Connect with us

Utah

Utah Rep. Maloy introduces bill to hold tech platforms responsible for deepfake images

Published

on

Utah Rep. Maloy introduces bill to hold tech platforms responsible for deepfake images


Rep. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, sponsored new bipartisan legislation that would make social media and other platforms legally responsible if they fail to act on abusive deepfake images and cyberstalking.

On Monday, Maloy and Rep. Jake Auchincloss, D-Mass., introduced the Deepfake Liability Act, a bill that would change how federal law treats websites and apps that host nonconsensual AI-generated sexual images and other intimate content.

“Abusive deepfakes and cyberstalking are harming people across the country, and victims deserve real help,” Maloy said in a press release. “Our bill creates a straightforward duty of care and a reliable process to remove harmful content when victims ask for help. Companies that take this seriously will keep their protections under the law. Those that do nothing will be held accountable.”

Maloy’s office noted that women and teenage girls are the overwhelming targets of nonconsensual deepfake pornography, which now makes up the majority of deepfake content online.

Advertisement

Changing Section 230 rules for AI content

The bill targets Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the law that has long shielded online platforms from being sued over most user-generated content.

The Deepfake Liability Act would condition those protections on whether a platform meets a new “duty of care.” To keep their immunity, companies would need to:

  • Take basic steps to prevent cyberstalking and abusive deepfakes
  • Respond to reports from victims
  • Investigate credible complaints
  • Remove intimate or privacy-violating content identified by those victims

The bill also clarifies that AI-generated content is not automatically covered by Section 230 immunity — a key change as generative tools make it easier to create convincing fake images and videos.

“AI shouldn’t have special privileges and immunities that journalists don’t get,” Auchincloss said in the press release, arguing that using bots or deepfakes to violate or stalk another person “needs to be a CEO-level problem for the trillion-dollar social media corporations that platform it. Congress needs to get ahead of this growing problem, instead of being left in the dust like we were with social media.”

Speaking about his broader “UnAnxious Generation” legislative package, Auchincloss told Time magazine that the Deepfake Liability Act is meant to move platforms from a “reactive” posture to a proactive one: Section 230 protections would hinge on actively working to prevent and remove deepfake porn and cyberstalking, not just responding when forced.

How it connects to the Take It Down Act

The new proposal is designed to build on a law that passed earlier this year: the federal Take It Down Act.

Advertisement

The Take It Down Act was co-sponsored by Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. First lady Melania Trump also strongly advocated for the bill to be passed. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent and cleared the House on a 409–2 vote before President Donald Trump signed it into law on May 19.

That law makes it a federal crime to “knowingly publish” or threaten to publish intimate images without a person’s consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. It also requires covered websites and social media platforms to remove such material — and make efforts to delete copies — within 48 hours after a victim reports it.

Enforcement is handled by the Federal Trade Commission, and platforms have until May 2026 to fully implement the required notice-and-removal systems.

The Deepfake Liability Act uses that same basic notice-and-removal framework but goes further by tying Section 230 protections to whether companies meet a clear duty of care.

Maloy and Auchincloss say that change would ensure that platforms that ignore reports of abuse no longer have the same legal shield as those that take active steps to protect victims.

Advertisement

Supporters say it closes a gap — critics warn about overreach

Advocates for reforming online liability say the new bill is a needed next step after Take It Down.

“The time is now to reform Section 230,” said Danielle Keats Citron, vice president of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and a longtime scholar of online abuse, per the release.

Keats said the Deepfake Liability Act contains a “well-defined duty of care” that would require platforms to prevent, investigate and remove cyberstalking, nonconsensual intimate images and digital forgeries. She also argued that it would close a loophole by making platforms responsible not only for content they help create but also for harmful content they “solicit or encourage.”

The Take It Down Act from earlier this year had drawn criticism from some free speech and digital rights groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others, who said its fast takedown deadlines and broad language could pressure platforms to over-remove content, rely heavily on automated filters and potentially sweep in lawful speech — such as news reporting, protest images or LGBTQ content — in the name of avoiding liability, per The Associated Press.

This new measure is part of a broader, bipartisan push to regulate AI-related harms and tighten rules for how tech companies handle children’s safety, online abuse and emerging threats from generative tools.

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

Ukrainian family in Utah facing separation, with 2 family members fearing deportation

Published

on

Ukrainian family in Utah facing separation, with 2 family members fearing deportation


LINDON — A Ukrainian family now living in Lindon that fled the violent war in the European nation now potentially faces separation, with two family members fearing deportation.

The turn of events — not the first time the family has contended with uncertainty — represents another twist in implementation of immigration policy under President Donald Trump and his crackdown on immigrants in the country.

Indeed, the Lindon family isn’t alone — other Ukrainian immigrants are contending with similar issues, according to representatives from Utah groups that aid Ukrainians.

“We can’t understand why because we didn’t break any laws,” said Yurii Ahieiev, facing deportation along with his 7-year-old daughter, Viktoriia Ahieieva. While the man’s wife and two older sons successfully applied for permission to remain in the country, at least for now, he and his daughter, instead, face deportation, he said, “and I don’t know why we have these issues.”

Advertisement

Several families in Lindon joined together in sponsoring the Ukrainian family’s relocation to the Utah County city in 2023 under the Uniting for Ukraine program, launched in 2022 under President Joe Biden to aid Ukrainians fleeing the war with Russia. On starting his second term as president earlier this year, however, Trump paused the program, though his administration later launched a process allowing eligible Ukrainians to apply for “re-parole” to extend their stay in the country.

At any rate, Ahieiev and his daughter, supported by their Lindon neighbors, are now scrambling to figure out their next steps after the apparent rejection, without explanation, of their applications to stay in the United States. Ahieiev and his wife Valentyna Ahieieva run a small accounting business while their two sons, ages 17 and 16, and daughter attend Lindon-area schools.

“We like it here, we like the U.S., like this country. But we don’t like what’s happening now in the immigration system,” Valentyna Ahieieva said. “Hopefully it changes.”

A hearing for Ahieiev is scheduled for July while his daughter is to appear before immigration authorities in February, when they and their backers fear they could be detained for deportation, said Jared Oates, one of the Lindon sponsors.

“Why would you separate a family?” he asked.

Advertisement

In response to a KSL.com query, a rep from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security asked for additional identifying information about Yurii Ahieiev and his daughter. Supplied the information, the department didn’t provide any comment, nor did reps from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. But the transplants to Lindon apparently have plenty of company. Despite the ongoing war in the Ukraine and prior moves to welcome at least some Ukrainians fleeing the conflict into the United States, the situation for many Ukrainians here remains tenuous.

“This is absolutely a major issue right now for both Ukrainians who came here for refuge, as well as for the Americans who sponsored them and those who have become their friends, neighbors, co-workers, employers, etc. It is devastating and heartbreaking to see the decisions and challenges that are being added to these people who have already gone through so much,” said Mindie Packer.

Packer is co-founder of Hope Across Borders, a Utah-based group that offers humanitarian aid in conflict zones around the world, including Ukraine.

Packer has heard many stories of Ukrainians in uncertain migratory situations, fearful they may be targeted by immigration agents. One Ukrainian family Hope Across Borders sponsored had to move to Slovenia because their permission to remain in the United States expired.

“We know many people who came legally and applied for renewal/extension of their status, paid their fees and have not heard anything back. They were not denied or accepted, but now their status is expired and they don’t know what to do,” Packer said.

Advertisement

Anne Perkins of Lifting Hands International, a Utah-based nonprofit organization that provides humanitarian aid to Ukraine, knows of one Ukrainian family in Utah that moved to Spain. The work visa of the head of the family ran out and he was unable to renew it, prompting the departure. Fees to seek extensions to remain in the country have increased, adding to the difficulties.

“Still, most of the families I’ve talked to are motivated to do whatever it takes to stay,” Perkins said.

Human Rights First, an American human rights organization, says around 50 Ukrainians were deported last November from the United States.

Shining a light on the situation

Given the current climate toward immigration under Trump, it’s unclear “whether immigrants, period, are welcome in the United States right now,” Oates said. “It’s just a very difficult time.”

That said, he and the others who first sponsored the Ahieiev family say they have made strides in transitioning to life here and stand behind them. They’re self-reliant with their accounting business, and the kids, whose English has improved greatly, are thriving in school.

Advertisement

“They’ve been remarkable,” Oates said.

Read more:

Their Lindon backers have consulted with immigration attorneys, who haven’t been able to offer any solutions. They’ve also reached out to U.S. Rep. Mike Kennedy, their congressional representative, for help in navigating the U.S. bureaucracy for answers.

Kennedy wouldn’t comment on specifics of the Ahieiev family’s situation due to privacy considerations. But he said his office is available to help.

“My office and I are committed to helping constituents of Utah’s 3rd Congressional District resolve issues with federal agencies to the best of our ability,” he said in a statement.

At this stage, Oates thinks the main means of helping the family might be shining the light on their situation in a bid to muster public support.

Advertisement

“The only thing that would change the calculus, as far as we can see, would be changing the political consequences of deporting (Viktoriia) and separating a family,” he said.

As for a possible return to Ukraine, Ahieiev and his wife shudder at the possibility. They lived in the Odessa region, which has faced some of the fiercest and sustained attacks from Russian forces.

“Our parents now still live in this region, but it’s really dangerous,” Yurii Ahiehiev said. “Very often there’s no electricity, no heating.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Jazz vs. Golden State Warriors: Recap and Final Score

Published

on

Utah Jazz vs. Golden State Warriors: Recap and Final Score


The Utah Jazz have extended their losing skid to three games with a loss against the Golden State Warriors. The final score was 114-123.

Here are the biggest takeaways from the night:

Defense folds again under Curry takeover

Utah controlled the first half of this game. At one point they held a 12 point lead.

Advertisement

But at 37 years old, Steph Curry can still do some amazing things. Curry went for 20 points in the third-quarter, frazzled the Jazz, and they never really recovered after that. Part of this was Curry being the greatest shooter of all time, but part of it was Utah struggling to defend at the point of attack and off screens. They weren’t particularly physical, particularly attached, or particularly effective at shrinking Curry’s space. It’s same story from most night’s this season.

The Jazz are a solid offensive team – 16th best in offensive rating to be exact. They continue to lead the league in sharing the ball with a 72% assist rate and have weapons at every level, especially when Walker Kessler returns. But they are still the worst defensive team in the league at 30th in defensive rating. This is good news for pro-tank fans, but bad for the Jazz becoming a competitive team under this core.

Who is Utah’s third piece

Keyonte George is clearly playing at an All-Star and Most Improved Player of the Year level. He finished tonight with 22 points and nine assists. His third-year jump is real and he’s solidified himself as a core of the franchise moving forward.

Lauri Markkanen is still playing at an All-NBA level. He finished tonight with 35 points and five rebounds. He’s one of the best scorers in the league this season and a great companion next to George.

Advertisement

When both of Utah’s stars are playing, it’s easy to convince yourself that the Jazz just need one more core player to pop to enter win-now mode. But it isn’t very clear who that player is. Is it Ace Bailey? Maybe, but that will take another two-three seasons to find out. It’s clear it’s not Cody Williams, Taylor Hendricks, or any other role player on the roster. It’s a shame that Walker Kessler is out for the season, because if the shooting was real, he might be a suitable answer.

The truth is that the next core piece is probably not on the roster right now. Let’s hope that comes from the draft if the Jazz keep their pick.

A note on tonight’s whistle

Praising the referees is usually not something people like to read about, especially when the Jazz lose. I’m doing it anyway, apologies.

Tonight’s crew chief was the fan-favorite Bill Kennedy. He was joined by 16-year veteran Kevin Cutler and 6-year veteran Simone Jelks. The crew did two things that I haven’t seen much of this season:

Advertisement

(1) The crew did not penalize defenders for simply existing while offensive players generated contract. Keyonte George, for one, was someone who struggled with this. George (smartly) has learned that the NBA has decided that offensive players can initiate contact at will, enter the established space of the defender, and be rewarded with free throws. It’s partly why he’s shooting 7.4 free throws a game. In my opinion, this is bad for basketball.

To be clear, I don’t blame George for doing this. The most talented players at manipulating this part of the game are elite scorers in the league (Shai Gilgeous-Alexander or Austin Reaves, for example). But tonight, the crew didn’t reward George, Curry, Butler, or Markkanen with any of these types of plays and I think it led to a more competitive, faster, and more enjoyable watching experience.

(2) The crew treated Draymond Green like every other player when it comes to technical fouls. It’s no secret that Green gets a much longer leash than most when it comes to berating the officials. Watching him get two technicals after complaining on a meaningless play was nice to see, for once.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

White scores 25 to help Utah women hand No. 8 TCU its 1st loss, 87-77 in overtime

Published

on

White scores 25 to help Utah women hand No. 8 TCU its 1st loss, 87-77 in overtime


SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Lani White scored 25 points to lead Utah past No. 8 TCU 87-77 in overtime Saturday night.

Reese Ross added 15 points and Maty Wilke had 12 for the Utes. Evelina Otto finished with 10 points and eight rebounds. Utah (11-4, 2-1 Big 12) made 13 3-pointers and shot 56.5% from long distance.

Olivia Miles had 31 points, seven rebounds and seven assists to pace the Horned Frogs (14-1, 2-1). Marta Suarez added 23 points and 11 rebounds. TCU shot just 37% from the field, including 9 of 39 from 3-point range.

Advertisement

White forced overtime by making a 3-pointer that tied it 67-all with 12 seconds left in regulation. Utah never trailed in OT and went up 76-69 with 2:47 left after White capped a 9-2 run with her fourth outside basket.

TCU used a 7-0 spurt to erase a four-point deficit in the final minute of the fourth quarter. Back-to-back 3-pointers from Suarez and Donovyn Hunter put TCU up 66-64 with 49 seconds remaining.

Ross had a chance to tie it on two free throws with 33.3 seconds left, but missed both. Miles made one of two foul shots with 22 seconds to go before White tied it.

Utah took advantage of cold shooting by the Horned Frogs to pull ahead in the third quarter. Back-to-back baskets from Suarez were TCU’s only field goals over an eight-minute stretch. The Utes scored on three straight possessions, culminating in a layup from Wilke, to take a 52-48 lead.

Miles made back-to-back baskets to put the Horned Frogs back up 58-56. Utah used a 7-0 run, punctuated by a 3-pointer from Ross, to go ahead 63-58 with 4:32 left in regulation.

Advertisement

Up next

TCU hosts Oklahoma State on Wednesday.

Utah plays at Kansas on Wednesday.

___

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP women’s college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-womens-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/womens-college-basketball.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending