Connect with us

Seattle, WA

Seattle Architects Unveil Designs for Social Housing Ahead of February Vote – The Urbanist

Published

on

Seattle Architects Unveil Designs for Social Housing Ahead of February Vote – The Urbanist


A social housing case study by Neiman Taber looks at combining family-sized housing with co-living studios and townhomes. The site is a surplus City-owned lot in Northgate. (Justin Oaksford)

In support of their effort to build social housing in Seattle, the nonprofit House Our Neighbors recently released architectural designs for transforming a piece of surplus publicly-owned land in Northgate. In the vision, designed by Neiman Taber Architects, a row of townhomes, a block of family-sized apartments, and a wing of co-living efficiency studios are wrapped around a central courtyard.

While voters approved formation of the Seattle Social Housing Developer in 2023, the city has a special election on deck in February with dueling ballot measures to actually fund that public developer. House Our Neighbors put forward the grassroots Initiative 137 that will be on next February’s ballot as Proposition 1A, while the centrist majority on Seattle City Council proposed the reactionary alternative. Voters will be asked whether they want to fund social housing at all, and if yes, they’ll have to choose between one of the two options.

“For House Our Neighbors, [Neiman Taber Architects] designed a detailed proposal for this parcel as a proof-of-concept to expand our idea of what a brighter, more equitable future could actually look like,” House Our Neighbors wrote. “Their design shows what is possible when we put people over profit; A variety of unit types to suit all kinds of households — from students and working class people to elderly folks, people with mobility needs, and families with and without children and with ample communal space and an interior courtyard where the community can come together to socialize and support each other. All of it affordable. Forever.”

The project envisioned on Northgate Way would create a central courtyard greenspace for socializing. (Neiman Taber Architects)

House Our Neighbors Co-Executive Director Tiffani McCoy said more design examples are on the way, with a call out for architects to lay out their own visions for surplus City-owned parcels.

Advertisement

“This is all pro bono from these architecture firms, but we know from I-135 that architects are incredibly excited about social housing, not just because they would be able to actually afford to live in the city in which they work, because architects are often between 80 to 120% of AMI [area median income], but also, you know, they’re just so restricted in their craft,” McCoy told The Urbanist. “Their creativity is really lost a lot because we’re more focused on quantity over quality, which has its benefits. But especially working in typical affordable housing buildings, the focus is as many as you can with the amount of funding.”

A rendering of the Northgate proposal show a brick townhome row and brick co-living building next to the larger building with family-sized apartments. The courtyard includes a playground and families playing or relaxing. (Neiman Taber)

The first social housing prototype came from the 2023 Seattle Design Festival with a submission by architects Jacqui Aiello and Anna Brodersen, McCoy said. The pair proposed a nine-unit apartment building with one ground-floor commercial space and a mix of unit sizes including two- and three-bedroom units. The roughly 4,000-square-foot lot being eyed was a surplus City-owned site at 1405 NE 65th Street in Roosevelt.

A diagram lays out the Passivhaus environmental standards of the project, which includes a greenscaping, white roof, cross ventilation, and high quality thermal insulation. (Neiman Taber)

As laid out in the charter for the Seattle Social Housing Developer, the Roosevelt building would be built to Passive House standards, which go above and beyond the energy efficiency and sustainability requirements of Seattle’s already rigorous code.

In addition to meeting very high environmental standards, social housing proponents are also hoping to design spaces that encourage socializing and social wellbeing. The courtyard space in the Northgate proposal seeks to foster those bonds, as does the rooftop and atrium in the Roosevelt proposal.

“You have these spaces that are designated to getting to know people, relationship-building community space,” McCoy said. “There’s this beautiful opportunity there to grow friends, maybe lifelong friends, that you wouldn’t have in a traditional apartment setting.”

House Our Neighbors is also planning to create a financial model, or “pro forma” in developer lingo, to go along with Neiman Taber’s architectural designs. That model would demonstrate the feasibility of actually turning the plan into a real-life building. Nonetheless, part of the value of the architectural plans is helping visualize for voters the work the Seattle Social Housing Developer would do — if they elect to fund it.

Advertisement

“We are just the ones creating the vision and showing people that this is what it looks like this is what could be in your neighborhood,” McCoy said. “People don’t know what this looks like. So that’s what we’re trying to do.”

A site plan shows the landscaping plan around the three buildings and courtyard. The site is at the intersection of Northgate Way and Interlaken Avenue N and used to be a fire station before being replaced. (Neiman Taber)

Social housing advocates are confident of success in the upcoming February special election. McCoy did note that council added a wrinkle by putting a competing measure on the ballot, which will make it a two-part vote. House Our Neighbors is also expecting a more robust opposition campaign than in 2023, when there was no funding source involved.

“We’ll just have a little bit more education to do since the council put on their alternative, which isn’t social housing,” McCoy said. “It’s just getting people to recognize that you have to vote twice. You have to vote yes twice, not just one. You have to make sure to do [Prop] 1 and 1A.”

Nonetheless, recent results point toward likely success.

“Seattle has already showed us that they’re very, very strongly supportive of social housing. You’ve seen that with the 14-point win in February 2023. We’ve seen that again with over 38,000 people signing Initiative 137, now Proposition 1A,” McCoy said. “And we’ve seen overwhelmingly Washingtonians want to tax the wealthiest in our state in order to provide services that regular people need. I have no problem thinking that we will win resoundingly at the ballot.”


Advertisement

Doug Trumm is publisher of The Urbanist. An Urbanist writer since 2015, he dreams of pedestrianizing streets, blanketing the city in bus lanes, and unleashing a mass timber building spree to end the affordable housing shortage and avert our coming climate catastrophe. He graduated from the Evans School of Public Policy and Governance at the University of Washington in 2019. He lives in East Fremont and loves to explore the city on his bike.



Source link

Seattle, WA

Seattle World Cup plans upended as Iran withdrawal clouds June match and FIFA replacement

Published

on

Seattle World Cup plans upended as Iran withdrawal clouds June match and FIFA replacement


Iran’s national soccer team will no longer participate in the upcoming World Cup, citing security concerns tied to escalating tensions surrounding the war in the Middle East.

Iran’s minister of sports and youth announced the decision this week, saying the team would not have adequate security and that its safety could not be guaranteed if players traveled to compete. The move comes months before Iran was scheduled to face Egypt in June in Seattle.

It remains unclear what will happen to that matchup or other matches involving Iran that had been scheduled in the United States.

Iran says country can’t take part in the FIFA World Cup because of US attacks

Advertisement

The announcement has drawn reactions from Iranian Americans in the Seattle area, some of whom said they are disappointed for the athletes who worked to qualify for the tournament.

“I’m totally disappointed for the players, frankly, who have worked so hard to get here,” said Etan Basseri, a local Persian American. “They’ve qualified for previous World Cups, and now they’re essentially being punished because of the decisions of this regime.”

“Individuals, whether they’re Iranian, whether they’re Israeli, no matter who they are, they should not be punished for the actions of their government,” he added.

“I have this mixed feeling,” Ali Kimiai, an Iranian American living in the Seattle area, told KOMO News. “I love soccer. I grew up with soccer. I still play soccer, and I like to be involved with the World Cup as much as I can, especially if the team representing Iran, where I was born, is playing.”

“But on the other hand, with all the atrocities that have happened over the past two to three months, it’s very hard to support the Iranian national team or the government right now,” Kimiai said.

Advertisement

Political Tensions Surround the Decision

Iran’s matches were previously scheduled to take place in Los Angeles and Seattle.

The withdrawal comes amid broader political tensions involving Iran’s national teams.

Iran’s women’s team recently made headlines after players refused to sing the current regime’s national anthem before their match in Australia. Following the game, at least five players have since applied for asylum in Australia and were granted humanitarian visas.

“The regime is also afraid of sending these teams out because they don’t know if they send them, are they going to join the opposition, are they going to apply for political asylum?” Shayan Arya, another Iranian-American in the Seattle area, said. “It’s going to be a big disaster in terms of the propaganda.”

“As far as the Iranian people are concerned, they don’t look at this like a war; they look at it as liberation,” Kimiai said.

Advertisement

What Happens Next

It remains uncertain what will happen with the matches originally scheduled in the United States.

Officials with Seattle’s FIFA World Cup 2026 organizing committee said they have not yet received any notice that the schedule will change.

In a statement to KOMO News, officials with SeattleFWC26 said:

“All match scheduling decisions rest with FIFA. At this time, SeattleFWC26 has not received any communication from FIFA indicating a change to our current match schedule, and our work continues uninterrupted.”

Some Iranian-Americans feel the international soccer governing body should take further action.

Kimiai said he believes FIFA should consider banning Iran’s national team entirely.

Advertisement

“FIFA itself should ban the Iranian soccer team, because not less than two months ago, the regime committed the atrocity,” Kimiai said. “They killed 30,000 people in two days, and I don’t think people should even allow the Iranian team to attend the World Cup.”

According to reports, President Donald Trump met with FIFA’s president earlier this week and said Iran’s team would be welcome to participate in the tournament.

ESPN reports FIFA’s rules on how to replace a team that withdraws are unclear. If Iran does not participate, countries such as Iraq or the United Arab Emirates could potentially take its place in the tournament.

For now, the fate of Iran’s scheduled World Cup matches, including the game planned in Seattle, remains uncertain.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Seattle goal overturned for goalie interference as Predators complete 4-2 comeback win

Published

on

Seattle goal overturned for goalie interference as Predators complete 4-2 comeback win


Ryan Ufko scored his first NHL goal with 5:35 to play in the second period to put the Nashville Predators ahead to stay in a 4-2 win over the Seattle Kraken on Tuesday night.

The rookie skated in from the right of the goal, dodged between two defenders, and tucked the puck past Seattle goalie Joey Daccord to give the Predators a 3-2 lead and two critical points in their chase for a wild-card playoff spot. Right now, the team is on the outside of the playoff picture.

Tyson Jost and Reid Schaefer also scored second-period goals to erase Seattle’s 2-0 first-period lead, and Steve Stamkos added an empty-netter for his 31st goal of the season.

Jonathan Marchessault had a pair of assists for Nashville, which had lost four of its previous five, and Juuse Saros made 43 saves.

Advertisement

Kaapo Kakko scored just 2:14 into the game, and Matty Beniers scored at 9:46 of the first period to give the Kraken a 2-0 lead. Beniers scored from a tough angle, firing from the bottom of the right circle and over the shoulder of Saros just inside the far post.

Daccord finished with 23 saves.

Seattle’s Shane Wright scored a goal in the second, but it was waved off because of goalie interference when Ryker Evans slid into Saros and took out his feet.

The Kraken were without left wing Jaden Schwartz, who was hit in the face by a skate during Seattle’s 7-4 loss to Ottawa on Saturday.

Kraken, clinging to a wild-card slot, have now lost five of their last seven games.

Advertisement

Up next

Predators: Visit Vancouver on Thursday night.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Kraken: Host Colorado on Thursday night.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Mayor Katie Wilson proposes $410 million Seattle Public Library Levy to city council

Published

on

Mayor Katie Wilson proposes 0 million Seattle Public Library Levy to city council


Seattle voters could decide next year whether to dramatically expand dedicated funding for The Seattle Public Library under a proposed $410 million Library Levy that Mayor Katie Wilson transmitted to the Seattle City Council on Tuesday.

The proposed 2026 replacement levy would fund the library system for seven years, from 2027 through 2033, replacing the expiring $219.1 million 2019 Library Levy, which currently accounts for one-third of the library’s total budget.

Most Seattle libraries will be open daily thanks to 2019 levy

“Seattle is a city of readers. From toddlers discovering their first stories to seniors finding connection and lifelong learning, our libraries belong to everyone,” Wilson said.

Advertisement

Investing in our libraries means investing in every community member, and in the shared public spaces that help our city learn, grow, imagine, and thrive together.

The 2026 levy proposal maintains the 2019 levy’s focus areas: Operating Hours and Access; Helping Children; Collections (Books and Materials); Technology and Online Services; Building Maintenance; and Administration and Central Costs.

If voters approve the 2026 Library Levy, it would invest in access, programming, collections, building maintenance, and technology and online services across Seattle’s library system. The proposal includes maintaining open hours at all 27 neighborhood branches, adding more physical books along with e-books and audiobooks, expanding technology and online services, and funding building maintenance and capital improvements. It also includes additional facility and janitorial resources intended to keep libraries “safer, cleaner and more welcoming for everyone.”

Chief Librarian Tom Fay thanked the mayor for the proposal.

“We thank Mayor Wilson for putting forward a levy proposal that reflects community needs and interests and invests in Library open hours, collections, programs, buildings, and technology,” Fay said. “We look forward to working in partnership with Mayor Wilson and City councilmembers through a public process that will ensure this package is something all Seattle residents can be proud to support in August,”

The proposal will be reviewed by a select committee of the Seattle City Council chaired by Councilmember Maritza Rivera, who represents District 4. Rivera joined Wilson, Fay and Library Board of Trustees President Yazmin Mehdi for the transmittal of the levy proposal to the City Council on Tuesday.

Advertisement

“This proposal reaffirms Seattle’s reputation as a world-class library system. We are a City of avid and curious readers who rely on our libraries for information and engagement,” Rivera said. “For decades, library patrons have described their branches as beloved third places, centers of learning, and safe spaces that are worth the investment.”

Rivera said the levy renewal also upholds “the city’s commitment to preserving library open hours, providing books in the format that readers want, delivering programming for tots all the way up to seniors, and maintaining welcoming branches that reflect the diversity of their neighborhoods.”

According to the proposal’s spending plan, major investments include:

  • Continued open hours across Seattle’s 27 neighborhood libraries ($176.1 million)
  • Early literacy through multilingual Play & Learn sessions and other programs ($7.5 million)
  • Social service referrals ($1.2 million)
  • Security personnel ($11 million)
  • Additional all-ages programs such as story times, literacy programs, classes and workshops, and events ($12.6 million)
  • Increased security and emergency preparedness ($7.7 million)
  • Establishment of an Office of Inclusion and Belonging ($2.4 million)
  • Expanded physical books and materials to maintain the library’s collection of 2.9 million items ($30.8 million)
  • Fine-free borrowing ($9 million)
  • Collections and shelving staff ($14 million)
  • Additional e-books, audiobooks and multilingual books ($4.6 million)

The proposal sets aside funding for routine and major maintenance, including:

  • Facility maintenance and custodial support, furniture, capital improvement staffing ($57 million) and administration ($6.7 million)
  • A seismic retrofit of the historic Columbia Branch ($13 million)
  • Priority and deferred maintenance for library locations ($10 million)
  • Additional maintenance and custodial support ($5.9 million)

Technology investments include:

  • Public and staff computers, printing and copying services, Wi-Fi hotspots, and staffing for Information Technology and Online Services ($25.8 million)
  • Strengthening IT systems and cybersecurity ($7.4 million)
  • Upgrading IT infrastructure ($5 million)

The first Select Committee meeting, which will include an overview of the 2019 Library Levy, is scheduled for March 11. The Select Committee will vote on a final proposal to place on the ballot in August 2026. Rivera will lead the council’s levy renewal process as chair of the Select Committee on the Library Levy.

“I want to thank Mayor Wilson’s office for their collaboration on this levy renewal,” Rivera said. “Any time we can work together on projects like this, the City benefits.”

If the updated package is approved by the City Council, it would go to voters on the Aug. 4, 2026, ballot. More information is available on The Seattle Public Library’s website.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending