Connect with us

North Carolina

5 years after a federal lawsuit, North Carolina voter ID trial is set to begin

Published

on

5 years after a federal lawsuit, North Carolina voter ID trial is set to begin


Raleigh, N.C. — A federal lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s photo voter identification law is set to go to trial Monday, with arguments expected to focus on whether the requirement unlawfully discriminates against Black and Hispanic citizens or serves legitimate state interests to boost public confidence in elections.

The non-jury trial in Winston-Salem begins more than five years after the state NAACP and several local chapters sued over the voter ID law enacted by the Republican-dominated General Assembly in late 2018.

This litigation, along with similar lawsuits in state courts, delayed implementation of the requirement until last year’s municipal elections. The 1.8 million voters who cast ballots in the March primaries also had to comply. State election data showed fewer than 500 provisional ballots cast because of ID-related issues in the primary ultimately didn’t count.

Advertisement

The November general election — with races for president, governor and other statewide seats — could see turnout three times greater than the primary. And the nation’s ninth-largest state is a presidential battleground where statewide races are often close.

A favorable NAACP ruling from U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs could block the requirement in the fall. The trial is expected to last several days, with Biggs already signaling in a document that she won’t immediately rule from the bench.

The NAACP lawyers contend the voter ID requirement, along with two other voting-related provisions in the 2018 law, violate the U.S. Constitution and the Voting Rights Act in part because lawmakers enacted them with discriminatory intent.

In a pretrial brief, attorneys for the state and local chapters of the civil rights group cite data showing Black and Latino voters are more than twice as likely to lack a qualifying ID with a photo than white voters. They plan to bring in witnesses who will say they encountered voting problems in the March primary.

“Absent relief, thousands of North Carolinians will similarly have their right to vote unconstitutionally abridged,” the NAACP lawyers wrote. They also said evidence will show North Carolina lawmakers rushed through the legislation — mere weeks after voters approved a constitutional amendment mandating photo ID — without considering its impact on minority voters.

Advertisement

Attorneys representing Republican legislative leaders and State Board of Elections members defending the law in court said in briefs that the rules impose only a minimal burden on voters.

They point out that the law greatly expanded the number of qualifying IDs compared with what was approved in a 2013 voter ID law that federal judges struck down as discriminatory. Free IDs are provided by county election and Division of Motor Vehicles offices, and people lacking photo ID at the polls should have their votes count if they fill out an exception form or bring in their ID to election officials before the final tallies.

“The General Assembly enacted (the law) after the People of North Carolina mandated the legislature to create a voter ID law. The bipartisan legislation did not have a discriminatory intent, and Plaintiffs cannot overcome the presumption of legislative good faith,” lawyers for House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger wrote in a brief. Preventing voter fraud is also a legitimate state interest for the law, the attorneys wrote. Nationwide, however, voter identity fraud is rare.

Biggs, who was nominated to court by President Barack Obama, already has ruled frequently in this case.

In late 2019 she issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the law, saying it was tainted because the 2013 law had been struck down on similar grounds of racial bias. But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed her decision, writing that she had put too much emphasis on the past conduct of the General Assembly when evaluating the 2018 law. When Biggs declined to allow Berger and Moore to join the lawsuit as defendants, they appealed, and the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately sided with them in 2022.

Advertisement

Biggs opened the door for a trial when the state Supreme Court determined the photo ID law comported with the state constitution.

Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring identification at the polls, 21 of which seek photo ID, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.



Source link

North Carolina

Families in Durham say they’re barely getting by; New report says Americans are saving less

Published

on

Families in Durham say they’re barely getting by; New report says Americans are saving less


DURHAM, N.C. (WTVD) — With the price of gas, groceries and housing continuing to climb, many who live in Durham say there’s not much left over to put away at the end of the month.

Samuel Fisher was filling up his daughter’s car at a Durham gas station when he admitted he’s had to get creative to stretch his budget. “We haven’t saved. We’re not rich,” he said. “We were saving a few hundred dollars here and there.”

Fisher said he’s now driving his daughter’s smaller car while she’s on vacation because it’s cheaper to fill up than his SUV. “It costs me 90 dollars to fill up,” he said with a laugh. “She’s not here, so I’m going to drive her car. Save some money.”

For others, cutting back has become a daily routine. Anne McConville said everything she was wearing came from a thrift store. “Black jumpsuit, black top and this necklace that was only three dollars,” she said. “It’s beautiful.”

Advertisement

McConville said shopping secondhand helps her afford the basics. “Every time I go shopping, I spend 100 dollars. For me. I just buy produce.”

A new federal report shows Americans are saving less overall. The U.S. personal savings rate fell to 2.6 percent in April, a sign that rising costs for essentials are squeezing household budgets.

Arkell Barnes, a Triangle-based financial advisor for the past 30 years, said even small amounts of savings matter. “I always recommend people put something away no matter what. Pay yourself first,” he said.

Barnes said finding small ways to cut costs can help families build a cushion. “Refinancing, taking meals to work instead of going out, watching your subscriptions,” he said.

It’s advice 79-year-old Jerry McClain is already following. Pushing a cart of groceries to his car, he said he’s scaled back his spending. “I’m older, so I don’t do as much,” McClain said. “I don’t go out as much. I don’t eat out as much.”

Advertisement

Barnes said more people are also picking up side jobs to bring in extra income. It’s something he believes could help boost savings in the long run.

Copyright © 2026 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Student from North Carolina finishes 4th in national spelling bee

Published

on

Student from North Carolina finishes 4th in national spelling bee


WASHINGTON (WBTV) – A student from North Carolina finished fourth in the Scripps National Spelling Bee on Thursday night.

Thirteen-year-old Kushi Gottimukkala made it to the 15th round of the May 28 spelling bee in Washington, D.C. before she misspelled the word “cara sposa.” She spelled it “carra spoza.”

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, cara sposa is an Italian word that means “dear wife.”

Gottimukkala is a seventh-grader at Carnage G&T Magnet Middle School in Raleigh. She was one of a handful of students to have been sponsored by the Carolina Panthers.

Advertisement

This year’s bee was not her first time participating in the national spelling competition. She finished 41st in the 2025 event.

Outside of spelling, Gottimukkala is active in Science Olympiad, MathCounts and a dance group. She enjoys reading and has an interest in history books and documentaries.

Fourteen-year-old Shrey Parikh from California won Thursday’s spelling bee after a “spell-off” decided the champion.

Kushi Gottimukkala finished 4th in the 2026 Scripps National Spelling Bee.(Allison Robbert | AP Photo/Allison Robbert)

Also Read: 14-year-old battles nerves, dominates spell-off to win National Spelling Bee

Copyright 2026 WBTV. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Raleigh courthouse shooting rekindles push for red-flag laws in North Carolina

Published

on

Raleigh courthouse shooting rekindles push for red-flag laws in North Carolina


A shooting last week outside a Raleigh courthouse is reviving a push for laws that would allow a court to confiscate firearms from people who are believed to be a threat to themselves or others.

Twenty-two states have laws allowing extreme risk protection orders, known as “red- flag” laws, which allow courts to temporarily restrict firearm access for people considered dangerous.

The laws generally allow a judge to make that determination and order a gun owner to surrender firearms and permits. It would also allow an appeals process.

Authorities say Gwendolyn White retrieved a handgun from her vehicle before shooting two lawyers outside a Wake County courthouse on Friday. Authorities said they later recovered multiple firearms from her home, including rifles. White has been charged in the shootings. 

Advertisement

Attempts to reach White and her current legal representative have been unsuccessful. 

Seth Blum, a lawyer who previously represented White, told WRAL that she called the police on her neighbors dozens of times. “Every time the police came out, they would investigate,” Blum said. “And Ms. White had this fixed belief that her neighbors were poisoning her through her air conditioning system, which there’s no evidence at all that that was true.”

Police alleged that White previously threatened a hospital and Blum described her as having an “untreated mental illness.”

“This case shows why this should be law,” said Wiley Nickel, a Democrat who is running unopposed for Wake County district attorney, referring to red-flag laws.

Democratic state Rep. Marcia Morey, has introduced red-flag legislation since 2018, but the bills have not advanced in the Republican-led General Assembly.

Advertisement

“From just the news reports I’ve heard, I agree that this might have helped,” Morey said, referring to the White case. She said under her proposal, a judge could have been asked to temporarily remove firearms if concerns were raised about mental illness and access to guns.

Spokespeople for Senate leader Phil Berger did not respond to requests for comment.

A spokesperson for House Speaker Destin Hall said Thursday: “This legislation is going nowhere” and criticized Democrats, including Morey, who voted against legislation last year that ramps up monitoring of alleged criminals with mental health problems, among other reforms.  Morey didn’t immediately provide a response to Hall’s comment.

Republicans and gun rights groups oppose the proposal, arguing it violates due process protections by allowing firearms to be removed based on allegations — before an actual criminal conviction. They also argue the focus should be on keeping repeat violent offenders and people in crisis off the streets, rather than restricting access to guns through civil court orders.

Paul Valone, president of gun-rights advocacy group Grass Roots North Carolina, said existing laws surrounding involuntary commitment and criminal enforcement should be used more aggressively instead of creating a new firearm restriction process. 

Advertisement

“They leave violent offenders on the streets, while confiscating firearms from lawful gun owners, in ex-parte hearings that defendants might not even know are occurring, much less get a chance to defend themselves in court,” Valone said.

Eighty-seven percent of respondents to a 2022 WRAL News poll supported red-flag laws.

Gov. Josh Stein has also supported similar restrictions. After a 2024 mass shooting in Southport, Stein said North Carolina needed a stronger response to “profoundly troubled” people and called for adoption of a red-flag law.

At the federal level, the debate intensified after a school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, that left 19 students dead. 

U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., helped negotiate the bipartisan federal gun safety law signed by former President Joe Biden that encouraged states to adopt crisis intervention and red-flag programs.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending