Connect with us

Utah

Here’s what University of Utah found to shut down a fraternity: A strip club visit, death videos and more hazing

Published

on

Here’s what University of Utah found to shut down a fraternity: A strip club visit, death videos and more hazing


The fraternity’s pledges were blindfolded and didn’t know until they could see again that they had been brought — without the option to refuse — to a South Salt Lake strip club.

The members who organized the visit called themselves “The Strip Club Club.” And they weren’t just senior leaders of the fraternity. Many were alumni, representing generations of past members. Some were 50 or older.

That fall 2024 trip was one of 14 documented instances of hazing that “more likely than not” happened at the University of Utah’s Sigma Nu fraternity over the last school year, according to an investigation the university conducted in May. Based on those findings, the school has moved to shut down the fraternity, terminating any affiliation with it.

“We have no confidence that future members of the fraternity could or would break tradition from this destructive history and practice,” the report concluded, after calling the violations “egregious.”

Advertisement

Sigma Nu cannot reapply for recognition at the U. until at least 2031 — “allowing enough time for current members and leaders of the chapter to graduate,” the school said.

The fraternity’s national affiliate organization has also suspended the group’s charter indefinitely.

“Sigma Nu prohibits hazing, and each fraternity member voluntarily commits to uphold and honor this prohibition,” said Brad Beacham, executive director of Sigma Nu Fraternity, Inc., in a letter dated June 2. Sigma Nu’s mission, Beacham wrote, is “to develop ethical and honorable leaders for society.”

In a 19-page report, university officials detailed repeated hazing beyond the strip club visit. Some recruits reported that they were forced to:

• Drink to the point “they couldn’t remember anything.” (Some pledges were under the legal drinking age.)

Advertisement

• Watch “brain rot” videos that featured porn and images of people being killed.

• Buy and use illegal drugs, particularly marijuana, and carry that with them at all times in a “pledge pack.”

• Do chores, often in the early morning hours.

• Sleep on a cement floor in the frat house basement, while older members would harass them so they couldn’t actually sleep.

• Answer to derogatory names given to them by older members.

Advertisement

In an email sent to Sigma Nu on May 19, Lori McDonald, the U.’s vice president for student affairs, wrote that the fraternity’s hazing history wasn’t limited to the latest fall and spring semesters.

“There has been a pattern of misbehavior over the past six years,” McDonald wrote, “including hazing, alcohol-related violations and destruction of property.”

Most of the rituals, the report says, had been ongoing since at least 2021.

The U. says it first received information about alleged hazing at Sigma Nu on Jan. 28 — when the fraternity was on suspension. The university interviewed more than 50 people connected to Sigma Nu, including current and former leaders, active members and recruits.

Ultimately, the investigation found that the fraternity had broken university policy on hazing — in all three categories the university documents (subtle, harassment and violent) — and likely also broke state and federal law.

Advertisement

In its report, the U. said it was particularly worried that hazing continued at Sigma Nu after several previous warnings and reprimands after investigations in 2018 and 2023. And school leaders were even more troubled, according to the report, that alumni were taking part.

“It is apparent that, at least in Utah, there is a deeply engrained culture and practice of hazing traditions within Sigma Nu,” the U. said.

How Sigma Nu hazed its recruits

Overall, Sigma Nu ran its initiation process with a demerit system, according to the report. Any time a recruit didn’t complete a task — or any time a leader felt they didn’t meet expectations — the pledge was given a mark against them.

Random quizzes were a regular part of initiation, the report states. Recruits were asked to remember the names of fraternity members going back to 2018. These “tests” often took place in the early morning, sometimes at 3 a.m., with loud music blasting while recruits tried to answer.

Pledges also were quizzed after watching explicit and violent videos. Sometimes they were told to write essays about what they viewed.

Advertisement

“New members were told they could request the videos to stop,” the U.’s report said, “but were fearful of speaking up or making such a request.”

Demerits were also handed out if a recruit didn’t participate in chores — with older members telling pledges that anyone who didn’t clean would be “humped.”

New members were expected to scrub the chapter house every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, as well as after any parties. Older members also created messes on purpose for recruits to clean, the report states; recruits were told they could work off demerits if they performed extra cleaning.

Cleaning often happened extremely early. That would violate both the U.’s policy and federal hazing policies, which prohibit any activity that doesn’t allow pledges to get enough sleep.

Such practices go back decades, according to one former member. Kase Johnstun, recounted in a February blog post the same experiences as a Sigma Nu recruit at the U. in 1995. He was initiated but left the fraternity after that.

Advertisement

Johnstun wrote that he experienced forced drinking, mandatory cleaning, harassment and jokes about assaulting women.

“The elders made us get down on our knees and clean the blackened kitchen floor of the most disgusting house on Greek Row,” Johnstun wrote. “The floor turned out to be white linoleum beneath all the gunk.”

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sigma Nu fraternity house at 95 South Wolcott St. and 100 S. at the University of Utah is pictured Wednesday, May 11, 2025.

Alcohol, drugs and blindfolds

One ritual the U. report criticized harshly was referred to as “Don’t F— Your Brother.”

That event took place in November. New members were placed in a circle, where a 30-pack of beer — along with vodka and whiskey — were given to one member to start, then passed around.

Advertisement

Each recruit was told to drink as much as they could “to not leave the new member at the end of the circle with a large amount of alcohol/liquor to drink.” If they didn’t finish the alcohol by the end, they were told they wouldn’t be initiated.

The fraternity’s president and other members, according to the U.’s investigative report, later apologized to the recruits for the event, but said they did it so the younger members would bond.

Alcohol was often present at events even if it was not approved in advance by the university or part of the granted “exemption” to the alcohol-free housing policy. Two such events, both last October, were a Halloween party and a parent’s weekend tailgate. At both, recruits were told to make boxes to conceal kegs.

Recruits were told to plan and pay for the Halloween party. The U.’s report said the party cost each student between $150 and $300.

Each recruit was also allegedly required to carry around a “pledge pack” that included tobacco, condoms, a golf tee, gum and a marijuana pen. The packs’ purpose, the report states, was “if an active member wanted something (i.e., an item in these packs), they would ask new members to provide it to them from their pack.”

Advertisement

Other random items recruits were often told to purchase included blow-up dolls, dildos, cigarettes, pacifiers, energy pills, drugs and liquor.

Older fraternity members were often allowed to be more harsh in their hazing, the U. said, based on a color-coded system. More experienced members (assigned “purple”) could “quiz/yell/reprimand new members at random” and withhold the required interviews to anyone they didn’t like. Newer members (labeled “green”) were told to be more inviting. The system had been in place since the 1980s, according to the report, and Johnstun described it in his blog as happening in 1995.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sigma Nu fraternity house at 95 South Wolcott St. and 100 S. at the University of Utah is pictured Wednesday, May 11, 2025.

At one initiation event in the last year, new members were given a cup of random ingredients and ordered to drink it as a “family tradition.” The ingredients included teriyaki sauce, lemon juice, vodka, pickle juice, fry sauce and beer. Once they finished the drink, they would find a number at the bottom of the cup, assigning their Sigma Nu mentor, known as a “big.”

Leaders would regularly blindfold recruits for different rituals — something that was “beyond the scope” of the Sigma Nu national office’s approved activities.

Advertisement

One Sigma Nu member told U. investigators: “Everyone at Sigma Nu had done it, so it was just repeated.”

Recruits were blindfolded and told to crawl through the chapter house to find their pledge pins. Older members made the exercise dangerous, the U. said, by moving the furniture, creating obstacles, and banging pots and pans to distract pledges.

During initiation week, new members were told they would go camping in Moab. Instead, they were blindfolded and led to the Sigma Nu house’s basement, where they were told to sleep on the cement floor for three days. They weren’t allowed to sleep, the report states, with older members frequently setting off fireworks to prevent it.

Sigma Nu’s century at the U.

Sigma Nu is the second fraternity at the U. to have its charter revoked in the last three years.

In 2022, the U.’s chapter of Kappa Sigma was terminated based on a reported assault at its house during a “wine Wednesday” event. A student told police she was sexually assaulted by a fraternity member while dancing. Kappa Sigma later regained its recognition in 2024.

Advertisement

A second sexual assault was reported in February 2022 at another U. fraternity. The U. responded at the time by temporarily suspending all fraternity and sorority activities and hosting an event for Greek life students about consent.

At the time, students started to post anonymously online about their experiences, saying assaults happened regularly at the houses along the U.’s Greek Row.

Greek Row, the area largely along 100 South at the west end of the Salt Lake City campus, is not technically the university’s property. The organizations are considered independent of the U., though the school oversees and approves fraternity and sorority activities.

One requirement that all U. fraternity and sorority members must fulfill annually is to sign an agreement not to participate in hazing.

The school said it has notified Salt Lake City, which owns the land under the Sigma Nu house, so it can decide what to do next. A city spokesperson said they didn’t immediately know what the city’s plans are.

Advertisement

(Chris Samuels | The Salt Lake Tribune) Fraternity and sorority houses along 100 South adjacent to the University of Utah, Tuesday, Feb. 1, 2022.

The U.’s Sigma Nu chapter was the last one operating in the state. The chapter there started in 1924, and its most famous alumnus, according to the national fraternity’s website, was Western author Wallace Stegner, who graduated from the U. in 1930 and died in 1993.

A Sigma Nu chapter at Utah State University — where legendary Brigham Young University football coach LaVell Edwards was a member from 1949 to 1952 — shut down in 2009 after a student, Michael Stark, died from alcohol poisoning during a hazing ritual.

Southern Utah University shuttered its Sigma Nu chapter in 2012 after “a hazing incident,” the details of which the school declined to share.

Alumni and ‘limited’ accountability

According to the U. report, up to 50 Sigma Nu alumni were present at different hazing events, including the strip club trip, basement “camping,” and mandatory cleanings.

Advertisement

Alumni “would engage in the same behaviors as the active members, such as yelling at the new members while cleaning or when new members provided incorrect answers,” the investigation found.

Those interviewed by investigators could only identify three alumni directly. Without knowing all who were there, the U. said, “there is limited means of accountability to ensure this chapter culture is no longer reinforced or encouraged among new and active members.”

The U. said it would have little recourse against alumni, who are no longer students. Sigma Nu national headquarters had said it will take steps to hold the alumni accountable but did not elaborate on how.

If there’s no action, the U. believes, the issues at the Sigma Nu chapter will never be fixed — because, the U. said in its report, “nothing the university has done in the past has served to break this culture.”

A 2018 investigation found similar hazing at Sigma Nu, including blindfolding, quizzing, drinking and forced cleaning. The U. placed the fraternity on administrative suspension for a year, and reviewed every member for possible suspension or probation. The national organization placed the chapter in “serious concern” status for an additional six months after that, fined the chapter $1,000 and required training on how to avoid hazing.

Advertisement

The U. again investigated Sigma Nu in 2023 for hazing with chores and cleaning. The fraternity appealed a finding of responsibility, which was overturned. After the appeal, the U.’s vice president for student affairs wrote a letter that warned Sigma Nu to “be careful to avoid any conduct that comes close to violating the letter or spirit of the rules relating to new members.”

Last November, less than a year after that letter, the U. received notice that the fraternity rented a house at Bear Lake in northern Utah to host a party. The property owner said there had been underage drinking and “significant damage.” The owner said the damages amounted to more than $41,000, and he plans to sue if there’s no resolution.

The U. said the Bear Lake situation was another factor in the decision to shut down Sigma Nu. All of the activities uncovered in its investigation, the school said, “have caused damage to the reputation of the University of Utah and the Greek system at the university.”

“If allowed to continue,” the school concluded, “[those] could potentially result in legal liability for the institution should someone be seriously harmed from those activities.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska

Published

on

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska


The weeks following the college football regular season provide players plenty of time to weigh their NFL draft options against their desire to compete in a bowl game.

In Utah’s case, offensive tackles Spencer Fano and Caleb Lomu, as well as defensive end Logan Fano, decided it was in their best interests to forego the Utes’ Las Vegas Bowl matchup against Nebraska and declare for the 2026 NFL Draft instead.

Utah quarterback Devon Dampier, meanwhile, was looking forward to one last ride with his 2025 teammates before calling it a season.

Advertisement

“I chose to finish out this season with my team,” Dampier said during a media availability session Thursday. “I’m gonna play in the game. But some people, it’s a lot higher stakes; got a couple first rounders and things like that.”

Advertisement

‘We know those guys love us. They let it be known every day since they’ve been here, so we still support those guys and they support us.”

Utah head coach Kyle Whittingham presumed Thursday that the Fano brothers and Lomu would be the only bowl game opt-outs on Utah’s side, along with a few walk-ons. Some Utes who announced their transfer portal intentions continued to practice with the team as well.

Dampier confirmed his availability for the Las Vegas Bowl after a historic regular season under center, becoming the first Utes signal-caller to throw for over 2,000 yards and rush for over 600 yards in a single season since Alex Smith accomplished the feat in 2004. Dampier had 2,180 passing yards, a career-high 22 passing touchdowns and only five interceptions after throwing 12 picks last season. He also had 687 rushing yards and seven touchdowns going into Utah’s postseason game.

While his intentions for Dec. 31 were made clear, Dampier’s status for next season remained somewhat cloudy. He did hint at making an announcement alongside fellow quarterback Byrd Ficklin, though it was postponed after Ficklin’s return to the Utes was leaked Dec. 11.

Advertisement

“Y’all going to see,” Dampier said when asked if he was coming back for the 2026 campaign. “It’s great. I’m very happy to be here.”

Advertisement

“[Ficklin and I] were trying to do something special, but his [return] got a little leaked out before we could get to it. But it’s coming.”

Dampier said during a radio show appearance earlier in December that he was “big on staying” and had “no intentions to leave” the Utes. He also said over the airwaves that he anticipates being named a captain for the 2026 squad, and that he does play a role in recruiting.

Dampier discussed Kyle Whittingham’s impending departure from the program and the future outlook with Morgan Scalley set to take over during his media availability session.

On Kyle Whittingham’s decision to step down as head coach

Advertisement

“That’s a legend. I got a lot of respect for him. I think he’s transformed this program. He’s made it perfect for [Morgan] Scalley to step in. I’m still excited to still be at Ute.”

On Morgan Scalley taking over as head coach

“I’m very confident in Scalley. When I came here on my visit, that was someone I talked to. He let me know the rundown for when his time comes. He had his full belief in me and in my talent, so I’m perfectly fine where I’m at.”

Advertisement

On sending Whittingham off with a win

“It means a lot to me. I could try to speak for everybody on the team, but for me, especially, that’s a coach that believed in me to come in here after being at New Mexico, and just had a full trust in me, in the offense, to do what we do. And that’s just huge respect from him, and just what he’s done for this program. This is one only programs in college football where you know what Utes do, you know how they play and you know the mentality. So for him to leave that up, I got to finish well for him.”

Advertisement

On whether the program is in better hands than it would be if an outsider was hired

“Most definitely. I think just what’s already set here, what’s known here; Scalley has been under Whitt. I think Whitt’s done a great job of allowing him to demonstrate what a good head coach looks like and I know Scalley is gonna step into it and do what he does.”

MORE UTAH NEWS & ANALYSIS

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts

Published

on

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts


DETROIT — Just as the Detroit Red Wings looked like they were getting into a groove, they hit a stumbling block Wednesday in a 4-1 loss to the Utah Mammoth.

It’s only one game for a team that still sits atop the Atlantic Division, and none of the Red Wings players or coaches were going to panic in the aftermath. But a night after head coach Todd McLellan cautioned, “You can’t give it back,” after a strong run of recent play, a three-goal loss on home ice wasn’t the follow-up anyone was looking for.

Here’s what went wrong and some other thoughts from Wednesday night.

1. There was no doubt what McLellan thought the biggest issue was against the Mammoth.

Advertisement

“For me, the difference was obvious,” he said. “It was play around our net.”

And that was a theme on all four goals Detroit allowed. On the first, Simon Edvinsson drifted just off of Clayton Keller in the slot, giving him enough room to put home a big rebound off Cam Talbot. On the second, Ben Chiarot didn’t tie up Jack McBain on the back post. The third was a bit different, as no one really lost their man, but when Moritz Seider went to clear a trickling puck headed for a goal line, he ended up bouncing it off Talbot’s pad and right to Dylan Guenther for an easy goal. And on the fourth, Nate Danielson was a step or two off his check in the slot for a one-timer.

“It’s like sitting at your desk at school,” McLellan said. “You’re sitting there, but big deal. Are you doing any work? We’re in position. Do the work. Do the job. Get it done.”

McLellan also noted that Edvinsson and Danielson threw their heads back after the first and fourth goals, indicating they knew immediately what had gone wrong.

2. Though those goals against were ultimately the difference in the final score, Detroit also created far too little danger of its own against the Mammoth, especially at five-on-five.

Advertisement

Detroit’s top players, in particular, had uncharacteristic nights, with their first line (Larkin, Lucas Raymond and Emmitt Finnie) and the top defense pair (Seider and Edvinsson) all ending the night at minus-2, and with five-on-five expected goals shares below 25 percent, according to Natural Stat Trick.

Finnie got the Red Wings’ lone goal on a third-period power-play blast that briefly gave Detroit life, but there just weren’t enough serious chances in the second or third periods to really threaten Utah.

Although Detroit’s power play eventually scored in the third, a pair of second-period opportunities on the man advantage went by uneventfully when the score was still 1-0. The Red Wings didn’t record a shot on goal in the first of those two chances, and the top unit managed just one shot on goal in the second as well.

“We had looks, we had zone time, we just didn’t get it done,” Larkin said. “Didn’t get pucks through. Credit to them, they had a tight diamond, and I’m sure Todd will tell you both on their penalty kill and five-on-five, they probably won the net play tonight, and that was probably the story of the game.”

Certainly, the lack of any five-on-five offense is a more damning proposition than a 1-for-4 night on the power play. But situationally, in a one-goal game, those were big missed chances to swing momentum. Utah scored just 22 seconds after killing off the second penalty to make it 2-0, and that ultimately proved to be the game-winning goal.

Advertisement

Still, with just one even-strength goal in the last two games, the Red Wings are going to need more there, and that includes their top players, who have really carried them offensively to this point.

3. Wednesday’s loss dropped the Red Wings to 1-5 in the second half of back-to-backs this season.

It’s a small sample, but that stands out, even with the inherent challenge of playing on consecutive nights. It didn’t seem to slow Utah too much Wednesday, for example.

Larkin acknowledged the Red Wings will have to be better in those situations, particularly with more on the horizon. Detroit will play three more sets of back-to-backs in the next two weeks, with a home-and-home against the Washington Capitals this weekend, tilts against the Carolina Hurricanes and Toronto Maple Leafs the following weekend, and then the Winnipeg Jets and Pittsburgh Penguins at New Year’s.

I asked McLellan if there was anything he could put his finger on with the back-to-backs, and he pointed out that Detroit hadn’t scored first in any of those losses. That is true, and it’s probably a symptom and a cause.

Advertisement

Not scoring early has been a theme all season, though. Detroit has just 19 first-period goals in 35 games, which ranks 30th in the league, while giving up 28. The goals against number isn’t so bad — it’s still roughly league average — but it still translates to coming out of the first in a hole too often.

Cam Talbot hasn’t quite hit the same highs as earlier this season in recent games. (Rick Osentoski / Imagn Images)

4. Just as John Gibson seems to have found a bit of a rhythm for the Red Wings, Cam Talbot — who was Detroit’s rock in net early this season — has slipped into a bit of a funk. Not many of Wednesday’s goals were on him, but the rebound he gave up on the first goal (stemming from a low-percentage shot from along the boards) and then the trickling puck that led the third are atypical of where he was to start the season.

McLellan said he thinks the Red Wings have played better in front of Gibson of late, a reversal from early in the season, but that he’d “have a conversation (with Talbot) real quick, just let him know that we believe in him, because we do.”

5. After Tuesday night’s game, I noted Detroit had a tougher portion of the schedule coming up, with the back-to-back games against Washington and hosting a good Dallas Stars team to lead into Christmas.

Advertisement

Co-worker Dom Luszczyszyn pointed out to me that it’s actually more dramatic in the big picture. His model projects the Red Wings with the league’s toughest remaining schedule coming into Wednesday, and Detroit’s remaining opponents also have the second-highest collective win percentage.

That’s just one more reason that banking every point possible matters right now, especially from Eastern Conference foes they’ll be competing with for a playoff spot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah organization urges harm reduction after executive order on fentanyl

Published

on

Utah organization urges harm reduction after executive order on fentanyl


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

ABC4 Utah is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

ABC4 Utah is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending