Connect with us

Utah

Feeling ‘a sense of betrayal,’ Rocky Mountain Power customers host ‘hearing’ to protest Utah rate hikes

Published

on

Feeling ‘a sense of betrayal,’ Rocky Mountain Power customers host ‘hearing’ to protest Utah rate hikes


In what some saw as a void of opportunity to weigh in on Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed rate increase, a group of the utility’s customers gathered for their own public “people’s hearing” on Saturday.

A row of five chairs reserved for utility executives and members of Utah’s Public Service Commission sat empty in the front row of a conference room at the Salt Lake City Public Library’s Marmalade Branch while electricity customers shared their personal testimony to a video camera.

“We’re going to send [the recording] to the Public Service Commission as a replacement for the hearing that they were not willing to have,” said Luis Miranda, a campaign organizer for the Sierra Club’s Utah chapter.

Utah’s Public Service Commission is currently considering Rocky Mountain Power’s request to raise its electricity rates for customers by 18% — down from a 30% increase the company initially requested last year. But pro-coal lawmakers and clean energy advocates alike say customers will end up paying the difference in the long run through Rocky Mountain Power parent company PacifiCorp’s Energy Balancing Account (EBA).

Advertisement

The hearing process has been mired in legislative and procedural drama. Legislators tried and failed this year to abolish the EBA for Utah customers. They have also repeatedly asked Rocky Mountain Power to separate from its parent company so that Utah customers did not pay for “poor regulatory decisions” in other states.

Saturday’s testimonies, however, were largely personal.

Jeffery White, a tiny homes architect and self-described senior citizen, said he hoped for “peace” in his retirement years.

Instead, “I find myself, like so many others, at the kitchen table doing math, trying to stretch a fixed income across food, medicine and power bills,” White said. “Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed hike isn’t just a number. It’s a sentence. It leaves people like me in cold homes staring at dark ceilings.”

The meeting, organized by a coalition of clean energy advocates, focused on Rocky Mountain Power’s renewed commitment to coal and natural gas after previously promising to amp up its clean energy portfolio.

Advertisement

“I feel a sense of betrayal as a homeowner,” said Paul Zuckerman, who said he moved to Utah in the 1970s and “fell in love with the clean air environment.”

Utah lawmakers last year passed two bills to keep the state’s two biggest coal plants alive and allow Rocky Mountain Power to pass the associated costs onto Utah customers.

(Shannon Sollitt | The Salt Lake Tribune) The names of Utah Public Service Commissioners and PacifiCorps executives, including Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffet, adorned empty chairs at a meeting Saturday afternoon about Rocky Mountain Power’s proposed rate hike. Berkshire Hathaway owns PacifiCorps, RMP’s parent company.

Shareholders at Berkshire Hathaway, which owns PacifiCorps and Rocky Mountain Power, will consider two proposals ahead of their May 3 shareholder meeting that ask the company to evaluate the financial impacts of its energy-saving initiatives. One proposal suggests the company’s “voluntary environmental activities” are “unnecessary” and do not benefit company shareholders, according to a proxy statement.

The other suggests Berkshire Hathaway’s fossil fuel investments are, in fact, harming the company and its shareholders due to increased insurance rates fueled by climate disasters.

Advertisement

Berkshire Hathaway’s board of directors has recommended voting “no” on both proposals. Organizers of Saturday’s meaning said the proposals would, at least, provide an “accounting of corporate climate change-related activities” and provide information that would benefit “shareholders and RMP ratepayers alike.”

But ratepayers are hit harder by Rocky Mountain Power’s policies, customers said.

“Don’t make the most vulnerable among us pay the price for someone else’s profit,” White said like he was addressing the Public Service Commissioners.

The utility’s customers who attended Saturday morning’s event said they were unwilling to pay more to burn coal and accelerate climate change.

“The people of Utah already pay a high enough price for climate change,” said Emma Verhamme, a Salt Lake City resident and RMP customer.

Advertisement

Verhamme listed, at length, the ways, she said, Salt Lake residents have “paid” for climate change: the dry Great Salt Lake, less snowfall in the winter months, more intense wildfire smoke in summer months, unhealthy air quality that keeps kids inside at recess some days.

“Personally, I don’t want any of that,” Verhemme said.

Some customers might, however, be willing to pay more to invest in renewable energy, said Ted Gurney.

“If they spend it on what we like, we’ll pay the rent,” Gurney proposed.

Shannon Sollitt is a Report for America corps member covering business accountability and sustainability for The Salt Lake Tribune. Your donation to match our RFA grant helps keep her writing stories like this one; please consider making a tax-deductible gift of any amount today by clicking here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

President Trump expected to reduce the size of Utah monuments

Published

on

President Trump expected to reduce the size of Utah monuments


  • President Donald Trump is expected to sign executive orders reducing the size of Utah’s Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments on Monday.
  • The monuments have shifted in size between administrations, with Trump reducing them in 2017 and President Joe Biden restoring their original boundaries in 2021.
  • Environmental groups and Utah officials are divided over the potential reduction, with critics threatening legal challenges and supporters seeking more local control.

President Donald Trump plans to sign an executive order on Monday afternoon shrinking the size of two national monuments in Utah, which currently cover a combined 5,094 square miles, the Deseret News confirmed on background with a Utah source.

The two national monuments — Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears — have oscillated in size through the previous several presidential administrations.

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was created by President Bill Clinton in September 1996. Bears Ears National Monument was created by President Barack Obama in December 2016. Both designations received a mixed reception among Utahns.

In 2017, Trump reduced Bears Ears by about 85% and Grand Staircase by about 46%.

Then when former President Joe Biden took office in 2021, he restored them to their original sizes.

Advertisement

Trump is expected to sign the executive orders in the Oval Office on Monday at 4:30 EST.

In a statement to the Deseret News on Friday, the White House said, “Any policy announcement will come directly from the President. This reporting about potential executive orders is pure speculation.”

National monument designations place restrictions on what recreational and economic activity residents and visitors can do on the land. The designation also prohibits anyone from pursuing new mining claims, oil and gas leasing, coal exploration or new commercial infrastructure projects.

Tourists look at the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument ion Friday, May 14, 2021. | Laura Seitz, Deseret News

However, the Bureau of Land Management previously found that Bears Ears and Grand Staircase have little to offer in terms of oil and gas potential, the Deseret News previously reported.

For nearly three decades since Clinton designated the first monument, Utah’s federal delegation has asked for reductions in land size for more local control, recreation and grazing.

Advertisement

Recently, Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy challenged the monument’s resource management plan to return to a plan the first Trump administration outlined in 2020 with help from local Utahns.

However, her bill died after missing a key deadline to make it to the Senate for a vote.

People react to the potential land reduction

Butler Wash Ruins, a cliff dwelling that was built and occupied by the Ancestral Puebloans in about 1200 A.D., can be seen at Bears Ears National Monument on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. The cliff dwelling features multiple habitation, storage and ceremonial structures. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News

Based on an initial report by ABC4, environmental groups are already vocalizing their disapproval over a potential reduction of monument land.

Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance Executive Director Scott Braden described the potential executive order as “unlawful, unwise and unacceptable,” in a press release sent to the Deseret News.

“This action will only bring uncertainty and chaos to places that should instead be protected for their rich biodiversity, unique geology, and remarkable cultural values,” he wrote. Braden said SUWA was preparing to fight the executive order through lawsuits or by lobbying in Congress.

On X, former Utah state Sen. Nate Blouin referenced the land reduction in conjunction with the Babylon Fire, which as of Friday is 25% contained and has covered more than 100,000 acres in southeastern Utah.

Advertisement

“As the largest wildfire in the U.S. burns pristine landscapes in southeastern Utah, Trump is threatening to shrink both Grand Staircase & Bears Ears National Monuments,” Blouin wrote. “This unprecedented move is happening without input from the region’s ancestral inhabitants.

Ricky Agnew, left, and wife Christy Agnew, right, look at petroglyphs on Newspaper Rock at Bears Ears National Monument on Monday, Dec. 1, 2025. The petroglyphs on Newspaper Rock date back to 1,500 years ago. The older art is attributed to the Basketmaker and Ancestral Puebloan people who inhabited this region from approximately 500 B.C. to 1350 A.D. The more recent petroglyphs are attributed to the Ute people who still live in the Four Corners area. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing expected to wrap up Friday – KSLNewsRadio

Published

on

Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing expected to wrap up Friday – KSLNewsRadio


PROVO — The preliminary hearing for Tyler Robinson is expected to wrap up Friday morning in Provo. But it will still be several weeks before a decision is made on whether there is enough probable cause to bind him over for trial.

Robinson, 23, is charged with 10 crimes, the most serious being aggravated murder, in the death of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed on the campus of Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025. A preliminary hearing is held to determine whether there is sufficient probable cause to go to trial on the charges levied against a defendant.

The Utah County Attorney’s Office finished calling their witnesses to testify on Thursday. Robinson’s defense team, who have already called two forensic experts from the FBI and ATF to testify, are expected to call one more on Friday before resting. Robinson has been attempting to cast doubt on the reliability of DNA testing, arguing that test results are subjective.

Prosecutors have objected several times to the line of questioning, arguing that it falls well outside the bounds of what is needed for a preliminary hearing. Even 4th District Judge Tony Graf warned defense attorney Michael Burt on Thursday during one line of questioning, “I feel we are exiting the orbit of probable cause.”

Advertisement

At the end of a preliminary hearing, both sides typically give closing arguments, and the judge decides if there is enough evidence for a defendant to proceed to trial. On Thursday, Graf granted a defense motion for each side to first submit briefs summarizing their arguments. The state will submit its brief by July 28, followed by the defense’s reply on Aug. 11 and the state’s rebuttal on Aug. 18. After that, another hearing will be held on Sept. 1 for both sides to present their cases in court.

Also on Thursday, portions of the video interview of Robinson’s roommate and boyfriend at the time of Kirk’s death, Lance Twiggs, were shown to the courtroom after much debate.

In addition, screenshots of the text messages exchanged between Twiggs and Robinson, a note Robinson left for Twiggs and messages on Discord that Robinson allegedly sent to his friend group prior to turning himself in, were all displayed in court.

For each piece of evidence introduced during the week-long hearing, Graf has had to decide:

  1. Whether to admit that evidence into the record;
  2. Whether that evidence should be shown to everyone in the courtroom;
  3. Whether that evidence can be filmed by the livestream camera broadcasting the hearing.

Robinson’s defense team remains adamant that broadcasting evidence to people outside the courtroom will jeopardize their client’s right to a fair trial by prejudging a future jury pool. Prosecutors want the evidence shown to everyone for the sake of transparency. Graf has compromised on several pieces of evidence by allowing them to be displayed to people in the courtroom but not on the livestream feed.

The extended debates over what evidence can be shown to the public and what is only viewed by attorneys and the judge have prompted Jeff Neiman, the attorney for Erika Kirk and the Kirk family, to address the courtroom several times, both in person and in a briefing filed Wednesday night, calling on the court to make all evidence public.

Advertisement

“For 10 months, the victim’s family has waited for this preliminary hearing. Erika Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk, and his grieving parents traveled to this courtroom for one reason: to be present at these proceedings and to bear witness to the evidence concerning the death of their husband and son. At certain points throughout the preliminary hearing, the Kirk family sat in the room while evidence was admitted but not presented for their viewing. They were present in body, yet denied the very thing their presence was meant to secure: their ability to meaningfully observe the preliminary hearing,” Neiman said. “The victim’s family’s position is simple. At a minimum, every exhibit entered into evidence during the preliminary hearing must be visible to every person lawfully present in the courtroom.”

Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk’s parents have been in the courtroom all week for the preliminary hearing.

At Neiman’s request, Graf agreed that at the end of court on Friday, he will show to the courtroom only the enhanced UVU surveillance video allegedly showing Robinson’s movements across the roof of the Losee Center and when he drops off the roof and runs to a wooded area off Campus Drive. The video includes moments in which film editors zoom in on the alleged gunman and impose a red circle around him to make it easier to view. The video was originally submitted as evidence but was only shown to Graf and attorneys.

Friday’s hearing begins at 9 a.m. Watch it livestreamed here:

We want to hear from you.

Have a story idea or tip? Send it to the KSL NewsRadio team here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Jazz vs Washington Wizards recap: Darryn Peterson is only a man

Published

on

Utah Jazz vs Washington Wizards recap: Darryn Peterson is only a man


It’s on nights like these that I’m reminded of the ravine that divides the NBA from all other levels of basketball. This Summer League tilt was sloppy on both sides, and not many fringe players earned an NBA contract tonight, by the looks of it.

This matchup has always been about the number-one pick AJ Dybantsa and the number-two pick Darryn Peterson. Rivals since high school, these two are in an eternal struggle for the designation of being “number-one”. They wanted to be the best in their high school class. They wanted to be the first off the board in the NBA Draft. Rest assured, these two will be battling for Rookie of the Year honors by the season’s end.

Advertisement

Both stars were fully aware of the magnitude of this game, and both wanted to be the first to strike in the Thomas and Mack Center.

Advertisement

Dybantsa took his first touch all the way to the basket and forced up an off-kilter shot that missed everything.

Peterson took the ball the other way and forced up a top-of-the-key three-pointer that missed badly.

Dybantsa quickly picked up the slack, flipping an under-and-around lay-in and following that up with a good leading bounce pass through traffic to find a cutting teammate.

From there, the 1-2 combo settled in and let the game flow around them.

For the first time in a Utah Jazz uniform, Darryn Peterson walked among mortal men as a commoner. He had a very slow start in his Las Vegas debut, opening the night 0-for-3 from the floor and even whiffing on his first all-or-nothing foul shot. His steps were hurried, and he stood unstable before his first trip to the bench. Not quite so infallible outside of the mountain air in Salt Lake City.

Advertisement

Advertisement

AJ claimed the first quarter, dicing up the defense with fadeaways, dribble chains, and this vicious, inhumane slam that will dominate your social media feed for the next day or so.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending