Connect with us

Technology

Your phone is now a crime scene in your pocket

Published

on

Your phone is now a crime scene in your pocket

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Take a second and look at your phone. It knows where you slept last night. Who you texted. What you searched. Where you drove.

For investigators, that information can turn into evidence fast. In fact, a major new survey found smartphones now show up in almost every criminal investigation.

In other words, your phone can become the primary crime scene. And that should get your attention.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Advertisement

Detectives say smartphones act as “a crime scene in your pocket,” storing messages, GPS history and payment records. (Anna Barclay/Getty Images)

Why smartphones have become the center of crime investigations

Your phone is always with you. It logs:

  • Text messages and chats
  • Photos and videos
  • GPS location history
  • App activity
  • Call logs
  • Payment records

According to the 2026 Industry Trends Report from Cellebrite, a digital forensics company that provides tools to law enforcement and investigators, smartphones are now the most cited source of digital evidence in criminal cases at 97%. The report shows that mobile data can reveal where a person has been, who they communicate with and patterns of daily life.

For that reason, many in law enforcement now describe the smartphone as “a crime scene in your pocket” to illustrate how deeply these devices factor into investigations. That phrase may sound dramatic. It is not. It reflects how investigations now unfold in the U.S. and around the world. In many criminal cases, phone data regularly helps:

  • Reconstruct timelines using cell site and GPS data
  • Place suspects near crime scenes
  • Confirm or contradict alibis
  • Recover deleted messages
  • Track digital payments

Police agencies have testified in court that smartphone extractions help establish sequences of events faster than traditional methods. Modern policing no longer relies only on fingerprints and surveillance footage. It often begins with digital footprints.

Real cases where phone data made the difference

This is happening in courtrooms right now. Case in point, in the prosecutions tied to the Gilgo Beach serial killings in New York, investigators leaned heavily on burner phone data, cell site records and digital communications to link the suspect to victims. Mobile records helped narrow movements, connect devices and support key search warrants.

In the ongoing University of Idaho murder case, prosecutors have relied on smartphone location data, digital mapping history and phone activity logs to build a timeline. Location records helped place the suspect’s phone near the crime scene during critical time windows.

Advertisement

Fraud investigations across the U.S. tell a similar story. In large-scale romance scams and crypto investment schemes, law enforcement now uses smartphone chat logs, transaction screenshots and crypto wallet trails to follow the money. Cryptocurrency evidence appears in a growing share of cases as online scams surge.

The pattern is clear. Phone data can protect the innocent by confirming where someone was. It can also reveal intent through messages, searches and digital payments.

Here is what matters most for everyday Americans. Even if you are not committing a crime, your phone creates a detailed and often lasting record of your life. And in today’s justice system, that record carries real weight.

BRYAN KOHBERGER’S PHONE RECORDS REVEAL PANICKED SEARCHES AFTER POLICE UNCOVERED KEY DETAIL

Bryan Kohberger appears at the Ada County Courthouse in Boise, Idaho, on July 23, 2025, for sentencing in the University of Idaho murders case, where prosecutors relied heavily on cellphone location data and digital evidence. (Kyle Green-Pool/Getty Images)

Advertisement

The rise of crypto and AI in criminal cases

The report revealed another important trend. Cryptocurrency is now the fastest-growing source of evidence. Investigators cited crypto data in 22% of cases, largely due to the explosion of online scams and fraud. If you have followed ransomware attacks or crypto investment scams, this makes sense. Payments leave blockchain trails. Law enforcement increasingly follows the money.

Meanwhile, 65% of detectives believe AI tools can speed up investigations. A typical case can require up to 35 hours of digital review. About 60% of that time goes to sorting and evaluating data. That creates pressure. And pressure can lead to mistakes.

Experts warn that generative AI can deliver convincing but inaccurate results if no one double-checks them.

The hidden bottlenecks behind digital evidence

The report also highlights challenges investigators face behind the scenes. More than half of devices arrive locked. Many investigators report difficulty accessing iOS and Android phones due to constant software updates and encryption. Most teams still review evidence manually. Only a small share of users use advanced analytical tools to connect data across devices and cases. On top of that, agency leaders say training gaps and rising data volume are slowing investigations and stretching resources. As digital evidence grows, so do the pressure points inside the system.

What this means for you

Here is the part most people miss. Even if you never plan to break the law, your phone can:

Advertisement
  • Place you at a location
  • Show who you were with
  • Reveal what you searched
  • Expose private conversations
  • Document your purchases

Sometimes that helps you. It can prove an alibi. It can clear your name. Other times, it raises serious privacy questions. Who has access to your data? How long is it stored? How securely is it handled?

In most criminal investigations, law enforcement must obtain a warrant or other court-approved legal process to access the contents of your phone. But the sheer volume of data these devices hold has exploded. And that changes the stakes.

Smartphone data and the growing privacy debate

We live in an era where digital evidence is the backbone of modern justice. That helps solve crimes. It protects victims. It speeds up investigations. But it also means the device in your pocket contains a map of your life.

As smartphone digital evidence becomes central to 97% of cases, we need to ask hard questions about privacy, oversight and AI accuracy. Because once data exists, it can be used.

5 SIMPLE TECH TIPS TO IMPROVE DIGITAL PRIVACY

Smartphones now appear in 97% of criminal investigations, with law enforcement relying on mobile data to reconstruct timelines and track suspects. (Boris Roessler/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Tech tips: Protect your digital footprint

You cannot eliminate your digital trail. But you can reduce unnecessary exposure.

1) Review location settings

Turn off constant location access for apps that do not need it. On iPhone and Android, set most apps to “While Using” instead of “Always.”

2) Use encrypted messaging

Apps like Signal and WhatsApp use end-to-end encryption, which means messages are scrambled so only you and the recipient can read them. Apple’s iMessage also uses end-to-end encryption for conversations between Apple devices. Strong encryption protects your messages from hackers and data breaches. It is also why law enforcement often cannot read message content without access to the physical device. Keep in mind that encryption protects message content, not everything around it. Metadata such as who you contacted and when may still exist.

3) Lock down cloud backups

Check whether your messages and photos back up to the cloud. Cloud data can become part of investigations.

4) Enable strong authentication

Use a long passcode, not a simple four-digit PIN. Turn on biometric security and two-factor authentication (2FA).

Advertisement

5) Think before you search

Search history, voice assistant queries and in-app messages often live longer than you expect.

6) Keep your phone updated

Security updates patch vulnerabilities that criminals exploit. They also protect your data from being stolen in breaches.

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Your phone is no longer just a communication tool. It is a timeline, a diary and a witness. For law enforcement, that is powerful. For you, it is a reminder that convenience comes with consequences. The next time you tap “Allow” on a permissions request, remember this. You are not just installing an app. You are adding another entry to your digital twin.

Advertisement

If your phone tells the story of your life, who should control that story when it matters most? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter. 

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Related Article

Your phone is tracking you even when you think it’s not

Technology

Live updates from Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court battle over the future of OpenAI

Published

on

Live updates from Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court battle over the future of OpenAI

Sam Altman and Elon Musk are facing off in a high-stakes trial that could alter the future of OpenAI and its most well-known product, ChatGPT. In 2024, Musk filed a lawsuit accusing OpenAI of abandoning its founding mission of developing AI to benefit humanity and shifting focus to boosting profits instead.

Elon Musk, his financial manager and Neuralink CEO, Jared Birchall, and OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman have already testified before the jury. Now, on Wednesday, May 6th, Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI board member who shares four children with Musk, is taking the stand, and the courtroom is seeing testimony from former OpenAI exec Mira Murati via video.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is scheduled to appear on Monday, with OpenAI cofounder and former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever lined up to testify after that.

Musk was a cofounder of OpenAI and claims that Altman and Brockman tricked him into giving the company money, only to turn their backs on their original goal. However, OpenAI says that “This lawsuit has always been a baseless and jealous bid to derail a competitor” in a bid to boost Musk’s own SpaceX / xAI / X companies that have launched Grok as a competitor to ChatGPT.

Elon Musk — plaintiff, OpenAI cofounder and now CEO of rival xAI

Advertisement

Steven Molo — lead counsel for plaintiff

Jared Birchall — manager of Musk’s family office

Shivon Zilis — former OpenAI board member who shares multiple children with Musk

Sam Altman — defendant, CEO of OpenAI

William Savitt — lead counsel for defendant

Advertisement

Greg Brockman — president of OpenAI as well as a cofounder

Ilya Sutskever — former chief scientist at OpenAI and a cofounder

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers — aka YGR, trial judge

Here’s all the latest on the trial between Musk and Altman:

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

World Password Day: Check if your passwords are safe

Published

on

World Password Day: Check if your passwords are safe

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

World Password Day is here, and it is the perfect excuse to check something most of us ignore until it is too late. Your passwords.

Think about it. You are scrolling on your phone, maybe checking email or social media, when you see a message claiming someone has access to your account. You want to ignore it. It feels like spam.

But this time, you pause. Because breaches happen all the time, and stolen passwords are still one of the easiest ways for hackers to get in.

So instead of waiting for a scare, today is a good day to get ahead of it.

Advertisement

AMERICA’S MOST-USED PASSWORD IN 2025 REVEALED

World Password Day is a reminder to update weak or reused passwords before hackers use stolen login details to access your accounts. (Pekic/Getty Images)

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

 Why World Password Day actually matters

This isn’t just another made-up holiday. It is a reminder of a very real problem. Companies get breached. Databases leak. And once login details are exposed, they often get shared or sold online.

From there, attackers try those same passwords across other accounts. This is called credential stuffing, and it works more often than you would think. That is why even one weak or reused password can put multiple accounts at risk. 

How to check and protect yourself today

You do not need a complicated process. Start simple and work your way through it.

Advertisement

1) Change your most important passwords

Start with your email, banking and social media accounts. If any of those passwords are old or reused, update them now.

2) Stop reusing passwords

Using the same password across sites is one of the biggest risks. If one account is exposed, the rest can fall like dominoes.

3) Turn on two-factor authentication

Two-factor authentication (2FA) adds a second layer of protection. Even if someone has your password, they still cannot get in without that extra step.

10 SIGNS YOUR PERSONAL DATA IS BEING SOLD ONLINE

Reused passwords can put multiple accounts at risk if one company breach exposes login details to hackers. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Advertisement

 

4) Reduce how much of your data is online

This step is often overlooked, but it matters more than people think. The more personal information floating around online, the easier it is for scammers to target you or break into your accounts. You can take a more proactive approach. Some data removal services offer a free scan that checks whether your personal information is exposed on data broker and people-search sites. It only takes a minute to run, and the results can show you which companies may have your data. From there, you can decide whether to remove that information and reduce your exposure going forward. Results arrive by email in about an hour.

Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting CyberGuy.com.

How to create a strong password

If you are updating passwords today, make sure you are doing it right.

Make it long

Aim for at least 12 characters. Longer passwords are much harder to crack. 

Mix different types of characters

Use uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers and symbols to increase complexity.

Advertisement

Avoid common words and phrases

Simple words or predictable combinations are easy for attackers to guess. What are the top 5 passwords to avoid? The most commonly used and insecure passwords are:

  • 123456
  • 123456789
  • 12345678
  • password
  • Qwerty123

These passwords are extremely easy to guess and should be avoided at all costs.

Skip obvious substitutions

Replacing letters with symbols, like “$” for “S,” is no longer effective. Hackers already account for that.

HOW SECURE IS MY PASSWORD? USE THIS TEST TO FIND OUT

Strong passwords, two-factor authentication and password managers can help protect email, banking and social media accounts from attackers. (Neil Godwin/Future via Getty Images)

Why a password manager is worth it

Managing strong passwords on your own isn’t realistic. That is why password managers exist.

Advertisement

These tools can generate strong, unique passwords for every account and store them securely. You only need to remember one master password.

It also makes logging in faster and easier, while removing the temptation to reuse passwords. That alone can prevent a lot of problems.

Check out the best expert-reviewed password managers of 2026 at CyberGuy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

World Password Day is a reminder, but it should not be the only day you think about this. Still, it is a good starting point. A few quick changes today can prevent a major headache later. Strong passwords, two-factor authentication and reducing your online footprint all work together. Tools like Incogni help take that one step further by limiting how much information is out there to begin with. Pair that with a password manager, and you are not just reacting to threats. You are building a much stronger defense.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

When was the last time you updated your passwords, and what made you finally do it? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Musk’s biggest loyalist became his biggest liability

Published

on

Musk’s biggest loyalist became his biggest liability

I sat down in the Musk v. Altman trial courtroom today, painfully aware that no one was going to ask Shivon Zilis the question on everyone’s minds: Girl, what the fuck are you doing?

Zilis, who testified under oath that she is the mother of four of Musk’s children, was… what’s the best way to characterize this? A Musk advisor? She denies she was a “chief of staff” but says she worked for Musk’s “entire AI portfolio: Tesla, Neuralink, and OpenAI” starting in 2017. The two met through OpenAI, and they had what she referred to as a “one off” before becoming “friends and colleagues.” The “one off,” she confirmed, was “romantic in nature.”

Her job under Musk was “to go find bottlenecks and solve them,” and she claims to have worked 80 to 100 hours a week doing that. “It was just bananas,” she said. Her first two children by Musk — twins — were born in 2021, while Zilis was serving on OpenAI’s board. She kept this a secret. She did not tell the board who the father was until Business Insider reported on court documents that listed Musk as the father.

“My first call was to my dad,” said Zilis, who testified that even her own family didn’t know the children’s paternity. “The call right after that was to Sam Altman.” Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, had testified he found out about Zillis’ children from news reports. When he talked to her about it, she claimed her relationship with Musk was “platonic” and that she’d had kids via IVF. This was reassurance enough for Brockman, who’d been friends with her since 2013. She remained on the board.

On the stand, Zilis spoke softly and quickly. She seemed mousy. A significant part of what made her testimony so bad for Musk was that she appeared to be the only person taking notes on what Brockman, Altman, Ilya Sutsekever, and Musk were discussing when the cofounders considered their options for creating a for-profit arm of OpenAI. She also was “aiding and facilitating communication between the principal parties.” Those notes are the trial’s most important evidence — more important, even, than Brockman’s diary.

Advertisement

The goal of the direct testimony seemed to be to take the sting out of what Zilis and the plaintiff’s lawyers had to know was coming. So she told the court that her role also meant telling Altman when Musk was “in a good headspace” for a conversation — perhaps inadvertently strengthening Brockman’s testimony yesterday that at one point he feared Musk would physically attack him —while vehemently denying that she funneled information to Musk.

Look, she and Musk testified they lived together and have a romantic relationship and four kids. She was originally a plaintiff in the suit. She kept her children’s paternity secret from her own father. All of those things would be reason enough to doubt her testimony about thinking OpenAI betrayed its mission during the chaos when Altman was fired by the board. She claimed that Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said something to the effect of “we are above them, we are below them, we are around them” during that chaotic period as being “terrifying.” (The quote was “We are below them, above them, around them.”)

But the notes are really what did Musk’s case in. Try as she might, Zilis couldn’t explain them away.

There were a lot of ideas batted around in 2017 and 2018. We saw a lot of Zilis’ emails from that period. Notably in one, an option was “switch to for profit in next couple of weeks (woah fast!).” Another email noted that a “complete non-negotiable” for Altman, Brockman and Sutskever “is an ironclad agreement to not have Elon (or anyone) have absolutely [sic] control of AGI they create.” In another she wrote to Musk money manager Jared Birchall, “They say they will not move forward without a guarantee to switch away from him having control. You and I can argue that’s stupid all we want but they are holding firm on it.”

“If he hung around E perhaps it would force him to think about humanity more”

Advertisement

Zilis also knew about Musk halting donations before OpenAI did. On August 20, 2017, she wrote, “Funding freeze: OpenAI is likely to realize this week that their $5M in Q3 is, albeit correctly, on hold. Unsure how this will impact negotiations but wanted to flag it since it’s likely to have a big psychological impact on them if they find out.” Musk told Brockman and Sutskever over a week later, on September 1st, that he’d pulled funding.

There were other machinations:

  • At one point, Musk seemed to have suggested that she, Sam Teller, and Birchall — two of Musk’s closest fixers — should all take seats on OpenAI’s board so that Musk would have control of the nonprofit. Zilis wrote to Teller that she didn’t share that with the OpenAI team.
  • In November 2017, Musk was thinking of creating a “world-class AI lab” inside Tesla. To that end, Musk offered Altman a board seat at Tesla.
  • Zilis wrote an email to Musk saying that to save him time she’d brainstormed some solutions for him. Three of them involved developing AGI at Tesla. One was making OpenAI a public benefit corporation subsidiary of Tesla. One was getting Altman as an “anchor” for TeslaAI.
  • My favorite of those solutions was: “Find a way to get Demis. Seriously…. Demis really does fanboy hard and I don’t think he’s immoral… just amoral. If he hung around E perhaps it would force him to think about humanity more.”
  • After hiring Andrej Karpathy, Musk asked for a list of top OpenAI people to poach.

We had already seen one of her text messages in the docket — the one where Musk leaves the board and she asks him whether she should remain “close and friendly” to continue funneling him information. In her direct testimony, she tried to put that in the context: “They were going through this weird half-breakup,” she said. But in the cross, we found out that she didn’t remember that in her deposition.

“Your long-lost memories have been recovered,” said Sarah Eddy, the OpenAI attorney, in one of the trial’s funnier moments. Sure, Musk’s team objected and the objection was sustained, but we all heard it. In fact, it was one of several times Zilis seemed to have recovered memories she didn’t have at her deposition, memories that — coincidentally I’m sure — happened to be good for Musk’s case.

To be fair, Zilis performed the best under cross examination of anyone we’ve seen so far, but she doesn’t exactly come across as truthful. And there was even more reason to be skeptical of her when we discovered how she left the board, which — according to her deposition — happened “because I picked up a call from Sam and he said, ‘I’ve heard Elon is starting a competitive venture’ and I said, ‘Well if that’s true, this is the time to resign.’”

Her primary allegiance was and is to Musk

Advertisement

Mysteriously, she had forgotten that call between the deposition and today. But she did seem to know that Musk was moving on AI when she texted a friend, who was in her phone as “Shahini Rubicon Fluffer.” (Incredible name. Thomas Pynchon will be so jealous.) “Have to resign OpenAI board btw,” she wrote. “E’s effort has become well-known.” Her friend didn’t seem surprised by the revelation. Zilis went on: “When the father of your babies starts a competitive effort and will recruit out of OpenAI there is nothing to be done.”

Zilis added that Musk “proactively apologized that he had pruned my friend network through this.”

Here’s what it added up to, as far as I am concerned: Her primary allegiance was and is to Musk. To believe she didn’t know about xAI, I would have to believe that despite their — at the time — three children and the time he spent with them every week, he never discussed it with her. I don’t believe that. Who would? There’s enough evidence in her meeting notes to suggest she routinely held back information from OpenAI on Musk’s behalf — xAI would be no different. I also don’t believe that she didn’t give Musk information about the Microsoft deals she approved while sitting on OpenAI’s board.

Musk didn’t have a problem converting the whole of OpenAI to a for-profit or kneecapping the charity by recruiting its strongest researchers. He didn’t mind the idea of subsuming it into Tesla in any of a variety of ways. The thing he did mind was not being in control of it. That’s what I took away from Zilis’ texts and emails.

Brockman and the OpenAI board were incredibly naive to allow Zilis to continue working there after learning of her twins’ paternity. But then, maybe no one expected someone so meek to be so devious. She was smart enough not to raise her voice or nitpick obvious questions during her cross-examination, so her bearing read as more trustworthy than anyone we’ve seen yet. It’s just that the overall takeaway from her written communications is that she’s put Musk first in her life. Everyone else — including, apparently, her own father — comes second. So on the stand, you might as well assume she’s saying what Musk wants to hear too.

Advertisement
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending