Connect with us

Washington

Nobody wants to be in the office on Fridays

Published

on

Nobody wants to be in the office on Fridays


Remark

Haley LaFloure picked up a pair dozen doughnuts on the best way to work.

She forgot it was Friday.

Advertisement

The shock she’d deliberate for her colleagues turned out to be on her: The workplace was empty. Everybody else on the St. Louis funding agency the place she works had determined to shut out the week from dwelling, which meant LaFloure was caught at her desk with sufficient sugary fried dough to final her a month.

“I don’t even like doughnuts,” the 25-year-old mentioned. “I sat down and was like, ‘What am I going to do with these?’ ”

As white-collar staff throughout the nation settle into hybrid work routines, one factor is turning into clear: No person desires to be within the workplace on Fridays.

The final day of the workweek, as soon as synonymous with lengthy lunches and early departures, has more and more change into a day to skip the workplace altogether. The pattern, which was already brewing earlier than the pandemic, has change into broadly adopted, even codified, in current months and is creating new challenges for employers.

Hating hybrid work? Right here’s the right way to make it much less painful.

Advertisement

Simply 30 % of workplace staff swiped into work on Fridays in June, the least of any weekday, in accordance with Kastle Techniques, which offers constructing safety companies for two,600 buildings nationwide. That’s in comparison with 41 % on Mondays, the day with the second-lowest turnout, and 50 % on Tuesdays, when the largest share of staff are within the workplace.

“It’s turning into a little bit of cultural norm: You already know no person else goes to the workplace on Friday, so possibly you’ll earn a living from home, too,” mentioned Peter Cappelli, director of the Heart for Human Sources on the College of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Faculty. “Even earlier than the pandemic, folks considered Friday as a form of blowoff day. And now there’s a rising expectation which you could earn a living from home to jump-start your weekend.”

To date, employers seem divided on whether or not to embrace a distant finish to the week or to attempt to lure workers to the workplace. There are taco vehicles and wine carts, costume contests and karaoke sing-offs, all aimed toward getting staff to surrender their couches for cubicles.

Even buttoned-up employers are studying to let free. Citigroup has deemed Fridays “Zoom-free,” whereas accounting large KPMG guarantees “no-camera Fridays” and lets workers clock out for the weekend at 3 p.m. within the summers.

“We need to be certain persons are getting a break to allow them to recharge their batteries,” mentioned Paul Knopp, chief govt of KPMG U.S. “We’re giving them much more company about how they work — and the place they work.”

Advertisement
A historical past of the invention of the 40-hour workweek, the present burnout disaster, and the options that employers are utilizing at present to draw their workforce. (Video: Jackie Lay/The Washington Publish)

For some staff, workplace mandates aren’t only a ache. They’re dangerous.

Some start-ups and tech companies have begun eliminating Fridays altogether. Crowdfunding platform Kickstarter and on-line consignment store ThredUp are amongst a small however rising variety of companies transferring to a four-day workweek that runs from Monday to Thursday.

Executives at Bolt, a checkout expertise firm in San Francisco, started experimenting with no-work Fridays final summer time and rapidly realized they’d hit a successful formulation. Staff had been extra productive than earlier than, and got here again to work on Mondays with new enthusiasm. In January, it switched to a four-day workweek for good.

“There was no hesitation: Everyone was like, ‘Signal me up,’ ” mentioned Angela Bagley, the corporate’s head of worker expertise. “And it was superb: We saved getting the job executed. Managers had been onboard, folks saved hitting their targets. And so they come again on Mondays energized and extra engaged.”

However for different firms, discovering the fitting stability has been trickier.

Advertisement

“Employers acknowledge that it’s more durable to get folks to come back again in, in order that they’re asking, ‘What can we do?’ ” mentioned Julie Schweber, an adviser on the Society of Human Useful resource Administration. “The reply is mainly: For those who feed them, they may come. Meals vehicles, particular catered occasions, ice cream socials, that’s what’s standard proper now.”

On-line Optimism, a digital advertising agency with places of work in New Orleans, Atlanta and Washington, D.C., has a Friday routine of free lunches and free-flowing completely happy hours starting at 4 p.m. sharp. The one rule: no pictures.

Though the corporate has dropped all necessities for in-office work, as many as 80 % of its 25 workers present up on days when there’s free meals, mentioned chief govt Flynn Zaiger.

“Truthfully, one of the best socializing occurs on Friday,” he mentioned. “Why not have a beer or two? If persons are going to be rather less productive sooner or later of the week, I’d reasonably it’s Friday than Monday.”

These shifting norms are rippling throughout the economic system and reshaping enterprise patterns for business actual property companies, parking storage operators and the numerous eateries that cater to staff through the week. The drop-off in workplace work, significantly on Fridays, has led espresso retailers to scale back their hours, delis to rethink staffing and bars like Pat’s Faucet in Minneapolis to kick off completely happy hour sooner than ever — beginning at 2 p.m.

Advertisement

“Since they’re not on the workplace, folks are available early to pluck away at their laptops whereas they sip a cocktail or two,” mentioned Basic Supervisor Dave Robinson. “By 4:30 or 5 on Fridays, we’re fully full.”

However lunchtime haunts that when noticed giant crowds on Fridays say they’re struggling. The drop-off has been significantly stark at Manny’s Cafeteria & Delicatessen in Chicago. Enterprise on Fridays is down 30 % from pre-pandemic ranges.

“It’s painful,” proprietor Dan Raskin mentioned. “Earlier than the pandemic, Friday was the busiest day of the week — folks would have a neater day at work and exit with their pals for lunch — however now it’s one of many slowest.”

Ask Assist Desk: If I take a distant job, can I be pressured into an workplace?

That’s additionally the case at LAZ Parking, which operates greater than 3,000 garages nationwide. Demand on Mondays and Fridays is way decrease — by about 20 % — than it’s midweek, mentioned Leo Villafana, the corporate’s vice chairman for the Mid-Atlantic area. Wednesdays are the busiest days, although even when folks do are available, they have an inclination to remain for shorter intervals.

Advertisement

The will to earn a living from home on Fridays is nearly common, mentioned Johnny Taylor, chief govt of the Society for Human Useful resource Administration, an business foyer group.

“While you ask workers after they need to earn a living from home, everybody desires Fridays,” he mentioned.

Taylor started toying with hybrid schedules in 2015, lengthy earlier than the pandemic pressured companies of every kind to adapt. However his early experiments with distant Fridays had been a catastrophe. Staff blew off their work and started winding down after lunch on Thursday. Productiveness fell off a cliff.

Hybrid work for a lot of is messy and exhausting

However now, because the pandemic enters yr three, norms have modified. Persons are extra accustomed to teleworking, Taylor mentioned. He now permits distant work on each Mondays and Fridays.

Advertisement

“Fridays from dwelling have change into institutionalized,” he mentioned. “There’s actually no turning again.”

As employers confront this new actuality, they’re searching for extra adaptable places of work with extra communal areas and gathering areas as an alternative of conventional cubicles. Suppose extra cozy couches, espresso bars, libraries and patio work areas.

“What folks don’t need is to work remotely, collectively, within the workplace,” mentioned Lenny Beaudoin, world head of office and design at business actual property companies agency CBRE. “Why make the journey if I’m simply logging onto Zoom, like I do at dwelling? It’s as much as organizations to have higher conversations and choreograph their schedules. It may’t be haphazard.”

Maybe most vital — much more so than free meals — Beaudoin mentioned, is the prospect of interacting with colleagues. To that finish, some companies are growing apps that supply workers a fast snapshot of who will likely be within the workplace on any given day, together with deliberate occasions and different perks, to allow them to resolve whether or not getting dressed and making the commute is worth it.

“Identical to no person likes to eat in an empty restaurant, no person desires to go to an empty workplace,” he mentioned. “When folks do are available to work, they need an actual social connection.”

Advertisement

That’s confirmed to be the case at MasterControl, a software program agency in Salt Lake Metropolis, the place workers have reconfigured their weekly rhythm to account for end-of-week slowdowns. The corporate’s health teams, together with its working and biking golf equipment, have moved Friday gatherings to earlier within the week. Most conferences and coaching classes are actually on Mondays and Tuesdays, when the most important share of workers are within the workplace.

“Friday, the turnout is unquestionably a lot decrease — you possibly can see that simply by coming into the workplace and searching round,” mentioned Alicia Garcia, the corporate’s chief tradition officer. “We’re discovering that individuals actually admire that flexibility.”

There are about 50 workers — out of 1,500 — at Overstock’s Utah headquarters on any given day. On Fridays, although? Hardly anyone.

The web retailer discourages conferences of any sort on Friday. Most company workers decide to work longer days through the week to allow them to take each different Friday off. However even for individuals who don’t, the final day of the workweek has change into a much-needed respite from unending conferences and messages, mentioned chief govt Jonathan Johnson.

“Fridays are the emptiest days,” mentioned Johnson, who additionally works from dwelling that day. “The workplace is open if folks need to come however we don’t push it.”

Advertisement

Most individuals within the workplace

Seven of 10 folks not within the workplace

Sporadic meals temptations at workplace

Johnson limits himself to 1 Zoom assembly on Fridays, then catches up on emails, writes a weekly letter to the corporate’s board and plans out the approaching week.

Although generally he makes room for extra private errands, too.

Advertisement

“I’ll admit I kicked off at 4 o’clock final Friday to get a haircut,” he mentioned. “It tends to be an amazing catch-up day.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Michigan basketball vs. Washington prediction: Can U-M stay undefeated in Big Ten?

Published

on

Michigan basketball vs. Washington prediction: Can U-M stay undefeated in Big Ten?


play

For Michigan basketball, the recent West Coast trip went about as well as hoped.

The No. 24 Wolverines (12-3, 4-0 Big Ten) picked up a pair of double-digit wins against the Big Ten’s Los Angeles-based teams — topping USC, 85-74, last Saturday and then defeating No. 21 UCLA, 94-75, Tuesday night as wildfires raged a few miles away — and now return home looking to make it three consecutive wins against league newcomers, welcoming Washington (10-6, 1-4) to Ann Arbor on Sunday afternoon (2 p.m., Big Ten Network).

Advertisement

The Huskies’ first trip to the Midwest hasn’t started well; they were dog-walked by Michigan State in East Lansing, 88-54, on Thursday. U-W trailed by 29 points at the half (42-13) and by more than 40 points in the second half (82-41 with less than five minutes to play) in an utter annihilation.

After two tight wins in conference play — by three points over Wisconsin and two over Iowa — U-M has won four games in a row by double digits and could make it five straight, with one of the bottom teams in the Big Ten coming to town.

Advertisement

Great Osobor with not-so-great help

U-Dub forward Great Osobor made headlines this offseason when he transferred from Utah State to Washington (following head coach Danny Sprinkle) for a then-record NIL deal worth $2 million.

Apparently, money doesn’t buy wins, because while Osobor has been decent, it hasn’t been nearly enough for the Huskies.

The senior leads the Huskies in scoring (13.8 points per game) and rebounding (8.4) but his efficiency has taken a large drop, as he has shot just 45% from the floor on 3s after hitting at least 57.7% in each of his first three college seasons. Some of that might be attributable to his increased 3-point tries — after attempting just 18 3s (and making four, for a 22.2% success rate) in his first 104 games, he has 14 3-point tries in 16 games this season (with only two makes, a 15.3% rate). More concerning is his 2-point shooting percentage: After hitting 59.1% last season, he’s at 47.7% inside the arc this season.

Advertisement

He has scored in double figures in 11 games with the Huskies, though much of his success came in a weak nonconference schedule. Though he put up 20 points and 14 rebounds vs. Maryland, he had just nine points and three boards vs. USC and a combined 15 points and eight rebounds vs. Illinois and MSU.

Sophomore guard Tyler Harris (Portland) is next at 12.3 points and 5.3 rebounds per game while freshman point guard Zoom Diallo, a top-50 recruit according to 247 Sports’ composite rankings, averages 10.8 points per contest for Sprinkle’s team.

Overall, U-Dub is simply not up to Big Ten standard. On defense, the Huskies are No. 7 nationally in limiting 3-pointers (28%) and No. 69 in efficiency (99.9), per KenPom, but on offense, the Huskies are No. 149 in efficiency (107.4), No. 201 in 2-point shooting (50.1%) and No. 240 on 3s (32%).

Advertisement

Depth on display

The Wolverines, meanwhile, continue to flex their depth and balance with each passing game.

Michigan just defeated UCLA by 19 on the road and did so by scoring 94 points (the most a Mick Cronin team has ever allowed at home) without perhaps its most proven guard: Roddy Gayle Jr. (knee bruise) missed Tuesday’s game vs. the Bruins. U-M coach Dusty May said then it was too early to say if he’d play Sunday.

“Long-term health is priority No. 1 for us,” May said. “But I would say he’ll be back relatively soon.”

Gayle is one of five U-M players scoring in double figures for May in his first season in Ann Arbor. After putting up a career-high 36 points vs. the Bruins, center Vlad Goldin now leads the Wolverines at 15.8 points per game. Point guard Tre Donaldson (13.1 points) is next while Danny Wolf, Goldin’s frontcourt partner, averages a double-double at 12.5 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.

All three had standout games on the trip; Wolf started the L.A. double-dip becoming just the third NCAA player in more than 20 years with at least 20 points, 10 rebounds, seven assists and six blocks, and Donaldson made a career-high four 3-pointers vs. USC, then topped it with six vs. UCLA.

Advertisement

And then there’s Gayle (12.4 points) and Nimari Burnett (10.5 points), who are both shooting better than 50% from the floor. Every starter has led the team in scoring at least once this season, a major reason U-M leads the country in 2-point shooting (62%) and effective field goal percentage (60.2%).

“I mean numbers don’t lie,” Donaldson said. “We’re shooting over 60% inside the arc, I mean just continuing to do that. We got big guys out here … with Danny doing what he does in and out. It’s hard to guard. Nobody’s seen nothing like that before.”

Tony Garcia is the Michigan Wolverines beat writer for the Detroit Free Press. Email him at apgarcia@freepress.com and follow him on X at @RealTonyGarcia.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Six lawmakers to watch in Washington’s 2025 session • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Six lawmakers to watch in Washington’s 2025 session • Washington State Standard


Washington’s citizen legislature kicks off its 2025 session Monday in Olympia. 

Lawmakers will have 105 days to make multi-billion dollar shortfalls disappear from state operations and transportation budgets. They’ll wrangle over policies for capping rent hikes, purchasing guns, providing child care, teaching students, and much, much more. With many new faces, they’ll spend a lot of time getting to know one another as well.

Here are six lawmakers and one statewide executive to keep an eye on when the action begins.

Sen. Jamie Pedersen, Democrat, of Seattle 

This is Pedersen’s first session leading the Senate Democrats. He takes over for the longtime majority leader Andy Billig, of Spokane, who retired last year. Pedersen represents one of the most progressive areas in the state, including Seattle’s Capitol Hill, which could indicate a shift in where his caucus is going politically. His new gig won’t be easy as he navigates the needs of 30 Democrats, seeks compromises with his 19 Republican colleagues, and deals with a gaping $12 billion budget hole. He takes the position after years as the majority floor leader, where he was well known for his efficiency, organization and Nordic sweaters.

Advertisement

Rep. Travis Couture, Republican, of Allyn 

As the lead Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, Couture will be the point person for his caucus as it looks to block tax bills and push the Legislature to tamp down state spending. This is a new responsibility for him. It will test his mettle to work with Democratic budget writers in both chambers while simultaneously carrying out his role as a vocal critic of Democratic initiatives his caucus opposes most strongly. For Couture, a conservative who some say can at times “sound like a Democrat” it might not be as difficult as it seems.

Sen. Noel Frame, Democrat, of Seattle

Frame stumbled into the spotlight last month after mistakenly sending an email to all senators — instead of just fellow Democrats — outlining ideas for new taxes. Those include taxing wealthy individuals and large businesses — proposals that are getting traction with her progressive colleagues. She also mentioned an excise tax on guns and ammunition sales, a lift of the 1% cap on annual property tax increases and a sales tax on self-storage unit rentals. Frame takes on a new role this year as vice chair of finance on the Senate Ways and Means Committee, giving her power to explore new revenue ideas and making her a central player in talks about how to solve the budget shortfall.

Sen. Matt Boehnke, Republican, of Kennewick

Boehnke, the top Republican on the Senate Energy, Environment and Technology Committee, is out to retool climate change laws passed by Democrats and outgoing Gov. Jay Inslee. He wants, for example, to repeal a law requiring Washington to adopt California’s tough vehicle emission standards for trucks. And he wants to cut the governor out of decision-making on major clean energy projects. Inslee stirred controversy when his actions led to approval of the state’s largest-ever wind farm, near the Tri-Cities, despite concerns from the community where it will be built. That community happens to be in Boehnke’s home county.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, Democrat, of Seattle

Alvarado will be a key lawmaker leading the charge to pass a cap on rent hikes. This was one of the more controversial bills to fail last year, passing the House but failing twice in the Senate. After the bill died, Alvarado said “momentum is building, and next year, I believe we will pass this bill.” She may have more success this time around, especially if she makes her way over to the Senate to fill Sen. Joe Nguyen’s vacancy (Nguyen is leaving to lead the state Department of Commerce. The appointment process for his seat is still ongoing). Democratic leadership said the rent proposal is a priority for their caucuses, and Pedersen said he believes the idea has more support in his chamber this year. But Alvarado still has her work cut out. The bill, which would cap yearly rent increases at 7% for existing renters, is sure to draw fire from powerful real estate groups and Republicans, who warn that capping rents could undercut the construction of new housing and end up hurting renters.

Rep. Jim Walsh, Republican, of Aberdeen 

Walsh made The Standard’s list of lawmakers to watch in 2024 because he was a legislator, the chair of the Washington State Republican Party and author of six initiatives, half of which are now law. He makes the cut again because he still wears two political hats giving him two separate pulpits to convey the Republican message. While he’s not pushing any ballot measures, yet, he did launch the state party’s “Project to Resist Tyranny in Washington” as a vehicle for opposing incoming Democratic governor Bob Ferguson.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Washington lawmakers revive plan for state cap on rent increases • Washington State Standard


Democratic state lawmakers are again pushing a proposal to restrict rent hikes across Washington.

Despite the rent cap bill’s dramatic failure last session, backers say its prospects this year are better given new lawmakers, revamped legislative committees and growing public support. The road to final passage, however, could still be tough.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, D-Seattle, prefiled a “rent stabilization” bill in the House on Thursday. It is similar to where the plan left off last year

The bill includes a 7% cap on yearly rent increases for existing tenants, with some exceptions, including buildings operated by nonprofits and residential construction that is 10 years old or less. It also requires landlords to give 180 days notice before an increase of 3% or more and limits some move-in and deposit fees.

Advertisement

“People are suffering, and I don’t know how anyone comes back to the legislative session and doesn’t want to support relief,” said Sen. Yasmin Trudeau, D-Tacoma, who will sponsor the legislation in the Senate.

Supporters say the proposal would help tenants and alleviate homelessness, but opponents say a rent cap could only worsen Washington’s housing shortage by disincentivizing new development.

Democratic leaders said Thursday that the proposal will likely be heard quickly in the House after the session kicks off next week but could move slowly in the Senate where it died last year. 

Trudeau said the new makeup of the chamber and the membership of key committees could be in the bill’s favor. Last year,  supporters blamed moderate Democrats on committees like Ways and Means and Housing for killing the bill. Two of those moderates — Sens. Mark Mullet and Kevin Van De Wege — did not run for reelection last year and will no longer be in the Senate. 

Trudeau also said that because the policy is being named early as a priority for their caucus, it will give lawmakers more time to consider it. 

Advertisement

“We’re still going to have conflict, just hopefully not as dramatic as last year,” she said. 

Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, told reporters Thursday that he believes his caucus is ready to support the bill, but that it would take passing other legislation to increase housing supply and improve affordability. 

In the House, the outlook is more certain. “We passed it off the floor in the House last year, and we will pass it off the floor this year,” House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, D-Tacoma, said.

The bill is sure to cause some heavy debate.

Last year, it had support from affordable housing advocates, tenants and labor unions. 

Advertisement

Michele Thomas, at the Washington Low Income Housing Alliance, said stabilizing rents is essential to help prevent evictions and homelessness. 

“I think lawmakers understand how much rising rents are contributing to housing instability, to homelessness, and to our state’s eviction crisis,” Thomas said.

Among those against the proposal are business groups, landlords and developers. 

Sean Flynn, board president and executive director at the Rental Housing Association of Washington, an industry group, criticized the idea, saying it would drive developers out of the state and lead to less home construction. 

“The fundamental problem that we have in our housing market is a lack of supply,” Flynn said. “This chokes off supply.”

Advertisement

Instead of a cap on all rents, Flynn said the Legislature should try to target tenants who need assistance most and specific landlords who use predatory rent increases without cause. 

One idea that has support from Republicans is creating a tenant assistance program that would give rental assistance vouchers to low-income tenants who may need help paying rent during a given month. Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens, is sponsoring that bill. 

House Minority Leader Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, told reporters Thursday his caucus is working on similar proposals with a more targeted approach to helping tenants. 

Stokesbary and Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, said their members likely will not support a rent cap policy this session. Stokesbary said he understands the short-term relief of the proposal but that the state ultimately needs more housing.

“In the long-run, this is a much worse deal for renters,” he said.  

Advertisement

Braun said lawmakers should find ways to make permitting easier and increase available land for home construction. He said there is “no quick solution” to the state’s housing and homelessness crisis.

But supporters of the rent cap bill push back on the idea that solely building more housing will solve the state’s problems.

Thomas said lawmakers have put a lot of emphasis in recent years on increasing the supply of homes and alleviating homelessness, but they have not passed legislation to help tenants struggling to keep their homes. Failing to do so will only result in higher levels of eviction and homelessness, Thomas said. 

“Rent stabilization stands alone,” she said. “Each of these issues are important, and the Legislature needs to address the entire housing ecosystem.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending