Connect with us

Utah

Utah Highway Patrol troopers are watching for distracted and impaired drivers this summer

Published

on

Utah Highway Patrol troopers are watching for distracted and impaired drivers this summer


Estimated read time: 10-11
minutes

SALT LAKE CITY — With summer in full swing, the Utah Highway Patrol is seeing more traffic, as well as an increase in violations that can impact public safety. Summer enforcement initiatives include identifying distracted and impaired drivers.

“When distracted driving laws were first written, we had no concept of what all the cellphone would become and how involved it is in people’s lives today,” said UHP Col. Michael Rapich. “The state Legislature has to balance personal liberty with public safety, but distraction is probably the most underreported contributor to vehicle crashes.”

The agency’s origins predate the necessity of Utah drivers being required to even have a driver’s license — beginning with just two part-time officers, hired in 1925, to patrol Utah highways and enforce traffic laws.

Advertisement

By 1928, the agency employed five full-time officers and five years later, it was given the name it goes by today. A year later, the Utah Highway Patrol was given the responsibility to test applicants for Utah’s new driver’s license.

The state Legislature empowered the UHP with statewide law enforcement jurisdiction in 1935. And by 1940, more than 50 sworn officers were employed by the agency.

Today, according to Rapich, the UHP’s original mission to patrol Utah’s freeways and highways stands, but it has expanded to include providing security at the state Capitol and for the governor. In addition, the agency is part of the Utah Department of Public Safety with a commissioner that is part of the governor’s cabinet.

“There are troopers that work outside of the Utah Highway Patrol; they work at the State Bureau of Investigations and also do statewide narcotics investigations. We have a statewide Major Crimes Unit that does death investigations on the highways, but also supports local law enforcement agencies with their investigations,” said Rapich.

In rural Utah, the UHP supports local agencies and, according to Rapich, there are times when a trooper and a local sheriff’s deputy may be the only law enforcement officers on duty for hundreds of square miles.

Advertisement

Public safety priority

Seat belt use in Utah is high, according to Rapich, but the fewer than 10% of Utahns who don’t buckle up represent between 40-50% of highway fatalities.

He said every trooper is trained to identify impaired drivers, and the statewide agency makes one one out of every three DUI arrests in Utah, despite making up fewer than 10% of the total police officers on the roads at any given time.

Trooper Julio Roman, who has nearly four years with the UHP, was a police officer in North Carolina prior to moving to Utah. On a recent shift patrolling both directions of I-15 in Utah County, he responded to a citizen complaint of an illegally parked boat in Santaquin. Roman is typically a motor squad officer, patrolling on a motorcycle.

This particular day, however, he was in a marked Dodge Durango sport utility vehicle.

He would consistently predict throughout the day, simply observing a car ahead of or behind him, whether they were distracted or would pass us while speeding. And, distracted drivers, of which there are plenty, were consistently unaware enough of their surroundings while driving — not even noticing his fully marked police vehicle on the freeway.

Advertisement

“I’ve learned to identify several behaviors that tell me a driver isn’t paying attention,” Roman said. “They don’t maintain their lane, they exit the freeway at the last second, some are visibly on their phone, a pattern of driving fast and then slow and, even the person that’s driving too slowly all the time, is often using their phone.”

Roman’s cruiser was equipped with both radar (to detect the fastest vehicle ahead or behind) and a LiDAR hand-held gun to be able to lock onto specific vehicles while stopped — the proverbial speed trap.

While Roman intended to use LiDAR at some point, he was kept busy enough while driving that it wasn’t necessary. Radar pinpoints a speed and troopers then visually identify the fastest moving vehicle and pace it, by matching speeds, to confirm they are the violator. Any vehicle immediately in front of or behind Roman’s cruiser is easily identified as a speeder.

Roman wrote several speeding tickets, including for a motorcycle travelling at 114 mph. Roman first spotted the motorcyclist approaching quickly from far behind. He wagered whether the driver would spot him and slow down.

He moved one lane to the right, putting two lanes between him and the motorcyclist. It wasn’t until Roman worked his way over as the motorcycle passed that the driver spotted us. According to Roman, motorcyclists often flee when they are caught driving excessively fast, so getting the license plate number was his priority.

Advertisement

This motorcyclist did stop and was ticketed. Due to past infractions, this man’s license could be jeopardized by this new ticket when he goes to court.


The state Legislature has to balance personal liberty with public safety, but distraction is probably the most underreported contributor to vehicle crashes.

–UHP Col. Mike Rapich


In another instance, as Roman entered I-15 southbound, a Tesla car sped past other drivers in the right lane of the on-ramp. The driver failed to signal as he merged each time to reach the freeway.

Roman sped to catch up and radar clocked the driver at 87 mph in a 70-mph zone. A ticket was issued.

Advertisement

Throughout the day, many tickets were issued to drivers for using cellphones while driving and for not wearing a seat belt. In one instance, a grandmother taking her grandchildren to an appointment said she was in a hurry and forgot to buckle up.

Her driving record showed Roman that she frequently doesn’t wear one. And, she was ticketed.

Roman also participated in two traffic slowdowns this day so that dangerous debris could be removed from I-15.

On the way to that citizen complaint about the boat, Roman pulled next to a speeding driver, who didn’t notice him prior to a friendly honk or two, and simply motioned for the driver to slow down. The driver complied and the trooper continued on his way.

Spotting drivers under the influence

According Rapich, troopers who exhibit great proficiency for identifying and arresting impaired drivers are selected for the DUI enforcement squad that concentrates its overnight efforts throughout the Salt Lake Valley — away from the freeways.

Advertisement

In addition to the squad’s efforts, which are concentrated around bars and restaurants, other troopers, on their normal patrols on I-80, I-15 and other highways, are also watching for impaired drivers. On a recent night shift, Cpl. Brock Ernstsen and at least one other trooper were patrolling downtown Salt Lake City.

As the night progressed, it was apparent that other agencies, including the Salt Lake City Police Department, were also concentrating manpower around areas with bars and nightclubs.

Ernstsen, who has been with UHP for more than eight years, was very familiar with the location of nearly every bar. Unfortunately, he could also point out the locations of many severe auto accidents and arrests associated with extreme DUI, including cases where sober people had been in the vehicles and could have driven instead, he said.

Just like Roman, Ernstsen has also learned to identify the behaviors that lead him to suspect someone may be impaired. Interestingly, they’re almost identical to those associated with distracted driving. In addition, though, impaired drivers often drive without their lights on or the wrong way on a road.

As reaction times are slowed by alcohol or drug use, drivers will also often drive too quickly and/or stop suddenly, or drive and stop too slowly altogether. The first driver pulled over that evening had stopped far into the crosswalk for two consecutive red lights, setting off red flags for Ernstsen.

Advertisement

The driver admitted to having had a beer or two at a basketball game at the Delta Center earlier that night. Ernstsen spoke to the driver and conducted the first field sobriety test while the driver remained seated in his vehicle — asking the driver to follow his finger with only his eyes.

What many may not know is that troopers aren’t simply watching to see if a driver can or cannot follow these simple instructions. Alcohol impairment will also cause involuntary spasms of the eyes that are noticable. Various drugs can cause pupils to dilate and the whites of the eyes to be red.

To an untrained eye, the driver appeared to struggle with some of the several field sobriety tests he was asked to perform after stepping out of his vehicle. The driver was not, however, impaired, as a breathalyzer test confirmed.

A driver believed to have been driving under the influence completes field sobriety tests conducted by Utah Highway Patrol Cpl. Brock Ernstsen in Salt Lake City July 14. This driver was not impaired.
A driver believed to have been driving under the influence completes field sobriety tests conducted by Utah Highway Patrol Cpl. Brock Ernstsen in Salt Lake City July 14. This driver was not impaired. (Photo: Mike Stapley)

Ernstsen explained that part of the reason for drivers being subjected to so many different field tests is that some are more naturally proficient than others at some tasks. This particular driver may not be very coordinated, but he wasn’t impaired.

UHP uses field sobriety tests created by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The tests are more varied and more time consuming than those typically seen on TV and in movies. Breathalyzer tests can be performed in the field and blood draws, voluntarily or by execution of a warrant, can be done following arrest to further validate the field sobriety tests.

While a trooper pulling over a driver for a speeding violation may only rely on the automatic use of his dash camera to record events, it was common for Ernstsen to manually engage the camera and begin speaking to further document his reasons for pulling over a vehicle in the first place.

Advertisement

As he approached an intersection, a car in the left turn lane next to us was sitting partly into the intersection on a green arrow and not proceeding. Ernstsen pulled to the left behind the car as it finally pulled away and the car then proceeded to start and stop while driving slowly.

After pulling the vehicle over and speaking to the driver, it turned out the tourists from Las Vegas were not impaired but simply lost and trying to find the garage entrance to their hotel.

Another driver, in a convertible, pulled away from a stoplight erratically and quickly and seemed distracted by the car next to him. As Ernstsen hit his flashing lights to pull the driver over, the car immediately swerved across several lanes of traffic before stopping on the right shoulder.

Despite the driver seeming fidgety and nervous, the interactions he had with the driver convinced Ernstsen the driver was only showing off for his friends in the other car and was not impaired. The driver received a warning for careless driving.

At approximately 1 a.m. Ernstsen saw a driver plow over a concrete median separating two turn lanes. After stopping briefly to check his car for damage, the driver proceeded at 11 mph over the speed limit.

Advertisement

Following a stop and field sobriety tests, the driver was arrested for suspicion of impaired driving. A backup trooper had arrived and the vehicle was searched. In addition to an open container of alcohol placed on the floor of the back seat, three vials of a white, waxy substance were found in the glove compartment.

Troopers tested that waxy substance and it proved positive for THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. Troopers explained that these more concentrated forms of THC can impair drivers more severely than smoked marijuana and every bit as much as alcohol.

Another 30 minutes or so was spent reading the suspect his Miranda rights and issuing the various traffic citations warranted. We also waited for a tow truck to impound the Mercedes. The driver was asked whether he’d voluntarily agree to a blood draw to confirm his level of impairment.

The driver refused and Ernstsen was able to request a search warrant for the blood draw from his vehicle’s computer. The driver was then taken to the UHP offices in Murray.

Utah Highway Patrol Cpl. Brock Ernstsen books evidence for a suspected DUI arrest on an overnight shift in Salt Lake City earlier this month.
Utah Highway Patrol Cpl. Brock Ernstsen books evidence for a suspected DUI arrest on an overnight shift in Salt Lake City earlier this month. (Photo: Mike Stapley)

After the warrant was approved — a judge is always on call — Ernstsen performed the blood draw. Another trooper witnessed it and then all evidence was booked, including two vials of the driver’s blood.

The driver then agreed to an interview by Ernstsen. It would be another nearly two hours before the man was booked into the Salt Lake County Jail.

Advertisement

At least six other drivers were arrested that Thursday night and Friday morning for suspicion of impaired driving by the UHP DUI squad alone.

“If there was a way for me to remain on the street while another trooper handled evidence and booked a driver into jail, I have no doubt, unfortunately, that I could get many more impaired drivers off the road each night than I can, as is,” declared Ernstsen.

Photos

Most recent Police & Courts stories

More stories you may be interested in



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Utah law targeting DEI leads university to close LGBT, women’s centers

Published

on

Utah law targeting DEI leads university to close LGBT, women’s centers


When Becket Harris started college at the University of Utah, the school’s LGBT center quickly became the most important spot on campus for her — a place where she studied, made friends and never had to worry about how people would react to learning she was transgender.

Harris, 20, was devastated to learn this week that the center is closing — along with one for students from underrepresented racial and religious communities and another for women — in response to a new state law that rolls back diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in public schools and universities.

“What am I going to do without my space on campus? How’s my friend group going to stay together?” said Harris, who finished her sophomore year this spring. “It’s attacking a space that’s very personal to me.”

Across Utah, public schools, universities and government agencies must make shifts to comply with the law, which goes into effect Monday. The state becomes the latest where Republican legislators have restricted DEI programs, amid a broader conservative effort to limit what is taught in schools and make diversity programs a flash point in the nation’s political debate.

Advertisement

Laws in other states have forced some universities to eliminate programs and jobs and, more commonly, to change hiring practices, such as ending requirements for diversity statements from job candidates. Some type of change to diversity requirements or programs has been made at 164 college campuses in 23 states since January 2023, according to a tally by the Chronicle of Higher Education.

At the University of Utah, administrators said they have had less than two months — the bill was passed in January, but the state higher education office’s guidance about how to comply with the law came down in May — to make final decisions about how to reorganize their staff and services. The school won’t lose its student services and will continue holding cultural events, but complying with the law will require a significant change in approach, administrators said.

“This definitely is having a profound impact,” said Lori McDonald, vice president for student affairs.

The Utah law labeled services for different communities — racial, ethnic, religious, gender-based or sexuality-based — as “discriminatory.”

Although it left their funding in place, it effectively directed schools to reorganize those services, such as mental health, career and scholarship help, under generalized campus centers catering to all students. Furthermore, the state’s guidance indicated those services couldn’t operate in centers that also did cultural programming.

Advertisement

At the University of Utah, school officials said that means closing its specialized centers in favor of two umbrella offices: one for all cultural programming and another for all student services. The school’s Division of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion has been eliminated. About 45 staff were affected, many of whom will be reassigned to the two new centers.

“This is not the path we would have chosen,” University Provost Mitzi Montoya wrote in a note to deans and faculty Thursday. “But … it is our calling to rise to the challenges of the day and find a better way forward.”

On Friday, a farewell was planned for the university’s LGBT Resource Center, which asked supporters to “join us to laugh, cry and celebrate” its 21-year run. An Instagram post advertising the goodbye party drew dozens of comments and broken-heart emojis.

“I’m starting school in the fall and am so upset this won’t be a resource for our community,” one person wrote. Another said, “Every single person in this building made me feel at home.”

Added a third, “I found support here [when] there was nowhere else.”

Advertisement

Along with the LGBT Resource Center, the university’s Women’s Resource Center and the Center for Equity and Student Belonging will close. Both the women’s center and the Center for Equity and Student Belonging, previously known as an ethnic student affairs center, had been in operation for more than 50 years, Montoya noted.

The law doesn’t mandate the closure of student centers, allowing them to stay open as cultural centers as long as they don’t also provide student services. Utah state Rep. Katy Hall (R), the bill’s House sponsor, said some universities had chosen to close centers “to better meet the goals” of the law.

The idea of leaving the centers open without providing the services they were created to house felt disingenuous, McDonald said, and university officials weren’t sure enough staff would be left to run them after some employees move to the student services center.

The university plans to keep its Black cultural center open; staff are working on how it will operate under the law as a gathering place, McDonald said. Those plans will have to be approved by the state, university officials said.

The law does not affect classroom instruction, academic freedom or academic research, the Utah System of Higher Education said in its guidance.

Advertisement

This spring, lawmakers in Alabama and Iowa passed similar bills to restrict DEI programs, and Wyoming removed state funding for the state university’s DEI office, forcing its closure. In mid-June, Republican members of Congress introduced a bill proposing to end all federal diversity, equity and inclusion programs and pull funding from government agencies, schools and others with DEI programs.

The law’s passage in Utah played to the more conservative wing of a divided Republican Party, said Michael Lyons, a political science professor at Utah State University. In an election year, Gov. Spencer Cox (R) and other GOP lawmakers faced the need to win over party delegates in Utah’s caucus-based nominating process.

“It’s not surprising to see them take very conservative positions,” he said.

Upon signing the bill, Cox said it offered a “balanced solution” by repurposing funding “to help all Utah students succeed regardless of their background.” His office did not respond to a request for comment from The Post this week.

Hall, the bill’s sponsor, said on the House floor that the measure came about because she had heard “serious concerns about the landscape at our higher education institutions” from “students and many professors.”

Advertisement

“I hope that students who benefited from these centers in the past know that the expectation is that they will still be able to receive the services and support that they need to succeed,” Hall told The Post.

Utah House Minority Leader Angela Romero (D) said she feared the bill would end up erasing people and identities, noting in a floor debate that she might not have succeeded at the University of Utah if not for the support of the ethnic students’ center. Free-speech advocates have also said such laws have a chilling and censoring effect on campuses.

Utah State University said this month it would reassign programs and clubs that had been housed under the school’s Inclusion Center and would ensure that its Latinx Cultural Center and a proposed Native American center comply with the law. The school said it would create a new center for community and cultural matters. Weber State University in Ogden, Utah, has closed its Division of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion and identity-based centers and reorganized staff positions.

At the University of Utah, where staff members are still working out plans for the new centers, Harris, the student, remembered the LGBT center as a cozy place that made college much easier — and worried about what the changes might mean for future students.

“I could just walk into a space,” Harris said, “and I knew that everyone there was safe to talk to.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Grand County Sheriff: Search for missing Moab couple changes from ‘rescue’ to ‘recovery’

Published

on

Grand County Sheriff: Search for missing Moab couple changes from ‘rescue’ to ‘recovery’


MOAB, Utah (ABC4) — The search for a missing Moab couple has officially transitioned from a ‘rescue’ mission to a ‘recovery’ one, according to Grand County Sheriff Jamison Wiggins.

Ray and Maranda Ankofski have been missing since June 21 after they traveled the Steel Bender off-road trail in Grand County. A search for the couple began after they didn’t return on time and their vehicle was reported as abandoned.

The son of the couple, Raymond Ankofski told ABC4.com earlier this week officials were planning to scale back their response at the end of the week because of the costs associated with the search efforts. According to a press release from Grand County Sheriff’s Office, as of Tuesday, eight agencies were involved in the search.

“Despite exhaustive efforts, including the use of advanced search techniques and resources, Ray and Maranda Ankofski have not been located,” stated a press release from Wiggins. “The decision to transition from a search and rescue mission to a recovery was made based on evidence at the scene during the operation.”

Advertisement

In the days following their disappearance, the couple’s children started a fundraiser via GoFundMe, with the initial goal of raising $25,000 — but Raymond Ankofski explained the money would not be for the family.

“The money is going towards the search and rescue to bring my parents back, and to find my parents,” Rauymond Ankofski said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah gets $20 million for transportation and traffic light technology

Published

on

Utah gets $20 million for transportation and traffic light technology


The Federal Highway Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation has announced a $20 million grant to Utah.

Drivers of snow plows, public transportation buses, and other government-operated vehicles are using technology that can direct traffic lights to change in order to improve safety and travel time.

Under the “Saving Lives and Connectivity: Accelerating V2X Deployment” program, Utah will receive $20 million of the $60 million that is aimed to improve vehicle technologies. The other $40 million will go to Texas and Arizona.

“Connecting vehicles and infrastructure is a great way for us to be able to take advantage of technology to help improve safety and other outcomes. And Utah’s DOT has been a leader in this space for a long time,” Shailen Bhatt, US Federal Highway Administrator said.

Advertisement

UDOT will use this $20 million to fund projects in Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming, where each state represents different population concentrations and transportation facilities.

Bhatt says protecting personal private information can be one of the challenges when using these types of technology.

“So we will want people to understand what is being exchanged is called a basic safety message of DSM. The vehicle is going to report to the intersection that I’m approaching, and the intersection is going to report back ‘oh, the light is about to turn red or my light is red’, but it’s all anonymous data,” Bhatt said.

The technology is being used in Salt Lake City, where travel time reliability and bus performance have improved.

“It is unequivocal that when you deploy technology, we are able to reduce crashes, we’re able to reduce congestion, we’re able to reduce the amount of time people sit in traffic, and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from our system. And we look forward to more investments being made on the basis of the data that we get from this initial deployment,” Bhatt said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending