WASHINGTON – The president of George Washington University called the ongoing protest encampment on campus unlawful and warned of the potential danger it is growing into.

President Ellen Granberg released a statement Sunday, nearly two weeks after the demonstrations over the Israel-Hamas war began on school grounds.

“There is a dire humanitarian crisis occurring in Gaza that must be addressed, and I am personally grief-stricken by the suffering and loss of innocent lives occurring on both sides of this conflict. I fully support and encourage our community to speak out and engage in controversial and critical dialogues on these crucial issues—as long as they occur within the limits of our university’s policies and the District’s laws,” Granberg’s statement said. “However, what is currently happening at GW is not a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment or our university’s policies. The demonstration, like many around the country, has grown into what can only be classified as an illegal and potentially dangerous occupation of GW property.”

Granberg also said that the protest is no longer a student demonstration adding that it has been absorbed “by individuals who are largely unaffiliated with our community and do not have our community’s best interest in mind.”

READ MORE: Protests continue at George Washington University after House Republicans spar with demonstrators

“We have offered an alternative demonstration site, requested the assistance of the DC Metropolitan Police Department, erected barriers to contain the protest, initiated academic and administrative consequences for trespassing GW students, expanded our security resources and personnel, and conducted regular and sustained dialogues with GW students connected to the camp,” Granberg  continued. “So far, all of these efforts have failed to end the encampment or deter the protesters from escalating the situation.”

READ MORE: GWU protest organizers vow to stay on campus until demands are met

She said the university is not equipped to handle the situation and must “rely on the support and experience of the DC Metropolitan Police Department.”

The demonstrations began on April 25. Since around the same time, colleges and universities around the country that have seen dozens of protests and hundreds of arrests at demonstrations over the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

Read The FULL STATEMENT From GW University President: 

Dear Members of the George Washington University Community,

It has been over a week since a group of students established an unauthorized protest encampment on GW’s University Yard. Since then, there have been many conversations about students’ rights to free expression and assembly and whether this is a peaceful protest. In this message, I want to directly address those conversations, share what we are experiencing on campus, and outline our desired outcomes moving forward. 

Before I begin, I want to make clear that I believe the issues at the heart of this protest are important and deserve our full attention and consideration. There is a dire humanitarian crisis occurring in Gaza that must be addressed, and I am personally grief-stricken by the suffering and loss of innocent lives occurring on both sides of this conflict. I fully support and encourage our community to speak out and engage in controversial and critical dialogues on these crucial issues—as long as they occur within the limits of our university’s policies and the District’s laws. However, what is currently happening at GW is not a peaceful protest protected by the First Amendment or our university’s policies. The demonstration, like many around the country, has grown into what can only be classified as an illegal and potentially dangerous occupation of GW property. 

History has repeatedly shown that there are many effective ways for communities to express their differing viewpoints lawfully within the District of Columbia. In the last seven months alone, at GW, we have seen this play out on all sides of the war between Israel and Hamas. I know that some in our community and others across the country argue that this, too, is simply a peaceful protest – and, at certain times, this has been true. However, when protesters overrun barriers established to protect the community, vandalize a university statue and flag, surround and intimidate GW students with antisemitic images and hateful rhetoric, chase people out of a public yard based on their perceived beliefs, and ignore, degrade, and push GW Police Officers and university maintenance staff, the protest ceases to be peaceful or productive. All of these things have happened at GW in the last five days. 

It is also essential to highlight that at no point was this encampment lawful. From the moment GW students declared their intent to establish an encampment on University Yard, they were in direct violation of multiple university policies and were trespassing on a space explicitly reserved for the GW Law final examinations. The university, which is committed to protecting our students’ rights to free expression, informed them of this and quickly offered a secure alternative protest site where GW would support them in holding peaceful daytime demonstrations. This offer was repeatedly refused.

Finally, it is clear that this is no longer a GW student demonstration. It has been co-opted by individuals who are largely unaffiliated with our community and do not have our community’s best interest in mind. It is increasingly unsafe and a violation of university and city regulations to have so many unidentified and unvetted people from outside the GW community living on university property. 

Conventional protests that abide by municipal law and university policy should and do receive protection and respect, no matter the message’s viewpoint. As I have outlined, this is not what is happening at GW.

For these reasons, the George Washington University continues to tirelessly pursue every avenue available to resolve the situation swiftly and safely. We have offered an alternative demonstration site, requested the assistance of the DC Metropolitan Police Department, erected barriers to contain the protest, initiated academic and administrative consequences for trespassing GW students, expanded our security resources and personnel, and conducted regular and sustained dialogues with GW students connected to the camp. So far, all of these efforts have failed to end the encampment or deter the protesters from escalating the situation.  

As a university, we are not equipped to single-handedly manage an unprecedented situation such as this. The GW police force is, and should only be, prepared to protect our community during normal university operations and to respond to routine and urgent incidents. When unlawful activities go beyond these limits, we must rely on the support and experience of the DC Metropolitan Police Department. At this time, the District is in communication with the university, and the DC Metropolitan Police are providing an increased security presence on and around University Yard.

I understand and fully share the deep concern many feel about the status of the protest. Many are frustrated that it is continuing; some are willing for it to proceed indefinitely. At GW, our commitment remains to regain and maintain the safety and security of University Yard, pursue accountability for those who have destroyed university property and harassed our community, and return our university to normal operations. This includes, of course, allowing and promoting the free exercise of various viewpoints and means of expression by members of our community within the limits of university policies. We continue to ask for the full support of our partners, including the District of Columbia, in pursuing these aims. 

Sincerely, 
 

Ellen M. Granberg

President

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Visiting Columbia University last week to see the pro-Palestinian protests took me back to my own student days at the University of California at Berkeley, from 1987 to 1991.

As a journalist for the Daily Californian, the university’s independent, student-run newspaper, I covered a lot of protests for causes as varied as divesting from South Africa, ending U.S. proxy wars in Central America, getting the ROTC off campus and staying out of the 1991 Gulf War (“no blood for oil”). But underlying all of the transitory passions of the day, I detected a powerful nostalgia for the 1960s — that heady era when mere students could imagine they were heroic figures in the vanguard of historical change. It often felt as if the students of my generation were simply historical reenactors of past glories for whom the act of protest was more important than the causes for which they protested.

The Pac-12 Softball Tournament matchups were decided as much by who didn’t play as by who did. UCLA secured the No. 1 seed with a 17-4 record after playing three fewer games than No. 2 Stanford (17-7). As for the Arizona Wildcats, their fate was determined by the cancelation of a game they weren’t even involved in.

The Wildcats will play Washington after a stunning weekend for the Huskies. Arizona will be the No. 5 seed and UW will be the No. 4 seed. The game is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. MST/PDT on Thursday, May 9. All games will be played in Stanford, Calif. at the Boyd & Jill Smith Family Stadium.

Going into the weekend, it seemed almost guaranteed that Arizona would play Oregon. The question was which team would be the four seed and which would be the five. UW rolled into Salt Lake City with what appeared to be an easy path to the No. 3 seed. Instead, they dropped two straight games to Utah before the third game was canceled due to weather.

The Huskies’ inability to get things done against the Utes opened the door for Oregon. The Ducks were on the road at Stanford. The Cardinal couldn’t catch the Bruins for the top seed because UCLA’s winning percentage was boosted by playing fewer games than anyone else. They still had pride on the line, though.

If the Ducks were swept, they would fall behind the Wildcats in the pecking order and allow Arizona to finish in the top half of the league at No. 4. If Oregon won just one game, though, they had a shot at third due to Washington’s misfortunes in SLC. That’s exactly how it played out.

Oregon defeated Stanford on the Cardinal’s senior day to secure the No. 3 seed. That gave the Ducks a 13-10 record, tying Washington. UO took the third spot by winning the series against the Huskies earlier in the season.

Arizona might have preferred to play Oregon. The Ducks are the only team in the top half of the standings who lost their series to the Wildcats.

Arizona defeated Oregon 2-1 in a series marred by the scary injury to Duck centerfielder Hanna Delgado. The Wildcats won the first game 7-5, lost the second game 5-2, then came back to secure the series victory 3-2 in the final game.

The Wildcats lost their series to Washington 1-2, and it wasn’t pretty. The Huskies run-ruled Arizona in the first two games by scores of 13-2 and 11-3 in six innings. UA eeked out a 2-0 victory in the final game to avoid the sweep at home.

The biggest difference in the two teams is the pitching staff. Washington is second in the Pac-12 with a 2.52 staff ERA. Oregon is sixth at 3.18. UW’s 1.25 WHIP is also second in the Pac-12 while UO’s is third at 1.34.

In all likelihood, Arizona will face UW ace Ruby Meylan who is third in the Pac-12 with a 2.04 ERA and eighth with a 1.29 WHIP. If they face Lindsay Lopez, they get a pitcher with a 2.85 ERA (9th) and a WHIP of 1.23 (3rd).

The Wildcats got a total of 14 hits in three games against Washington. They gave up 29 hits.

On a positive note for Arizona, the Huskies did not rise to the occasion the final weekend of the season. They lost to the Utes 5-4 and 2-1 before the final game was called off. They have lost five of their last eight games and three straight.

If the Wildcats can pull off the win, they will face the winner of Thursday’s game between UCLA and either Arizona State or Oregon State. The Sun Devils and the Beavers will play in the 8/9 game on Wednesday, May 8.

The other games on Thursday are No. 3 Oregon against No. 6 Utah and No. 2 Stanford vs No. 7 California. All games are aired on Pac-12 Networks until the semifinals, which are on ESPN2.