the second level. He offers a rare combination of energy, versatility, and pass-rush ability. The fact that he’s already excelled as the green dot for Ohio State proves he has the leadership and high football IQ to be an instant starter and the commander of the Washington defense. Styles wowed with his measurables and athleticism at the NFL Combine.

Expert: Nate Tice and Charles McDonald

Selection: David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (March 2)

Advertisement

Analysis: As tempting as it will be to add an offensive player of some kind here, with tasty options at offensive line, wide receiver, tight end and running back, the Commanders instead add firepower to a defense that has to get faster, younger and just straight up better. Bailey is an explosive pass rusher who is constantly attacking offensive tackles. He will never be a strong run defender, but he has long arms (measured at 33 ¾ inches at the combine) and has improved in that area. Bailey is the exact type of talent injection this defense needs.

Expert: Ryan Wilson, CBS Sports

Selection: Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (March 2)

Analysis: Could Reese fall to No. 7? It seems like a long shot, but if the Bills trade up for a WR, things can get interesting quickly. This is a best-case scenario for the Commanders, who have to upgrade their pass rush.

Expert: Trevor Sikkema, Pro Football Focus

Advertisement

Selection: Rueben Bain, EDGE, Miami (March 2)

Analysis: Bain measured in with short arms (sub-31 inches), but we already knew that would happen. That doesn’t change his tape or the fact that he is one of the top three-down defensive linemen in the class. He would immediately be the biggest difference maker on the Commanders’ defensive line after racking up the most pressures (83) in college football this past season.

Expert: Henry McKenna, FOX Sports

Selection: Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State (Feb. 26)

Analysis: Dan Quinn was in Dallas when the Cowboys had the inspired idea to convert Micah Parsons into a pass-rusher. Can Quinn do it again with Reese?

Advertisement

Expert: Vinnie Iyer, Sporting News

Selection: David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech (March 2)

Analysis: The Commanders should be prepared to jump on Bailey should he fall here after his freakish athletic profile was on display at the Combine. Dan Quinn needs this level of dynamic pass rusher who also has rare dropback coverage skills outside.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Tulip Day Washington draws buzz as sign-up site goes down

Published

on

Tulip Day Washington draws buzz as sign-up site goes down


Coming up this month, spring’s most colorful new event: Tulip Day Washington. 

What we know:

Advertisement

On March 15, 2026, Tulip Day Washington will transform DC’s National Mall into a vibrant tulip-picking garden beautiful views of U.S. Capitol 

This one-day event will take place from 11:15 AM – 4:15 PM, offering a floral showcase of approximately 150,000 tulips; visitors are invited to pick their choice of 10 tulips for free upon arrival.  

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

The registration site for Tulip Day is currently down, showing users “This site is currently unavailable. If you’re the owner of this website, please contact your hosting provider to get this resolved.” 

Users on social media say the event may be sold out. 

Advertisement

Check tulipday.eu for updates.  

The backstory:

The event is organized by the Embassy of the Netherlands and Royal Anthos, a Dutch trade association, in honor of America’s 250th birthday. The display of tulips will be in the shape of the number 250. 

Advertisement

The bulbs come from the Netherlands, but are being grown in Virginia and New Jersey. 

These won’t be the first tulips on the National Mall, however. The Floral Library, also known as the Tulip Library, features 93 beds of flowers near the Tidal Basin. The Floral Library was established in 1969, and is maintained by the National Park Services. These flowers, though, are to be enjoyed only – not to be picked. 

Advertisement
Things To Do in the DMVNewsWashington, D.C.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending