SALT LAKE CITY — Jordan Clarkson’s foot was in the wrong spot at the wrong time.

Philadelphia forward Paul George had frantically grabbed an offensive rebound with the shot clock winding down and turned to shoot a desperation fadeaway. In the process, he clipped Clarkson and that sent him tumbling down.

Foul.

Jazz coach Will Hardy quickly challenged the play, but after review, the call stood. That was one of three reviews in the closing minute that went Philadelphia’s way as the 76ers escaped Utah with a 114-111 victory Saturday at the Delta Center.

Was that deflating?

“Only now that you bring it up,” Hardy quipped when asked. “The challenge is there for the reasons that are obvious. They were right on both theirs and we weren’t on ours. But, yeah, I wasn’t sad till now.”

(Sorry about that, Will.)

In fact, he left the game feeling quite good about his team’s progress. Over the last 10 games, the Jazz have had a top-10 offense in the NBA and are now on a five-game run where the team has played clutch minutes (albeit, Utah is 2-3 in that stretch).

Saturday was yet another example of an improving team. The Jazz had 27 assists, had three players reach 20 or more points, and were within one possession for the entire final five minutes, save for four seconds.

All that against a team that has Joel Embiid (32 points), Tyrese Maxey (32 points and six assists) and Paul George (13 points) playing together. Those three combined for 21 points in the fourth quarter.

“I don’t think anybody should walk away from this game discouraged at all,” Hardy said. “Losing hurts. Losing is not fun. But there’s a lot of really good stuff happening on our team right now; the cohesion of the group on both sides of the ball has grown a lot in the last couple of weeks.”

One issue, though, is masking some of that progress, and that’s turnovers. The Jazz had 22 giveaways — including 15 live-ball turnovers — leading to 22 points.

“You can go look at the list — it’s everybody,” Hardy said. “We’re not doing a good enough job of seeing that shift defender. We’re dribbling into a secondary defender too many times. We also just have some moments of poor ball security. The team knows that and we’ll face that reality, and we’ll continue to work at it.”

Because, otherwise, the Jazz have been playing some good basketball. They lost at the buzzer on Thursday, lost in the final seconds on Saturday and took Cleveland down to the final minutes earlier in the week.

Moral victory? Sure. Regardless, it’s a night-and-day difference from what the Jazz were like at the beginning of the season.

“We’ve stuck together, even though it hasn’t been the best year,” said Lauri Markkanen, who led the Jazz with 23 points and hit a late, deep 3-pointer to keep some hope alive. “We didn’t close out tonight, or in Portland, or even the Cavs game, but we were right there.”

If anything, that’s been the hallmark of Hardy’s Jazz teams. The Utah front office has yet to give him a team that can truly compete. Yet, in his first two seasons, his teams exceeded expectations — even to the chagrin of some Jazz fans (and maybe some management, too) — and things are starting to trend in that direction again.

And it’s coming via veterans and youngsters.

In the last five games, Markkanen has scored over 20 points each time and Collin Sexton is averaging 22.2 points and 7.2 assists. On Saturday, Brice Sensabaugh showed more patience reading the floor, leading to 20 points and two assists; and rookie forward Cody Williams had some bright spots attacking the rim.

“They have a really talented team with some incredibly high-level players that made some big-time plays,” Hardy said. “But this is a night where I walk out feeling good about the progress of our group.”

The fact that challenges were even needed during the final minute is evidence enough of that.

Authorities this week said they want to find anyone involved in the installation of climbing bolts at the site of an ancient outdoor engraving in northeastern Utah.

Climbing bolts, also known as anchors, were discovered at the site of the Pregnant Sheep Petroglyph Panel on federal land in the northeastern corner of the state on Nov. 10, the Uintah County Sheriff’s Office said.

On Thursday, the sheriff’s office and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management asked for the public’s help in tracking down anyone involved in the installation of bolts near Highway 40’s Musket Shot Springs Overlook, which is about 11 miles from Dinosaur National Monument in neighboring Colorado.

In a statement on Facebook, the bureau characterized the act as vandalism.

The sheriff’s office characterized the installation as having taken place on the petroglyph panel. Sheriff’s officials did not immediately respond to a request for more information.

Information on the specific panel was not immediately available.

Elements associated with similar engravings in Wayne County, Utah, in the southern third of the state, have been radiocarbon dated by Colorado State University geomorphologist Joel Pederson to 1100 A.D., according to the Natural History Museum of Utah.

Collaborator Steven Simms, a Utah State University anthropologist, is quoted by the museum as stating some of the state’s petroglyphs represent “persistence, reformulation, and integration of art, iconography, and ideology among peoples.”

Autumn Gillard, the cultural resource manager for the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, told NBC affiliate KSL of Salt Lake City that installing bolts at the site of a petroglyph is “disrespectful” to the state’s indigenous people because the engravings are sacred to many.

“For us, as tribal people, these are our churches,” she told the station earlier this month. “When folks go in and they vandalize panels, or they vandalize cultural sites, we correlate it to the same thing as if somebody was to go into a temple or a religious space and were to write graffiti all over it or to write their name all over it.”

The search for the bolts’ installer is taking place as climbing advocacy group Access Fund celebrated a December victory for legislation called Protecting America’s Rock Climbing, passed by Congress as part of the Expanding Public Lands Outdoor Recreation Experiences Act.

The bill, in part, “clarifies that climbing and the placement, use, and maintenance of fixed anchors (including bolts, pins, and slings) are appropriate, and not prohibited, within wilderness areas,” the nonprofit group said in a statement on Dec. 19.

The Access Fund said the National Park Service this month backed off a proposal that would have prohibited fixed anchors on federal land.

On Dec. 2, Utah’s Kane County Sheriff’s Office said two people wanted for questioning in the alleged defacing of a petroglyph near Wire Pass, known for its photogenic rock formations, were located and contacted.

Bureau of Land Management district manager Harry Barber told KSL a woman was arrested and could face multiple felony counts connected to the incident. Barber said in a video update posted to Facebook that the woman allegedly wrote her name “and/or other things” on the petroglyph.

It wasn’t clear if the woman has a lawyer, and the status of the case was not available. The federal public defender’s office for Utah did not immediately respond to a request for comment Saturday night.

In Uintah County, roughly 500 miles northeast of Wire Pass, sheriff’s officials indicated any leads that develop in their search for the bolt installer would be forwarded to federal agents.

“BLM law enforcement is asking the public to report any information they may have identifying the person(s) responsible for this incident,” the sheriff’s office there said in its Thursday statement.

Earlier this month, Gov. Spencer Cox stated that he “remained committed” to the Utah Compact on Immigration, a document first released in 2010 and reaffirmed by state leaders in 2019. Cox said, “The principles of the Compact, I think, are still very important.” That is good news for Utah. The bad news is Cox’s support for President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportation.

Cox was not elected to the Utah House of Representatives until 2012, two legislative sessions after the Utah Compact was released followed by unprecedented support by former Gov. Gary Herbert and the conservative state Legislature for comprehensive state-based immigration reform. And despite his welcome support recently for the Utah Compact, I cannot seem to locate a moment when Cox actually signed the document — though I will happily stand corrected if wrong.

My point is that supporting the principles in the Utah Compact while supporting Trump’s mass deportation plans feels a bit like double-dealing.

I am a co-author of the Utah Compact. While I ran Sutherland Institute, we played an instrumental role in changing public opinion on immigration — from 70% of Utahns favoring Trump-like enforcement-only policies early in 2010 to 70% favoring the Compact and the comprehensive reforms passed by the state Legislature in 2011. I was present from beginning to end of those historic and precedent-setting policy reforms.

In other words, I know whereof I speak when I say that the Utah Compact stands in stark contrast to Trump’s rants on mass deportation policies. The policies underlying the 2011 immigration reforms strove to bring otherwise law-abiding undocumented immigrants to the surface of society, leaving the residue of criminal immigrants for law enforcement to clean up. Utah warmly embraced existing undocumented immigrants already living among us peaceably and productively.

In contrast, Trump’s policies underlying mass deportations — insomuch as anyone knows what that means today — portray undocumented immigrants as criminals. And while the label is legally true — a person crossing our border for the first time, for any peaceful and productive reason, commits a misdemeanor — no decent Utahn would treat that person as a hardened criminal. In fact, the offense was simply an “infraction,” like a speeding ticket, when the Utah Compact was created.

I am quite sure that Gov. Cox does not really have in mind deporting every undocumented resident of Utah. The governor is a decent and prudent man, not inhumane or impractical. And yet, what does he mean by supporting Trump’s policies?

Cox announced a five-prong strategy for the state to work with federal immigration officials focusing on “criminal behavior.” Nothing about those five policies gives me concern. What does give me concern is probable overreach by the Trump administration when it deems “criminal behavior” to include otherwise law-abiding undocumented immigrants. My concern is when malum prohibitum is equated with malum in se — when an infraction or misdemeanor is equated with murder, rape and other felonies.

Prior to the historic immigration reforms in 2011, Sutherland Institute published an essay, “Onus or Opportunity: Immigration and Conservatism,” in which we made an authentic conservative argument for those comprehensive reforms.

A serious consideration for us at the time was to ensure that the growing tide of opinion favoring enforcement-only immigration policies did not produce a new police-state mentality. Authentic conservatives certainly believe in law and order but we don’t believe in police states. The Trump-Cox policies proposed are one slight interpretation away from a police state. If “criminal behavior” includes mere undocumented immigrants, authentic conservatives have reason for concern.

The principles of the Utah Compact are the most prudent model to maintain justice and humanity. I know Gov. Cox understands this in his heart.