Seattle, WA
Seahawks Notebook: Christian Haynes to start if Grey Zabel out
INGLEWOOD, CA – JANUARY 05: Seattle Seahawks guard Christian Haynes (64) walks off of the field after an NFL game between the Seattle Seahawks and Los Angeles Rams on January 05, 2025, at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, CA. (Jordon Kelly / Icon Sportswire / Getty Images)
RENTON, Wash. – Coming off his first appearance for the Seahawks, Christian Haynes will get the start at left guard for Seattle this weekend against the Tennessee Titans if rookie Grey Zabel isn’t able to recover from a knee injury in time.
Head coach Mike Macdonald confirmed on Wednesday that Haynes would get the nod to make his first career start after playing only in relief during his rookie campaign last season.
“We’ve seen it on our football team, if somebody can’t go for a certain amount of time, whether it’s practice or games, the standard stays the same.” Macdonald said. “We expect you to go in and go rip it for us and he did that. He didn’t bat an eye, and there’s things he’s going to learn from the game, and we’re going to need him to play at a high level if he needs to play this week.”
Zabel didn’t practice on Wednesday due to the left knee injury he sustained late in Seattle’s 21-19 loss to the Los Angeles Rams on Sunday. While the Seahawks received good news about Zabel’s status, they still might be without him this weekend.
“It was definitely a surreal moment, but just being ready and locked in,” Haynes said of playing on Seattle’s final drive. “That’s what they need me for, to be ready, to be locked in at all times so I was ready to go out there and then go get a game-winning drive going.”
Haynes missed the first nine games of the season due to a pectoral injury sustained during the team’s joint practice with the Green Bay Packers in mid-August ahead of their preseason matchup.
“I already hurt it once before that and then the joint practice, it got worse,” Haynes said.
Haynes was a right guard in college at the University of Connecticut before becoming a third-round pick in the 2024 NFL Draft by Seattle. Haynes has been working at both guard spots, as well as center, during his time with the Seahawks.
“I’ve been playing a lot of left guard, practicing both, and then I played preseason games at left guard. So it wasn’t nothing new to me when I was out there,” Haynes said.
Haynes played ten snaps for Seattle on their final drive of the game as they were able to move to the edge of field goal range for a last-second, game-winning field goal attempt from 61 yards away for Jason Myers.
“It felt good being back out there,” Haynes said. “I felt confident, and I just felt like I go out there and play my best ball I could possibly play. I felt pretty good out there. I felt in my groove. One thing like Coach Mike always says, like, just be loose and focused, and I felt loose and focused out there. Just go out there and block it and play my game.”
Haynes couldn’t crack Seattle’s lineup last season, unable to unseat veterans Laken Tomlinson or Anthony Bradford, and even fellow rookie Sataoa Laumea had better showings when called upon. But Haynes was challenging Bradford for the starting job at right guard in the preseason before his injury put him on the shelf for two months.
“:Faster with everything I’m doing, with my calls, with my steps, and just seeing things faster as a player,” Haynes said. “Just seeing things before it comes and just then being confident every time in everything that I’m doing.”
Notes:
– Nose tackle Johnathan Hankins won’t play this season for the Seahawks due to a back injury that has kept him out all year. Hankins was placed on the non-football injury list prior to the start of training camp and isn’t progressing to the point of being able to play.
“I’ll probably leave it private right now, what’s going on with his health, but yeah, he won’t be with us this year,” Macdonald said.
“The back is tricky. If it’s not working, it’s not a fun situation to be in, so we wish him the best.”
– Rookie defensive end Rylie Mills is getting close to being able to start practicing with the team. Mills, a fifth-round pick out of Notre Dame in April, has been recovering from an ACL injury in his right knee sustained last December.
“I think we’re getting within a couple weeks now of him starting to practice,” Macdonald said.
Mills would need multiple weeks of practice to get up to speed as he hasn’t been on a football field since college, but he’s getting close to becoming an option.
– Guard Grey Zabel, wide receiver Tory Horton, linebacker Tyrice Knight, and fullback Robbie Ouzts were the four players that did not participate in practice on Wednesday.
Knight sustained a concussion on Sunday, and Horton is still working back from a shin injury that’s kept him out the last two games.
“Some other guys limited that we’re taking care of with reps, but those are the guys that won’t practice,” Macdonald said.
While Ouzts is dealing with an elbow injury, his absence was for non-injury reasons.
Macdonald said Horton’s chances of playing this week will come down to if his shin injury improves in the coming days.
“We’ll see. Really just a matter of calming down, so it could happen tonight, it could happen, not tonight,” Macdonald said.
The Source: Information in this story came from FOX 13 Seattle reporting.
MORE SEAHAWKS NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE
Mike Macdonald says Grey Zabel’s knee injury showed “nothing significant” for Seahawks
Seattle Sports Live for Sunday, 11/16
Takeaways from Seattle Seahawks 21-19 loss to Rams
Seahawks fall to Rams 21–19 after last-second missed field goal
Sam Darnold throws four interceptions as Seattle Seahawks lose 21-19 to Rams
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
Seattle, WA
Op-Ed: Seattle Monorail Should Honor Transfers, Be Treated Like Real Transit » The Urbanist
Seattle landmarks are woven into the city’s identity: the Space Needle, Gas Works Park, Pike Place Market, Humpy the Salmon. They’re playful, iconic, and accessible to locals and visitors alike. The monorail should belong in that same category. It is a piece of transportation infrastructure history that helps residents move through the city and remark on times gone by. Instead, it is becoming a premium attraction aimed at visitors, rather than a practical option for everyday riders.
Fresh off hiking fares on the nearly-one-mile-long monorail to $4.00, Seattle Monorail Services is getting rid of transfer credits to other transit services in a blow to riders. In early December, ORCA informed riders that starting January 1, 2026, monorail fares paid with ORCA E-purse will no longer receive the two-hour transfer credit. Every ride will require full payment, even if the rider tapped onto another service minutes earlier.
For transit users who rely on transfers to move through the city, this is a step backward. It is also a policy decision that treats the monorail as an exception to regional transit norms — or perhaps not a service intended for use by locals, at all.
Taking the 1 Line from Lynnwood and transferring to the monorail to attend Pride, Seattle Eats, or any number of other events in Seattle Center just jumped from $4 per person to $7 per person. Fortunately, many Climate Pledge Arena events come with monorail cost bundled in the ticket cost.
History of the Seattle Monorail
Seattle’s monorail began as a showpiece, built in 1962 for the Century 21 World’s Fair. The idea wasn’t to serve commuters, but rather to dazzle visitors and move crowds between downtown and the fairgrounds. For more dazzling during the World’s Fair, Seattle Center had rollercoasters, which I, for one, am in favor of bringing back.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-1024×666.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-1024×666.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-188343″ srcset=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-1024×666.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-768×499.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-646×420.jpg 646w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives-696×452.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/large_8183_The-Seattle-Monorail-via-Seattle-Municipal-Archives.jpg 1114w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
The monorail system worked as millions rode it in its first year, and the sleek elevated trains helped cement the city’s Jet Age identity. But the system was never expanded, and the short two-stop alignment was left behind as a novelty once the fair ended.
Seattle actually tried to scale that vision into real transit. In 1968 and 1970, voters were asked to approve the Forward Thrust plan, a regional rapid transit system combining tunnels, elevated lines, and stations across the city. Both measures earned a majority, but Washington law required 60% voter approval to issue bonds. The transit proposals failed, and the federal funds earmarked for Seattle were redirected to Atlanta (where only a simple 50% majority vote was required), funds that ultimately seeded MARTA.
Meanwhile, Seattle spent decades without rapid transit, and the monorail became a relic of a future that never materialized. Fortunately, Seattle eventually invested in light rail and continues to do so despite financial hurdles.
But before light rail buildout, Seattle made one more attempt to turn the monorail into a network. From the late 1990s through the mid-2000s, voters backed the Seattle Popular Monorail Authority, which pursued the elevated “Green Line” from Ballard through Downtown to West Seattle. The citizen-led program struggled with escalating costs, uncertain financing models, and political backlash.
Map of the proposed Seattle Monorail Project, superimposed on Link (2021 extent) and Sounder. (Mliu92, CC 4.0)After five public votes, the project was dissolved in 2005 without breaking ground. What remained was the original 0.9-mile segment. Still iconic, still beloved by tourists, but functionally unchanged since the Eisenhower era.
Recent fare hike
In 2024, the City and the contracted operator of the monorail announced another round of fare increases. Adult fares rose from $3.50 to $4.00, a 14% jump in a single adjustment.
The monorail fare hike was much steeper than those on other transit services in the region. King County Metro buses moved from $2.75 to $3.00, a 9% increase. Sound Transit’s Link light rail standardized fares at $3.00 regardless of trip distance, in a win for long-distance commuters. Even in larger cities with higher living costs, like New York and San Francisco, transit fares remain lower at around $2.85–$2.90 for metro service. The monorail is now one of the most expensive local transit rides per mile in the country.
For many riders, fare increases alone would be frustrating but manageable. Seattle transit often requires combining services: a bus from a neighborhood, a train downtown, then the monorail to a shift at Seattle Center or an event at Climate Pledge Arena. The regional ORCA card system has long made this a possibility. Riders are given a two-hour transfer window so multiple trips are counted as part of the same journey rather than priced separately.
That saving grace is about to end with the end of monorail transfer credits in 2026.
Email sent by MyORCA on December 2nd, 2025. (MyORCA) The monorail has always been an unusual piece of infrastructure. The city owns the physical system, but operations are handled by a private contractor. That arrangement gives the operator strong incentives to raise revenue, while riders are left without the protections and policies that apply to publicly-run transit service.
The argument for ending transfer credits is that monorail operating costs have risen, and maintenance is essential to preserving a historic system. That is a reasonable concern. Transit infrastructure requires investment, but charging riders twice within two hours, once for a bus or train and again for the monorail, does not preserve the system; it discourages the very people who use it most consistently. The monorail should not be the transfer exception.
Ridership rebound
“But Sam hardly anyone takes the monorail anyway. Why does it matter?” I hear you say. Despite its short route and just two stops, the monorail sees real usage. The Seattle Times reported that the monorail hit its highest ridership in over a decade in early 2023. Buoyed by Seattle Kraken hockey fans, the monorail recorded 533,000 rides in the first quarter of 2023, 150,000 more than during the same period in 2022, and over 100,000 more than in the same four months of 2019. That’s about 4,000 rides per day.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-175650″ srcset=”https://i3.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-768×576.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-560×420.jpg 560w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-696×522.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126-265×198.jpg 265w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Climate-Pledge-Arena-Doug-Trumm-20220126.jpg 1280w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
In 2023, the monorail carried nearly 2.1 million passengers and in 2024 approached 2.2 million trips, offering a strong indication that, given the right circumstances, the monorail serves a concrete transit need, not just occasional tourists.
Admittedly, other transit lines get far more ridership. In 2024, the region’s six ORCA transit agencies delivered about 151 million trips, up from roughly 134 million in 2023, a 12% increase. Within that total, Sound Transit alone logged 41.5 million trips in 2024, up by more than 4 million from 2023 (about an 11% year-over-year increase).
The Link light rail system operated by Sound Transit carried 30.8 million passengers in 2024 and averaged about 90,050 weekday riders system-wide. Recent months have seen ridership climb even higher: as of May 2025, Link weekday boardings exceeded 112,000, a 23% increase over May 2024.
For the monorail, much of that boost came from event traffic. With the arrival of the Seattle Kraken hockey franchise and the rebound in concert and arena events at Climate Pledge Arena after the 2020 pandemic, a notable portion of fans used the monorail (or other transit) to avoid heavy traffic and gridlock around Seattle Center. Now, with a new Professional Women’s Hockey League hockey team and the FIFA World Cup on the horizon the entire city’s infrastructure needs to be ready, with transit running at peak efficiency to handle the load. Mega events act as a canary in a coal mine, stress testing our transportation network.

” data-medium-file=”https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR.jpg” data-large-file=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ fifu-data-src=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1″ alt=”A small crowd waits for the doors to open on a monorail train at Seattle Center” class=”wp-image-188264″ srcset=”https://i1.wp.com/www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-1024×768.jpg?ssl=1 1024w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-768×576.jpg 768w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-560×420.jpg 560w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-696×522.jpg 696w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR-265×198.jpg 265w, https://www.theurbanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/IMG_20240827_150858277_HDR.jpg 1280w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px”/><figcaption class=)
But the monorail’s renewed popularity and potential to help shoulder the load during World Cup games doesn’t mean its pricing should shift even further toward tourists. If anything, high ridership underscores its value as part of a functioning public-transport network.
Possible solutions
Unlike most transit systems in Washington, the Seattle Center Monorail is not a drain on the public purse. The monorail’s operations are uniquely funded through fare revenue rather than taxpayer subsidies, and even returns money to the City of Seattle annually under a concessions agreement. That revenue covers day-to-day operations, and equipment upgrades, an almost unheard-of arrangement in U.S. transit.
But the monorail’s success doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Its elevated track and supporting pylons occupy the public right-of-way along 5th Avenue and Belltown corridors, forming a permanent footprint above some of the city’s most heavily used streets. Riders may not feel it, but the system relies on the city’s public infrastructure and airspace to operate.
Seattle’s broader goals like reducing car dependency, cutting emissions, and encouraging public transit depend on regional coordination. Breaking fare integration works in the opposite direction. If the monorail is truly a civic asset, it should align with the rest of the city’s transportation policies.
There are realistic solutions. The City of Seattle can require that the monorail restore ORCA transfer credit as a condition of its operating agreement. The City can tie future fare increases to best practices other agencies typically follow, such as conducting public outreach, publishing a cost-benefit analysis noting ridership impacts, and providing a public forum to debate the tradeoffs.
Most importantly, Seattle leaders can treat the monorail as part of the transit network rather than an isolated, revenue-dependent attraction. None of these changes require a huge funding infusion or an expansion of the system (even if I think it would be cool if they expanded the monorail). They simply require prioritizing residents over ticket revenue.
I ride the monorail more than most living in Lower Queen Anne/Uptown. It avoids traffic, provides a distinct view of the city, and remains one of Seattle’s most recognizable transit experiences. It should not be reserved for tourists or special occasions. Public transportation should be priced to serve the public. If it brings joy while doing so, that is even better.

Samuel Ross
Samuel Ross is a Seattle based public servant, returned Peace Corps volunteer, and self-described nerd. He works to promote sustainable development backed by mixed-method research. All opinions expressed are his alone and do not reflect attitudes of any organizations he is affiliated with.
Seattle, WA
WA river levels remain high through Thursday, scattered showers remain
SEATTLE – A strong atmospheric river remains over the Pacific Northwest, bringing heavy rain, record level flooding and dangerous conditions. Winds continue through this evening, but will ease into Thursday morning. Landslide risks remain high through the end of the week with very saturated soil.
A strong atmospheric river remains over the Pacific Northwest, bringing heavy rain, record level flooding and dangerous conditions.
A rare Flash Flood Watch is in effect for parts of western Skagit and northwestern Snohomish County through Friday night due to a possible threat of levee or dike failure. Heavy rain is creating extreme flooding forecasts, which could break the current levee or dike structure below Sedro-Woolley. This could cause inundation in areas like Burlington and Mount Vernon, then along to Skagit Bay. This is an alert to “Get Ready,” because if the levees break, they will release a sudden torrent of water.
A rare Flash Flood Watch is in effect for parts of western Skagit and northwestern Snohomish County through Friday night due to a possible threat of levee or dike failure.
Rain totals reached one to over two inches for parts of Western Washington as steady rain fell through this evening.
Rain totals reached one to two inches for parts of Western Washington as steady rain fell through this evening.
Heavy rain will fall through early Thursday, but the atmospheric river will slowly sag southward throughout the day. Showers will still be around Thursday, but will not be as heavy as the past several days. We could also see snowfall at the higher mountain passes and peaks, mainly above Stevens Pass.
Heavy rain will fall through early Thursday, but the atmospheric river will slowly sag southward throughout the day.
Major river flooding is expected to continue through Friday afternoon, and we will continue to watch the latest conditions very closely. Linger showers continue Friday with drier skies by Saturday. A few showers are possible Sunday, with another round of showers into next week.
Major river flooding is expected to continue through Friday afternoon, and we will continue to watch the latest conditions very closely.
MORE NEWS FROM FOX 13 SEATTLE
New WA laws in 2026 include higher wages, luxury car tax, plastic bag fee hike
Charter bus breaks down in Leavenworth, leaving dozens stranded
75-year-old woman attacked in Downtown Seattle, suspect arrested
Washington State Ferries seeks new owners for aging fleet castoffs
26 years later, family of abducted Tacoma toddler holds toy drive in her honor
Everett police chief retires, replacement to be appointed
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national news.
The Source: Information in this story came from FOX 13 Seattle Meteorologists Claire Anderson and Ilona McCauley, and the National Weather Service.
Seattle, WA
UPDATE: Crash on westbound West Seattle Bridge
11:23 PM: Beware if you’ll be heading westbound on the West Seattle Bridge any time soon – that two-car crash is right in the middle of the westbound lanes near midspan. No serious injuries reported.
11:56 PM: Not cleared yet; SDOT crews are in place east of the collision scene, to warn traffic to go around it by using the outside westbound lane.
12:35 AM: They’ve just reopened all westbound lanes.
-
Alaska5 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
Texas5 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington2 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa4 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire