Connect with us

Washington

Death of US-Turkish activist in West Bank 'non-accidental,' Washington Post claims

Published

on

Death of US-Turkish activist in West Bank 'non-accidental,' Washington Post claims


American-Turkish citizen Aysenur Eygi may not have been killed in the way the IDF claimed, the Washington Post alleged on Wednesday following an independent investigation. 

Eygi, who was killed by IDF fire near the Beita Junction, West Bank, was reportedly not killed during peak clashes in the area. The report alleges that Eygi was shot about 20 minutes after the crowd had moved on the main road more than 200 meters away from the Israeli security forces.

Advertisement

Eygi, 26, was killed by IDF fire on Friday in a violent gathering of dozens of Palestinians who had set tires on fire and threw rocks at the forces at the Beita Junction. The incident has sparked concern in the United States and significant outrage in Turkey.

The IDF released a statement following an investigation, indicating that it is highly likely that Eygi was unintentionally hit by indirect fire from Israeli forces. The fire was aimed at a primary agitator who was throwing rocks at the forces and posed a threat.

IDF inquiry into the incident 

The IDF also emphasized that a Military Police investigation has been opened in response to the incident, and the Military Advocate General will review the findings upon its conclusion. Additionally, Israel has requested to conduct an autopsy.

Advertisement
A Palestinian demonstrator throws a stone as they clash with Israeli forces during a protest against Israeli settlements in Beita, in the West Bank July 2, 2021. (credit: RANEEN SAWAFTA/ REUTERS)

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken commented on the incident, stating that “the killing of the American activist in the West Bank was unjustified and unprovoked. No one should be harmed by gunfire for participating in a protest. Israel needs to make changes in how it operates in the West Bank, including revising the IDF’s rules of engagement.”

US President Joe Biden spoke with Eygi’s family shortly after the incident.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Oregon State, Washington State start Pac-12 rebuild with 4 Mountain West schools

Published

on

Oregon State, Washington State start Pac-12 rebuild with 4 Mountain West schools


Oregon State and Washington State are moving ahead with a plan to rebuild the Pac-12 by adding four of the Mountain West’s top schools, The Oregonian/OregonLive has confirmed.

Yahoo Sports first reported Wednesday night that the Pac-12 is eyeing Colorado State, San Diego State, Boise State and Fresno State as part of a rebuilt conference beginning with the 2026-27 school year.

Another media report says an announcement could come as soon as Thursday.

Oregon State athletic director Scott Barnes did not respond to a text requesting corroboration.

Advertisement

The Pac-12 is looking to rebuild a conference with football strength in mind in order to make a case for an automatic CFP berth. Adding Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State and San Diego State is the first step toward expanding the Pac-12 to at least eight schools, the NCAA required minimum to qualify as an FBS conference. It is unknown if a rebuilt Pac-12 would regain the same autonomous status as the current four Power conferences.

Boise State has been one of top Group of 5 football programs for the past 20 years. Fresno State has often contended for the Mountain West title, and has more than a dozen wins over Power conference schools. Colorado State offers the Denver market, and San Diego State an entrance into Southern California.

The Pac-12, currently made up of Oregon State and Washington State, was given a two-year grace period by the NCAA to rebuild the conference beginning this school year. It must reach the eight-school minimum by July 2026.

The cost of moving the four MWC schools to the Pac-12 is $111 million. The Pac-12 would owe the MWC a $43 million withdrawal fee, in addition to the four schools each paying a $17 million exit fee. Should Fresno State, Colorado State, Boise State and San Diego State leave the MWC, it would leave that conference with seven schools. Presumably, one or two of those remaining Mountain West schools could become an eventual Pac-12 expansion target.

In filling out the rest of the Pac-12, other current top G5 schools could be in play. Then there’s Stanford and California, depending on what happens to the ACC during the next 12 to 18 months. The Pac-12 has significant assets, from its settlement with the departing 10 schools, plus Rose Bowl, CFP and NCAA men’s basketball revenue.

Advertisement

The move comes less than two weeks after Pac-12 and MWC couldn’t come to a scheduling agreement for the 2025 football season. Oregon State and Washington State have yet to announce a 2025 football schedule, though both schools have contracts for six games each and are thought to be close to wrapping up the remaining six games.

–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Commanders vs. Giants | Week 2 injury report

Published

on

Commanders vs. Giants | Week 2 injury report


There was no hiding what the priority was for the Washington Commanders heading into the offseason with a new head coach and general manage. The main question was how long that would take, and after Sunday’s 37-20 loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, it’s clear there’s still a long way to go. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Wake up with the Washington Examiner: Trump’s disappointing debate, moderator bias, and Taylor Swift weighs in – Washington Examiner

Published

on

Wake up with the Washington Examiner: Trump’s disappointing debate, moderator bias, and Taylor Swift weighs in – Washington Examiner


Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump met for the first time last night on the debate stage in what became a sparring match on policy. The moderators started the night with questions on the economy. Scott Jennings, a longtime adviser to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), thought Trump won the first 15 minutes by speaking on the economy and inflation but that his winning streak ran out after that.

Harris seemed to get under Trump’s skin during the immigration question, and he wasn’t able to course-correct for the rest of the debate. He was “agitated,” University of New Hampshire professor James Farrell told the Washington Examiner’s Haisten Willis, while Harris remained, for the most part, calm.

However, not all viewers were impressed with Harris’s performance. Kirstin Kiledal, professor of rhetoric at Hillsdale College, told Haisten she gave her a grade of “fail” against Trump’s grade of “pass.”

“‘I believe’ and ‘I have a plan’ and ‘I know,’ however many times you repeat them, do not equal ‘I have a dream,’” Kiledal said. “That is the primary problem. She tells us that she has a plan and that leaders must have a vision, but the only vision here is MAGA. It is inseparable from the Trump campaign.”

Advertisement

Harris reiterated her claim of having a plan many times throughout the night despite only publishing a policy section on her website this week. She repeated her idea to give new small businesses a $50,000 tax deduction rather than the current $5,000 one, as well as her goal to increase the child tax credit to $6,000.

On the border, however, she evaded the question of why the Biden administration waited until six months before the election to cap the number of people allowed in, a policy that has successfully decreased the number of people crossing the border.

“Then, the immigration question happened,” Jennings told Haisten. “She evaded responsibility for any of it and pivoted to taunting him on his rallies. And [after that, she was] largely … in control of the debate. He had a few moments, and she has lied terribly about a number of things, but I’d say he won the first 15 minutes, and the rest, she’s been dictating the flow of the debate.”

Click here to read more reactions to the debate.

On abortion

As Harris said last night, Trump is no longer running against President Joe Biden, and on the abortion question, it showed. Whereas Biden and Harris are largely aligned when it comes to abortion, Harris was able to deliver the Democrats’ argument in a passionate and genuine way that Biden never was. Trump largely looked straight ahead, unflinching, while Harris told anecdotes about women miscarrying in their car because of the difficulty of receiving treatment following the overturning of Roe v. Wade and subsequent changes to abortion access.

Advertisement

Trump was asked about his own stance on this issue quite forcibly by the moderators. The former president has said he is in favor of the issue being decided by the states but was unclear about whether he would sign a national abortion ban. When reminded that his running mate, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH), said he would, Trump responded, “I didn’t discuss it with J.D.”

Click here to read more takeaways from the evening.

Moderator fact-checking or bias?

Following the debate, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis faced swift backlash over their fact-checking of Trump. Frank Luntz, the GOP pollster, wrote on X that Muir “arguing with Trump will fuel the narrative that these moderators are biased against him.”

Several Trump surrogates echoed those comments in the spin room following the debate. “I thought that they definitely leaned to the left side of American politics,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) told Mabinty Quarshie. “But listen, as a Republican, we’re accustomed to dealing with moderators who don’t play it straight down the middle and keep Democrat members on task.”

During the debate, the ABC News anchors fact-checked Trump on his claims about Haitian immigrants eating pets in Springfield, Ohio.

Advertisement

“Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” Trump said in a moment that went viral.

“You bring up Springfield, Ohio, and ABC News did reach out to the city manager there,” Muir responded. “He told us there had been no credible reports of specific claims of pets being used by individuals within the immigrant community.”

A similar situation occurred after Trump’s answer on abortion when he claimed it was legal to “execute” a baby after it was born under some abortion laws.

“There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born,” Davis said bluntly before turning her attention to Harris.

Harris did not receive the same “fact-checking” as Trump did.

Advertisement

Click here for more about Harris not being held accountable.

What else you missed

Biggest zingers from first Trump-Harris presidential debate

Harris brings debate fight to Trump in a way Biden could not

Taylor Swift endorses Harris with ‘childless cat lady’ swipe

Presidential debate: Fact-checking Harris’s statements on fracking

Advertisement

In nondebate news

Kroger-Albertsons merger: Why the FTC says it will raise food prices

Kelly Ayotte and Joyce Craig head to competitive race for New Hampshire governor

Four takeaways from hearing with migrant crime victims

To know today

Biden and Harris will start the day in New York City for a 9/11 commemoration ceremony at ground zero. They will then head to Shanksville, Pennsylvania, for a wreath-laying ceremony commemorating Flight 93. Finally, they will head back to Washington, D.C., for a wreath-laying ceremony at the Pentagon.

The Senate has an 11 a.m. meeting to consider judicial nominees.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending