Connect with us

Utah

Utah Rep. Maloy introduces bill to hold tech platforms responsible for deepfake images

Published

on

Utah Rep. Maloy introduces bill to hold tech platforms responsible for deepfake images


Rep. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, sponsored new bipartisan legislation that would make social media and other platforms legally responsible if they fail to act on abusive deepfake images and cyberstalking.

On Monday, Maloy and Rep. Jake Auchincloss, D-Mass., introduced the Deepfake Liability Act, a bill that would change how federal law treats websites and apps that host nonconsensual AI-generated sexual images and other intimate content.

“Abusive deepfakes and cyberstalking are harming people across the country, and victims deserve real help,” Maloy said in a press release. “Our bill creates a straightforward duty of care and a reliable process to remove harmful content when victims ask for help. Companies that take this seriously will keep their protections under the law. Those that do nothing will be held accountable.”

Maloy’s office noted that women and teenage girls are the overwhelming targets of nonconsensual deepfake pornography, which now makes up the majority of deepfake content online.

Advertisement

Changing Section 230 rules for AI content

The bill targets Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the law that has long shielded online platforms from being sued over most user-generated content.

The Deepfake Liability Act would condition those protections on whether a platform meets a new “duty of care.” To keep their immunity, companies would need to:

  • Take basic steps to prevent cyberstalking and abusive deepfakes
  • Respond to reports from victims
  • Investigate credible complaints
  • Remove intimate or privacy-violating content identified by those victims

The bill also clarifies that AI-generated content is not automatically covered by Section 230 immunity — a key change as generative tools make it easier to create convincing fake images and videos.

“AI shouldn’t have special privileges and immunities that journalists don’t get,” Auchincloss said in the press release, arguing that using bots or deepfakes to violate or stalk another person “needs to be a CEO-level problem for the trillion-dollar social media corporations that platform it. Congress needs to get ahead of this growing problem, instead of being left in the dust like we were with social media.”

Speaking about his broader “UnAnxious Generation” legislative package, Auchincloss told Time magazine that the Deepfake Liability Act is meant to move platforms from a “reactive” posture to a proactive one: Section 230 protections would hinge on actively working to prevent and remove deepfake porn and cyberstalking, not just responding when forced.

How it connects to the Take It Down Act

The new proposal is designed to build on a law that passed earlier this year: the federal Take It Down Act.

Advertisement

The Take It Down Act was co-sponsored by Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. First lady Melania Trump also strongly advocated for the bill to be passed. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent and cleared the House on a 409–2 vote before President Donald Trump signed it into law on May 19.

That law makes it a federal crime to “knowingly publish” or threaten to publish intimate images without a person’s consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. It also requires covered websites and social media platforms to remove such material — and make efforts to delete copies — within 48 hours after a victim reports it.

Enforcement is handled by the Federal Trade Commission, and platforms have until May 2026 to fully implement the required notice-and-removal systems.

The Deepfake Liability Act uses that same basic notice-and-removal framework but goes further by tying Section 230 protections to whether companies meet a clear duty of care.

Maloy and Auchincloss say that change would ensure that platforms that ignore reports of abuse no longer have the same legal shield as those that take active steps to protect victims.

Advertisement

Supporters say it closes a gap — critics warn about overreach

Advocates for reforming online liability say the new bill is a needed next step after Take It Down.

“The time is now to reform Section 230,” said Danielle Keats Citron, vice president of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative and a longtime scholar of online abuse, per the release.

Keats said the Deepfake Liability Act contains a “well-defined duty of care” that would require platforms to prevent, investigate and remove cyberstalking, nonconsensual intimate images and digital forgeries. She also argued that it would close a loophole by making platforms responsible not only for content they help create but also for harmful content they “solicit or encourage.”

The Take It Down Act from earlier this year had drawn criticism from some free speech and digital rights groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others, who said its fast takedown deadlines and broad language could pressure platforms to over-remove content, rely heavily on automated filters and potentially sweep in lawful speech — such as news reporting, protest images or LGBTQ content — in the name of avoiding liability, per The Associated Press.

This new measure is part of a broader, bipartisan push to regulate AI-related harms and tighten rules for how tech companies handle children’s safety, online abuse and emerging threats from generative tools.

Advertisement



Source link

Utah

The Utah Jazz will eventually have to face their their lack of defense

Published

on

The Utah Jazz will eventually have to face their their lack of defense


PORTLAND — The Utah Jazz currently have the worst defensive rating in the NBA (122). If they finish the season that way, it would be the third straight year with the dishonor of having the worst defense in the league.

Of course, there are some caveats that are necessary to point out. Like the fact that this team has been bad by design and built, in large part, to lose games. And, there has been an emphasis on getting offensively gifted players and fostering their development.

It’s also important to point out the lack of Walker Kessler this season and the amount that the Jazz have to try to cover up for what he provides on defense. But even with Kessler, a good defensive player, the last couple of years the Jazz’s overall defense has been very bad.

On offense, the team is generally trending in the right direction — the Jazz had the 7th best offensive rating for games played in December. The emergence of Keyonte George as a massive scoring threat helps that.

Advertisement

“It’s crazy, for how good our offense has been, how little we actually talk about it as a group,” Jazz head coach Will Hardy said. “Defense is what we’re attacking every day, and it’s what we’ll continue to attack until we get it right.”

Personnel

It’s not like the Jazz players haven’t been continuously told that they need to be better on that side of the ball. They know where they’ve ranked and they know where they are now compared to the other 29 teams.

But, do the Jazz actually have the personnel to play good defense in the NBA?

“I think any group of people can perform to a certain level,” Hardy said when asked that question. “I don’t want to put a limitation on our group at all on that side of the ball. If I didn’t believe in the ability for a group of people to outperform the sum of their parts, or if I didn’t believe in the ability for individuals to grow and get better, then this would be a horrible profession for me. I go to bed with that belief. I wake up with that belief.”

You’ll notice that wasn’t a “yes.”

Advertisement

The Jazz’s point-of-attack defense has been abysmal throughout the rebuild. George has improved this season, but not to the point that he has been a good defender. Statistically he’s still been a negative defender, along with Isaiah Collier, Brice Sensabaugh, Cody Williams and Kyle Filipowski.

The Jazz are hopeful that Ace Bailey can become a positive defender, but he’s still so young and is still trying to adjust to being in the NBA. His growth on defense is something to worry about in the years to come. There’s some grace that Filipowski deserves considering how much he’s been playing the five this season, where he is known to have deficiencies as a defender.

There’s a lot of hope riding on Hendricks, who was drafted in large part because of his defense, but lost last year to injury and has yet to recover the reaction time or quickness required to be the kind of defender the Jazz need at his position.

Some of the Jazz’s best defenders this season (and that’s not saying much) have been Svi Mykhailiuk, Kyle Anderson and Jusuf Nurkić, and those are not the players that the Jazz desperately need to see defensive improvement from.

The future

At some point in the near future, the Utah Jazz are going to have to face the fact that they have a major problem on defense.

Advertisement

“Defense is tiring. Defense is not fun,” Hardy said. “But defense is what gives you the opportunity to win. We can’t show up to the games thinking that we’re just going to outscore everybody. That’s an unsustainable approach. And right now, where we are as a team and as a program, we’re trying to build sustainable habits, a sustainable approach for long term success. Our focus on the defensive side of the ball, individually, has to go up.”

It’s not like the Jazz’s defense needs to be better to win games this season. We all know that’s not the ultimate goal of the front office. But if they were to try to win games next season with this exact roster, the defense would be a problem.

And there’s blame to go around. The Jazz front office has not drafted defensively sound players, Hardy has not been head coach of a good defensive team, and the players on the team have not shown that they care enough on that side of the ball or that they can improve to a reasonable level.

It’s possible that with winning being the goal, the players would care more, that Hardy would coach differently, that players would buy in, etc. But that’s not concrete evidence for us to work with right now.

On Monday night they gave up 137 points to the Portland Trail Blazers, a bottom-10 offensive team. It was just the latest, in a multi-year string of poor defensive outings. The Jazz’s defensive issues are not going away anytime soon. So something has to change if the Jazz want to be a good team in the future.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah grocery store manager accused of stealing $40,000 from cash registers

Published

on

Utah grocery store manager accused of stealing ,000 from cash registers


A manager of a Salt Lake City grocery store was arrested for allegedly stealing $40,000 over the course of a year.

Yasmin Castellanos, 47, was the manager of the Smith’s located near 1100 W 600 N in the Rose Park neighborhood until just before her arrest on Sunday, according to police. She is facing a second-degree felony charge of theft.

According to the probable cause affidavit, Smith’s officials started documenting missing cash starting in February 2025 through late December of that year.

MORE | Daycare worker arrested for child abuse after Blanding police review security footage

Advertisement

Police said approximately $40,000 is believed to have been stolen during that time.

The highest amount of cash missing in a day was documented on Dec. 27, with officials saying over $14,760 was gone.

Castellanos was taken into custody and interviewed by investigators.

They said she explained that, as part of her job, she would collect bags of cash from the registers and place the cash into a collection machine. This included cash from pharmacy registers.

Castellanos allegedly admitted to theft, saying she would pocket some of the cash from the bags and use it to pay loans, rent, food and medical bills.

Advertisement

Police said she admitted to taking about $40,000. The money has not yet been found.

Castellanos was booked in the Salt Lake County Jail on Sunday evening.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

___

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Ukrainian family in Utah facing separation, with 2 family members fearing deportation

Published

on

Ukrainian family in Utah facing separation, with 2 family members fearing deportation


LINDON — A Ukrainian family now living in Lindon that fled the violent war in the European nation now potentially faces separation, with two family members fearing deportation.

The turn of events — not the first time the family has contended with uncertainty — represents another twist in implementation of immigration policy under President Donald Trump and his crackdown on immigrants in the country.

Indeed, the Lindon family isn’t alone — other Ukrainian immigrants are contending with similar issues, according to representatives from Utah groups that aid Ukrainians.

“We can’t understand why because we didn’t break any laws,” said Yurii Ahieiev, facing deportation along with his 7-year-old daughter, Viktoriia Ahieieva. While the man’s wife and two older sons successfully applied for permission to remain in the country, at least for now, he and his daughter, instead, face deportation, he said, “and I don’t know why we have these issues.”

Advertisement

Several families in Lindon joined together in sponsoring the Ukrainian family’s relocation to the Utah County city in 2023 under the Uniting for Ukraine program, launched in 2022 under President Joe Biden to aid Ukrainians fleeing the war with Russia. On starting his second term as president earlier this year, however, Trump paused the program, though his administration later launched a process allowing eligible Ukrainians to apply for “re-parole” to extend their stay in the country.

At any rate, Ahieiev and his daughter, supported by their Lindon neighbors, are now scrambling to figure out their next steps after the apparent rejection, without explanation, of their applications to stay in the United States. Ahieiev and his wife Valentyna Ahieieva run a small accounting business while their two sons, ages 17 and 16, and daughter attend Lindon-area schools.

“We like it here, we like the U.S., like this country. But we don’t like what’s happening now in the immigration system,” Valentyna Ahieieva said. “Hopefully it changes.”

A hearing for Ahieiev is scheduled for July while his daughter is to appear before immigration authorities in February, when they and their backers fear they could be detained for deportation, said Jared Oates, one of the Lindon sponsors.

“Why would you separate a family?” he asked.

Advertisement

In response to a KSL.com query, a rep from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security asked for additional identifying information about Yurii Ahieiev and his daughter. Supplied the information, the department didn’t provide any comment, nor did reps from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. But the transplants to Lindon apparently have plenty of company. Despite the ongoing war in the Ukraine and prior moves to welcome at least some Ukrainians fleeing the conflict into the United States, the situation for many Ukrainians here remains tenuous.

“This is absolutely a major issue right now for both Ukrainians who came here for refuge, as well as for the Americans who sponsored them and those who have become their friends, neighbors, co-workers, employers, etc. It is devastating and heartbreaking to see the decisions and challenges that are being added to these people who have already gone through so much,” said Mindie Packer.

Packer is co-founder of Hope Across Borders, a Utah-based group that offers humanitarian aid in conflict zones around the world, including Ukraine.

Packer has heard many stories of Ukrainians in uncertain migratory situations, fearful they may be targeted by immigration agents. One Ukrainian family Hope Across Borders sponsored had to move to Slovenia because their permission to remain in the United States expired.

“We know many people who came legally and applied for renewal/extension of their status, paid their fees and have not heard anything back. They were not denied or accepted, but now their status is expired and they don’t know what to do,” Packer said.

Advertisement

Anne Perkins of Lifting Hands International, a Utah-based nonprofit organization that provides humanitarian aid to Ukraine, knows of one Ukrainian family in Utah that moved to Spain. The work visa of the head of the family ran out and he was unable to renew it, prompting the departure. Fees to seek extensions to remain in the country have increased, adding to the difficulties.

“Still, most of the families I’ve talked to are motivated to do whatever it takes to stay,” Perkins said.

Human Rights First, an American human rights organization, says around 50 Ukrainians were deported last November from the United States.

Shining a light on the situation

Given the current climate toward immigration under Trump, it’s unclear “whether immigrants, period, are welcome in the United States right now,” Oates said. “It’s just a very difficult time.”

That said, he and the others who first sponsored the Ahieiev family say they have made strides in transitioning to life here and stand behind them. They’re self-reliant with their accounting business, and the kids, whose English has improved greatly, are thriving in school.

Advertisement

“They’ve been remarkable,” Oates said.

Read more:

Their Lindon backers have consulted with immigration attorneys, who haven’t been able to offer any solutions. They’ve also reached out to U.S. Rep. Mike Kennedy, their congressional representative, for help in navigating the U.S. bureaucracy for answers.

Kennedy wouldn’t comment on specifics of the Ahieiev family’s situation due to privacy considerations. But he said his office is available to help.

“My office and I are committed to helping constituents of Utah’s 3rd Congressional District resolve issues with federal agencies to the best of our ability,” he said in a statement.

At this stage, Oates thinks the main means of helping the family might be shining the light on their situation in a bid to muster public support.

Advertisement

“The only thing that would change the calculus, as far as we can see, would be changing the political consequences of deporting (Viktoriia) and separating a family,” he said.

As for a possible return to Ukraine, Ahieiev and his wife shudder at the possibility. They lived in the Odessa region, which has faced some of the fiercest and sustained attacks from Russian forces.

“Our parents now still live in this region, but it’s really dangerous,” Yurii Ahiehiev said. “Very often there’s no electricity, no heating.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending