Connect with us

Utah

Here’s what University of Utah found to shut down a fraternity: A strip club visit, death videos and more hazing

Published

on

Here’s what University of Utah found to shut down a fraternity: A strip club visit, death videos and more hazing


The fraternity’s pledges were blindfolded and didn’t know until they could see again that they had been brought — without the option to refuse — to a South Salt Lake strip club.

The members who organized the visit called themselves “The Strip Club Club.” And they weren’t just senior leaders of the fraternity. Many were alumni, representing generations of past members. Some were 50 or older.

That fall 2024 trip was one of 14 documented instances of hazing that “more likely than not” happened at the University of Utah’s Sigma Nu fraternity over the last school year, according to an investigation the university conducted in May. Based on those findings, the school has moved to shut down the fraternity, terminating any affiliation with it.

“We have no confidence that future members of the fraternity could or would break tradition from this destructive history and practice,” the report concluded, after calling the violations “egregious.”

Advertisement

Sigma Nu cannot reapply for recognition at the U. until at least 2031 — “allowing enough time for current members and leaders of the chapter to graduate,” the school said.

The fraternity’s national affiliate organization has also suspended the group’s charter indefinitely.

“Sigma Nu prohibits hazing, and each fraternity member voluntarily commits to uphold and honor this prohibition,” said Brad Beacham, executive director of Sigma Nu Fraternity, Inc., in a letter dated June 2. Sigma Nu’s mission, Beacham wrote, is “to develop ethical and honorable leaders for society.”

In a 19-page report, university officials detailed repeated hazing beyond the strip club visit. Some recruits reported that they were forced to:

• Drink to the point “they couldn’t remember anything.” (Some pledges were under the legal drinking age.)

Advertisement

• Watch “brain rot” videos that featured porn and images of people being killed.

• Buy and use illegal drugs, particularly marijuana, and carry that with them at all times in a “pledge pack.”

• Do chores, often in the early morning hours.

• Sleep on a cement floor in the frat house basement, while older members would harass them so they couldn’t actually sleep.

• Answer to derogatory names given to them by older members.

Advertisement

In an email sent to Sigma Nu on May 19, Lori McDonald, the U.’s vice president for student affairs, wrote that the fraternity’s hazing history wasn’t limited to the latest fall and spring semesters.

“There has been a pattern of misbehavior over the past six years,” McDonald wrote, “including hazing, alcohol-related violations and destruction of property.”

Most of the rituals, the report says, had been ongoing since at least 2021.

The U. says it first received information about alleged hazing at Sigma Nu on Jan. 28 — when the fraternity was on suspension. The university interviewed more than 50 people connected to Sigma Nu, including current and former leaders, active members and recruits.

Ultimately, the investigation found that the fraternity had broken university policy on hazing — in all three categories the university documents (subtle, harassment and violent) — and likely also broke state and federal law.

Advertisement

In its report, the U. said it was particularly worried that hazing continued at Sigma Nu after several previous warnings and reprimands after investigations in 2018 and 2023. And school leaders were even more troubled, according to the report, that alumni were taking part.

“It is apparent that, at least in Utah, there is a deeply engrained culture and practice of hazing traditions within Sigma Nu,” the U. said.

How Sigma Nu hazed its recruits

Overall, Sigma Nu ran its initiation process with a demerit system, according to the report. Any time a recruit didn’t complete a task — or any time a leader felt they didn’t meet expectations — the pledge was given a mark against them.

Random quizzes were a regular part of initiation, the report states. Recruits were asked to remember the names of fraternity members going back to 2018. These “tests” often took place in the early morning, sometimes at 3 a.m., with loud music blasting while recruits tried to answer.

Pledges also were quizzed after watching explicit and violent videos. Sometimes they were told to write essays about what they viewed.

Advertisement

“New members were told they could request the videos to stop,” the U.’s report said, “but were fearful of speaking up or making such a request.”

Demerits were also handed out if a recruit didn’t participate in chores — with older members telling pledges that anyone who didn’t clean would be “humped.”

New members were expected to scrub the chapter house every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, as well as after any parties. Older members also created messes on purpose for recruits to clean, the report states; recruits were told they could work off demerits if they performed extra cleaning.

Cleaning often happened extremely early. That would violate both the U.’s policy and federal hazing policies, which prohibit any activity that doesn’t allow pledges to get enough sleep.

Such practices go back decades, according to one former member. Kase Johnstun, recounted in a February blog post the same experiences as a Sigma Nu recruit at the U. in 1995. He was initiated but left the fraternity after that.

Advertisement

Johnstun wrote that he experienced forced drinking, mandatory cleaning, harassment and jokes about assaulting women.

“The elders made us get down on our knees and clean the blackened kitchen floor of the most disgusting house on Greek Row,” Johnstun wrote. “The floor turned out to be white linoleum beneath all the gunk.”

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sigma Nu fraternity house at 95 South Wolcott St. and 100 S. at the University of Utah is pictured Wednesday, May 11, 2025.

Alcohol, drugs and blindfolds

One ritual the U. report criticized harshly was referred to as “Don’t F— Your Brother.”

That event took place in November. New members were placed in a circle, where a 30-pack of beer — along with vodka and whiskey — were given to one member to start, then passed around.

Advertisement

Each recruit was told to drink as much as they could “to not leave the new member at the end of the circle with a large amount of alcohol/liquor to drink.” If they didn’t finish the alcohol by the end, they were told they wouldn’t be initiated.

The fraternity’s president and other members, according to the U.’s investigative report, later apologized to the recruits for the event, but said they did it so the younger members would bond.

Alcohol was often present at events even if it was not approved in advance by the university or part of the granted “exemption” to the alcohol-free housing policy. Two such events, both last October, were a Halloween party and a parent’s weekend tailgate. At both, recruits were told to make boxes to conceal kegs.

Recruits were told to plan and pay for the Halloween party. The U.’s report said the party cost each student between $150 and $300.

Each recruit was also allegedly required to carry around a “pledge pack” that included tobacco, condoms, a golf tee, gum and a marijuana pen. The packs’ purpose, the report states, was “if an active member wanted something (i.e., an item in these packs), they would ask new members to provide it to them from their pack.”

Advertisement

Other random items recruits were often told to purchase included blow-up dolls, dildos, cigarettes, pacifiers, energy pills, drugs and liquor.

Older fraternity members were often allowed to be more harsh in their hazing, the U. said, based on a color-coded system. More experienced members (assigned “purple”) could “quiz/yell/reprimand new members at random” and withhold the required interviews to anyone they didn’t like. Newer members (labeled “green”) were told to be more inviting. The system had been in place since the 1980s, according to the report, and Johnstun described it in his blog as happening in 1995.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sigma Nu fraternity house at 95 South Wolcott St. and 100 S. at the University of Utah is pictured Wednesday, May 11, 2025.

At one initiation event in the last year, new members were given a cup of random ingredients and ordered to drink it as a “family tradition.” The ingredients included teriyaki sauce, lemon juice, vodka, pickle juice, fry sauce and beer. Once they finished the drink, they would find a number at the bottom of the cup, assigning their Sigma Nu mentor, known as a “big.”

Leaders would regularly blindfold recruits for different rituals — something that was “beyond the scope” of the Sigma Nu national office’s approved activities.

Advertisement

One Sigma Nu member told U. investigators: “Everyone at Sigma Nu had done it, so it was just repeated.”

Recruits were blindfolded and told to crawl through the chapter house to find their pledge pins. Older members made the exercise dangerous, the U. said, by moving the furniture, creating obstacles, and banging pots and pans to distract pledges.

During initiation week, new members were told they would go camping in Moab. Instead, they were blindfolded and led to the Sigma Nu house’s basement, where they were told to sleep on the cement floor for three days. They weren’t allowed to sleep, the report states, with older members frequently setting off fireworks to prevent it.

Sigma Nu’s century at the U.

Sigma Nu is the second fraternity at the U. to have its charter revoked in the last three years.

In 2022, the U.’s chapter of Kappa Sigma was terminated based on a reported assault at its house during a “wine Wednesday” event. A student told police she was sexually assaulted by a fraternity member while dancing. Kappa Sigma later regained its recognition in 2024.

Advertisement

A second sexual assault was reported in February 2022 at another U. fraternity. The U. responded at the time by temporarily suspending all fraternity and sorority activities and hosting an event for Greek life students about consent.

At the time, students started to post anonymously online about their experiences, saying assaults happened regularly at the houses along the U.’s Greek Row.

Greek Row, the area largely along 100 South at the west end of the Salt Lake City campus, is not technically the university’s property. The organizations are considered independent of the U., though the school oversees and approves fraternity and sorority activities.

One requirement that all U. fraternity and sorority members must fulfill annually is to sign an agreement not to participate in hazing.

The school said it has notified Salt Lake City, which owns the land under the Sigma Nu house, so it can decide what to do next. A city spokesperson said they didn’t immediately know what the city’s plans are.

Advertisement

(Chris Samuels | The Salt Lake Tribune) Fraternity and sorority houses along 100 South adjacent to the University of Utah, Tuesday, Feb. 1, 2022.

The U.’s Sigma Nu chapter was the last one operating in the state. The chapter there started in 1924, and its most famous alumnus, according to the national fraternity’s website, was Western author Wallace Stegner, who graduated from the U. in 1930 and died in 1993.

A Sigma Nu chapter at Utah State University — where legendary Brigham Young University football coach LaVell Edwards was a member from 1949 to 1952 — shut down in 2009 after a student, Michael Stark, died from alcohol poisoning during a hazing ritual.

Southern Utah University shuttered its Sigma Nu chapter in 2012 after “a hazing incident,” the details of which the school declined to share.

Alumni and ‘limited’ accountability

According to the U. report, up to 50 Sigma Nu alumni were present at different hazing events, including the strip club trip, basement “camping,” and mandatory cleanings.

Advertisement

Alumni “would engage in the same behaviors as the active members, such as yelling at the new members while cleaning or when new members provided incorrect answers,” the investigation found.

Those interviewed by investigators could only identify three alumni directly. Without knowing all who were there, the U. said, “there is limited means of accountability to ensure this chapter culture is no longer reinforced or encouraged among new and active members.”

The U. said it would have little recourse against alumni, who are no longer students. Sigma Nu national headquarters had said it will take steps to hold the alumni accountable but did not elaborate on how.

If there’s no action, the U. believes, the issues at the Sigma Nu chapter will never be fixed — because, the U. said in its report, “nothing the university has done in the past has served to break this culture.”

A 2018 investigation found similar hazing at Sigma Nu, including blindfolding, quizzing, drinking and forced cleaning. The U. placed the fraternity on administrative suspension for a year, and reviewed every member for possible suspension or probation. The national organization placed the chapter in “serious concern” status for an additional six months after that, fined the chapter $1,000 and required training on how to avoid hazing.

Advertisement

The U. again investigated Sigma Nu in 2023 for hazing with chores and cleaning. The fraternity appealed a finding of responsibility, which was overturned. After the appeal, the U.’s vice president for student affairs wrote a letter that warned Sigma Nu to “be careful to avoid any conduct that comes close to violating the letter or spirit of the rules relating to new members.”

Last November, less than a year after that letter, the U. received notice that the fraternity rented a house at Bear Lake in northern Utah to host a party. The property owner said there had been underage drinking and “significant damage.” The owner said the damages amounted to more than $41,000, and he plans to sue if there’s no resolution.

The U. said the Bear Lake situation was another factor in the decision to shut down Sigma Nu. All of the activities uncovered in its investigation, the school said, “have caused damage to the reputation of the University of Utah and the Greek system at the university.”

“If allowed to continue,” the school concluded, “[those] could potentially result in legal liability for the institution should someone be seriously harmed from those activities.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

‘Protect us before it’s too late’: Utah youth take fossil fuel fight back to court

Published

on

‘Protect us before it’s too late’: Utah youth take fossil fuel fight back to court


Ten young Utahns argue that the Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining is violating their right to “life, health, and safety.”

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Lydia May spoke during a news conference at Washington Square Park in Salt Lake City following oral arguments in a previous youth climate lawsuit on Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2024. May is among the ten youth plaintiffs who filed a new lawsuit on Monday, Dec. 1, 2025 against the Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining.

Ten young people from Utah are suing the state over the harms caused by fossil fuel development.

The youth plaintiffs — ages 13 to 22 — filed a lawsuit against the Utah Board of Oil, Gas, and Mining, the Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining and the division’s director on Monday.

They argue that new permits for fossil fuel development, including coal, oil and gas, “violate their constitutional rights to life, health, and safety,” according to a news release from Our Children’s Trust, a nonprofit law firm. The plaintiffs want the court to declare the permits unconstitutional, use its authority to review or revoke existing permits and make sure future permits account for public health risks.

Advertisement

“I worry every day about my health, my future, and what kind of world I’ll live in if the state keeps approving these fossil fuel permits,” said Natalie Roberts, one of the youth plaintiffs, in a statement. “We’re fighting for our lives and asking the court to protect us before it’s too late.”

The lawsuit builds on a previous case which many of the same youth brought forward in 2022. A district court dismissed the case later that year, but the Utah Supreme Court agreed to hear the young plaintiff’s appeal in 2023. Earlier this year, the Utah Supreme Court upheld the previous decision to dismiss the lawsuit but ordered the lower court to change its ruling to dismissal without prejudice, opening a door for the young people to sue again.

State officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the lawsuit.

That previous case targeted Utah’s broader energy policy, while this new lawsuit narrows in on fossil fuel permitting, according to the news release.

“The state cannot continue issuing fossil fuel permits that put children’s lives and health in jeopardy,” said Andrew Welle, lead attorney to the plaintiffs. “This case is about holding Utah accountable to its constitutional obligations to protect youth from serious harm caused by air pollution, climate impacts, and unsafe fossil fuel development.”

Advertisement

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Big West Oil refinery in North Salt Lake is pictured on Jan. 6, 2023.

Poor air quality and “climate-related harms,” such as wildfires and extreme heat, have caused respiratory issues and mental health challenges for the young plaintiffs, according to the news release.

“Some days I can’t even go outside because the air is so polluted,” Roberts said. “I get headaches, feel dizzy when it’s too hot, and sometimes I can’t even see down my own street because of smoke from wildfires.”

Similar cases have been filed in other states. A Montana judge in 2023 sided with a group of teens who argued their state violated its constitutional commitment “to maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment” by prioritizing fossil fuel development.

The decision directed Montana state agencies and regulators to consider climate impacts when issuing permits for development. The Montana Supreme Court upheld that ruling late last year.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Sanpete County students, staff mourn loss of two teens killed in wrong-way crash

Published

on

Sanpete County students, staff mourn loss of two teens killed in wrong-way crash


MOUNT PLEASANT, Utah — The tragic loss of two teenagers killed in a wrong-way crash over the holiday weekend is being felt across Utah, especially in the tight-knit community of Mount Pleasant.

Eighteen-year-old Leo Shepherd, who graduated earlier this year from Pleasant Creek School in the North Sanpete School District, was one of two young victims in Saturday’s fiery collision on I-15. His girlfriend, 17-year-old Anneka Wilson of Springville, was also killed.

Pleasant Creek School Principal Steven Solen said the news has devastated students and staff.

“It just crushed us. It’s been really hard for people who know him, especially in a small community like Sanpete. It affects everybody,” Solen said.

Advertisement

The principal said Shepherd graduated early in March after months of focused effort.

“He came in and just worked his butt off,” Solen said. “He adhered to the policies, worked hard, and graduated early in March instead of in May.”

Solen described a group of boys who motivated one another daily. Shepherd’s close friend drove him to school, and together the group worked side by side at the same table, pushing each other to finish strong.

Counselors were available to students at the school Monday to support students and staff grieving the sudden loss.

According to the Utah Highway Patrol, the wrong-way crash happened around 2 a.m. Saturday on I-15 near 1900 South. Troopers say a southbound vehicle was traveling in the northbound lanes when it collided with the teens’ car, causing a fire and killing both Shepherd and Wilson.

Advertisement

“We’ve been on several very bad scenes, but this one was horrific — one of the worst I’ve personally seen,” said UHP Lt. Brian Peterson.

The teens were reportedly driving to Idaho to spend the rest of the holiday weekend with family.

At Springville High School, students dressed up Monday in honor of Wilson.

Solen said the heartbreak is made worse by the fact that the crash appears to have been preventable.

“If someone else could have taken [the suspect’s] keys, or said, ‘No, don’t go.’ Unfortunately, because of his bad decisions, he affected other people for it. He didn’t put their safety into consideration and it’s frustrating,” he said.

Advertisement

He added that he has spent 17 years teaching driver’s education and consistently stresses the dangers of impaired driving.

UHP identified the wrong-way driver as 21-year-old Jose Angel Torres Jimenez, who suffered only minor injuries. He is under investigation for driving under the influence.

“One day you see them alive, and then the next day, they’re gone,” Solen said. “We love his family and hope the best for them.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

How Colorado River talks will affect Utahns and millions more across the Southwest

Published

on

How Colorado River talks will affect Utahns and millions more across the Southwest


Water from the Colorado River and its tributaries irrigates farms, sprinkles lawns and quenches the thirst of millions across Utah and the greater Southwest.

While only 27% of the state’s water comes from it, some 60% of Utahns rely on the Colorado River for drinking water, agriculture and industries such as energy and mining.

The future of that water supply is increasingly tenuous, though. The river is overallocated, meaning farmers, cities and companies have rights to more water than actually runs through the basin. That gap is only growing as climate change makes the region hotter and drier, slowing the river’s flow.

For years, representatives from the seven U.S. states that share the river have been in tense negotiations over how to manage the waterway during dry years. States were supposed to reach a basic agreement on Nov. 11, but they had nothing to show.

Advertisement

These complex negotiations have been happening behind closed doors with little opportunity for public input. But the result of these talks affects the lives of not only most Utahns, but 40 million people across the U.S. Southwest, northern Mexico and 30 federally recognized tribes.

The stakes are high. The river has sustained tribes for time immemorial and has allowed desert cities, such as Salt Lake City and Phoenix, to boom. It waters fields of fruit, vegetables and alfalfa, from melon farms in Utah’s Green River to agriculture giants in California’s Imperial Valley. It creates habitat for endangered fish and carves sandstone layers in beloved national parks, such as Canyonlands and the Grand Canyon.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Colorado River loops back on itself before reaching the confluence with the Green and the start of Cataract Canyon in Canyonlands National Park as seen in mid-October 2021.

“[The Colorado River] matters to the economic integrity of the United States,” said Jack Schmidt, director of the Center for Colorado River Studies at Utah State University. “It matters to the well being of a significant amount of people.”

With less water flowing through the river system, though, states will have to cut back their consumption. But negotiators can’t agree on who carries that burden. If that plan includes mandatory cuts to Utah’s water use, that may affect cities, tribes and farmers across the state.

Advertisement

Utah’s major cities are “potentially vulnerable to cuts”

Utah’s bustling cities along the Wasatch Front are outside of the Colorado River Basin and get much of their water from the creeks and rivers that eventually end up in the Great Salt Lake. But residents still rely in part on the Colorado River thanks to a series of reservoirs and pipelines that deliver water from eastern Utah to cities such as Salt Lake.

Snow flakes falling in the Uinta Mountains this winter will eventually melt into rivers and creeks that feed the Green River, the Colorado River’s largest tributary. But some of that water will be diverted to Strawberry Reservoir then travel through pipelines across the Wasatch Mountain to Utah and Salt Lake Counties.

That web of dams and tunnels is called the Central Utah Project, the Bureau of Reclamation’s largest and most complex water project in Utah, according to the agency. That project is “potentially vulnerable to cuts,” though, because its water rights are newer, said Michael Drake, deputy state engineer with the Utah Division of Water Rights.

Utah, like most Western states, follows prior appropriation, or “first in time, first in right.” Those who began using water first, such as multigenerational farming families, hold senior rights and see cuts last.

(Christopher Cherrington | The Salt Lake Tribune)

Advertisement

“There’s no doubt the Central Utah Project is a junior user on the river,” Gene Shawcroft, Utah’s Colorado River commissioner, said during a press conference on Nov. 12. “We have capacity in reservoirs to help us through drought cycles. We will have to be very judicious about how we use the water during these periods of time when we have low water.”

One option, he added, was purchasing a farmers’ “third crop of hay,” to supplant the water available to cities and towns.

Farmers may take a “significant hit”

Some Utah farmers have been paid to temporarily fallow their fields as part of a new pilot program under the Colorado River Authority of Utah to reduce water use.

Kevin Cotner, a third generation farmer in Carbon County and the president of the Carbon Canal Company, let some of his fields rest for the past three years. He hopes his and his fellow farmers’ voluntary actions will prevent forced cuts.

“We’ve been aware of this potential downstream call on us at some point in the future,” he told reporters with the Colorado River Collaborative last month. “Our thoughts were … if there’s ever a negotiation, we’d be able to raise our hand and say, ‘Hey, we’ve been proactive on this from the get go.”

Advertisement

Agriculture accounts for roughly 62% of Utah’s use of Colorado River water, according to the Colorado River Authority of Utah. Utah’s state engineer already cuts farmers’ water use based on daily river flows and priority of water rights, Drake said.

Farmers may see deeper cuts, though, if Utah is required to use less water under a new Colorado River agreement. “Certainly our ag producers will take a pretty significant hit if we, the state engineer’s office, are called upon to curtail water rights,” Drake said.

During dry years, that may mean farmers have very little water. A few years ago, the Carbon Canal was only able to deliver direct flow water to the area’s farmers for three days out of the year, Kotner said. They relied on water from the Scofield Reservoir for the rest of the season.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Kevin Cotner, a farmer who uses Price River water, fallows some of his fields and leases the saved irrigation water to benefit the over-allocated Colorado River system, as seen on Aug. 16, 2023.

But those reservoirs may not be able to get farmers through dry stretches to the same extent if the state has to cut water use at a basin-wide scale. “Many of the storage reservoirs are operating on relatively junior water rights, so you might see those cut first,” Drake said. If those rights are cut back, the water will flow down stream rather than getting stored in reservoirs.

Advertisement

“A lot of these places are going to be operating as kind of run of the river, however much water is available in the river at any given time in the year,” Drake said. “So that’s going to be a hard challenge for farmers.”

Tribes have substantial water rights, but not all are settled or developed

The Ute Mountain Ute’s tribal owned farm enterprise couldn’t grow wheat this year for Cortez Milling Co., which makes the popular Blue Bird Flour, said Letisha Yazzie, water resources director for the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.

The tribe only received 35% of its water allocation in Colorado this year. It bumped up its supply to 50% by purchasing water from the local irrigation company, but the tribe still had to fallow nearly half of its fields, Yazzie said.

Tribes typically have some of the most senior water rights in the Colorado River Basin, often dating back to the year the tribe’s reservation was established or in some cases time immemorial, according to the Congressional Research Service. But some tribes have accepted more junior water rights when resolving claims. As part of its settlement with Colorado, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe agreed to take more junior water rights in exchange for drinking and agricultural water infrastructure.

The tribe still hasn’t resolved its rights in Utah. The Ute Indian Tribe, San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe and Kaibab Paiute Band also have unresolved water rights in Utah, according to a report by the Water & Tribes Initiative, an organization that builds tribal capacity in water policy and management. The federal government has an obligation to protect tribes’ federally reserved water rights, but tribes have to go through a lengthy and expensive legal process to quantify and secure their water.

Advertisement

Across the Colorado River Basin, eleven tribes still have unresolved claims as of 2023, according to the Congressional Research Service.

(Rick Bowmer | AP) Delanna Mart stands on a dock at a lake on Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Monday, July 25, 2022, in Fort Duchesne. The divvying up between Colorado River Basin states never took into account Indigenous Peoples or many others, and from the start the calculation of who should get what amount of that water may never have been balanced.

Colorado River Basin tribes that have settled their claims currently hold substantial water rights, roughly a quarter of all water in the basin, according to the Water & Tribes Initiative. Not all have the infrastructure to use that water, though.

“Certainly there’s been increased recognition that tribes don’t just have senior water rights, substantial water rights, but also that they haven’t been able to fully develop their rights and access that for the benefit of their communities,” said Heather Tanana, a citizen of the Navajo Nation and law professor at the University of Denver.

As the basin states discuss cuts, she added, “it’s not quite fair or equitable” to ask tribes to cut back their use since they haven’t been able to develop over the past century to the same extent as others.

Advertisement

“What we have at stake is our future,” Yazzie said.

The seven basin states — Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming — have until mid-February to develop a more hashed out plan for the river’s future, according to the Interior Department. Whatever they decide will shape the future for tribes, farmers and millions of people across the Colorado River Basin.

This article is published through the Colorado River Collaborative, a solutions journalism initiative supported by the Janet Quinney Lawson Institute for Land, Water, and Air at Utah State University. See all of our stories about how Utahns are impacted by the Colorado River at greatsaltlakenews.org/coloradoriver.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending